SSC/Structure/BiPolytropes/51RenormaizePart3: Difference between revisions
| Line 789: | Line 789: | ||
==Yabushita75 Plot== | ==Yabushita75 Plot== | ||
===Specify Desired Abscissa and Ordinate=== | |||
Here our desire is to generate a plot that is analogous to the one that appears as Fig. 1 (p. 445) of {{ Yabushita75 }}. We need to plot the core mass versus the central density, and the total mass versus central density where, | Here our desire is to generate a plot that is analogous to the one that appears as Fig. 1 (p. 445) of {{ Yabushita75 }}. We need to plot the core mass versus the central density, and the total mass versus central density where, | ||
| Line 879: | Line 881: | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
</table> | </table> | ||
===Compare with Earlier Derivation=== | |||
From our [[SSC/Structure/BiPolytropes/Analytic51#Parameter_Values|earlier derivation]], we know that, | |||
<table border="0" cellpadding="3" align="center"> | |||
<tr> | |||
<td align="right"> | |||
<math>\nu \equiv \frac{M_\mathrm{core}}{M_\mathrm{tot}}</math> | |||
</td> | |||
<td align="center"> | |||
<math>=</math> | |||
</td> | |||
<td align="left"> | |||
<math> | |||
\sqrt{3} \biggl(\frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c}\biggr)^{2} \biggl[ | |||
\frac{\xi_i^3 \theta_i^4}{A\eta_s} | |||
\biggr] | |||
</math> | |||
</td> | |||
</tr> | |||
<tr> | |||
<td align="right"> | |||
| |||
</td> | |||
<td align="center"> | |||
<math>=</math> | |||
</td> | |||
<td align="left"> | |||
<math> | |||
\sqrt{3} \biggl(\frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c}\biggr)^{2} \biggl[ | |||
\frac{\xi_i^3 \theta_i^4}{\eta_s} | |||
\biggr]\biggl[ | |||
-\eta_s \biggl(\frac{d\phi}{d\eta}\biggr)_s | |||
\biggr]^{-1} | |||
</math> | |||
</td> | |||
</tr> | |||
<tr> | |||
<td align="right"> | |||
| |||
</td> | |||
<td align="center"> | |||
<math>=</math> | |||
</td> | |||
<td align="left"> | |||
<math> | |||
\sqrt{3} \biggl(\frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c}\biggr)^{2} \theta_i\biggl[ | |||
\xi_i^3 \biggl(1 + \frac{1}{3}\xi_i^2\biggr)^{-3 / 2} | |||
\biggr]\biggl[ | |||
-\eta_s^2 \biggl(\frac{d\phi}{d\eta}\biggr)_s | |||
\biggr]^{-1} \, . | |||
</math> | |||
</td> | |||
</tr> | |||
</table> | |||
Also, our [[SSC/Structure/BiPolytropes/Analytic51#Parameter_Values|earlier derivation]] gave, | |||
<table border="0" cellpadding="3" align="center"> | |||
<tr> | |||
<td align="right"> | |||
<math>\frac{\rho_c}{\bar\rho}</math> | |||
</td> | |||
<td align="center"> | |||
<math>=</math> | |||
</td> | |||
<td align="left"> | |||
<math> | |||
\biggl(\frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c}\biggr)^{-1} \biggl[\frac{\eta_s^2}{3A\theta_i^5} \biggr] | |||
</math> | |||
</td> | |||
</tr> | |||
<tr> | |||
<td align="right"> | |||
| |||
</td> | |||
<td align="center"> | |||
<math>=</math> | |||
</td> | |||
<td align="left"> | |||
<math> | |||
\frac{1}{3} \biggl(\frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c}\biggr)^{-1} \biggl(1 + \frac{1}{3}\xi_i^2\biggr)^{5 / 2} \biggl[- \frac{1}{\eta_s}\cdot \biggl(\frac{d\phi}{d\eta}\biggr)_s\biggr]^{-1} | |||
\, . | |||
</math> | |||
</td> | |||
</tr> | |||
</table> | |||
Hooray! These both match our "new normalization" derivation. | |||
=See Also= | =See Also= | ||
Revision as of 18:00, 11 November 2023
BiPolytrope with nc = 5 and ne = 1
After studying 📚 S. Yabushita (1975, MNRAS, Vol. 172, pp. 441 - 453) in depth, here we renormalize our original construction of bipolytropic models with such that both entropy values, , are held fixed along each model sequence.
Original Derivation
Throughout the Core
Drawing from our original derivation, throughout the core …
|
Specify: and |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Throughout the Envelope
|
|
Knowing: and from Step 5 |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interface Conditions
And at the interface …
|
|
Setting , , and |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New Normalization
From one of the interface conditions, we see that,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hence, throughout the core, we have,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
||
And, throughout the envelope …
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
||
| Adopted Normalizations | ||||||||||||||
|
|
Note that the configuration's mean density is,
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
||
Hence, the central-to-mean density of each equilibrium configuration is,
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
||
Yabushita75 Plot
Specify Desired Abscissa and Ordinate
Here our desire is to generate a plot that is analogous to the one that appears as Fig. 1 (p. 445) of 📚 Yabushita (1975). We need to plot the core mass versus the central density, and the total mass versus central density where,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a check against earlier derivations, note as well that,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compare with Earlier Derivation
From our earlier derivation, we know that,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Also, our earlier derivation gave,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hooray! These both match our "new normalization" derivation.
See Also
- M. Gabriel & M. L. Roth (1974, A&A, Vol. 32, p. 309) … On the Secular Stability of Models with an Isothermal Core
- M. Gabriel & P. Ledoux (1967, Annales d'Astrophysique, Vol. 30, p. 975) … Sur la Stabilité Séculaire des Modeéles a Noyaux Isothermes
In § 1 (p. 442) of 📚 Yabushita (1975) we find the following reference: "A somewhat similar problem has been investigated by Gabriel & Ledoux (1967). Gaseous configurations with an isothermal core and polytropic envelope of index 3 were studied by 📚 Henrich & Chandrasekhar (1941) and by 📚 Schönberg & Chandrasekhar (1942). As is well known there is an upper limit (Schönberg-Chandrasekhar limit) to the mass of the core for the configurations to be in hydrostatic equilibria. Gabriel & Ledoux have investigated the stability of these configurations and have shown that secular stability is lost at the configuration that corresponds to the Schönberg-Chandrasekhar limit."
|
Appendices: | VisTrailsEquations | VisTrailsVariables | References | Ramblings | VisTrailsImages | myphys.lsu | ADS | |