SSC/FreeEnergy/PolytropesEmbedded/Pt3A: Difference between revisions

From jetwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Line 50: Line 50:
</table>
</table>
</div>
</div>
==Order of Magnitude Derivation==
Let's begin by providing very rough, approximate expressions for each of these four terms, assuming that <math>~n_c = 5</math> and <math>~n_e = 1</math>. 
<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~W_\mathrm{grav}\biggr|_\mathrm{core}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~\approx</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~- \mathfrak{a}_c \biggl[ \frac{GM_\mathrm{tot} M_c}{(R_i/2)} \biggr]
= - 2\mathfrak{a}_c \biggl[ \frac{GM_\mathrm{tot}^2 }{R} \biggl(\frac{\nu}{q}\biggr) \biggr] \, ;</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~W_\mathrm{grav}\biggr|_\mathrm{env}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~\approx</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~- \mathfrak{a}_e \biggl[ \frac{GM_\mathrm{tot} M_e}{(R_i+R)/2} \biggr]
= - 2\mathfrak{a}_e \biggl[ \frac{GM_\mathrm{tot}^2 }{R} \biggl(\frac{1-\nu}{1+q}\biggr) \biggr] \, ;</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~\mathfrak{S}_\mathrm{therm}\biggr|_\mathrm{core} = U_\mathrm{int}\biggr|_\mathrm{core} </math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~\approx</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~\mathfrak{b}_c \cdot n_cK_c M_c ({\bar\rho}_c)^{1/n_c}
= 5\mathfrak{b}_c \cdot K_c M_\mathrm{tot}\nu \biggl[ \frac{3M_c}{4\pi R_i^3} \biggr]^{1/5}
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~\mathfrak{b}_c \biggl( \frac{3\cdot 5^5}{2^2\pi} \biggr)^{1/5} K_c (M_\mathrm{tot}\nu)^{6/5} (Rq)^{-3/5} 
\, ;</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~\mathfrak{S}_\mathrm{therm}\biggr|_\mathrm{env} = U_\mathrm{int}\biggr|_\mathrm{env} </math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~\approx</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~\mathfrak{b}_e \cdot n_eK_e M_\mathrm{env} ({\bar\rho}_e)^{1/n_e}
= \mathfrak{b}_e \cdot K_e M_\mathrm{tot}(1-\nu) \biggl[ \frac{3M_\mathrm{env}}{4\pi (R^3-R_i^3)} \biggr]
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~
\mathfrak{b}_e \biggl( \frac{3}{2^2\pi } \biggr) K_e [M_\mathrm{tot}(1-\nu)]^2 [R^3(1-q^3)]^{-1} \, .
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
In writing this last expression, it has been necessary to (temporarily) introduce a sixth physical parameter, namely, the polytropic constant that characterizes the envelope material, <math>~K_e</math>.  But this constant can be expressed in terms of <math>~K_c</math> via a relation that ensures continuity of pressure across the interface while taking into account the drop in mean molecular weight across the interface, that is,
<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~K_e ({\bar\rho}_e)^{(n_e+1)/n_e}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~\approx</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~K_c ({\bar\rho}_c)^{(n_c+1)/n_c}</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~\Rightarrow ~~~~ K_e \biggl[\biggl( \frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c} \biggr) {\bar\rho}_c\biggr]^{2}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~\approx</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~K_c ({\bar\rho}_c)^{6/5}</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~\Rightarrow ~~~~ \frac{K_e}{K_c} \biggl( \frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c} \biggr)^{2}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~\approx</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~\biggl[ \frac{3M_\mathrm{tot}\nu}{4\pi (Rq)^3} \biggr]^{-4/5} \, .</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
Hence, the fourth energy term may be rewritten in the form,
<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~\mathfrak{S}_\mathrm{therm}\biggr|_\mathrm{env} = U_\mathrm{int}\biggr|_\mathrm{env} </math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~\approx</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~
\mathfrak{b}_e \biggl( \frac{3}{2^2\pi } \biggr) \biggl( \frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c} \biggr)^{-2}
K_c\biggl[ \frac{3M_\mathrm{tot}\nu}{4\pi (Rq)^3} \biggr]^{-4/5}  [M_\mathrm{tot}(1-\nu)]^2 [R^3(1-q^3)]^{-1}
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~
\mathfrak{b}_e \biggl( \frac{3}{2^2\pi } \biggr)^{1/5} \biggl( \frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c} \biggr)^{-2}
K_c M_\mathrm{tot}^{6/5}R^{-3/5}\biggl[ \frac{q^3}{\nu} \biggr]^{4/5}  \frac{(1-\nu)^2}{(1-q^3)} \, .
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
Putting all the terms together gives,
<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~\mathfrak{G}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~\approx</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~
- 2\mathfrak{a}_c \biggl[ \frac{GM_\mathrm{tot}^2 }{R} \biggl(\frac{\nu}{q}\biggr) \biggr]
- 2\mathfrak{a}_e \biggl[ \frac{GM_\mathrm{tot}^2 }{R} \biggl(\frac{1-\nu}{1+q}\biggr) \biggr]
+ \mathfrak{b}_c \biggl( \frac{3\cdot 5^5}{2^2\pi} \biggr)^{1/5} K_c (M_\mathrm{tot}\nu)^{6/5} (Rq)^{-3/5}
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~
+ \mathfrak{b}_e \biggl( \frac{3}{2^2\pi } \biggr)^{1/5} \biggl( \frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c} \biggr)^{-2}
K_c M_\mathrm{tot}^{6/5}R^{-3/5}\biggl[ \frac{q^3}{\nu} \biggr]^{4/5}  \frac{(1-\nu)^2}{(1-q^3)}
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~
- 2 \mathcal{A}_\mathrm{biP} \biggl[ \frac{GM_\mathrm{tot}^2 }{R} \biggr]
+ \mathcal{B}_\mathrm{biP} K_c \biggl[\frac{(\nu M_\mathrm{tot})^{2}}{ qR} \biggr]^{3/5}
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~\Rightarrow ~~~~ \frac{\mathfrak{G}}{E_\mathrm{norm}}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~
- 2 \mathcal{A}_\mathrm{biP} \biggl[ \frac{GM_\mathrm{tot}^2 }{R} \biggr] \biggl(\frac{G^3}{K_c^5}\biggr)^{1/2}
+ \mathcal{B}_\mathrm{biP} \biggl(\frac{\nu^2}{q}\biggr)^{3/5} K_c \biggl[\frac{M_\mathrm{tot}^{2}}{ R} \biggr]^{3/5}\biggl(\frac{G^3}{K_c^5}\biggr)^{1/2}
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~
- 2 \mathcal{A}_\mathrm{biP} \biggl[ \frac{R_\mathrm{norm}}{R} \biggr]
+ \mathcal{B}_\mathrm{biP} \biggl(\frac{\nu^2}{q}\biggr)^{3/5} \biggl[\frac{R_\mathrm{norm}}{ R} \biggr]^{3/5} \, ,
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
where,
<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~\mathcal{A}_\mathrm{biP}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~\equiv</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~\biggl[ \mathfrak{a}_c\biggl(\frac{\nu}{q}\biggr)  + \mathfrak{a}_e  \biggl(\frac{1-\nu}{1+q}\biggr)  \biggr] \, ,</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~\mathcal{B}_\mathrm{biP}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~\equiv</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~\biggl( \frac{3}{2^2\pi} \biggr)^{1/5} \biggl[5\mathfrak{b}_c 
+ \mathfrak{b}_e \biggl( \frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c} \biggr)^{-2} \frac{q^3(1-\nu)^2}{\nu^2(1-q^3)} \biggr] \, .</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
==Equilibrium Radius==
===Order of Magnitude Estimate===
This means that,
<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~\frac{\partial\mathfrak{G}}{\partial R}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~
+ 2 \mathcal{A}_\mathrm{biP}\biggl[ \frac{GM_\mathrm{tot}^2 }{R^2} \biggr]
- \frac{3}{5} \mathcal{B}_\mathrm{biP} K_c \biggl[\frac{\nu^{2}}{ q} \biggr]^{3/5} M_\mathrm{tot}^{6/5} R^{-8/5}
\, .
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
Hence, because equilibrium radii are identified by setting <math>~\partial\mathfrak{G}/\partial R = 0</math>, we have,
<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~\frac{R_\mathrm{eq}}{R_\mathrm{norm}}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~\biggl(\frac{2\cdot 5}{3}\biggr)^{5/2} \biggl[\frac{\mathcal{A}_\mathrm{biP} }{\mathcal{B}_\mathrm{biP}}\biggr]^{5/2} \biggl(\frac{ q} {\nu^{2}}\biggr)^{3/2} \, .
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
===Reconcile With Known Analytic Expression===
From our [[SSC/Structure/BiPolytropes/FreeEnergy51#The_Core_2|earlier derivations]], it appears as though,
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>\chi_\mathrm{eq} \equiv \frac{R_\mathrm{eq}}{R_\mathrm{norm}}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>\biggl( \frac{3^8}{2^5\pi} \biggr)^{-1/2} 
\biggl(\frac{3}{2^4}\biggr) \biggl( \frac{q}{\ell_i}\biggr)^{5}\biggl(\frac{\nu}{q^3} \biggr)^2 \biggl( 1 + \ell_i^2 \biggr)^{3}
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>\biggl(\frac{2\cdot 5}{3}\biggr)^{5/2} \biggl(\frac{q}{\nu^2} \biggr)^{3/2}
\biggl[\biggl( \frac{\pi}{2^8 \cdot 3 \cdot 5^5} \biggr)^{1/2}  \biggl(\frac{\nu^2}{q} \biggr)^{5/2}
\frac{(1 + \ell_i^2)^3}{\ell_i^5} \biggr] \, .
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
This implies that,
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>\frac{\mathcal{A}_\mathrm{biP} }{\mathcal{B}_\mathrm{biP}}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>\approx</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\biggl[\biggl( \frac{\pi}{2^8 \cdot 3 \cdot 5^5} \biggr)^{1/2}  \biggl(\frac{\nu^2}{q} \biggr)^{5/2}
\frac{(1 + \ell_i^2)^3}{\ell_i^5} \biggr]^{2/5}
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>\biggl(\frac{\nu^2}{q} \biggr)
\biggl( \frac{\pi}{2^8 \cdot 3 \cdot 5^5} \biggr)^{1/5}  \frac{(1 + \ell_i^2)^{6/5}}{\ell_i^2}
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>\Rightarrow ~~~~ \biggl[ \mathfrak{a}_c\biggl(\frac{\nu}{q}\biggr)  + \mathfrak{a}_e  \biggl(\frac{1-\nu}{1+q}\biggr)  \biggr] </math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>\approx</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>\frac{1}{2^2\cdot 5}\biggl(\frac{\nu^2}{q} \biggr)
\frac{(1 + \ell_i^2)^{6/5}}{\ell_i^2} \biggl[5\mathfrak{b}_c 
+ \mathfrak{b}_e \biggl( \frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c} \biggr)^{-2} \frac{q^3(1-\nu)^2}{\nu^2(1-q^3)} \biggr]
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>\Rightarrow ~~~~ \biggl[ \mathfrak{a}_c  + \mathfrak{a}_e \cdot  \frac{q(1-\nu)}{\nu(1+q)}  \biggr] </math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>\approx</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>\frac{\nu}{2^2\cdot 5}
\frac{(1 + \ell_i^2)^{6/5}}{\ell_i^2} \biggl[5\mathfrak{b}_c 
+ \mathfrak{b}_e \biggl( \frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c} \biggr)^{-2} \frac{q^3(1-\nu)^2}{\nu^2(1-q^3)} \biggr]
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
==Focus on Five-One Free-Energy Expression==
===Approximate Expressions===
Let's plug this equilibrium radius back into each term of the free-energy expression.
<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~\frac{W_\mathrm{grav}}{E_\mathrm{norm}}\biggr|_\mathrm{core}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~\approx</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~- 2\mathfrak{a}_c \biggl(\frac{G^3}{K_c^5}\biggr)^{1/2} \biggl[ \frac{GM_\mathrm{tot}^2 }{R_\mathrm{eq}} \biggl(\frac{\nu}{q}\biggr) \biggr] </math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~- 2\mathfrak{a}_c \biggl(\frac{\nu}{q}\biggr) \biggl[ \frac{R_\mathrm{norm} }{R_\mathrm{eq}} \biggr] \, ;</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~\frac{W_\mathrm{grav}}{E_\mathrm{norm}}\biggr|_\mathrm{env}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~\approx</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~- 2\mathfrak{a}_e \biggl(\frac{G^3}{K_c^5}\biggr)^{1/2} \biggl[ \frac{GM_\mathrm{tot}^2 }{R_\mathrm{eq}} \biggl(\frac{1-\nu}{1+q}\biggr) \biggr] </math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~- 2\mathfrak{a}_e \biggl(\frac{1-\nu}{1+q}\biggr) \biggl[ \frac{R_\mathrm{norm} }{R_\mathrm{eq}} \biggr] \, ;</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~\frac{S_\mathrm{core}}{E_\mathrm{norm}} = \biggl[\frac{3(\gamma_c-1)}{2}\biggr] \frac{U_\mathrm{int}}{E_\mathrm{norm}}\biggr|_\mathrm{core} </math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~\approx</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~\biggl[\frac{3}{2\cdot 5}\biggr]\mathfrak{b}_c \biggl( \frac{3\cdot 5^5}{2^2\pi} \biggr)^{1/5} \biggl(\frac{G^3}{K_c^5}\biggr)^{1/2}
K_c (M_\mathrm{tot}\nu)^{6/5} (R_\mathrm{eq}q)^{-3/5} 
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~
\biggl[\frac{3}{2\cdot 5}\biggr]\mathfrak{b}_c \biggl( \frac{3\cdot 5^5}{2^2\pi} \biggr)^{1/5} 
\biggl(\frac{\nu^2}{q}\biggr)^{3/5} \biggl(\frac{R_\mathrm{norm}}{R_\mathrm{eq}}\biggr)^{3/5}
\, ;</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~\frac{S_\mathrm{env}}{E_\mathrm{norm}} = \biggl[\frac{3(\gamma_e-1)}{2}\biggr] \frac{U_\mathrm{int}}{E_\mathrm{norm}}\biggr|_\mathrm{env} </math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~\approx</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~\biggl[\frac{3}{2}\biggr]
\mathfrak{b}_e \biggl( \frac{3}{2^2\pi } \biggr)^{1/5} \biggl( \frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c} \biggr)^{-2}
\biggl(\frac{G^3}{K_c^5}\biggr)^{1/2} K_c M_\mathrm{tot}^{6/5}R_\mathrm{eq}^{-3/5}\biggl[ \frac{q^3}{\nu} \biggr]^{4/5}  \frac{(1-\nu)^2}{(1-q^3)}
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~\biggl[\frac{3}{2}\biggr]
\mathfrak{b}_e \biggl( \frac{3}{2^2\pi } \biggr)^{1/5} \biggl( \frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c} \biggr)^{-2}
\biggl[ \frac{q^3}{\nu} \biggr]^{4/5}  \frac{(1-\nu)^2}{(1-q^3)}
\biggl(\frac{R_\mathrm{norm}}{R_\mathrm{eq}}\biggr)^{3/5} \, .
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
===From Detailed Force-Balance Models===
In the following derivations, we will use the expression,
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>\chi_\mathrm{eq} \equiv \frac{ R_\mathrm{eq}}{R_\mathrm{norm}}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>\biggl( \frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c} \biggr)^3 \biggl( \frac{\pi}{2^3} \biggr)^{1/2} \frac{1}{A^2\eta_s}
= \biggl(\frac{\pi}{2^3}\biggr)^{1/2} \frac{\nu^2}{q} \cdot \frac{(1+\ell_i^2)^3}{3^3\ell_i^5} \, .</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
Keep in mind, as well &#8212; as derived in an [[SSC/Structure/BiPolytropes/Analytic51#Background|accompanying discussion]] &#8212; that,
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>\nu \equiv \frac{M_\mathrm{core}}{M_\mathrm{tot}} </math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>(m_3^2 \ell_i^3) (1 + \ell_i^2)^{-1/2} [1 + (1-m_3)^2 \ell_i^2]^{-1/2}  \biggl[ m_3\ell_i + (1+\ell_i^2) \biggl(\frac{\pi}{2} + \tan^{-1} \Lambda_i \biggr) \biggr]^{-1} \, ,</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
where,
<div align="center">
<math>m_3 \equiv 3 \biggl( \frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c} \biggr) \, .</math>
</div>
From the [[SSC/Structure/BiPolytropes/Analytic51#Parameter_Values|accompanying Table 1 parameter values]], we also can write,
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>q</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>\frac{\eta_i}{\eta_s}
= \eta_i \biggl\{\frac{\pi}{2} + \eta_i + \tan^{-1}\biggl[ \frac{1}{\eta_i} - \ell_i \biggr]  \biggr\}^{-1}</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\eta_i \biggl\{\eta_i + \cot^{-1}\biggl[ \ell_i - \frac{1}{\eta_i} \biggr]  \biggr\}^{-1} \, ,
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
where,
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>\eta_i</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>m_3 \biggl[\frac{\ell_i }{(1+\ell_i^2)}\biggr] \, .</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
Let's also define the following shorthand notation:
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>\mathfrak{L}_i</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>\equiv</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>\frac{(\ell_i^4-1)}{\ell_i^2} + \frac{(1+\ell_i^2)^3}{\ell_i^3} \cdot \tan^{-1}\ell_i \, ;</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>\mathfrak{K}_i</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>\equiv</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>\frac{(1+\Lambda_i^2)}{\eta_i} \biggl[\frac{\pi}{2} + \tan^{-1}\Lambda_i\biggr] + \frac{\Lambda_i}{\eta_i} \, .</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
====Gravitational Potential Energy of the Core====
Pulling from [[SSC/Structure/BiPolytropes/Analytic51#Expression_for_Free_Energy|our detailed derivations]],
<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="4">
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~\biggl[  \frac{W_\mathrm{core}}{E_\mathrm{norm}} \biggr]_\mathrm{eq}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=~</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~ - \biggl( \frac{3^8}{2^5\pi } \biggr)^{1/2}
\biggl[ \ell_i \biggl(\ell_i^4 - \frac{8}{3} \ell_i^2 -1 \biggr) (1 + \ell_i^2)^{-3}  + \tan^{-1}(\ell_i) \biggr] \, .</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~\Rightarrow ~~~~ -\chi_\mathrm{eq} \biggl[  \frac{W_\mathrm{core}}{E_\mathrm{norm}} \biggr]_\mathrm{eq}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=~</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~
\biggl( \frac{3^8}{2^5\pi } \biggr)^{1/2}
\biggl[ \ell_i \biggl(\ell_i^4 - \frac{8}{3} \ell_i^2 -1 \biggr) (1 + \ell_i^2)^{-3}  + \tan^{-1}(\ell_i) \biggr]
\biggl(\frac{\pi}{2^3}\biggr)^{1/2} \frac{\nu^2}{q} \cdot \frac{(1+\ell_i^2)^3}{3^3\ell_i^5}
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=~</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~
\biggl( \frac{3}{2^4} \biggr) \frac{\nu^2}{q} \cdot \frac{1}{\ell_i^5}
\biggl[ \ell_i \biggl(\ell_i^4 - \frac{8}{3} \ell_i^2 -1 \biggr)  + (1 + \ell_i^2)^{3}\tan^{-1}(\ell_i) \biggr]
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
Out of equilibrium, then, we should expect,
<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="4">
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~\frac{W_\mathrm{core}}{E_\mathrm{norm}} </math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=~</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~ - \chi^{-1}
\biggl( \frac{3}{2^4} \biggr) \frac{\nu^2}{q} \cdot \frac{1}{\ell_i^5}
\biggl[ \ell_i \biggl(\ell_i^4 - \frac{8}{3} \ell_i^2 -1 \biggr)  + (1 + \ell_i^2)^{3}\tan^{-1}(\ell_i) \biggr]
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=~</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~
- \chi^{-1}
\biggl( \frac{3}{2^4} \biggr) \frac{\nu^2}{q} \cdot \frac{1}{\ell_i^2}
\biggl[ \mathfrak{L}_i - \frac{8}{3} \biggr] 
\, ,
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
which, in comparison with our above approximate expression, implies,
<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="4">
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~\mathfrak{a}_c  </math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=~</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~
\biggl( \frac{3}{2^5} \biggr) \frac{\nu}{\ell_i^5}
\biggl[ \ell_i \biggl(\ell_i^4 - \frac{8}{3} \ell_i^2 -1 \biggr)  + (1 + \ell_i^2)^{3}\tan^{-1}(\ell_i) \biggr]  \, .
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
====Thermal Energy of the Core====
Again, pulling from [[SSC/Structure/BiPolytropes/Analytic51#Expression_for_Free_Energy|our detailed derivations]],
<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="4">
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~\biggl[ \frac{S_\mathrm{core}}{E_\mathrm{norm}}\biggr]_\mathrm{eq}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=~</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~ \frac{1}{2} \biggl( \frac{3^8}{2^5\pi} \biggr)^{1/2} \biggl[ \ell_i (\ell_i^4 - 1 )(1+\ell_i^2)^{-3}  + \tan^{-1}(\ell_i) \biggr] </math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~\Rightarrow ~~~~ \chi_\mathrm{eq}^{3} \biggl[ \frac{S_\mathrm{core}}{E_\mathrm{norm}}\biggr]^5_\mathrm{eq}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=~</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~
\frac{1}{2^5} \biggl( \frac{3^8}{2^5\pi} \biggr)^{5/2} \biggl[ \ell_i (\ell_i^4 - 1 )(1+\ell_i^2)^{-3}  + \tan^{-1}(\ell_i) \biggr]^5
\biggl[\biggl(\frac{\pi}{2^3}\biggr)^{1/2} \frac{\nu^2}{q} \cdot \frac{(1+\ell_i^2)^3}{3^3\ell_i^5}\biggr]^{3}
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=~</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~ \frac{1}{\pi}\biggl(\frac{3}{2^{2}}\biggr)^{11}
\biggl(\frac{\nu^2}{q}\biggr)^{3} \biggl[ \ell_i (\ell_i^4 - 1 )(1+\ell_i^2)^{-3}  + \tan^{-1}(\ell_i) \biggr]^5
\biggl[\frac{(1+\ell_i^2)^9}{\ell_i^{15}}\biggr] \, .
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
Out of equilibrium, we should then expect,
<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="4">
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~\frac{S_\mathrm{core}}{E_\mathrm{norm}}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=~</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~
\biggl(\frac{3}{2^2\pi} \biggr)^{1/5}\biggl[ \chi^{-1}
\biggl(\frac{\nu^2}{q}\biggr) \frac{1}{(1+\ell_i^2)^{2}} \biggr]^{3/5} \biggl(\frac{3}{2^{2}}\biggr)^{2}\mathfrak{L}_i
\, .
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
In comparison with our above approximate expression, we therefore have,
<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="4">
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~
\biggl[ \biggl(\frac{3}{2\cdot 5}\biggr)\mathfrak{b}_c \biggl( \frac{3\cdot 5^5}{2^2\pi} \biggr)^{1/5} 
\biggl(\frac{\nu^2}{q}\biggr)^{3/5} \biggr]^5</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=~</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~ \frac{1}{\pi}\biggl(\frac{3}{2^{2}}\biggr)^{11}
\biggl(\frac{\nu^2}{q}\biggr)^{3} \biggl[ \ell_i (\ell_i^4 - 1 )(1+\ell_i^2)^{-3}  + \tan^{-1}(\ell_i) \biggr]^5
\biggl[\frac{(1+\ell_i^2)^9}{\ell_i^{15}}\biggr]
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~\Rightarrow~~~~
\mathfrak{b}_c 
</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=~</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~\frac{ 3 }{2^3\ell_i^{3}(1+\ell_i^2)^{6/5}}
\biggl[ \ell_i (\ell_i^4 - 1 )  + (1+\ell_i^2)^{3}\tan^{-1}(\ell_i) \biggr] \, .
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
====Gravitational Potential Energy of the Envelope====
Again, pulling from [[SSC/Structure/BiPolytropes/Analytic51#Expression_for_Free_Energy|our detailed derivations]] and appreciating, in particular, that (see, for example, [[SSC/Structure/BiPolytropes/Analytic51#Equilibrium_Condition|our notes on equilibrium conditions]]),
<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="3">
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~A</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=~</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~\frac{\eta_i}{\sin(\eta_i - B)} \, ,</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~(\eta_s - B)</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=~</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~\pi \, ,</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~\eta_i - B</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=~</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~\frac{\pi}{2} - \tan^{-1}(\Lambda_i)\, ,</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~\Rightarrow ~~~ \sin(\eta_i -B) = (1+\Lambda_i^2)^{-1/2}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; and &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~\sin[2(\eta_i-B)] = 2\Lambda_i(1 + \Lambda_i^2)^{-1} \ ,</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
we have,
<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="4">
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~\biggl[\frac{W_\mathrm{env}}{E_\mathrm{norm}}\biggr]_\mathrm{eq}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=~</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~ -\biggl( \frac{1}{2^3\pi} \biggr)^{1/2}  \biggl( \frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c} \biggr)^{-3} A^2
\biggl\{ \biggl[6(\eta_s-B) - 3\sin[2(\eta_s - B)] -4\eta_s\sin^2(\eta_s-B) + 4B\biggr]
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~ - \biggl[6(\eta_i-B) - 3\sin[2(\eta_i - B)] -4\eta_i\sin^2(\eta_i-B) + 4B \biggr]\biggr\}
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=~</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~ -\biggl( \frac{1}{2^3\pi} \biggr)^{1/2}  \biggl( \frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c} \biggr)^{-3} \biggl[\frac{\eta_i}{\sin(\eta_i - B)} \biggr]^2
\biggl\{ 6\pi - \biggl[6(\eta_i-B) - 3\sin[2(\eta_i - B)] -4\eta_i\sin^2(\eta_i-B) \biggr]\biggr\}
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=~</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~ -\biggl( \frac{1}{2^3\pi} \biggr)^{1/2}  \biggl( \frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c} \biggr)^{-3} \eta_i^2(1+\Lambda_i^2)
\biggl\{ 6\pi - 6\biggl[\frac{\pi}{2} - \tan^{-1}(\Lambda_i)\biggr] + 6\biggl[ \frac{\Lambda_i}{(1 + \Lambda_i^2)}  \biggr]
+ 4\eta_i \biggl[ \frac{1}{(1+\Lambda_i^2)} \biggr] \biggr\}
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=~</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~ -\biggl( \frac{3^2}{2\pi} \biggr)^{1/2}  \biggl( \frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c} \biggr)^{-3} \eta_i^2
\biggl\{ (1+\Lambda_i^2)\biggl[\frac{\pi}{2}+\tan^{-1}(\Lambda_i)\biggr] + \Lambda_i + \frac{2}{3} \cdot \eta_i \biggr\} \, .
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
So, in equilibrium we can write,
<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="4">
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~-\chi_\mathrm{eq}\biggl[\frac{W_\mathrm{env}}{E_\mathrm{norm}}\biggr]_\mathrm{eq}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=~</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~ \biggl( \frac{3^2}{2\pi} \biggr)^{1/2}  \biggl( \frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c} \biggr)^{-3} \eta_i^2
\biggl\{ (1+\Lambda_i^2)\biggl[\frac{\pi}{2}+\tan^{-1}(\Lambda_i)\biggr] + \Lambda_i + \frac{2}{3} \cdot \eta_i \biggr\}
\biggl(\frac{\pi}{2^3}\biggr)^{1/2} \frac{\nu^2}{q} \cdot \frac{(1+\ell_i^2)^3}{3^3\ell_i^5}
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=~</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~ \frac{3}{2^2} \biggl(\frac{\eta_i}{m_3}\biggr)^3
\biggl\{ \frac{(1+\Lambda_i^2)}{\eta_i} \biggl[\frac{\pi}{2}+\tan^{-1}(\Lambda_i)\biggr] + \frac{\Lambda_i}{\eta_i} + \frac{2}{3} \biggr\}
\frac{\nu^2}{q} \cdot \frac{(1+\ell_i^2)^3}{\ell_i^5}
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=~</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~ \frac{3}{2^2} \biggl(\frac{\nu^2}{q} \biggr) \frac{1}{\ell_i^2}
\biggl\{ \frac{(1+\Lambda_i^2)}{\eta_i} \biggl[\frac{\pi}{2}+\tan^{-1}(\Lambda_i)\biggr] + \frac{\Lambda_i}{\eta_i} + \frac{2}{3} \biggr\} \, .
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
And out of equilibrium,
<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="4">
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~\frac{W_\mathrm{env}}{E_\mathrm{norm}}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=~</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~
-\chi^{-1}\cdot \frac{3}{2^2} \biggl(\frac{\nu^2}{q} \biggr) \frac{1}{\ell_i^2}
\biggl[\mathfrak{K}_i+ \frac{2}{3} \biggr]
\, .
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
This, in turn, implies that both in and out of equilibrium,
<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="4">
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~\mathfrak{a}_e </math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=~</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~ \frac{3}{2^3} \biggl[\frac{\nu^2(1+q)}{q(1-\nu)} \biggr] \frac{1}{\ell_i^2}
\biggl\{ \frac{(1+\Lambda_i^2)}{\eta_i} \biggl[\frac{\pi}{2}+\tan^{-1}(\Lambda_i)\biggr] + \frac{\Lambda_i}{\eta_i} + \frac{2}{3} \biggr\} \, .
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
====Thermal Energy of the Envelope====
Again, pulling from [[SSC/Structure/BiPolytropes/Analytic51#Expression_for_Free_Energy|our detailed derivations]],
<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="4">
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~\biggl[\frac{S_\mathrm{env}}{E_\mathrm{norm}} \biggr]_\mathrm{eq}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=~</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~ ~ \biggl( \frac{1}{2^5\pi} \biggr)^{1/2} \biggl( \frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c} \biggr)^{-3} A^2
\biggl\{  \biggl[6(\eta_s - B) - 3\sin[2(\eta_s-B)] \biggr] - \biggl[6(\eta_i - B) - 3\sin[2(\eta_i-B)] \biggr] \biggr\}</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=~</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~ ~ \biggl( \frac{1}{2^5\pi} \biggr)^{1/2} \biggl( \frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c} \biggr)^{-3} \biggl[\frac{\eta_i}{\sin(\eta_i - B)} \biggr]^2
\biggl\{ 6\pi  - 6(\eta_i - B) + 3\sin[2(\eta_i-B)]  \biggr\}</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=~</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~ ~ \biggl( \frac{1}{2^5\pi} \biggr)^{1/2} \biggl( \frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c} \biggr)^{-3} \eta_i^2 (1 + \Lambda_i^2) 
\biggl\{ 6\biggl[\frac{\pi}{2} + \tan^{-1}(\Lambda_i) \biggr] + 6\biggl[\Lambda_i(1 + \Lambda_i^2)^{-1} \biggr] \biggr\}</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=~</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~ ~\frac{1}{2} \biggl( \frac{3^2}{2\pi} \biggr)^{1/2} \biggl( \frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c} \biggr)^{-3} \eta_i^2 
\biggl\{  (1 + \Lambda_i^2)\biggl[\frac{\pi}{2} + \tan^{-1}(\Lambda_i) \biggr] + \Lambda_i \biggr\} \, .</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
So, in equilibrium we can write,
<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="4">
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~\chi_\mathrm{eq}^{3}\biggl[\frac{S_\mathrm{env}}{E_\mathrm{norm}} \biggr]_\mathrm{eq}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=~</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~ ~\frac{1}{2} \biggl( \frac{3^2}{2\pi} \biggr)^{1/2} \biggl( \frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c} \biggr)^{-3} \eta_i^2 
\biggl\{  (1 + \Lambda_i^2)\biggl[\frac{\pi}{2} + \tan^{-1}(\Lambda_i) \biggr] + \Lambda_i \biggr\}
\biggl[\biggl(\frac{\pi}{2^3}\biggr)^{1/2} \frac{\nu^2}{q} \cdot \frac{(1+\ell_i^2)^3}{3^3\ell_i^5}\biggr]^{3}
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=~</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~ ~\biggl(\frac{\nu^2}{q} \biggr)^3 \biggl( \frac{3^2\pi^2}{2^{12}} \biggr)^{1/2} \biggl( \frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c} \biggr)^{-3} \eta_i^3 
\biggl\{  \frac{(1 + \Lambda_i^2)}{\eta_i}\biggl[\frac{\pi}{2} + \tan^{-1}(\Lambda_i) \biggr] + \frac{\Lambda_i}{\eta_i} \biggr\}
\biggl[\frac{(1+\ell_i^2)^9}{3^9\ell_i^{15}}\biggr]
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=~</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~ ~\biggl(\frac{\nu^2}{q} \biggr)^3 \biggl( \frac{\pi}{2^{6}\cdot 3^5} \biggr)  \biggl[\frac{(1+\ell_i^2)^6}{\ell_i^{12}}\biggr]
\biggl\{  \frac{(1 + \Lambda_i^2)}{\eta_i}\biggl[\frac{\pi}{2} + \tan^{-1}(\Lambda_i) \biggr] + \frac{\Lambda_i}{\eta_i} \biggr\} \, .
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
And, out of equilibrium,
<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="4">
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~\biggl[\frac{S_\mathrm{env}}{E_\mathrm{norm}} \biggr]_\mathrm{eq}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=~</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~ ~
\chi^{-3}\biggl(\frac{\nu^2}{q} \biggr)^3 \biggl( \frac{\pi}{2^{6}\cdot 3^5} \biggr) 
\biggl[\frac{(1+\ell_i^2)^6}{\ell_i^{12}}\biggr]\mathfrak{K}
\, .
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
====Combined in Equilibrium====
Notice that, in combination,
<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~\biggl[\frac{2S_\mathrm{env} + W_\mathrm{env}}{E_\mathrm{norm}} \biggr]_\mathrm{eq}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~ - \frac{2}{3}\biggl( \frac{3^2}{2\pi} \biggr)^{1/2}  \biggl( \frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c} \biggr)^{-3} \eta_i^3
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~ - \frac{2}{3}\biggl( \frac{3^2}{2\pi} \biggr)^{1/2}  \biggl( \frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c} \biggr)^{-3}
\biggl[3 \biggl( \frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c} \biggr) \ell_i \biggl( 1 + \ell_i^2 \biggr)^{-1}\biggr]^3
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~ - \biggl( \frac{2\cdot 3^6}{\pi} \biggr)^{1/2} 
\biggl[\frac{\ell_i^3}{( 1 + \ell_i^2)^3}\biggr] \, .
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
Also, from above,
<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="4">
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~\biggl[  \frac{2S_\mathrm{core}+W_\mathrm{core}}{E_\mathrm{norm}} \biggr]_\mathrm{eq}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=~</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~ - \biggl( \frac{3^8}{2^5\pi } \biggr)^{1/2}
\biggl[ \ell_i \biggl(- \frac{8}{3} \ell_i^2 \biggr) (1 + \ell_i^2)^{-3}  \biggr] </math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=~</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~ + \biggl( \frac{2\cdot 3^6}{\pi } \biggr)^{1/2}
\biggl[ \frac{\ell_i^3}{(1 + \ell_i^2)^{3}}  \biggr] \, .</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
So, in equilibrium, these terms from the core and envelope sum to zero, as they should.
====Out of Equilibrium====
And now, in combination ''out'' of equilibrium,
<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~\frac{\mathfrak{G}}{E_\mathrm{norm}} </math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~
\biggl(\frac{\chi}{\chi_\mathrm{eq}}\biggr)^{-1} \biggl\{ \biggl[ \frac{W_\mathrm{core}}{E_\mathrm{norm}}\biggr]_\mathrm{eq} 
+ \biggl[\frac{W_\mathrm{env}}{E_\mathrm{norm}}\biggr]_\mathrm{eq}\biggr\}
+\biggl(\frac{\chi}{\chi_\mathrm{eq}}\biggr)^{-3/5} \biggl(\frac{2n_c}{3}\biggr) \biggl[ \frac{S_\mathrm{core}}{E_\mathrm{norm}}\biggr]_\mathrm{eq}
+\biggl(\frac{\chi}{\chi_\mathrm{eq}}\biggr)^{-3} \biggl(\frac{2n_e}{3}\biggr)\biggl[\frac{S_\mathrm{env}}{E_\mathrm{norm}}\biggr]_\mathrm{eq}
\, .
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
Hence, quite generally ''out'' of equilibrium,
<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~\frac{\partial}{\partial \chi} \biggl[ \frac{\mathfrak{G}}{E_\mathrm{norm}} \biggr] </math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~
-\chi^{-1}\biggl(\frac{\chi}{\chi_\mathrm{eq}}\biggr)^{-1} \biggl\{ \biggl[ \frac{W_\mathrm{core}}{E_\mathrm{norm}}\biggr]_\mathrm{eq} 
+ \biggl[\frac{W_\mathrm{env}}{E_\mathrm{norm}}\biggr]_\mathrm{eq}\biggr\}
-\frac{3}{5}\chi^{-1}\biggl(\frac{\chi}{\chi_\mathrm{eq}}\biggr)^{-3/5} \biggl(\frac{10}{3}\biggr) \biggl[ \frac{S_\mathrm{core}}{E_\mathrm{norm}}\biggr]_\mathrm{eq}
-3\chi^{-1}\biggl(\frac{\chi}{\chi_\mathrm{eq}}\biggr)^{-3} \biggl(\frac{2}{3}\biggr)\biggl[\frac{S_\mathrm{env}}{E_\mathrm{norm}}\biggr]_\mathrm{eq} \, .
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
Let's see what the value of this derivative is if the dimensionless radius, <math>~\chi</math>, is set to the value that has been determined, via a detailed force-balanced analysis, to be the equilibrium radius, namely, <math>~\chi = \chi_\mathrm{eq}</math>.  In this case, we have,
<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~\biggl\{\frac{\partial}{\partial \chi} \biggl[ \frac{\mathfrak{G}}{E_\mathrm{norm}} \biggr] \biggr\}_\mathrm{\chi \rightarrow \chi_\mathrm{eq}}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~ -\chi_\mathrm{eq}^{-1}\biggl\{
\biggl[ \frac{W_\mathrm{core}}{E_\mathrm{norm}}\biggr]_\mathrm{eq} 
+ \biggl[\frac{W_\mathrm{env}}{E_\mathrm{norm}}\biggr]_\mathrm{eq}
+2\biggl[ \frac{S_\mathrm{core}}{E_\mathrm{norm}}\biggr]_\mathrm{eq}
+2\biggl[\frac{S_\mathrm{env}}{E_\mathrm{norm}}\biggr]_\mathrm{eq} \biggr\} \, .
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
But, according to the virial theorem &#8212; and, as we have just demonstrated &#8212; the four terms inside the curly braces sum to zero.  So this demonstrates that the derivative of our out-of-equilibrium free-energy expression does go to zero at the equilibrium radius, as it should!
===Summary51===
In summary, the desired ''out'' of equilibrium free-energy expression is,
<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~\frac{\mathfrak{G}}{E_\mathrm{norm}} </math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~
\frac{W_\mathrm{core}}{E_\mathrm{norm}}  + \frac{W_\mathrm{env}}{E_\mathrm{norm}}
+\biggl(\frac{2n_c}{3}\biggr)\frac{S_\mathrm{core}}{E_\mathrm{norm}}
+\biggl(\frac{2n_e}{3}\biggr)\frac{S_\mathrm{env}}{E_\mathrm{norm}}
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~
- \chi^{-1}
\biggl( \frac{3}{2^4} \biggr) \frac{\nu^2}{q} \cdot \frac{1}{\ell_i^2}
\biggl[ \mathfrak{L}_i - \frac{8}{3} \biggr] 
-\chi^{-1}\cdot \frac{3}{2^2} \biggl(\frac{\nu^2}{q} \biggr) \frac{1}{\ell_i^2}
\biggl[\mathfrak{K}_i+ \frac{2}{3} \biggr]
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~ 
+
\biggl(\frac{2\cdot 5}{3}\biggr) \biggl(\frac{3}{2^2\pi} \biggr)^{1/5}\biggl[ \chi^{-1}
\biggl(\frac{\nu^2}{q}\biggr) \frac{1}{(1+\ell_i^2)^{2}} \biggr]^{3/5} \biggl(\frac{3}{2^{2}}\biggr)^{2}\mathfrak{L}_i
+\biggl(\frac{2}{3}\biggr)
\chi^{-3}\biggl(\frac{\nu^2}{q} \biggr)^3 \biggl( \frac{\pi}{2^{6}\cdot 3^5} \biggr) 
\biggl[\frac{(1+\ell_i^2)^6}{\ell_i^{12}}\biggr]\mathfrak{K}
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~
-
\biggl( \frac{3}{2^4} \biggr) \biggl[\chi^{-1}\frac{\nu^2}{q} \cdot \frac{1}{\ell_i^2}\biggr]
\biggl[ \mathfrak{L}_i + 4\mathfrak{K}_i \biggr] 
+
\biggl(\frac{3}{2^2\pi} \biggr)^{1/5}\biggl(\frac{3\cdot 5}{2^3}\biggr) \biggl[ \chi^{-1}
\biggl(\frac{\nu^2}{q}\biggr) \frac{1}{(1+\ell_i^2)^{2}} \biggr]^{3/5}
\mathfrak{L}_i
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~
+ \biggl( \frac{\pi}{2^{5}\cdot 3^6} \biggr)
\biggl[\chi^{-1}\biggl(\frac{\nu^2}{q} \biggr) 
\frac{(1+\ell_i^2)^2}{\ell_i^{4}}\biggr]^3\mathfrak{K} \, .
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
Or, in terms of the ratio,
<div align="center">
<math>\Chi \equiv \frac{\chi}{\chi_\mathrm{eq}} \, ,</math>
</div>
and pulling from the above expressions,
<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="4">
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~\biggl[  \frac{W_\mathrm{core}}{E_\mathrm{norm}} \biggr]_\mathrm{eq}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=~</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~ - \biggl( \frac{3^8}{2^5\pi } \biggr)^{1/2}
\biggl[ \ell_i \biggl(\ell_i^4 - \frac{8}{3} \ell_i^2 -1 \biggr) (1 + \ell_i^2)^{-3}  + \tan^{-1}(\ell_i) \biggr] </math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=~</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~ - \biggl( \frac{3^8}{2^5\pi } \biggr)^{1/2} \biggl[ \frac{\ell_i}{(1+\ell_i^2)} \biggr]^{3}
\biggl[ \mathfrak{L}_i - \frac{8}{3}\biggr]
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~\biggl[\frac{W_\mathrm{env}}{E_\mathrm{norm}}\biggr]_\mathrm{eq}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=~</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~ -\biggl( \frac{3^2}{2\pi} \biggr)^{1/2}  \biggl( \frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c} \biggr)^{-3} \eta_i^2
\biggl\{ (1+\Lambda_i^2)\biggl[\frac{\pi}{2}+\tan^{-1}(\Lambda_i)\biggr] + \Lambda_i + \frac{2}{3} \cdot \eta_i \biggr\}
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=~</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~ -\biggl( \frac{3^8}{2^5\pi} \biggr)^{1/2}  \biggl[ \frac{\ell_i}{(1+\ell_i^2)} \biggr]^{3}
\biggl[4\mathfrak{K}_i + \frac{8}{3} \biggr]
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~\biggl[ \frac{S_\mathrm{core}}{E_\mathrm{norm}}\biggr]_\mathrm{eq}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=~</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~ \frac{1}{2} \biggl( \frac{3^8}{2^5\pi} \biggr)^{1/2} \biggl[ \ell_i (\ell_i^4 - 1 )(1+\ell_i^2)^{-3}  + \tan^{-1}(\ell_i) \biggr] </math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=~</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~ \frac{1}{2} \biggl( \frac{3^8}{2^5\pi} \biggr)^{1/2} \biggl[ \frac{\ell_i}{(1+\ell_i^2)} \biggr]^{3}\mathfrak{L}_i  </math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~\biggl[\frac{S_\mathrm{env}}{E_\mathrm{norm}} \biggr]_\mathrm{eq}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=~</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~ ~\frac{1}{2} \biggl( \frac{3^2}{2\pi} \biggr)^{1/2} \biggl( \frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c} \biggr)^{-3} \eta_i^2 
\biggl\{  (1 + \Lambda_i^2)\biggl[\frac{\pi}{2} + \tan^{-1}(\Lambda_i) \biggr] + \Lambda_i \biggr\} </math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=~</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~ ~\frac{1}{2} \biggl( \frac{3^8}{2^5\pi} \biggr)^{1/2} \biggl[ \frac{\ell_i}{(1+\ell_i^2)} \biggr]^{3}  (4\mathfrak{K}_i) \, ,
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
we have the streamlined,
<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~\biggl( \frac{2^5\pi}{3^6} \biggr)^{1/2} \biggl[ \frac{(1+\ell_i^2)}{\ell_i} \biggr]^{3}  \biggl[\frac{\mathfrak{G}}{E_\mathrm{norm}} \biggr]</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~
+\Chi^{-3/5} (5 \mathfrak{L}_i)
+\Chi^{-3} (4\mathfrak{K}_i)
-\Chi^{-1} (3\mathfrak{L}_i  +12\mathfrak{K}_i )
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
or, better yet,
<div align="center" id="BiPolytropeFreeEnergy">
<table border="1" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
<th align="center">
<font size="+1">Out-of-Equilibrium, Free-Energy Expression for BiPolytropes with</font> <math>~(n_c, n_e) = (5, 1)</math>
</th>
</tr>
<tr><td align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~2^4\biggl( \frac{q\ell_i^2}{\nu^2}\biggr) \chi_\mathrm{eq} \biggl[\frac{\mathfrak{G}}{E_\mathrm{norm}} \biggr]</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~
\Chi^{-3/5} (5 \mathfrak{L}_i)
+\Chi^{-3} (4\mathfrak{K}_i)
-\Chi^{-1} (3\mathfrak{L}_i  +12\mathfrak{K}_i )
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
</td></tr>
</table>
</div>
where,
<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~\mathfrak{L}_i</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~\equiv</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~\frac{(\ell_i^4-1)}{\ell_i^2} + \frac{(1+\ell_i^2)^3}{\ell_i^3} \cdot \tan^{-1}\ell_i \, ,</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~\mathfrak{K}_i</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~\equiv</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~\frac{\Lambda_i}{\eta_i}  + \frac{(1+\Lambda_i^2)}{\eta_i} \biggl[\frac{\pi}{2} + \tan^{-1}\Lambda_i\biggr] \, ,</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~\Lambda_i</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~\equiv</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~\frac{1}{\eta_i} - \ell_i \, ,</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~\eta_i</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~3 \biggl( \frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c} \biggr) \biggl[\frac{\ell_i }{(1+\ell_i^2)}\biggr] \, .</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
From the [[SSC/Structure/BiPolytropes/Analytic51#Parameter_Values|accompanying Table 1 parameter values]], we also can write,
<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~\frac{1}{q}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~\frac{\eta_s}{\eta_i}
= 1 + \frac{1}{\eta_i}\biggl[\frac{\pi}{2} + \tan^{-1}\Lambda_i \biggr] \, ,</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~\nu</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~
\frac{\ell_i q}{(1+\Lambda_i^2)^{1/2}} \, .
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
<div align="center">
<table border="1" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr><td align="center">Radial Derivatives</td></tr>
<tr><td align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~\frac{\partial \mathfrak{G}^*}{\partial \Chi}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~
-\Chi^{-8/5} (3 \mathfrak{L}_i)
-\Chi^{-4} (12\mathfrak{K}_i)
+\Chi^{-2} (3\mathfrak{L}_i  +12\mathfrak{K}_i )
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~\frac{\partial^2 \mathfrak{G}^*}{\partial \Chi^2}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~\frac{3}{5}\biggl[
\Chi^{-13/5} (8\mathfrak{L}_i)
+\Chi^{-5} (80\mathfrak{K}_i)
-\Chi^{-1} (10\mathfrak{L}_i  +40\mathfrak{K}_i )\biggr]
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
</td></tr>
</table>
</div>
Consistent with our [[SSC/BipolytropeGeneralization#Free_Energy_and_Its_Derivatives|generic discussion of the stability of bipolytropes]] and the ''specific'' discussion of [[SSC/Structure/BiPolytropes/Analytic51#Stability_Condition|the stability of bipolytropes having]] <math>~(n_c, n_e) = (5, 1)</math>, it can straightforwardly be shown that <math>~\partial \mathfrak{G}/\partial \chi = 0</math> is satisfied by setting <math>~\Chi = 1</math>; that is, the equilibrium condition is,
<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~\chi = \chi_\mathrm{eq}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~\biggl(\frac{\pi}{2^3}\biggr)^{1/2} \frac{\nu^2}{q} \cdot \frac{(1+\ell_i^2)^3}{3^3\ell_i^5} \, .</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
Furthermore, the equilibrium configuration is unstable whenever <math>~\partial^2 \mathfrak{G}/\partial \chi^2 < 0</math>, that is, it is unstable whenever,
<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~\frac{ \mathfrak{L}_i}{\mathfrak{K}_i}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~></math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~20 \, .</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
[[SSC/Structure/BiPolytropes/Analytic51#Stability_Condition|Table 1 of an accompanying chapter]] &#8212; and the red-dashed curve in the figure adjacent to that table &#8212; identifies some key properties of the model that marks the transition from stable to unstable configurations along equilibrium sequences that have various values of the mean-molecular weight ratio, <math>~\mu_e/\mu_c</math>.


=See Also=
=See Also=

Revision as of 13:45, 15 October 2023

Background

Index to original, very long chapter

Free-Energy of Bipolytropes

In this case, the Gibbs-like free energy is given by the sum of four separate energies,

𝔊

=

[Wgrav+𝔖therm]core+[Wgrav+𝔖therm]env.

In addition to specifying (generally) separate polytropic indexes for the core, nc, and envelope, ne, and an envelope-to-core mean molecular weight ratio, μe/μc, we will assume that the system is fully defined via specification of the following five physical parameters:

  • Total mass, Mtot;
  • Total radius, R;
  • Interface radius, Ri, and associated dimensionless interface marker, qRi/R;
  • Core mass, Mc, and associated dimensionless mass fraction, νMc/Mtot;
  • Polytropic constant in the core, Kc.

In general, the warped free-energy surface drapes across a five-dimensional parameter "plane" such that,

𝔊

=

𝔊(R,Kc,Mtot,q,ν).

Order of Magnitude Derivation

Let's begin by providing very rough, approximate expressions for each of these four terms, assuming that nc=5 and ne=1.

Wgrav|core

𝔞c[GMtotMc(Ri/2)]=2𝔞c[GMtot2R(νq)];

Wgrav|env

𝔞e[GMtotMe(Ri+R)/2]=2𝔞e[GMtot2R(1ν1+q)];

𝔖therm|core=Uint|core

𝔟cncKcMc(ρ¯c)1/nc=5𝔟cKcMtotν[3Mc4πRi3]1/5

 

=

𝔟c(35522π)1/5Kc(Mtotν)6/5(Rq)3/5;

𝔖therm|env=Uint|env

𝔟eneKeMenv(ρ¯e)1/ne=𝔟eKeMtot(1ν)[3Menv4π(R3Ri3)]

 

=

𝔟e(322π)Ke[Mtot(1ν)]2[R3(1q3)]1.

In writing this last expression, it has been necessary to (temporarily) introduce a sixth physical parameter, namely, the polytropic constant that characterizes the envelope material, Ke. But this constant can be expressed in terms of Kc via a relation that ensures continuity of pressure across the interface while taking into account the drop in mean molecular weight across the interface, that is,

Ke(ρ¯e)(ne+1)/ne

Kc(ρ¯c)(nc+1)/nc

Ke[(μeμc)ρ¯c]2

Kc(ρ¯c)6/5

KeKc(μeμc)2

[3Mtotν4π(Rq)3]4/5.

Hence, the fourth energy term may be rewritten in the form,

𝔖therm|env=Uint|env

𝔟e(322π)(μeμc)2Kc[3Mtotν4π(Rq)3]4/5[Mtot(1ν)]2[R3(1q3)]1

 

=

𝔟e(322π)1/5(μeμc)2KcMtot6/5R3/5[q3ν]4/5(1ν)2(1q3).

Putting all the terms together gives,

𝔊

2𝔞c[GMtot2R(νq)]2𝔞e[GMtot2R(1ν1+q)]+𝔟c(35522π)1/5Kc(Mtotν)6/5(Rq)3/5

 

 

+𝔟e(322π)1/5(μeμc)2KcMtot6/5R3/5[q3ν]4/5(1ν)2(1q3)

 

=

2𝒜biP[GMtot2R]+biPKc[(νMtot)2qR]3/5

𝔊Enorm

=

2𝒜biP[GMtot2R](G3Kc5)1/2+biP(ν2q)3/5Kc[Mtot2R]3/5(G3Kc5)1/2

 

=

2𝒜biP[RnormR]+biP(ν2q)3/5[RnormR]3/5,

where,

𝒜biP

[𝔞c(νq)+𝔞e(1ν1+q)],

biP

(322π)1/5[5𝔟c+𝔟e(μeμc)2q3(1ν)2ν2(1q3)].

Equilibrium Radius

Order of Magnitude Estimate

This means that,

𝔊R

=

+2𝒜biP[GMtot2R2]35biPKc[ν2q]3/5Mtot6/5R8/5.

Hence, because equilibrium radii are identified by setting 𝔊/R=0, we have,

ReqRnorm

=

(253)5/2[𝒜biPbiP]5/2(qν2)3/2.

Reconcile With Known Analytic Expression

From our earlier derivations, it appears as though,

χeqReqRnorm

=

(3825π)1/2(324)(qi)5(νq3)2(1+i2)3

 

=

(253)5/2(qν2)3/2[(π28355)1/2(ν2q)5/2(1+i2)3i5].

This implies that,

𝒜biPbiP

[(π28355)1/2(ν2q)5/2(1+i2)3i5]2/5

 

=

(ν2q)(π28355)1/5(1+i2)6/5i2

[𝔞c(νq)+𝔞e(1ν1+q)]

1225(ν2q)(1+i2)6/5i2[5𝔟c+𝔟e(μeμc)2q3(1ν)2ν2(1q3)]

[𝔞c+𝔞eq(1ν)ν(1+q)]

ν225(1+i2)6/5i2[5𝔟c+𝔟e(μeμc)2q3(1ν)2ν2(1q3)]

Focus on Five-One Free-Energy Expression

Approximate Expressions

Let's plug this equilibrium radius back into each term of the free-energy expression.

WgravEnorm|core

2𝔞c(G3Kc5)1/2[GMtot2Req(νq)]

 

=

2𝔞c(νq)[RnormReq];

WgravEnorm|env

2𝔞e(G3Kc5)1/2[GMtot2Req(1ν1+q)]

 

=

2𝔞e(1ν1+q)[RnormReq];

ScoreEnorm=[3(γc1)2]UintEnorm|core

[325]𝔟c(35522π)1/5(G3Kc5)1/2Kc(Mtotν)6/5(Reqq)3/5

 

=

[325]𝔟c(35522π)1/5(ν2q)3/5(RnormReq)3/5;

SenvEnorm=[3(γe1)2]UintEnorm|env

[32]𝔟e(322π)1/5(μeμc)2(G3Kc5)1/2KcMtot6/5Req3/5[q3ν]4/5(1ν)2(1q3)

 

=

[32]𝔟e(322π)1/5(μeμc)2[q3ν]4/5(1ν)2(1q3)(RnormReq)3/5.

From Detailed Force-Balance Models

In the following derivations, we will use the expression,

χeqReqRnorm

=

(μeμc)3(π23)1/21A2ηs=(π23)1/2ν2q(1+i2)333i5.

Keep in mind, as well — as derived in an accompanying discussion — that,

νMcoreMtot

=

(m32i3)(1+i2)1/2[1+(1m3)2i2]1/2[m3i+(1+i2)(π2+tan1Λi)]1,

where,

m33(μeμc).

From the accompanying Table 1 parameter values, we also can write,

q

=

ηiηs=ηi{π2+ηi+tan1[1ηii]}1

 

=

ηi{ηi+cot1[i1ηi]}1,

where,

ηi

=

m3[i(1+i2)].

Let's also define the following shorthand notation:

𝔏i

(i41)i2+(1+i2)3i3tan1i;

𝔎i

(1+Λi2)ηi[π2+tan1Λi]+Λiηi.


Gravitational Potential Energy of the Core

Pulling from our detailed derivations,

[WcoreEnorm]eq

=

(3825π)1/2[i(i483i21)(1+i2)3+tan1(i)].

χeq[WcoreEnorm]eq

=

(3825π)1/2[i(i483i21)(1+i2)3+tan1(i)](π23)1/2ν2q(1+i2)333i5

 

=

(324)ν2q1i5[i(i483i21)+(1+i2)3tan1(i)]

Out of equilibrium, then, we should expect,

WcoreEnorm

=

χ1(324)ν2q1i5[i(i483i21)+(1+i2)3tan1(i)]

 

=

χ1(324)ν2q1i2[𝔏i83],

which, in comparison with our above approximate expression, implies,

𝔞c

=

(325)νi5[i(i483i21)+(1+i2)3tan1(i)].

Thermal Energy of the Core

Again, pulling from our detailed derivations,

[ScoreEnorm]eq

=

12(3825π)1/2[i(i41)(1+i2)3+tan1(i)]

χeq3[ScoreEnorm]eq5

=

125(3825π)5/2[i(i41)(1+i2)3+tan1(i)]5[(π23)1/2ν2q(1+i2)333i5]3

 

=

1π(322)11(ν2q)3[i(i41)(1+i2)3+tan1(i)]5[(1+i2)9i15].

Out of equilibrium, we should then expect,

ScoreEnorm

=

(322π)1/5[χ1(ν2q)1(1+i2)2]3/5(322)2𝔏i.

In comparison with our above approximate expression, we therefore have,

[(325)𝔟c(35522π)1/5(ν2q)3/5]5

=

1π(322)11(ν2q)3[i(i41)(1+i2)3+tan1(i)]5[(1+i2)9i15]

𝔟c

=

323i3(1+i2)6/5[i(i41)+(1+i2)3tan1(i)].


Gravitational Potential Energy of the Envelope

Again, pulling from our detailed derivations and appreciating, in particular, that (see, for example, our notes on equilibrium conditions),

A

=

ηisin(ηiB),

(ηsB)

=

π,

ηiB

=

π2tan1(Λi),

sin(ηiB)=(1+Λi2)1/2

     and    

sin[2(ηiB)]=2Λi(1+Λi2)1 ,

we have,

[WenvEnorm]eq

=

(123π)1/2(μeμc)3A2{[6(ηsB)3sin[2(ηsB)]4ηssin2(ηsB)+4B]

 

 

[6(ηiB)3sin[2(ηiB)]4ηisin2(ηiB)+4B]}

 

=

(123π)1/2(μeμc)3[ηisin(ηiB)]2{6π[6(ηiB)3sin[2(ηiB)]4ηisin2(ηiB)]}

 

=

(123π)1/2(μeμc)3ηi2(1+Λi2){6π6[π2tan1(Λi)]+6[Λi(1+Λi2)]+4ηi[1(1+Λi2)]}

 

=

(322π)1/2(μeμc)3ηi2{(1+Λi2)[π2+tan1(Λi)]+Λi+23ηi}.

So, in equilibrium we can write,

χeq[WenvEnorm]eq

=

(322π)1/2(μeμc)3ηi2{(1+Λi2)[π2+tan1(Λi)]+Λi+23ηi}(π23)1/2ν2q(1+i2)333i5

 

=

322(ηim3)3{(1+Λi2)ηi[π2+tan1(Λi)]+Λiηi+23}ν2q(1+i2)3i5

 

=

322(ν2q)1i2{(1+Λi2)ηi[π2+tan1(Λi)]+Λiηi+23}.

And out of equilibrium,

WenvEnorm

=

χ1322(ν2q)1i2[𝔎i+23].

This, in turn, implies that both in and out of equilibrium,

𝔞e

=

323[ν2(1+q)q(1ν)]1i2{(1+Λi2)ηi[π2+tan1(Λi)]+Λiηi+23}.

Thermal Energy of the Envelope

Again, pulling from our detailed derivations,

[SenvEnorm]eq

=

(125π)1/2(μeμc)3A2{[6(ηsB)3sin[2(ηsB)]][6(ηiB)3sin[2(ηiB)]]}

 

=

(125π)1/2(μeμc)3[ηisin(ηiB)]2{6π6(ηiB)+3sin[2(ηiB)]}

 

=

(125π)1/2(μeμc)3ηi2(1+Λi2){6[π2+tan1(Λi)]+6[Λi(1+Λi2)1]}

 

=

12(322π)1/2(μeμc)3ηi2{(1+Λi2)[π2+tan1(Λi)]+Λi}.

So, in equilibrium we can write,

χeq3[SenvEnorm]eq

=

12(322π)1/2(μeμc)3ηi2{(1+Λi2)[π2+tan1(Λi)]+Λi}[(π23)1/2ν2q(1+i2)333i5]3

 

=

(ν2q)3(32π2212)1/2(μeμc)3ηi3{(1+Λi2)ηi[π2+tan1(Λi)]+Λiηi}[(1+i2)939i15]

 

=

(ν2q)3(π2635)[(1+i2)6i12]{(1+Λi2)ηi[π2+tan1(Λi)]+Λiηi}.

And, out of equilibrium,

[SenvEnorm]eq

=

χ3(ν2q)3(π2635)[(1+i2)6i12]𝔎.

Combined in Equilibrium

Notice that, in combination,

[2Senv+WenvEnorm]eq

=

23(322π)1/2(μeμc)3ηi3

 

=

23(322π)1/2(μeμc)3[3(μeμc)i(1+i2)1]3

 

=

(236π)1/2[i3(1+i2)3].

Also, from above,

[2Score+WcoreEnorm]eq

=

(3825π)1/2[i(83i2)(1+i2)3]

 

=

+(236π)1/2[i3(1+i2)3].

So, in equilibrium, these terms from the core and envelope sum to zero, as they should.

Out of Equilibrium

And now, in combination out of equilibrium,

𝔊Enorm

=

(χχeq)1{[WcoreEnorm]eq+[WenvEnorm]eq}+(χχeq)3/5(2nc3)[ScoreEnorm]eq+(χχeq)3(2ne3)[SenvEnorm]eq.

Hence, quite generally out of equilibrium,

χ[𝔊Enorm]

=

χ1(χχeq)1{[WcoreEnorm]eq+[WenvEnorm]eq}35χ1(χχeq)3/5(103)[ScoreEnorm]eq3χ1(χχeq)3(23)[SenvEnorm]eq.

Let's see what the value of this derivative is if the dimensionless radius, χ, is set to the value that has been determined, via a detailed force-balanced analysis, to be the equilibrium radius, namely, χ=χeq. In this case, we have,

{χ[𝔊Enorm]}χχeq

=

χeq1{[WcoreEnorm]eq+[WenvEnorm]eq+2[ScoreEnorm]eq+2[SenvEnorm]eq}.

But, according to the virial theorem — and, as we have just demonstrated — the four terms inside the curly braces sum to zero. So this demonstrates that the derivative of our out-of-equilibrium free-energy expression does go to zero at the equilibrium radius, as it should!

Summary51

In summary, the desired out of equilibrium free-energy expression is,

𝔊Enorm

=

WcoreEnorm+WenvEnorm+(2nc3)ScoreEnorm+(2ne3)SenvEnorm

 

=

χ1(324)ν2q1i2[𝔏i83]χ1322(ν2q)1i2[𝔎i+23]

 

 

+(253)(322π)1/5[χ1(ν2q)1(1+i2)2]3/5(322)2𝔏i+(23)χ3(ν2q)3(π2635)[(1+i2)6i12]𝔎

 

=

(324)[χ1ν2q1i2][𝔏i+4𝔎i]+(322π)1/5(3523)[χ1(ν2q)1(1+i2)2]3/5𝔏i

 

 

+(π2536)[χ1(ν2q)(1+i2)2i4]3𝔎.

Or, in terms of the ratio,

Xχχeq,

and pulling from the above expressions,

[WcoreEnorm]eq

=

(3825π)1/2[i(i483i21)(1+i2)3+tan1(i)]

 

=

(3825π)1/2[i(1+i2)]3[𝔏i83]

[WenvEnorm]eq

=

(322π)1/2(μeμc)3ηi2{(1+Λi2)[π2+tan1(Λi)]+Λi+23ηi}

 

=

(3825π)1/2[i(1+i2)]3[4𝔎i+83]

[ScoreEnorm]eq

=

12(3825π)1/2[i(i41)(1+i2)3+tan1(i)]

 

=

12(3825π)1/2[i(1+i2)]3𝔏i

[SenvEnorm]eq

=

12(322π)1/2(μeμc)3ηi2{(1+Λi2)[π2+tan1(Λi)]+Λi}

 

=

12(3825π)1/2[i(1+i2)]3(4𝔎i),

we have the streamlined,

(25π36)1/2[(1+i2)i]3[𝔊Enorm]

=

+X3/5(5𝔏i)+X3(4𝔎i)X1(3𝔏i+12𝔎i)

or, better yet,

Out-of-Equilibrium, Free-Energy Expression for BiPolytropes with (nc,ne)=(5,1)

24(qi2ν2)χeq[𝔊Enorm]

=

X3/5(5𝔏i)+X3(4𝔎i)X1(3𝔏i+12𝔎i)


where,

𝔏i

(i41)i2+(1+i2)3i3tan1i,

𝔎i

Λiηi+(1+Λi2)ηi[π2+tan1Λi],

Λi

1ηii,

ηi

=

3(μeμc)[i(1+i2)].

From the accompanying Table 1 parameter values, we also can write,

1q

=

ηsηi=1+1ηi[π2+tan1Λi],

ν

=

iq(1+Λi2)1/2.

Radial Derivatives

𝔊*X

=

X8/5(3𝔏i)X4(12𝔎i)+X2(3𝔏i+12𝔎i)

2𝔊*X2

=

35[X13/5(8𝔏i)+X5(80𝔎i)X1(10𝔏i+40𝔎i)]

Consistent with our generic discussion of the stability of bipolytropes and the specific discussion of the stability of bipolytropes having (nc,ne)=(5,1), it can straightforwardly be shown that 𝔊/χ=0 is satisfied by setting X=1; that is, the equilibrium condition is,

χ=χeq

=

(π23)1/2ν2q(1+i2)333i5.

Furthermore, the equilibrium configuration is unstable whenever 2𝔊/χ2<0, that is, it is unstable whenever,

𝔏i𝔎i

>

20.

Table 1 of an accompanying chapter — and the red-dashed curve in the figure adjacent to that table — identifies some key properties of the model that marks the transition from stable to unstable configurations along equilibrium sequences that have various values of the mean-molecular weight ratio, μe/μc.

See Also

Tiled Menu

Appendices: | VisTrailsEquations | VisTrailsVariables | References | Ramblings | VisTrailsImages | myphys.lsu | ADS |