Appendix/Ramblings/BiPolytrope51ContinueSearch: Difference between revisions
Created page with "__FORCETOC__ <!-- __NOTOC__ will force TOC off --> =Continue Search for Marginally Unstable (5,1) Bipolytropes= This ''Ramblings Appendix'' chapter — see also, User:..." |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
=Continue Search for Marginally Unstable (5,1) Bipolytropes= | =Continue Search for Marginally Unstable (5,1) Bipolytropes= | ||
This ''Ramblings Appendix'' chapter — see also, [[ | This ''Ramblings Appendix'' chapter — see also, [[Appendix/Ramblings/BiPolytrope51AnalyticStability|various trials]] — provides some detailed trial derivations in support of the [[SSC/Stability/BiPolytropes#Eigenvectors_for_Marginally_Unstable_Models_with_.28.CE.B3c.2C_.CE.B3e.29_.3D_.286.2F5.2C_2.29|accompanying, thorough discussion of this topic]]. | ||
==Key Differential Equation== | ==Key Differential Equation== | ||
In an [[ | In an [[SSC/Perturbations#2ndOrderODE|accompanying discussion]], we derived the so-called, | ||
<div align="center" id="2ndOrderODE"> | <div align="center" id="2ndOrderODE"> | ||
<font color="#770000">'''Linear Adiabatic Wave''' (or ''Radial Pulsation'') '''Equation'''</font><br /> | <font color="#770000">'''Linear Adiabatic Wave''' (or ''Radial Pulsation'') '''Equation'''</font><br /> | ||
{{ | {{Math/EQ_RadialPulsation01}} | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
whose solution gives eigenfunctions that describe various radial modes of oscillation in spherically symmetric, self-gravitating fluid configurations. After adopting an appropriate set of variable normalizations — as detailed [[ | whose solution gives eigenfunctions that describe various radial modes of oscillation in spherically symmetric, self-gravitating fluid configurations. After adopting an appropriate set of variable normalizations — as detailed [[SSC/Stability/BiPolytropes#Foundation|here]] — this becomes, | ||
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center"> | <table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center"> | ||
| Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
</table> | </table> | ||
where, <math>~\alpha_g \equiv (3 - 4/\gamma_g)</math>. Alternatively — see, for example, our [[ | where, <math>~\alpha_g \equiv (3 - 4/\gamma_g)</math>. Alternatively — see, for example, our [[SSC/Stability/Polytropes#Numerical_Integration_from_the_Center.2C_Outward|introductory discussion]] — for polytropic configurations we may write, | ||
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center"> | <table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center"> | ||
| Line 53: | Line 53: | ||
===Applied to the Core=== | ===Applied to the Core=== | ||
As we have already summarized in an [[ | As we have already summarized in an [[SSC/Stability/BiPolytropes#Profile|accompanying discussion]], throughout the core we have, | ||
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center"> | <table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center"> | ||
| Line 127: | Line 127: | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
</table> | </table> | ||
Now, following our [[ | Now, following our [[SSC/Stability/BiPolytropes#Is_There_an_Analytic_Expression_for_the_Eigenfunction.3F|separate discussion of an analytic solution to this LAWE]], we try, | ||
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center"> | <table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center"> | ||
| Line 290: | Line 290: | ||
===Applied to the Envelope=== | ===Applied to the Envelope=== | ||
And as we have also summarized in the same [[ | And as we have also summarized in the same [[SSC/Stability/BiPolytropes#Profile|accompanying discussion]], throughout the envelope we have, | ||
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center"> | <table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center"> | ||
| Line 496: | Line 496: | ||
In [[ | In [[Appendix/Ramblings/BiPolytrope51AnalyticStability#Attempt_4B|yet another ''Ramblings Appendix'' derivation]] we have explored a trial dimensionless displacement for the envelope of the form, | ||
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center"> | <table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center"> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
| Line 595: | Line 595: | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
</table> | </table> | ||
and [[ | and [[Appendix/Ramblings/BiPolytrope51AnalyticStability#proof|it can be shown]] that the simplified ''envelope'' LAWE is perfectly satisfied. Notice that, with this adopted segment of the eigenfunction for the envelope, we have, | ||
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center"> | <table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center"> | ||
| Line 662: | Line 662: | ||
==Interface Matching== | ==Interface Matching== | ||
According to our [[ | According to our [[SSC/Stability/BiPolytropes#Interface_Conditions|accompanying discussion]] of the interface matching condition — as we presently understand it — the proper eigenfunction will exhibit a discontinuity in the slope of the dimensionless displacement function such that, | ||
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center"> | <table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center"> | ||
Latest revision as of 17:53, 12 April 2022
Continue Search for Marginally Unstable (5,1) Bipolytropes
This Ramblings Appendix chapter — see also, various trials — provides some detailed trial derivations in support of the accompanying, thorough discussion of this topic.
Key Differential Equation
In an accompanying discussion, we derived the so-called,
whose solution gives eigenfunctions that describe various radial modes of oscillation in spherically symmetric, self-gravitating fluid configurations. After adopting an appropriate set of variable normalizations — as detailed here — this becomes,
|
|
|
|
where, . Alternatively — see, for example, our introductory discussion — for polytropic configurations we may write,
|
|
|
|
Applied to the Core
As we have already summarized in an accompanying discussion, throughout the core we have,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
So the relevant core LAWE becomes,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Now, following our separate discussion of an analytic solution to this LAWE, we try,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plugging this trial function into the relevant LAWE gives,
|
LAWE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Now, if we set and , we find that the terms on the RHS sum to zero. It therefore appears that we have identified a dimensionless displacement function that satisfies the core LAWE.
Applied to the Envelope
And as we have also summarized in the same accompanying discussion, throughout the envelope we have,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
So the relevant envelope LAWE becomes,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
where,
|
|
|
|
and |
|
|
|
If we set and , the envelope LAWE simplifies to the form,
|
|
|
|
In yet another Ramblings Appendix derivation we have explored a trial dimensionless displacement for the envelope of the form,
|
|
|
In this case,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and it can be shown that the simplified envelope LAWE is perfectly satisfied. Notice that, with this adopted segment of the eigenfunction for the envelope, we have,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interface Matching
According to our accompanying discussion of the interface matching condition — as we presently understand it — the proper eigenfunction will exhibit a discontinuity in the slope of the dimensionless displacement function such that,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Also
- K. De et al. (12 October 2018, Science, Vol. 362, No. 6411, pp. 201 - 206), A Hot and Fast Ultra-stripped Supernova that likely formed a Compact Neutron Star Binary.
|
Appendices: | VisTrailsEquations | VisTrailsVariables | References | Ramblings | VisTrailsImages | myphys.lsu | ADS | |