<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://tohline.education/SelfGravitatingFluids/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Template%3ALSU_CT99CommonTheme2A</id>
	<title>Template:LSU CT99CommonTheme2A - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://tohline.education/SelfGravitatingFluids/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Template%3ALSU_CT99CommonTheme2A"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://tohline.education/SelfGravitatingFluids/index.php?title=Template:LSU_CT99CommonTheme2A&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-04-20T00:31:22Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.43.1</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://tohline.education/SelfGravitatingFluids/index.php?title=Template:LSU_CT99CommonTheme2A&amp;diff=1839&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Jet53man: Created page with &quot;Referencing (equivalently, Version 1 of) the above-identified integral expression for the &#039;&#039;Gravitational Potential of an Axisymmetric Mass Distribution,&#039;&#039; [http:/...&quot;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://tohline.education/SelfGravitatingFluids/index.php?title=Template:LSU_CT99CommonTheme2A&amp;diff=1839&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2021-09-10T17:42:51Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Created page with &amp;quot;Referencing (equivalently, Version 1 of) the &lt;a href=&quot;#Part_1&quot;&gt;above-identified integral expression&lt;/a&gt; for the &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Gravitational Potential of an Axisymmetric Mass Distribution,&amp;#039;&amp;#039; [http:/...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;Referencing (equivalently, Version 1 of) the [[#Part_1|above-identified integral expression]] for the &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Gravitational Potential of an Axisymmetric Mass Distribution,&amp;#039;&amp;#039; [http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012MNRAS.424.2635T Trova, Hur&amp;amp;eacute; &amp;amp;amp; Hersant (2012)] offer the following assessment in &amp;amp;sect;6 of their paper:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;table border=&amp;quot;0&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;3&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; width=&amp;quot;60%&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td align=&amp;quot;left&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;darkgreen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The important question we have tried to clarify concerns the possibility of converting the remaining double integral &amp;amp;hellip; into a line integral &amp;amp;hellip; this question remains open.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/table&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
We also have wondered whether there is a possibility of converting the double integral in this Key Equation into a single (line) integral.  This is a particularly challenging task when, as is the case with &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Version 1&amp;#039;&amp;#039; of the expression, the integrand is couched in terms of cylindrical coordinates because the modulus of the elliptic integral is explicitly a function of both &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;~\varpi^&amp;#039;&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;~z^&amp;#039;&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We have realized that if we focus, instead, on &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Version 2&amp;#039;&amp;#039; of the expression and associate the meridional-plane coordinates of the &amp;#039;&amp;#039;anchor ring&amp;#039;&amp;#039; with the coordinates of the location where the potential is &amp;#039;&amp;#039;being evaluated&amp;#039;&amp;#039; &amp;amp;#8212; that is, if we set &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;~(\varpi_a, z_a) = (\varpi,z)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;amp;#8212; the argument of the elliptic integral becomes, &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;~\mu = \biggl[\frac{2}{1+\coth\eta^&amp;#039; }\biggr]^{1 / 2} \, ,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
while the integral expression for the gravitational potential becomes,&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;table border=&amp;quot;0&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;5&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;td align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;~\Phi(\varpi,z)\biggr|_\mathrm{axisym}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;td align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;~=&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;td align=&amp;quot;left&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;~&lt;br /&gt;
- 2^{3/2}G \varpi^2 \iint\limits_\mathrm{config}  &lt;br /&gt;
 \biggl[\frac{ \sinh\eta^&amp;#039;}{(\cosh\eta^&amp;#039; - \cos\theta^&amp;#039;)^5} \biggr]^{1 / 2} \biggl[\frac{1}{1+\coth\eta^&amp;#039; }\biggr]^{1 / 2} K(\mu) \rho(\eta^&amp;#039;, \theta^&amp;#039;) d\eta^&amp;#039; d\theta^&amp;#039; &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;td align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;td align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;~=&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;td align=&amp;quot;left&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;~- 2^{3 / 2} G \varpi^{2}&lt;br /&gt;
\int\limits^{\eta_\mathrm{min}}_{\eta_\mathrm{max}} \frac{K(\mu) \sinh \eta^&amp;#039; ~d\eta^&amp;#039;}{( \sinh \eta^&amp;#039; +\cosh \eta^&amp;#039; )^{1 / 2}}  &lt;br /&gt;
\int\limits_{\theta_\mathrm{min}(\eta)}^{\theta_\mathrm{max}(\eta)}  \rho(\eta^&amp;#039;, \theta^&amp;#039;) &lt;br /&gt;
\biggl[ \frac{d\theta^&amp;#039;}{(\cosh\eta^&amp;#039; - \cos\theta^&amp;#039;)^{5 / 2}} \biggr]  \, .&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/table&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Notice that, by adopting this strategy, the argument of the elliptical integral is a function only of one coordinate &amp;amp;#8212; the toroidal coordinate system&amp;#039;s &amp;#039;&amp;#039;radial&amp;#039;&amp;#039; coordinate, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;~\eta^&amp;#039;&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.  As result, the integral over the &amp;#039;&amp;#039;angular&amp;#039;&amp;#039; coordinate, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;~\theta^&amp;#039;&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, does not involve the elliptic integral function.  Then &amp;amp;#8212; as is shown in an accompanying chapter titled, [[2DStructure/ToroidalCoordinates#Using_Toroidal_Coordinates_to_Determine_the_Gravitational_Potential|&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Attempt at Simplification&amp;#039;&amp;#039;]] &amp;amp;#8212; if the configuration&amp;#039;s density is constant, the integral over the angular coordinate variable can be completed analytically.  Hence, &amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;orange&amp;quot;&amp;gt;the task of evaluating the gravitational potential (both inside and outside) of a uniform-density, axisymmetric configuration having &amp;#039;&amp;#039;any&amp;#039;&amp;#039; surface shape has been reduced to a problem of carrying out a single, line integration. This provides an answer to the question posed by&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt; [http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012MNRAS.424.2635T Trova, Hur&amp;amp;eacute; &amp;amp;amp; Hersant (2012)].&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Jet53man</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>