Jet53man: Created page with " FORCETOC =Confusion Regarding Whipple Formulae= May, 2018 (J.E.Tohline): I am trying to figure out what the correct relationship i..."

2021-07-26T16:57:01Z

Created page with " __FORCETOC__ =Confusion Regarding Whipple Formulae= May, 2018 (J.E.Tohline): I am trying to figure out what the correct relationship i..."

New page

__FORCETOC__
=Confusion Regarding Whipple Formulae=

May, 2018 (J.E.Tohline): I am trying to figure out what the correct relationship is between half-integer degree, associated Legendre functions of the first and second kinds. In order to illustrate my current confusion, here I will restrict my presentation to expressions that give <math>~Q^m_{n - 1 / 2}(\cosh\eta)</math> in terms of <math>~P^n_{m - 1 / 2}(\coth\eta)</math>.

==Published Expressions==
From equation (34) of [http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000AN....321..363C H. S. Cohl, J. E. Tohline, A. R. P. Rau, & H. M. Srivastiva (2000, Astronomische Nachrichten, 321, no. 5, 363 - 372)] I find:
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr><th align="center" colspan="3"><font color="maroon">Expression #1</font></th></tr>
<tr>
<td align="right">
<math>~Q^m_{n - 1 / 2}(\cosh\eta)</math>
</td>
<td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
</td>
<td align="left">
<math>~
\frac{(-1)^n \pi}{\Gamma(n - m + \tfrac{1}{2})} \biggl[ \frac{\pi}{2\sinh\eta} \biggr]^{1 / 2} P^n_{m - 1 / 2}(\coth\eta) \, .
</math>
</td>
</tr>
</table>

From [http://hcohl.sdf.org/WHIPPLE.html Howard Cohl's online overview] of toroidal functions, I find:
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr><th align="center" colspan="3"><font color="maroon">Expression #2</font></th></tr>
<tr>
<td align="right">
<math>~Q^n_{m- 1 / 2}(\cosh\alpha)</math>
</td>
<td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
</td>
<td align="left">
<math>~(-1)^n
~\Gamma(n-m + \tfrac{1}{2}) \biggl[ \frac{\pi}{2\sinh\alpha} \biggr]^{1 / 2} P^m_{n- 1 / 2}(\coth\alpha)\, ,
</math>
</td>
</tr>
</table>

Copying the Whipple's formula from [https://dlmf.nist.gov/14.19.v §14.19 of DLMF],
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr><th align="center" colspan="3"><font color="maroon">Expression #3</font></th></tr>
<tr>
<td align="right">
<math>~\boldsymbol{Q}^{m}_{n-\frac{1}{2}}\left(\cosh\xi\right)</math>
</td>
<td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
</td>
<td align="left">
<math>~
\frac{\Gamma\left(m-n+
\tfrac{1}{2}\right)}{\Gamma\left(m+n+\tfrac{1}{2}\right)}\left(\frac{\pi}{2
\sinh\xi}\right)^{1 / 2}P^{n}_{m-\frac{1}{2}}\left(\coth\xi\right) \, .
</math>
</td>
</tr>
</table>

<span id="Gil">So far, this gives me three ''similar'' but not identical formulae for the same function mapping!</span> As per equation (8) in (yet another source!) [http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000JCoPh.161..204G A. Gil, J. Segura, & N. M. Temme (2000, JCP, 161, 204 - 217)], the relationship is:
{{ Math/EQ_Toroidal02 }}

This expression from Gil et al. (2000) means, for example, that by identifying <math>~x</math> with <math>~\coth\eta</math>, we have <math>~\lambda = \cosh\eta</math>, and,

<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">

<tr>
<td align="right">
<math>~Q_{n-1 / 2}^m (\cosh\eta)</math>
</td>
<td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
</td>
<td align="left">
<math>~(-1)^n
\frac{\pi^{3/2}}{\sqrt{2} \Gamma(n-m+1 / 2)} (\coth^2\eta-1)^{1 / 4} P_{m-1 / 2}^n(\coth\eta)
</math>
</td>
</tr>

<tr>
<td align="right">
 
</td>
<td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
</td>
<td align="left">
<math>~
\frac{(-1)^n ~\pi}{\Gamma(n-m+1 / 2)} \biggl( \frac{\pi}{2}\biggr)^{1 / 2} \biggl[\frac{\cosh^2\eta}{\sinh^2\eta}-1 \biggr]^{1 / 4} P_{m-1 / 2}^n(\coth\eta)
</math>
</td>
</tr>

<tr>
<td align="right">
 
</td>
<td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
</td>
<td align="left">
<math>~
\frac{(-1)^n ~\pi}{\Gamma(n-m+1 / 2)} \biggl( \frac{\pi}{2}\biggr)^{1 / 2} \biggl[\frac{1}{\sinh\eta}\biggr]^{1 / 2} P_{m-1 / 2}^n(\coth\eta) \, .
</math>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
That is, we have,
<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr><th align="center" colspan="3"><font color="maroon">Expression #4</font></th></tr>
<tr>
<td align="right">
<math>~Q_{n-1 / 2}^m (\cosh\eta)</math>
</td>
<td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
</td>
<td align="left">
<math>~
\frac{(-1)^n ~\pi}{\Gamma(n-m+1 / 2)} \biggl[\frac{\pi}{2\sinh\eta}\biggr]^{1 / 2} P_{m-1 / 2}^n(\coth\eta) \, ,
</math>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
which matches the above expression #1 drawn from Cohl et al. (2000), but which appears ''not'' to match either of the other two "published" (online) formulae, expressions #2 or #3.

==Specific Application==
I stumbled into this dilemma when I tried to explicitly demonstrate how <math>~Q_{-1 / 2}(\cosh\eta)</math> can be derived from <math>~P_{-1 / 2}(z)</math> where, from §8.13 of [https://books.google.com/books?id=MtU8uP7XMvoC&printsec=frontcover&dq=Abramowitz+and+stegun&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwialra5xNbaAhWKna0KHcLAASAQ6AEILDAA#v=onepage&q=Abramowitz%20and%20stegun&f=false M. Abramowitz & I. A. Stegun (1995)], we find,

<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">

<tr>
<td align="right">
<math>~Q_{-1 / 2}(\cosh\eta)</math>
</td>
<td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
</td>
<td align="left">
<math>~2 e^{- \eta / 2}
~K(e^{-\eta} ) \, ,
</math>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" colspan="3">Abramowitz & Stegun (1995), eq. (8.13.4)</td>
</tr>
</table>
and,

<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
<td align="right">
<math>~P_{-1 / 2}(z)</math>
</td>
<td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
</td>
<td align="left">
<math>~
\frac{2}{\pi} \biggl[\frac{2}{z+1}\biggr]^{1 / 2} ~K\biggl( \sqrt{ \frac{z-1}{z+1}} \biggr) \, .
</math>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" colspan="3">Abramowitz & Stegun (1995), eq. (8.13.1)</td>
</tr>
</table>
When I used the Whipple formula as defined in [https://dlmf.nist.gov/14.19.v §14.19 of DLMF] (expression #3 reprinted above), the function mapping <font color="red">'''gave me the wrong result'''</font>; I was off by a factor of <math>~\Gamma(\tfrac{1}{2}) =\sqrt{\pi}</math>. But, as demonstrated below, the Whipple formula provided by Cohl et al. (2000) and by Gil et al. (2000) — that is, expressions #1 and #4, above — ''does'' give the correct result.

<table border="1" cellpadding="5" align="center" width="80%">
<tr>
<td align="center">
Demonstration that <math>~Q_{-\frac{1}{2}}</math> can be derived from <math>~P_{-\frac{1}{2}}</math>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
Copying equation (34) from [http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000AN....321..363C Cohl et al. (2000)], we begin with,
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">

<tr>
<td align="right">
<math>~Q^m_{n - 1 / 2}(\cosh\eta)</math>
</td>
<td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
</td>
<td align="left">
<math>~
\frac{(-1)^n \pi}{\Gamma(n - m + \tfrac{1}{2})} \biggl[ \frac{\pi}{2\sinh\eta} \biggr]^{1 / 2} P^n_{m - 1 / 2}(\coth\eta) \, ;
</math>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
then setting <math>~m = n = 0</math>, we have,
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">

<tr>
<td align="right">
<math>~Q_{-\frac{1}{2}}(\cosh\eta)</math>
</td>
<td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
</td>
<td align="left">
<math>~
\frac{\pi}{\Gamma(\tfrac{1}{2})} \biggl[ \frac{\pi}{2\sinh\eta} \biggr]^{1 / 2} P_{-\frac{1}{2}}(\coth\eta)
</math>
</td>
</tr>

<tr>
<td align="right">
 
</td>
<td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
</td>
<td align="left">
<math>~
\frac{\pi}{\sqrt{2}} \biggl[ \frac{1}{\sinh\eta} \biggr]^{1 / 2} P_{-\frac{1}{2}}(\coth\eta) \, .
</math>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
Step #1:   Associate … <math>z \leftrightarrow \cosh\eta</math>. Then,
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">

<tr>
<td align="right">
<math>~Q_{-\frac{1}{2}}(\cosh\eta)</math>
</td>
<td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
</td>
<td align="left">
<math>~
\frac{\pi}{\sqrt{2}} \biggl[ \frac{1}{\sqrt{z^2-1}} \biggr]^{1 / 2} P_{-\frac{1}{2}}\biggl(\frac{z}{\sqrt{z^2-1}} \biggr) \, .
</math>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
Step #2:   Now making the association … <math>\Lambda \leftrightarrow z/\sqrt{z^2-1}</math>, and drawing on eq. (8.13.1) from [https://books.google.com/books?id=MtU8uP7XMvoC&printsec=frontcover&dq=Abramowitz+and+stegun&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwialra5xNbaAhWKna0KHcLAASAQ6AEILDAA#v=onepage&q=Abramowitz%20and%20stegun&f=false Abramowitz & Stegun (1995)], we can write,

<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
<td align="right">
<math>~P_{-\frac{1}{2}}(\Lambda)</math>
</td>
<td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
</td>
<td align="left">
<math>~
\frac{2}{\pi} \biggl[\frac{2}{\Lambda+1}\biggr]^{1 / 2} ~K\biggl( \sqrt{ \frac{\Lambda-1}{\Lambda+1}} \biggr)
</math>
</td>
</tr>

<tr>
<td align="right">
 
</td>
<td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
</td>
<td align="left">
<math>~
\frac{2}{\pi} \biggl[\frac{2\sqrt{z^2-1} }{z+\sqrt{z^2-1} }\biggr]^{1 / 2} ~K\biggl( \sqrt{ \frac{z-\sqrt{z^2-1} }{z+\sqrt{z^2-1} }} \biggr) \, .
</math>
</td>
</tr>
</table>

Step #3:   Again, making the association … <math>z \leftrightarrow \cosh\eta</math>, means,
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">

<tr>
<td align="right">
<math>~P_{-\frac{1}{2}}(\Lambda)</math>
</td>
<td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
</td>
<td align="left">
<math>~
\frac{2}{\pi} \biggl[\frac{2\sinh\eta }{\cosh\eta +\sinh\eta }\biggr]^{1 / 2} ~K\biggl( \sqrt{ \frac{\cosh\eta-\sinh\eta }{\cosh\eta +\sinh\eta }} \biggr)
</math>
</td>
</tr>

<tr>
<td align="right">
<math>~\Rightarrow ~~~ Q_{-\frac{1}{2}}(\cosh\eta)</math>
</td>
<td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
</td>
<td align="left">
<math>~
\frac{\pi}{\sqrt{2}} \biggl[ \frac{1}{\sinh\eta} \biggr]^{1 / 2}
\frac{2}{\pi} \biggl[\frac{2\sinh\eta }{\cosh\eta +\sinh\eta }\biggr]^{1 / 2} ~K\biggl( \sqrt{ \frac{\cosh\eta-\sinh\eta }{\cosh\eta +\sinh\eta }} \biggr)
</math>
</td>
</tr>

<tr>
<td align="right">
 
</td>
<td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
</td>
<td align="left">
<math>~
2 \biggl[\frac{1 }{\cosh\eta +\sinh\eta }\biggr]^{1 / 2} ~K\biggl( \sqrt{ \frac{\cosh^2\eta-\sinh^2\eta }{[\cosh\eta +\sinh\eta ]^2}} ~\biggr)
</math>
</td>
</tr>

<tr>
<td align="right">
 
</td>
<td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
</td>
<td align="left">
<math>~
2 \biggl[\frac{1 }{e^\eta }\biggr]^{1 / 2} ~K\biggl( \sqrt{ \frac{1 }{e^{2\eta}}} \biggr)
</math>
</td>
</tr>

<tr>
<td align="right">
 
</td>
<td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
</td>
<td align="left">
<math>~2 e^{-\eta/2} K(e^{-\eta}) \, .
</math>
</td>
</tr>
</table>

This, indeed, matches eq. (8.13.4) from [https://books.google.com/books?id=MtU8uP7XMvoC&printsec=frontcover&dq=Abramowitz+and+stegun&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwialra5xNbaAhWKna0KHcLAASAQ6AEILDAA#v=onepage&q=Abramowitz%20and%20stegun&f=false Abramowitz & Stegun (1995)].
</td>
</tr>
</table>

=Cohl's Response to My (May 2018) Email Query=

==Proper Interpretation of DLMF Expression==
Most of the confusion expressed above stems from the DLMF's use of '''bold''' fonts, such as the function on the left-hand side of expression #3, above — that is, the Whipple formula from [https://dlmf.nist.gov/14.19.v §14.19 of DLMF],

<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">

<tr>
<td align="right">
<math>~\boldsymbol{Q}^{m}_{n-\frac{1}{2}}\left(\cosh\xi\right)</math>
</td>
<td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
</td>
<td align="left">
<math>~
\frac{\Gamma\left(m-n+
\tfrac{1}{2}\right)}{\Gamma\left(m+n+\tfrac{1}{2}\right)}\left(\frac{\pi}{2
\sinh\xi}\right)^{1 / 2}P^{n}_{m-\frac{1}{2}}\left(\coth\xi\right) \, .
</math>
</td>
</tr>
</table>

What has been missing in my discussion is an appreciation of the following relationship between [http://dlmf.nist.gov/14.3.E10 '''bold''' and plain-text function names],
<div align="center">
<math>
\boldsymbol{Q}^{\mu}_{\nu}\left(x\right)=e^{-\mu\pi i}\frac{Q^{\mu}_{\nu}\left(x\right)}{\Gamma\left(\nu+\mu+1\right)}.
</math>
</div>
After making the substitutions, <math>~\mu \rightarrow m</math> and <math>~\nu \rightarrow (n-\tfrac{1}{2})</math>, the Whipple formula displayed above as expression #3 becomes,

<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">

<tr>
<td align="right">
<math>~e^{-m\pi i}\frac{Q^{m}_{n-\frac{1}{2}}\left(\cosh\xi\right)}{\Gamma\left(n+m+\tfrac{1}{2}\right)}</math>
</td>
<td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
</td>
<td align="left">
<math>~
\frac{\Gamma\left(m-n+
\tfrac{1}{2}\right)}{\Gamma\left(m+n+\tfrac{1}{2}\right)}\left(\frac{\pi}{2
\sinh\xi}\right)^{1 / 2}P^{n}_{m-\frac{1}{2}}\left(\coth\xi\right)
</math>
</td>
</tr>

<tr>
<td align="right">
<math>~\Rightarrow ~~~ Q^{m}_{n-\frac{1}{2}}\left(\cosh\xi\right)</math>
</td>
<td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
</td>
<td align="left">
<math>~e^{m\pi i}
\Gamma\left(m-n+\tfrac{1}{2}\right)\left(\frac{\pi}{2
\sinh\xi}\right)^{1 / 2}P^{n}_{m-\frac{1}{2}}\left(\coth\xi\right)
</math>
</td>
</tr>

<tr>
<td align="right">
 
</td>
<td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
</td>
<td align="left">
<math>~(-1)^m
\Gamma\left(m-n+\tfrac{1}{2}\right)\left(\frac{\pi}{2
\sinh\xi}\right)^{1 / 2}P^{n}_{m-\frac{1}{2}}\left(\coth\xi\right) \, ,
</math>
</td>
</tr>
</table>

which matches expression #2, above. But it does not ''appear'' to match expressions #1 or #4.

<table border="1" cellpadding="5" align="center" width="80%"><tr><td align="left">
The standard "Euler reflection formula for gamma functions" is usually presented in the form,
{{ User:Tohline/Math/EQ_Gamma01 }}
If we make the association,
<div align="center">
<math>~z \leftrightarrow (m - n + \tfrac{1}{2}) \, ,</math>
</div>
with <math>~m</math> and <math>~n</math> both being either zero or a positive integer, then, this Euler reflection formula becomes,
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">

<tr>
<td align="right">
<math>~\Gamma(m - n + \tfrac{1}{2}) ~ \Gamma(n - m + \tfrac{1}{2} )</math>
</td>
<td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
</td>
<td align="left">
<math>~\pi \biggl\{ \sin\biggl[ \pi(m - n + \tfrac{1}{2}) \biggr] \biggr\}^{-1}</math>
</td>
</tr>

<tr>
<td align="right">
 
</td>
<td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
</td>
<td align="left">
<math>~\pi (-1)^{m+n} \, .</math>
</td>
</tr>
</table>

</td></tr></table>

However, in our situation the so-called "Euler reflection formula for gamma functions" gives the relation,
<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">

<tr>
<td align="right">
<math>~\frac{\pi (-1)^{m+n}}{\Gamma(n-m+\frac{1}{2}) }</math>
</td>
<td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
</td>
<td align="left">
<math>~\Gamma(m-n+\tfrac{1}{2}) \, .</math>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>

Hence, we may also write,

<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">

<tr>
<td align="right">
<math>~ Q^{m}_{n-\frac{1}{2}}\left(\cosh\xi\right)</math>
</td>
<td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
</td>
<td align="left">
<math>~(-1)^m \biggl[ \frac{\pi (-1)^{m+n}}{\Gamma(n-m+\frac{1}{2}) } \biggr]
\left(\frac{\pi}{2
\sinh\xi}\right)^{1 / 2}P^{n}_{m-\frac{1}{2}}\left(\coth\xi\right)
</math>
</td>
</tr>

<tr>
<td align="right">
 
</td>
<td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
</td>
<td align="left">
<math>~ \frac{(-1)^n \pi }{\Gamma(n-m+\frac{1}{2}) }
\left(\frac{\pi}{2
\sinh\xi}\right)^{1 / 2}P^{n}_{m-\frac{1}{2}}\left(\coth\xi\right) \, ,
</math>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
which matches expressions #1 and #4. So everything appears to be in agreement! Hooray!

==Derivation From Scratch==

Whenever he deals with these types of relations, Cohl usually begins with,

<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr><th align="center" colspan="3"><font color="maroon">Expression #5</font></th></tr>
<tr>
<td align="right">
<math>~Q^\mu_\nu(\cosh\eta)</math>
</td>
<td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
</td>
<td align="left">
<math>~
\sqrt{\frac{\pi}{2}} ~\Gamma(\nu + \mu + 1) ~e^{i\mu\pi} \biggl[ \frac{1}{\sinh^2\eta} \biggr]^{1 / 4} P^{-\nu-\frac{1}{2}}_{-\mu - \frac{1}{2}} (\coth\eta)
</math>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
Making the pair of substitutions,
<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">

<tr>
<td align="right">
<math>~\nu</math>
</td>
<td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
</td>
<td align="left">
<math>~n - \frac{1}{2} \, ,</math>
</td>
<td align="center">      </td>
<td align="right">
<math>~n ~~\in</math>
</td>
<td align="left">
<math>~\mathbb{N}_0 = \{ 0, 1, 2, \cdots\} \, ,</math>
</td>
</tr>

<tr>
<td align="right">
<math>~\mu</math>
</td>
<td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
</td>
<td align="left">
<math>~m \, ,</math>
</td>
<td align="center">      </td>
<td align="right">
<math>~m ~~\in</math>
</td>
<td align="left">
<math>~\mathbb{N}_0 = \{ 0, 1, 2, \cdots\} \, ,</math>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
we also have,
<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">

<tr>
<td align="right">
<math>~\nu + \mu +1</math>
</td>
<td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
</td>
<td align="left">
<math>~n - \frac{1}{2} + m + 1</math>
</td>
<td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
</td>
<td align="left">
<math>~n + m + \frac{1}{2} \, ,</math>
</td>
</tr>

<tr>
<td align="right">
<math>~-\mu - \frac{1}{2}</math>
</td>
<td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
</td>
<td align="left">
<math>~-m-\frac{1}{2} \, ,</math>
</td>
<td align="center">
 
</td>
<td align="left">
 
</td>
</tr>

<tr>
<td align="right">
<math>~-\nu - \frac{1}{2}</math>
</td>
<td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
</td>
<td align="left">
<math>~-\biggl(n - \frac{1}{2}\biggr)-\frac{1}{2} </math>
</td>
<td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
</td>
<td align="left">
<math>~-n \, , </math>
</td>
</tr>

<tr>
<td align="right">
<math>~e^{i\mu\pi}</math>
</td>
<td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
</td>
<td align="left">
<math>~e^{i m \pi}</math>
</td>
<td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
</td>
<td align="left">
<math>~(-1)^{m} \, , </math>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
in which case,
<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">

<tr>
<td align="right">
<math>~Q^m_{n-\frac{1}{2}}(\cosh\eta)</math>
</td>
<td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
</td>
<td align="left">
<math>~
\sqrt{\frac{\pi}{2}} ~\Gamma(n+m + \tfrac{1}{2}) ~(-1)^m\biggl[ \frac{1}{ \sqrt{\sinh\eta}} \biggr] P^{-n}_{-m - \frac{1}{2}} (\coth\eta) \, .
</math>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>

----

Now, since,
<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">

<tr>
<td align="right">
<math>~P^\mu_\nu(z)</math>
</td>
<td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
</td>
<td align="left">
<math>~P^\mu_{-\nu-1}(z) \, ,</math>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
if we make the substitution,
<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">

<tr>
<td align="right">
<math>~-(\nu + 1)</math>
</td>
<td align="center">
<math>~\rightarrow</math>
</td>
<td align="left">
<math>~-(m+\tfrac{1}{2})</math>
</td>
<td align="center">    <math>~\Rightarrow</math>   </td>
<td align="right">
<math>~\nu</math>
</td>
<td align="center">
<math>~\rightarrow</math>
</td>
<td align="left">
<math>~m - \tfrac{1}{2} \, ,</math>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
we also know that,
<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">

<tr>
<td align="right">
<math>~P^\mu_{m-\frac{1}{2}}(z)</math>
</td>
<td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
</td>
<td align="left">
<math>~P^\mu_{-m-\frac{1}{2}}(z) \, .</math>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
<span id="QPrelation">Hence, we can write,</span>
<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">

<tr>
<td align="right">
<math>~Q^m_{n-\frac{1}{2}}(\cosh\eta)</math>
</td>
<td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
</td>
<td align="left">
<math>~
\sqrt{\frac{\pi}{2}} ~\Gamma(n+m + \tfrac{1}{2}) ~(-1)^m\biggl[ \frac{1}{ \sqrt{\sinh\eta}} \biggr] P^{-n}_{m - \frac{1}{2}} (\coth\eta) \, .
</math>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>

----

Finally, another relation states that, for <math>~n \in \mathbb{N}_0</math>,
<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">

<tr>
<td align="right">
<math>~P^{-n}_{m-\frac{1}{2}}(z)</math>
</td>
<td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
</td>
<td align="left">
<math>~\biggl[ \frac{\Gamma(m-n+\frac{1}{2})}{\Gamma(m+n+\frac{1}{2})} \biggr] P^n_{m-\frac{1}{2}}(z) \, .</math>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
So, we obtain,
<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">

<tr>
<td align="right">
<math>~Q^m_{n-\frac{1}{2}}(\cosh\eta)</math>
</td>
<td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
</td>
<td align="left">
<math>~(-1)^m
\sqrt{\frac{\pi}{2}} ~\Gamma(n+m + \tfrac{1}{2}) \biggl[ \frac{1}{ \sqrt{\sinh\eta}} \biggr] \biggl[ \frac{\Gamma(m-n+\frac{1}{2})}{\Gamma(m+n+\frac{1}{2})} \biggr]P^{n}_{m - \frac{1}{2}} (\coth\eta) \, .
</math>
</td>
</tr>

<tr>
<td align="right">
 
</td>
<td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
</td>
<td align="left">
<math>~(-1)^m
\sqrt{\frac{\pi}{2}} ~\Gamma(m-n+\tfrac{1}{2}) \biggl[ \frac{1}{ \sqrt{\sinh\eta}} \biggr] P^{n}_{m - \frac{1}{2}} (\coth\eta) \, .
</math>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
This matches expressions #2 and #3, above.

==Index Values of Zero==
Setting <math>~n = m = 0</math> gives the following sought-for relationship:

<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">

<tr>
<td align="right">
<math>~Q^0_{-\frac{1}{2}}(\cosh\eta)</math>
</td>
<td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
</td>
<td align="left">
<math>~
\sqrt{\frac{\pi}{2}} ~\Gamma(\tfrac{1}{2}) \biggl[ \frac{1}{ \sqrt{\sinh\eta}} \biggr] P^{0}_{- \frac{1}{2}} (\coth\eta) \, .
</math>
</td>
</tr>

<tr>
<td align="right">
 
</td>
<td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
</td>
<td align="left">
<math>~
\frac{\pi}{\sqrt{2}} ~ \biggl[ \frac{1}{ \sqrt{\sinh\eta}} \biggr] P^{0}_{- \frac{1}{2}} (\coth\eta) \, .
</math>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>

==Joel's Additional Manipulations==

From [https://dlmf.nist.gov/14.19.iv §14.19.6 of DLMF], we find the following summation expression:

<div align="center">
<math>~\boldsymbol{Q}^{\mu}_{-\frac{1}{2}}\left(\cosh\xi\right)+2\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}
\frac{\Gamma\left(\mu+n+\tfrac{1}{2}\right)}{\Gamma\left(\mu+\tfrac{1}{2}
\right)}\boldsymbol{Q}^{\mu}_{n-\frac{1}{2}}\left(\cosh\xi\right)\cos\left(n
\phi\right)=\dfrac{\left(\frac{1}{2}\pi\right)^{1/2}\left(\sinh\xi\right)^{\mu
}}{\left(\cosh\xi-\cos\phi\right)^{\mu+(1/2)}}
</math></div>

Then, if we again employ the [http://dlmf.nist.gov/14.3.E10 DLMF relationship between '''bold''' and plain-text function names], namely,
<div align="center">
<math>
\boldsymbol{Q}^{\mu}_{n-\frac{1}{2}}\left(x\right)
=
e^{-\mu\pi i}\frac{Q^{\mu}_{n-\frac{1}{2}}\left(x\right)}{\Gamma\left(\mu+n + \tfrac{1}{2} \right)} \, ,
</math>
</div>
where we have made the substitution, <math>~\nu \rightarrow (n-\tfrac{1}{2})</math>, the ''Sums'' expression becomes,
<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">

<tr>
<td align="right">
<math>~e^{-\mu\pi i}\frac{Q^{\mu}_{-\frac{1}{2}}\left(\cosh\xi\right)}{\Gamma\left(\mu+ \tfrac{1}{2} \right)}</math>
</td>
<td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
</td>
<td align="left">
<math>~
\dfrac{\left(\frac{1}{2}\pi\right)^{1/2}\left(\sinh\xi\right)^{\mu
}}{\left(\cosh\xi-\cos\phi\right)^{\mu+(1/2)}}
-
2\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}
\frac{\Gamma\left(\mu+n+\tfrac{1}{2}\right)}{\Gamma\left(\mu+\tfrac{1}{2}
\right)}
\biggl[ e^{-\mu\pi i}\frac{Q^{\mu}_{n-\frac{1}{2}}\left(\cosh\xi\right)}{\Gamma\left(\mu+n + \tfrac{1}{2} \right)} \biggr] \cos\left(n
\phi\right)
</math>
</td>
</tr>

<tr>
<td align="right">
<math>~\Rightarrow ~~~Q^{\mu}_{-\frac{1}{2}}\left(\cosh\xi\right)</math>
</td>
<td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
</td>
<td align="left">
<math>~ e^{\mu\pi i} \Gamma\left(\mu+ \tfrac{1}{2} \right) \biggl[
\dfrac{\left(\frac{1}{2}\pi\right)^{1/2}\left(\sinh\xi\right)^{\mu
}}{\left(\cosh\xi-\cos\phi\right)^{\mu+(1/2)}}\biggr]
-
2\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}
Q^{\mu}_{n-\frac{1}{2}}\left(\cosh\xi\right) \cos\left(n
\phi\right) \, .
</math>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>

When dealing with Dyson-Wong tori, we will set <math>~\mu = 0</math>, in which case the ''Sums'' expression becomes,

<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">

<tr>
<td align="right">
<math>~Q_{-\frac{1}{2}}\left(\cosh\xi\right)</math>
</td>
<td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
</td>
<td align="left">
<math>~ \biggl[
\dfrac{ \pi/\sqrt{2} }{\left(\cosh\xi-\cos\phi\right)^{\frac{1}{2}} }\biggr]
-
2\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}
Q_{n-\frac{1}{2}}\left(\cosh\xi\right) \cos\left(n
\phi\right) \, .
</math>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>

But this can be rewritten in the form,
<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">

<tr>
<td align="right">
<math>~
\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \epsilon_n
Q_{n-\frac{1}{2}}\left(\cosh\xi\right) \cos\left(n
\phi\right)

</math>
</td>
<td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
</td>
<td align="left">
<math>~ \biggl[
\dfrac{ \pi/\sqrt{2} }{\left(\cosh\xi-\cos\phi\right)^{\frac{1}{2}} }\biggr]
</math>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>

=See Also=

{{ SGFfooter }}

Appendix/Mathematics/ToroidalConfusion - Revision history

Jet53man: /* Proper Interpretation of DLMF Expression */

Jet53man: Created page with " FORCETOC =Confusion Regarding Whipple Formulae= May, 2018 (J.E.Tohline): I am trying to figure out what the correct relationship i..."

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:58, 26 July 2021
Line 448:		Line 448:
	<table border="1" cellpadding="5" align="center" width="80%"><tr><td align="left">		<table border="1" cellpadding="5" align="center" width="80%"><tr><td align="left">
	The standard "Euler reflection formula for gamma functions" is usually presented in the form,		The standard "Euler reflection formula for gamma functions" is usually presented in the form,
	{{ ~~User:Tohline/~~Math/EQ_Gamma01 }}		{{ Math/EQ_Gamma01 }}
	If we make the association,		If we make the association,
	<div align="center">		<div align="center">

Appendix/Mathematics/ToroidalConfusion - Revision history

Jet53man: /* Proper Interpretation of DLMF Expression */

Jet53man: Created page with " __FORCETOC__ =Confusion Regarding Whipple Formulae= May, 2018 (J.E.Tohline): I am trying to figure out what the correct relationship i..."

Jet53man: Created page with " FORCETOC =Confusion Regarding Whipple Formulae= May, 2018 (J.E.Tohline): I am trying to figure out what the correct relationship i..."