ThreeDimensionalConfigurations/JacobiEllipsoids: Difference between revisions

From jetwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Created page with "__FORCETOC__ <!-- will force the creation of a Table of Contents --> <!-- __NOTOC__ will force TOC off --> =Jacobi Ellipsoids= {| class="HNM82" style="float:left; margin-right..."
 
No edit summary
Line 6: Line 6:
! style="height: 125px; width: 125px; background-color:#ffeeee;" |[[H_BookTiledMenu#Three-Dimensional_Configurations|<b>Jacobi<br />Ellipsoids</b>]]
! style="height: 125px; width: 125px; background-color:#ffeeee;" |[[H_BookTiledMenu#Three-Dimensional_Configurations|<b>Jacobi<br />Ellipsoids</b>]]
|}
|}
As has been detailed in an [[ThreeDimensionalConfigurations/HomogeneousEllipsoids#Gravitational_Potential|accompanying chapter]], the gravitational potential anywhere inside or on the surface, <math>~(a_1,a_2,a_3) ~\leftrightarrow~(a,b,c)</math>, of an homogeneous ellipsoid may be given analytically in terms of the following three coefficient expressions:
<div align="center">
<table align="center" border=0 cellpadding="3">
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>
~A_1
</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>
~=
</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~2\biggl(\frac{b}{a}\biggr)\biggl(\frac{c}{a}\biggr)
\biggl[  \frac{F(\theta,k) - E(\theta,k)}{k^2 \sin^3\theta} \biggr] \, ,
</math>
  </td>
</tr>


Our focus, here, is on the pioneering work of [http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1893RSPTA.184...43D F. W. Dyson (1893a, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. A., 184, 43 - 95)] and [http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1893RSPTA.184.1041D (1893b, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. A., 184, 1041 - 1106)]. He used analytic techniques to determine the approximate equilibrium structure of axisymmetric, uniformly rotating, incompressible tori.
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>
~A_3
</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>
~=
</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
~2\biggl(\frac{b}{a}\biggr) \biggl[  \frac{(b/a) \sin\theta - (c/a)E(\theta,k)}{(1-k^2) \sin^3\theta} \biggr] \, ,
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
 
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>
~A_2
</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>
~=
</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~2 - (A_1+A_3) \, ,</math>
  </td>
</tr>
 
</table>
</div>
where, <math>~F(\theta,k)</math> and <math>~E(\theta,k)</math> are incomplete elliptic integrals of the first and second kind, respectively, with arguments,
<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
 
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~\theta = \cos^{-1} \biggl(\frac{c}{a} \biggr)</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; and &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~k = \biggl[\frac{1 - (b/a)^2}{1 - (c/a)^2} \biggr]^{1/2} \, .</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr><td align="center" colspan="3">[<b>[[Appendix/References#EFE|EFE]]</b>], <font color="#00CC00">Chapter 3, &sect;17, Eq. (32)</font></td></tr>
</table>
</div>
 
==Equilibrium Conditions for Jacobi Ellipsoids==
Pulling from Chapter 6 &#8212; specifically, &sect;39 &#8212; of [[Appendix/References#EFE|Chandrasekhar's EFE]], we understand that the semi-axis ratios, <math>~(\tfrac{b}{a},\tfrac{c}{a})</math> associated with Jacobi ellipsoids are given by the roots of the equation,
<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
 
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~a^2 b^2 A_{12}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~c^2 A_3 \, ,</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr><td align="center" colspan="3">[<b>[[Appendix/References#EFE|EFE]]</b>], <font color="#00CC00">&sect;39, Eq. (4)</font> </td></tr>
</table>
</div>
and the associated value of the square of the equilibrium configuration's angular velocity is,
<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
 
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~\frac{\Omega^2}{\pi G \rho}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~2B_{12} \, ,</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr><td align="center" colspan="3">[<b>[[Appendix/References#EFE|EFE]]</b>], <font color="#00CC00">&sect;39, Eq. (5)</font> </td></tr>
</table>
</div>
where,
<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~A_{12}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~\equiv</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~-\frac{A_1-A_2}{(a^2 - b^2)} \, ,</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr><td align="center" colspan="3">[<b>[[Appendix/References#EFE|EFE]]</b>], <font color="#00CC00">&sect;21, Eq. (107)</font></td></tr>
 
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~B_{12}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~\equiv</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~A_2 - a^2A_{12} \, .</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr><td align="center" colspan="3">[<b>[[Appendix/References#EFE|EFE]]</b>], <font color="#00CC00">&sect;21, Eq. (105)</font></td></tr>
</table>
</div>
 
 
Taken together, we see that, written in terms of the two primary coefficients, <math>~A_1</math> and <math>~A_3</math>, the pair of defining relations for Jacobi ellipsoids is:
 
 
<div align="center" id="JacobiConstraints">
<table border="1" align="center" cellpadding="8"><tr><td align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~f_J</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~\equiv</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~\biggl(\frac{b}{a}\biggr)^2 \biggl[ \frac{2(1-A_1)-A_3}{1 - (b/a)^2} \biggr]-\biggl(\frac{c}{a}\biggr)^2  A_3 =0 </math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr><td align="center" colspan="3">and</td></tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~\frac{\Omega^2}{\pi G \rho}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~2\biggl\{2 - (A_1+A_3) - \biggl[ \frac{2(1-A_1)-A_3}{1 - (b/a)^2} \biggr] \biggr\}</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
</td></tr>
</table>
</div>
 
==Roots of the Governing Relation==
 
===Constraint on Axis-Ratio Relationship===
To simplify notation, here we will set,
<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
 
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~\chi \equiv \frac{b}{a}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; and &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~\upsilon \equiv \frac{c}{a} \, ,</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
in which case the governing relation is,
<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~f_J</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~\frac{\chi^2}{1-\chi^2} \biggl[ 2(1-A_1)-A_3\biggr]-\upsilon^2  A_3 =0 \, .</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
 
Our plan is to employ the [https://brilliant.org/wiki/newton-raphson-method/ Newton Raphson method] to find the root(s) of the <math>~f_J = 0</math> relation, typically holding <math>~\upsilon</math> fixed and using the Newton-Raphson technique to identify the corresponding "root" value of <math>~\chi</math>.  Using this approach, the [https://brilliant.org/wiki/newton-raphson-method/ Newton Raphson technique] requires specification of, not only the function, <math>~f_J</math>, but also its first derivative,
<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
 
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~f_J^'</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~\frac{df_J}{d\chi} \, .</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
 
Let's determine the requisite expression, using a prime superscript to indicate differentiation with respect to <math>~\chi</math>. 
<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
 
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~f_J^'</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~
\biggl[ 2(1-A_1)-A_3\biggr]\biggl[ \frac{2\chi}{(1-\chi^2)^2} \biggr]
-\frac{\chi^2}{1-\chi^2} \biggl[ 2A_1^'+A_3^'\biggr]
-\upsilon^2  A_3^' \, ,
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
where, given that <math>~\theta</math> does not depend on <math>~\chi</math>,
<div align="center">
<table align="center" border=0 cellpadding="3">
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>
~A_1^'
</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>
~=
</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~\frac{2\upsilon}{\sin^3\theta}  \cdot \frac{d}{d\chi}\biggl\{ \frac{\chi}{k^2} \biggl[ F(\theta,k) - E(\theta,k) \biggr] \biggr\}
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
 
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>
~=
</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~\frac{2\upsilon}{k^3 \sin^3\theta}  \cdot \biggl\{ [ F - E ] [k - 2\chi k^'  ]
+\chi k [ F^' - E^' ]\biggr\} \, ,
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
 
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>
~A_3^'
</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>
~=
</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
~\frac{2}{\sin^3\theta}  \cdot \frac{d}{d\chi}\biggl\{ \frac{\chi}{(1-k^2)} \biggl[  \chi \sin\theta - \upsilon E(\theta,k)\biggr] \biggr\}
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
 
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>
~=
</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
~\frac{2}{(1-k^2)^2\sin^3\theta}  \biggl\{
\biggl[  \chi \sin\theta - \upsilon E\biggr]\biggl[ (1-k^2) +2\chi kk^' \biggr] + \chi(1-k^2) \biggl[  \sin\theta - \upsilon E^'\biggr]
\biggr\}\, ,
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
 
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~k^'</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~
\frac{d}{d\chi}\biggl[\frac{1 - \chi^2}{1 - \upsilon^2} \biggr]^{1/2} = \frac{-\chi}{(1 - \chi^2)^{1/2}(1 - \upsilon^2)^{1/2}} \, ,
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
 
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~F^'</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~
\frac{\partial F(\theta,k)}{\partial k} \cdot k^' \, ,
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
 
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~E^'</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~
\frac{\partial E(\theta,k)}{\partial k} \cdot k^' \, .
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
 
Now, according to [http://functions.wolfram.com/EllipticIntegrals/EllipticF/introductions/IncompleteEllipticIntegrals/ShowAll.html online WolframResearch documentation] &#8212; see, in particular, the subsection titled, "Representations of Derivatives" &#8212;
<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
 
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~\frac{\partial F(z|m)}{\partial m}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~
\frac{E(z|m)}{2(1-m)m} - \frac{F(z|m)}{2m} - \frac{\sin(2z)}{4(1-m)\sqrt{1-m\sin^2(z)}} \, ,
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
and,
<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
 
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~\frac{\partial E(z|m)}{\partial m}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~\frac{E(z|m) - F(z|m)}{2m} \, ,</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
where, <math>~z~\leftrightarrow~\theta</math>, and,
<div align="center">
<math>~m \equiv k^2 ~~~~\Rightarrow~~~~\frac{dm}{dk} = 2k \ .</math>
</div>
Hence, we have,
 
<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
 
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~F^'</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~
\biggl[\frac{\partial F(z|m)}{\partial m} \cdot \frac{dm}{dk}\biggr] k^'
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
 
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~
\biggl[ \frac{E(\theta,k)}{2(1-k^2)k^2} - \frac{F(\theta,k)}{2k^2} - \frac{\sin(2\theta)}{4(1-k^2)\sqrt{1-k^2\sin^2\theta}} \biggr] 2kk^' \, ,
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
 
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~E^'</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~
\biggl[ \frac{\partial E(z|m)}{\partial m} \cdot \frac{dm}{dk}\biggr] k^'
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
 
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~
\biggl[ E(\theta,k) - F(\theta,k) \biggr] \frac{k^'}{k} \, .
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
This, then, gives us all of the expressions necessary to specify the derivative, <math>~f_J^'</math> analytically.
 
 
 
<table border="1" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
  <th align="center" colspan="1">
<font size="+1">Table 1:&nbsp; Double-Precision Evaluations</font><p></p>
Related to Table IV in [<b>[[Appendix/References#EFE|EFE]]</b>], <font color="#00CC00">Chapter 6, &sect;39 (p. 103)</font>
</th>
</tr>
<tr><td align="left">
<pre>
        b/a      c/a            omega2              angmom              5L/M                fJ              fJderiv
 
        1.00  0.582724    3.742297785D-01    3.037510987D-01    4.232965627D+00    0.000000000D+00    0.000000000D+00
        0.96  0.570801    3.739782202D-01    3.039551227D-01    4.235808832D+00    1.377942479D-06    1.636908401D-01
        0.92  0.558330    3.731876801D-01    3.046006837D-01    4.244805137D+00    -6.821687132D-07    1.676406830D-01
        0.88  0.545263    3.717835971D-01    3.057488283D-01    4.260805266D+00    8.533280272D-07    1.715558312D-01
        0.84  0.531574    3.696959199D-01    3.074667323D-01    4.284745355D+00    -4.622993727D-08    1.754024874D-01
        0.80  0.517216    3.668370069D-01    3.098368632D-01    4.317774645D+00    2.805300664D-08    1.791408327D-01
        0.76  0.502147    3.631138118D-01    3.129555079D-01    4.361234951D+00    3.221800126D-07    1.827219476D-01
        0.72  0.486322    3.584232032D-01    3.169377270D-01    4.416729718D+00    3.274773094D-08    1.860866255D-01
        0.68  0.469689    3.526490289D-01    3.219229588D-01    4.486202108D+00    1.202999164D-08    1.891636215D-01
        0.64  0.452194    3.456641138D-01    3.280805511D-01    4.572012092D+00    2.681560312D-07    1.918668912D-01
        0.60  0.433781    3.373298891D-01    3.356184007D-01    4.677056841D+00    1.037186290D-08    1.940927000D-01
        0.56  0.414386    3.274928085D-01    3.447962894D-01    4.804956583D+00    1.071021385D-07    1.957166395D-01
        0.52  0.393944    3.159887358D-01    3.559412795D-01    4.960269141D+00    8.098003093D-08    1.965890756D-01
        0.48  0.372384    3.026414267D-01    3.694732246D-01    5.148845443D+00    1.255768368D-07    1.965308751D-01
        0.44  0.349632    2.872670174D-01    3.859399647D-01    5.378319986D+00    1.329168636D-08    1.953277019D-01
        0.40  0.325609    2.696779847D-01    4.060726774D-01    5.658882201D+00    -9.783004411D-08    1.927241063D-01
        0.36  0.300232    2.496925963D-01    4.308722159D-01    6.004479614D+00    1.044268276D-07    1.884168286D-01
        0.32  0.273419    2.271530240D-01    4.617497270D-01    6.434777459D+00    -4.469279448D-08    1.820477545D-01
        0.28  0.245083    2.019461513D-01    5.007767426D-01    6.978643856D+00    7.996820889D-08    1.731984783D-01
        0.24  0.215143    1.740514751D-01    5.511400218D-01    7.680488329D+00    1.099319693D-07    1.613864645D-01
        0.20  0.183524    1.436093757D-01    6.180687545D-01    8.613182979D+00    5.068010978D-08    1.460685065D-01
        0.16  0.150166    1.110438660D-01    7.109267615D-01    9.907218635D+00    -2.170751250D-08    1.266576761D-01
        0.12  0.115038    7.728058393D-02    8.487699974D-01    1.182815219D+01    3.613784147D-09    1.025686850D-01
        0.08  0.078166    4.416740942D-02    1.079303624D+00    1.504078558D+01    3.319018649D-08    7.332782508D-02
        0.04  0.039688    1.541513490D-02    1.582762691D+00    2.205680933D+01    -6.674246644D-09    3.882477311D-02
</pre>
</td></tr>
</table>
 
<span id="Table2"><b>With regard to our Table 1 (immediately above):</b></span>  Given each pair of axis ratios, <math>~(\tfrac{b}{a},\tfrac{c}{a})</math> &#8212; copied from Table IV of EFE (see columns 1 and 2 of our Table 1) &#8212; and the corresponding coefficient values, <math>~A_1</math>, <math>~A_2</math>, and <math>~A_3</math>, as tabulated in [[ThreeDimensionalConfigurations/HomogeneousEllipsoids#Table2|Table 2 of our accompanying discussion]], we calculated corresponding values of <math>~\Omega^2</math> (column 3) and total angular momentum (column 4) in the units used in EFE's Table IV, as well as  (column 5) the total angular momentum in units used by [http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1995ApJ...446..472C Christodoulou, ''et al.'' (1995, ApJ, 446, 472)] &#8212; see [[ThreeDimensionalConfigurations/HomogeneousEllipsoids#Example_Evaluations|our related discussion of these physical quantities]].  We also have tabulated associated values of the function, <math>~f_J</math>, (column 6) and its first derivative, <math>~f_J^'</math>, (column 7) as defined immediately above.  Notice that <math>~f_J</math> is very nearly zero in all cases, which indicates that each axis-ratio pair indeed identifies a configuration that lies along the Jacobi sequence.
 
<table border="1" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
  <th align="center" colspan="1">
<font size="+1">Table 2:&nbsp; Jacobi Sequence</font>
</th>
</tr>
<tr><td align="left">
<pre>
  b/a      c/a        A1        A2        A3      omega2      a      5L/M
 
  0.990699  0.580000  0.512818  0.518962  0.968220  0.374217  1.868761  4.233113
  0.901558  0.552381  0.481786  0.549836  0.968378  0.372621  1.960046  4.251259
  0.820783  0.524762  0.450993  0.580215  0.968792  0.368424  2.057217  4.299402
  0.747135  0.497143  0.420459  0.610088  0.969452  0.361716  2.161309  4.377683
  0.679613  0.469524  0.390210  0.639442  0.970348  0.352587  2.273548  4.486951
  0.617393  0.441905  0.360273  0.668258  0.971469  0.341129  2.395412  4.628802
  0.559798  0.414286  0.330684  0.696516  0.972800  0.327439  2.528716  4.805667
  0.506257  0.386667  0.301483  0.724187  0.974329  0.311620  2.675723  5.020964
  0.456291  0.359048  0.272719  0.751241  0.976040  0.293786  2.839307  5.279337
  0.409492  0.331429  0.244450  0.777636  0.977914  0.274062  3.023190  5.587020
  0.365507  0.303810  0.216744  0.803324  0.979931  0.252593  3.232298  5.952388
  0.324034  0.276190  0.189686  0.828246  0.982067  0.229546  3.473314  6.386811
  0.284807  0.248571  0.163376  0.852329  0.984295  0.205118  3.755577  6.906010
  0.247591  0.220952  0.137939  0.875480  0.986581  0.179549  4.092599  7.532311
  0.212179  0.193333  0.113527  0.897587  0.988885  0.153130  4.504785  8.298565
  0.178382  0.165714  0.090333  0.918505  0.991162  0.126229  5.024664  9.255452
  0.146026  0.138095  0.068601  0.938044  0.993355  0.099316  5.707871 10.486253
  0.114948  0.110476  0.048654  0.955953  0.995393  0.073010  6.659169 12.140357
  0.084989  0.082857  0.030927  0.971879  0.997194  0.048162  8.105501 14.522397
  0.055982  0.055238  0.016051  0.985298  0.998651  0.026008 10.663879 18.396951
  0.027738  0.027619  0.005032  0.995331  0.999637  0.008539 16.979084 26.660547
</pre>
</td></tr>
</table>
 
<b>With regard to our Table 2 (immediately above):</b>  Here we specified twenty-one values of the axis ratio, <math>~\tfrac{c}{a}</math>, (column 2) and used our Newton-Raphson-based root finder to identify corresponding values of the companion axis ratio, <math>~\tfrac{b}{a}</math>, (column 1) that satisfies the governing relation, <math>~f_J = 0</math>.
 
===Angular Momentum Constraint===
Alternatively, let's choose a value for the system's total angular momentum, <math>~L > 4.23296</math>, and solve for the axis-ratio pair that identifies that configuration's location along the Jacobi sequence.  We'll adopt the units used by [http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1995ApJ...446..472C Christodoulou ''et al'' (1995)], that is, <math>~G = 1</math>, <math>~\pi \rho = 1</math> and <math>~M = 5</math>, hence,
 
<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
 
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~a^3</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~\frac{3Ma^2}{4\pi(bc)\rho} = \frac{15}{4}\biggl(\frac{b}{a}\biggr)^{-1}  \biggl(\frac{c}{a}\biggr)^{-1}\, .</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
 
Given that the relationship between <math>~L</math> and <math>~\Omega</math> in equilibrium Jacobi ellipsoids is,
<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
 
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~L</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~a^2\biggl[1 + \biggl(\frac{b}{a}\biggr)^2\biggr]\Omega </math>
  </td>
</tr>
 
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~\biggl[ \frac{15}{4}\biggl(\frac{b}{a}\biggr)^{-1}  \biggl(\frac{c}{a}\biggr)^{-1} \biggr]^{2/3}
\biggl[1 + \biggl(\frac{b}{a}\biggr)^2\biggr]\Omega </math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
 
the [[#JacobiConstraints|constraint on <math>~\Omega^2</math> given above]] implies that,
<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
 
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~L^2 \biggl[ \frac{4}{15}\biggl(\frac{b}{a}\biggr)  \biggl(\frac{c}{a}\biggr) \biggr]^{4/3}
\biggl[1 + \biggl(\frac{b}{a}\biggr)^2\biggr]^{-2}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~2\biggl\{2 - (A_1+A_3) - \biggl[ \frac{2(1-A_1)-A_3}{1 - (b/a)^2} \biggr] \biggr\} \, .</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
Or, again adopting the shorthand notation,
<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
 
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~\chi \equiv \frac{b}{a}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; and &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~\upsilon \equiv \frac{c}{a} \, ,</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
 
we seek roots of the function,
<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
 
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~f_L</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~\equiv</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~L^2  - \biggl[ \frac{3^4\cdot 5^4}{2^5}  \biggr]^{1/3}\chi^{-4/3} \upsilon^{-4/3}(1 + \chi^2)^{2}
\biggl\{[2 - (A_1+A_3)] - \biggl[ 2(1-A_1)-A_3\biggr](1-\chi^2)^{-1} \biggr\} = 0 \, .</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
 
As [[#Constraint_on_Axis-Ratio_Relationship|above]], we will hold <math>~\upsilon</math> fixed and use the Newton-Raphson technique to identify the corresponding "root" value of <math>~\chi</math>. Hence, we need to specify, not only the function, <math>~f_L</math>, but also its first derivative,
<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
 
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~f_L^'</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~\equiv</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~\frac{\partial f_L}{\partial \chi} \, .</math>
  </td>
</tr>
 
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~- \biggl[ \frac{3^4\cdot 5^4}{2^5}  \biggr]^{1/3}\upsilon^{-4/3} \frac{\partial}{\partial \chi} \biggl\{
\chi^{-4/3} (1 + \chi^2)^{2}
[2 - (A_1+A_3)]
- \chi^{-4/3} (1 + \chi^2)^{2}(1-\chi^2)^{-1}[ 2(1-A_1)-A_3]
\biggr\}</math>
  </td>
</tr>
 
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~- \biggl[ \frac{3^4\cdot 5^4}{2^5}  \biggr]^{1/3}\upsilon^{-4/3} \biggl\{
-\frac{4}{3}\chi^{-7/3} (1 + \chi^2)^{2}[2 - (A_1+A_3)]
+4\chi^{-1/3} (1 + \chi^2)[2 - (A_1+A_3)]
-\chi^{-4/3} (1 + \chi^2)^{2}(A_1^'+A_3^')
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
 
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~
+ \frac{4}{3} \chi^{-7/3} (1 + \chi^2)^{2}(1-\chi^2)^{-1}[ 2(1-A_1)-A_3]
- 4\chi^{-1/3} (1 + \chi^2)(1-\chi^2)^{-1}[ 2(1-A_1)-A_3]
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
 
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~
- 2 \chi^{-1/3} (1 + \chi^2)^{2}(1-\chi^2)^{-2}[ 2(1-A_1)-A_3]
- \chi^{-4/3} (1 + \chi^2)^{2}(1-\chi^2)^{-1}[ -2A_1^'-A_3^']
\biggr\}</math>
  </td>
</tr>
 
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~- \biggl[ \frac{3\cdot 5^4}{2^5} \biggr]^{1/3}\upsilon^{-4/3} \chi^{-7/3} (1 + \chi^2)\biggl\{
[12\chi^2-4(1 + \chi^2)][2 - (A_1+A_3)]
-3\chi (1 + \chi^2)(A_1^'+A_3^')
+ 3\chi (1 + \chi^2)(1-\chi^2)^{-1}[ 2A_1^' + A_3^']
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
 
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~
+ (1-\chi^2)^{-2}\{ 4  (1 + \chi^2)(1-\chi^2)[ 2(1-A_1)-A_3]
- 12\chi^{2} (1-\chi^2)[ 2(1-A_1)-A_3]
- 6 \chi^{2} (1 + \chi^2)[ 2(1-A_1)-A_3] \}
\biggr\}
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
 
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~- \biggl[ \frac{3\cdot 5^4}{2^5} \biggr]^{1/3}\upsilon^{-4/3} \chi^{-7/3} (1 + \chi^2)\biggl\{
[8\chi^2-4]A_1
+ 3\chi (1 + \chi^2)(1-\chi^2)^{-1} [ (1+\chi^2)A_1^' + \chi^2A_3^' ]
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
 
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~
+ 2(1-\chi^2)^{-2} [ 2-2A_1-A_3] [ (4\chi^2-2)(1-\chi^2)^{2} +
2  (1 + \chi^2)(1-\chi^2)  - 6\chi^{2} (1-\chi^2) - 3 \chi^{2} (1 + \chi^2)
] \biggr\}
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
 
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~- \biggl[ \frac{3\cdot 5^4}{2^5} \biggr]^{1/3}\upsilon^{-4/3} \chi^{-7/3} (1 + \chi^2)\biggl\{
3\chi (1 + \chi^2)(1-\chi^2)^{-1} [ (1+\chi^2)A_1^' + \chi^2A_3^' ]
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
 
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~+[8\chi^2-4]A_1
+ 2(1-\chi^2)^{-2} [ 2-2A_1-A_3] [ - \chi^2 - 9\chi^4    + 4\chi^6 ] \biggr\}
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<!--
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~
+ 4\chi^2 - 8\chi^4 + 4\chi^6 -2+4\chi^2 - 2\chi^4  + 2  - 2\chi^4  - 6\chi^{2}  + 6\chi^4 - 3 \chi^{2} - 3 \chi^4
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
 
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~-2 + 2
+ 4\chi^2 +4\chi^2  - 6\chi^{2}  - 3 \chi^{2} - 8\chi^4  - 2\chi^4  - 2\chi^4  + 6\chi^4 - 3 \chi^4 + 4\chi^6 
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
 
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~- \chi^2 - 9\chi^4    + 4\chi^6 
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
-->
</table>
</div>
 
 
What values of <math>~L</math> should we choose?  In association with our [[ThreeDimensionalConfigurations/EFE_Energies#Conserve_Only_L|discussion of warped free-energy surfaces]], we'd like to specify the eccentricity, <math>~e</math>, of a Maclaurin spheroid and adopt the angular momentum of ''that'' configuration.  According to our [[Apps/MaclaurinSpheroids#Maclaurin_Spheroids_.28axisymmetric_structure.29|accompanying discussion of the properties of Maclaurin spheroids]],
<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
 
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~L_\mathrm{Mac}^2</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~2^2a^4\Omega^2</math>
  </td>
</tr>
 
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~2^3a^4 [ A_1 -A_3(1-e^2)]_\mathrm{Mac} </math>
  </td>
</tr>
 
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~2^3 \biggl[\frac{3\cdot 5}{2^2}(1-e^2)^{-1/2}  \biggr]^{4/3} [ A_1 -A_3(1-e^2)]_\mathrm{Mac} </math>
  </td>
</tr>
 
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~ [2\cdot 3^4\cdot 5^4]^{1/3} (1-e^2)^{-2/3}  \biggl\{ \frac{1}{e^2} \biggl[\frac{\sin^{-1}e}{e} - (1-e^2)^{1/2}  \biggr](1-e^2)^{1/2} 
-\frac{2}{e^2} \biggl[(1-e^2)^{-1/2} -\frac{\sin^{-1}e}{e} \biggr](1-e^2)^{3/2}  \biggr\} </math>
  </td>
</tr>
 
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~ [2\cdot 3^4\cdot 5^4]^{1/3} (1-e^2)^{-2/3}  \biggl\{
\frac{1}{e^2} \biggl[\frac{\sin^{-1}e}{e}  \biggr](1-e^2)^{1/2} 
+\frac{2}{e^2} \biggl[\frac{\sin^{-1}e}{e} \biggr](1-e^2)^{3/2} 
-\frac{1}{e^2} \biggl[ (1-e^2)^{1/2}  \biggr](1-e^2)^{1/2} 
-\frac{2}{e^2} \biggl[(1-e^2)^{-1/2}  \biggr](1-e^2)^{3/2} 
\biggr\} </math>
  </td>
</tr>
 
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~ [2\cdot 3^4\cdot 5^4]^{1/3} (1-e^2)^{-2/3}  \biggl\{
\frac{1}{e^2} \biggl[\frac{\sin^{-1}e}{e}  \biggr](1-e^2)^{1/2}  \biggl[3-2e^2\biggr]
-\frac{3(1-e^2)}{e^2} 
\biggr\} </math>
  </td>
</tr>
 
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~ [2\cdot 3^4\cdot 5^4]^{1/3} \frac{(1-e^2)^{1/3} }{e^2} \biggl\{
\biggl[\frac{\sin^{-1}e}{e}  \biggr](1-e^2)^{-1/2}  \biggl[3-2e^2\biggr] - 3 
\biggr\} \, . </math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
 
Note, for example, that if <math>~e = 0.85</math>, the square-root of this expression gives, <math>~L_\mathrm{Mac} = 4.7148806</math>, which matches the angular momentum that was used by [http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1995ApJ...446..472C Christodoulou ''et al'' (1995)] to generate their Figure 3.
 
==Sequence Plots==
 
<div align="center">
<table border="1" cellpadding="5" width="80%">
<tr>
<td align="left">Jacobi Sequence: (blue) Points defined by data in Table IV of [<b>[[Appendix/References#EFE|EFE]]</b>], <font color="#00CC00">Chapter 6, &sect;39 (p. 103)</font>; (red) points generated here from [[#Roots_of_the_Governing_Relation|above-defined roots of the governing relation]].</td>
<td align="center">
Figure 2 extracted<sup>&dagger;</sup> from p. 902 of [http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1965ApJ...142..890C S. Chandrasekhar (1965)]<p></p>
"''The Equilibrium and the Stability of the Riemann Ellipsoids.  I''"<p></p>
ApJ, vol. 142, pp. 890-921 &copy; [http://aas.org/ American Astronomical Society]
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="center">
[[File:JacobiSequenceB.png|300px|Jacobi Sequence]]
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<!-- [[File:NormanWilson78D.png|650px|center|Norman &amp; Wilson (1978)]] -->
[[File:ChandrasekharFig2annotated.png|340px|Chandrasekhar Figure2]]
  </td>
</tr>
<tr><td align="left">&nbsp;</td>
<td align="left"><sup>&dagger;</sup>Original figure has been annotated (maroon-colored text and arrow added) for clarification.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="center">
[[File:OverlapAttempt3.png|300px|Jacobi Sequence]]
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<!-- [[File:NormanWilson78D.png|650px|center|Norman &amp; Wilson (1978)]] -->
[[File:OverlapAttempt1.png|340px|Chandrasekhar Figure2]]
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>


=See Also=
=See Also=
* [[Apps/MaclaurinSpheroids#Maclaurin_Spheroids_.28axisymmetric_structure.29|Properties of Maclaurin Spheroids]]
* [[Apps/MaclaurinSpheroids/GoogleBooks#Excerpts_from_A_Treatise_of_Fluxions|Excerpts from Maclaurin's (1742) ''A Treatise of Fluxions'']]




{{ SGFfooter }}
{{ SGFfooter }}

Revision as of 17:13, 22 September 2021

Jacobi Ellipsoids

Jacobi
Ellipsoids

As has been detailed in an accompanying chapter, the gravitational potential anywhere inside or on the surface, (a1,a2,a3)(a,b,c), of an homogeneous ellipsoid may be given analytically in terms of the following three coefficient expressions:

A1

=

2(ba)(ca)[F(θ,k)E(θ,k)k2sin3θ],

A3

=

2(ba)[(b/a)sinθ(c/a)E(θ,k)(1k2)sin3θ],

A2

=

2(A1+A3),

where, F(θ,k) and E(θ,k) are incomplete elliptic integrals of the first and second kind, respectively, with arguments,

θ=cos1(ca)

      and      

k=[1(b/a)21(c/a)2]1/2.

[EFE], Chapter 3, §17, Eq. (32)

Equilibrium Conditions for Jacobi Ellipsoids

Pulling from Chapter 6 — specifically, §39 — of Chandrasekhar's EFE, we understand that the semi-axis ratios, (ba,ca) associated with Jacobi ellipsoids are given by the roots of the equation,

a2b2A12

=

c2A3,

[EFE], §39, Eq. (4)

and the associated value of the square of the equilibrium configuration's angular velocity is,

Ω2πGρ

=

2B12,

[EFE], §39, Eq. (5)

where,

A12

A1A2(a2b2),

[EFE], §21, Eq. (107)

B12

A2a2A12.

[EFE], §21, Eq. (105)


Taken together, we see that, written in terms of the two primary coefficients, A1 and A3, the pair of defining relations for Jacobi ellipsoids is:


fJ

(ba)2[2(1A1)A31(b/a)2](ca)2A3=0

and

Ω2πGρ

=

2{2(A1+A3)[2(1A1)A31(b/a)2]}

Roots of the Governing Relation

Constraint on Axis-Ratio Relationship

To simplify notation, here we will set,

χba

      and      

υca,

in which case the governing relation is,

fJ

=

χ21χ2[2(1A1)A3]υ2A3=0.

Our plan is to employ the Newton Raphson method to find the root(s) of the fJ=0 relation, typically holding υ fixed and using the Newton-Raphson technique to identify the corresponding "root" value of χ. Using this approach, the Newton Raphson technique requires specification of, not only the function, fJ, but also its first derivative,

fJ'

=

dfJdχ.

Let's determine the requisite expression, using a prime superscript to indicate differentiation with respect to χ.

fJ'

=

[2(1A1)A3][2χ(1χ2)2]χ21χ2[2A1'+A3']υ2A3',

where, given that θ does not depend on χ,

A1'

=

2υsin3θddχ{χk2[F(θ,k)E(θ,k)]}

 

=

2υk3sin3θ{[FE][k2χk']+χk[F'E']},

A3'

=

2sin3θddχ{χ(1k2)[χsinθυE(θ,k)]}

 

=

2(1k2)2sin3θ{[χsinθυE][(1k2)+2χkk']+χ(1k2)[sinθυE']},

k'

=

ddχ[1χ21υ2]1/2=χ(1χ2)1/2(1υ2)1/2,

F'

=

F(θ,k)kk',

E'

=

E(θ,k)kk'.

Now, according to online WolframResearch documentation — see, in particular, the subsection titled, "Representations of Derivatives" —

F(z|m)m

=

E(z|m)2(1m)mF(z|m)2msin(2z)4(1m)1msin2(z),

and,

E(z|m)m

=

E(z|m)F(z|m)2m,

where, zθ, and,

mk2dmdk=2k .

Hence, we have,

F'

=

[F(z|m)mdmdk]k'

 

=

[E(θ,k)2(1k2)k2F(θ,k)2k2sin(2θ)4(1k2)1k2sin2θ]2kk',

E'

=

[E(z|m)mdmdk]k'

 

=

[E(θ,k)F(θ,k)]k'k.

This, then, gives us all of the expressions necessary to specify the derivative, fJ' analytically.


Table 1:  Double-Precision Evaluations

Related to Table IV in [EFE], Chapter 6, §39 (p. 103)

         b/a      c/a            omega2              angmom              5L/M                fJ              fJderiv

        1.00   0.582724     3.742297785D-01     3.037510987D-01     4.232965627D+00     0.000000000D+00     0.000000000D+00
        0.96   0.570801     3.739782202D-01     3.039551227D-01     4.235808832D+00     1.377942479D-06     1.636908401D-01
        0.92   0.558330     3.731876801D-01     3.046006837D-01     4.244805137D+00    -6.821687132D-07     1.676406830D-01
        0.88   0.545263     3.717835971D-01     3.057488283D-01     4.260805266D+00     8.533280272D-07     1.715558312D-01
        0.84   0.531574     3.696959199D-01     3.074667323D-01     4.284745355D+00    -4.622993727D-08     1.754024874D-01
        0.80   0.517216     3.668370069D-01     3.098368632D-01     4.317774645D+00     2.805300664D-08     1.791408327D-01
        0.76   0.502147     3.631138118D-01     3.129555079D-01     4.361234951D+00     3.221800126D-07     1.827219476D-01
        0.72   0.486322     3.584232032D-01     3.169377270D-01     4.416729718D+00     3.274773094D-08     1.860866255D-01
        0.68   0.469689     3.526490289D-01     3.219229588D-01     4.486202108D+00     1.202999164D-08     1.891636215D-01
        0.64   0.452194     3.456641138D-01     3.280805511D-01     4.572012092D+00     2.681560312D-07     1.918668912D-01
        0.60   0.433781     3.373298891D-01     3.356184007D-01     4.677056841D+00     1.037186290D-08     1.940927000D-01
        0.56   0.414386     3.274928085D-01     3.447962894D-01     4.804956583D+00     1.071021385D-07     1.957166395D-01
        0.52   0.393944     3.159887358D-01     3.559412795D-01     4.960269141D+00     8.098003093D-08     1.965890756D-01
        0.48   0.372384     3.026414267D-01     3.694732246D-01     5.148845443D+00     1.255768368D-07     1.965308751D-01
        0.44   0.349632     2.872670174D-01     3.859399647D-01     5.378319986D+00     1.329168636D-08     1.953277019D-01
        0.40   0.325609     2.696779847D-01     4.060726774D-01     5.658882201D+00    -9.783004411D-08     1.927241063D-01
        0.36   0.300232     2.496925963D-01     4.308722159D-01     6.004479614D+00     1.044268276D-07     1.884168286D-01
        0.32   0.273419     2.271530240D-01     4.617497270D-01     6.434777459D+00    -4.469279448D-08     1.820477545D-01
        0.28   0.245083     2.019461513D-01     5.007767426D-01     6.978643856D+00     7.996820889D-08     1.731984783D-01
        0.24   0.215143     1.740514751D-01     5.511400218D-01     7.680488329D+00     1.099319693D-07     1.613864645D-01
        0.20   0.183524     1.436093757D-01     6.180687545D-01     8.613182979D+00     5.068010978D-08     1.460685065D-01
        0.16   0.150166     1.110438660D-01     7.109267615D-01     9.907218635D+00    -2.170751250D-08     1.266576761D-01
        0.12   0.115038     7.728058393D-02     8.487699974D-01     1.182815219D+01     3.613784147D-09     1.025686850D-01
        0.08   0.078166     4.416740942D-02     1.079303624D+00     1.504078558D+01     3.319018649D-08     7.332782508D-02
        0.04   0.039688     1.541513490D-02     1.582762691D+00     2.205680933D+01    -6.674246644D-09     3.882477311D-02

With regard to our Table 1 (immediately above): Given each pair of axis ratios, (ba,ca) — copied from Table IV of EFE (see columns 1 and 2 of our Table 1) — and the corresponding coefficient values, A1, A2, and A3, as tabulated in Table 2 of our accompanying discussion, we calculated corresponding values of Ω2 (column 3) and total angular momentum (column 4) in the units used in EFE's Table IV, as well as (column 5) the total angular momentum in units used by Christodoulou, et al. (1995, ApJ, 446, 472) — see our related discussion of these physical quantities. We also have tabulated associated values of the function, fJ, (column 6) and its first derivative, fJ', (column 7) as defined immediately above. Notice that fJ is very nearly zero in all cases, which indicates that each axis-ratio pair indeed identifies a configuration that lies along the Jacobi sequence.

Table 2:  Jacobi Sequence

   b/a       c/a        A1        A2        A3      omega2       a       5L/M

  0.990699  0.580000  0.512818  0.518962  0.968220  0.374217  1.868761  4.233113
  0.901558  0.552381  0.481786  0.549836  0.968378  0.372621  1.960046  4.251259
  0.820783  0.524762  0.450993  0.580215  0.968792  0.368424  2.057217  4.299402
  0.747135  0.497143  0.420459  0.610088  0.969452  0.361716  2.161309  4.377683
  0.679613  0.469524  0.390210  0.639442  0.970348  0.352587  2.273548  4.486951
  0.617393  0.441905  0.360273  0.668258  0.971469  0.341129  2.395412  4.628802
  0.559798  0.414286  0.330684  0.696516  0.972800  0.327439  2.528716  4.805667
  0.506257  0.386667  0.301483  0.724187  0.974329  0.311620  2.675723  5.020964
  0.456291  0.359048  0.272719  0.751241  0.976040  0.293786  2.839307  5.279337
  0.409492  0.331429  0.244450  0.777636  0.977914  0.274062  3.023190  5.587020
  0.365507  0.303810  0.216744  0.803324  0.979931  0.252593  3.232298  5.952388
  0.324034  0.276190  0.189686  0.828246  0.982067  0.229546  3.473314  6.386811
  0.284807  0.248571  0.163376  0.852329  0.984295  0.205118  3.755577  6.906010
  0.247591  0.220952  0.137939  0.875480  0.986581  0.179549  4.092599  7.532311
  0.212179  0.193333  0.113527  0.897587  0.988885  0.153130  4.504785  8.298565
  0.178382  0.165714  0.090333  0.918505  0.991162  0.126229  5.024664  9.255452
  0.146026  0.138095  0.068601  0.938044  0.993355  0.099316  5.707871 10.486253
  0.114948  0.110476  0.048654  0.955953  0.995393  0.073010  6.659169 12.140357
  0.084989  0.082857  0.030927  0.971879  0.997194  0.048162  8.105501 14.522397
  0.055982  0.055238  0.016051  0.985298  0.998651  0.026008 10.663879 18.396951
  0.027738  0.027619  0.005032  0.995331  0.999637  0.008539 16.979084 26.660547

With regard to our Table 2 (immediately above): Here we specified twenty-one values of the axis ratio, ca, (column 2) and used our Newton-Raphson-based root finder to identify corresponding values of the companion axis ratio, ba, (column 1) that satisfies the governing relation, fJ=0.

Angular Momentum Constraint

Alternatively, let's choose a value for the system's total angular momentum, L>4.23296, and solve for the axis-ratio pair that identifies that configuration's location along the Jacobi sequence. We'll adopt the units used by Christodoulou et al (1995), that is, G=1, πρ=1 and M=5, hence,

a3

=

3Ma24π(bc)ρ=154(ba)1(ca)1.

Given that the relationship between L and Ω in equilibrium Jacobi ellipsoids is,

L

=

a2[1+(ba)2]Ω

 

=

[154(ba)1(ca)1]2/3[1+(ba)2]Ω

the constraint on Ω2 given above implies that,

L2[415(ba)(ca)]4/3[1+(ba)2]2

=

2{2(A1+A3)[2(1A1)A31(b/a)2]}.

Or, again adopting the shorthand notation,

χba

      and      

υca,

we seek roots of the function,

fL

L2[345425]1/3χ4/3υ4/3(1+χ2)2{[2(A1+A3)][2(1A1)A3](1χ2)1}=0.

As above, we will hold υ fixed and use the Newton-Raphson technique to identify the corresponding "root" value of χ. Hence, we need to specify, not only the function, fL, but also its first derivative,

fL'

fLχ.

 

=

[345425]1/3υ4/3χ{χ4/3(1+χ2)2[2(A1+A3)]χ4/3(1+χ2)2(1χ2)1[2(1A1)A3]}

 

=

[345425]1/3υ4/3{43χ7/3(1+χ2)2[2(A1+A3)]+4χ1/3(1+χ2)[2(A1+A3)]χ4/3(1+χ2)2(A1'+A3')

 

 

+43χ7/3(1+χ2)2(1χ2)1[2(1A1)A3]4χ1/3(1+χ2)(1χ2)1[2(1A1)A3]

 

 

2χ1/3(1+χ2)2(1χ2)2[2(1A1)A3]χ4/3(1+χ2)2(1χ2)1[2A1'A3']}

 

=

[35425]1/3υ4/3χ7/3(1+χ2){[12χ24(1+χ2)][2(A1+A3)]3χ(1+χ2)(A1'+A3')+3χ(1+χ2)(1χ2)1[2A1'+A3']

 

 

+(1χ2)2{4(1+χ2)(1χ2)[2(1A1)A3]12χ2(1χ2)[2(1A1)A3]6χ2(1+χ2)[2(1A1)A3]}}

 

=

[35425]1/3υ4/3χ7/3(1+χ2){[8χ24]A1+3χ(1+χ2)(1χ2)1[(1+χ2)A1'+χ2A3']

 

 

+2(1χ2)2[22A1A3][(4χ22)(1χ2)2+2(1+χ2)(1χ2)6χ2(1χ2)3χ2(1+χ2)]}

 

=

[35425]1/3υ4/3χ7/3(1+χ2){3χ(1+χ2)(1χ2)1[(1+χ2)A1'+χ2A3']

 

 

+[8χ24]A1+2(1χ2)2[22A1A3][χ29χ4+4χ6]}


What values of L should we choose? In association with our discussion of warped free-energy surfaces, we'd like to specify the eccentricity, e, of a Maclaurin spheroid and adopt the angular momentum of that configuration. According to our accompanying discussion of the properties of Maclaurin spheroids,

LMac2

=

22a4Ω2

 

=

23a4[A1A3(1e2)]Mac

 

=

23[3522(1e2)1/2]4/3[A1A3(1e2)]Mac

 

=

[23454]1/3(1e2)2/3{1e2[sin1ee(1e2)1/2](1e2)1/22e2[(1e2)1/2sin1ee](1e2)3/2}

 

=

[23454]1/3(1e2)2/3{1e2[sin1ee](1e2)1/2+2e2[sin1ee](1e2)3/21e2[(1e2)1/2](1e2)1/22e2[(1e2)1/2](1e2)3/2}

 

=

[23454]1/3(1e2)2/3{1e2[sin1ee](1e2)1/2[32e2]3(1e2)e2}

 

=

[23454]1/3(1e2)1/3e2{[sin1ee](1e2)1/2[32e2]3}.

Note, for example, that if e=0.85, the square-root of this expression gives, LMac=4.7148806, which matches the angular momentum that was used by Christodoulou et al (1995) to generate their Figure 3.

Sequence Plots

Jacobi Sequence: (blue) Points defined by data in Table IV of [EFE], Chapter 6, §39 (p. 103); (red) points generated here from above-defined roots of the governing relation. Figure 2 extracted from p. 902 of S. Chandrasekhar (1965)

"The Equilibrium and the Stability of the Riemann Ellipsoids. I"

ApJ, vol. 142, pp. 890-921 © American Astronomical Society

Jacobi Sequence

Chandrasekhar Figure2

  Original figure has been annotated (maroon-colored text and arrow added) for clarification.

Jacobi Sequence

Chandrasekhar Figure2

See Also


Tiled Menu

Appendices: | VisTrailsEquations | VisTrailsVariables | References | Ramblings | VisTrailsImages | myphys.lsu | ADS |