SSC/VirialEquilibrium/UniformDensity: Difference between revisions

From jetwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Created page with "__FORCETOC__ <!-- will force the creation of a Table of Contents --> <!-- __NOTOC__ will force TOC off --> =Uniform-Density Sphere= ==Review== In an User:Tohline/Sphericall..."
 
No edit summary
 
Line 4: Line 4:


==Review==
==Review==
In an [[User:Tohline/SphericallySymmetricConfigurations/Virial#Virial_Equilibrium|introductory discussion]] of the virial equilibrium structure of spherically symmetric configurations &#8212; see especially the section titled, [[User:Tohline/SphericallySymmetricConfigurations/Virial#Energy_Extrema|''Energy Extrema'']] &#8212; we deduced that a system's equilibrium radius, <math>~R_\mathrm{eq}</math>, measured relative to a reference length scale, <math>~R_0</math>, ''i.e.,'' the dimensionless equilibrium radius,  
In an [[SSCpt1/Virial#Virial_Equilibrium|introductory discussion]] of the virial equilibrium structure of spherically symmetric configurations &#8212; see especially the section titled, [[SSCpt1/Virial#Energy_Extrema|''Energy Extrema'']] &#8212; we deduced that a system's equilibrium radius, <math>~R_\mathrm{eq}</math>, measured relative to a reference length scale, <math>~R_0</math>, ''i.e.,'' the dimensionless equilibrium radius,  
<div align="center">
<div align="center">
<math>~\chi_\mathrm{eq} \equiv \frac{R_\mathrm{eq}}{R_0} \, ,</math>
<math>~\chi_\mathrm{eq} \equiv \frac{R_\mathrm{eq}}{R_0} \, ,</math>
Line 232: Line 232:
</table>
</table>
</div>
</div>
This should be compared with our [[User:Tohline/SSC/Structure/UniformDensity#Summary|detailed force-balance solution]] of the interior structure of an isolated, nonrotating, uniform-density sphere, which gives the precise expression,
This should be compared with our [[SSC/Structure/UniformDensity#Summary|detailed force-balance solution]] of the interior structure of an isolated, nonrotating, uniform-density sphere, which gives the precise expression,
<div align="center">
<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
Line 252: Line 252:
The expression for <math>~P_c</math> derived from our identification of an extremum in the free energy is identical to the expression derived from the more precise, detailed force-balance analysis, except that the leading numerical coefficients differ by a factor of <math>~(5\mathfrak{f}_A/2\mathfrak{f}_W)</math>.   
The expression for <math>~P_c</math> derived from our identification of an extremum in the free energy is identical to the expression derived from the more precise, detailed force-balance analysis, except that the leading numerical coefficients differ by a factor of <math>~(5\mathfrak{f}_A/2\mathfrak{f}_W)</math>.   


From a free-energy analysis alone, the best we can do is assume that both structural form factors, <math>~\mathfrak{f}_W</math> and <math>\mathfrak{f}_A</math>, are of order unity.  But knowing the detailed force-balance solution allows us to evaluate both form factors.  From our [[User:Tohline/SphericallySymmetricConfigurations/Virial#FormFactors|introductory discussion of the free energy function]], their respective definitions are,
From a free-energy analysis alone, the best we can do is assume that both structural form factors, <math>~\mathfrak{f}_W</math> and <math>\mathfrak{f}_A</math>, are of order unity.  But knowing the detailed force-balance solution allows us to evaluate both form factors.  From our [[SSCpt1/Virial#FormFactors|introductory discussion of the free energy function]], their respective definitions are,
<div align="center">
<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
Line 281: Line 281:
</table>
</table>
</div>
</div>
Now, because the configuration under discussion has a uniform density, we should set <math>~\rho(x)/\rho_c = 1</math> in the definition of <math>~\mathfrak{f}_W</math> which, after evaluation of the nested integrals, gives <math>~\mathfrak{f}_W = 1</math>.  But, instead of being uniform throughout the configuration, in the [[User:Tohline/SSC/Structure/UniformDensity#Summary|detailed force-balance model]], the pressure drops from the center to the surface according to the relation,
Now, because the configuration under discussion has a uniform density, we should set <math>~\rho(x)/\rho_c = 1</math> in the definition of <math>~\mathfrak{f}_W</math> which, after evaluation of the nested integrals, gives <math>~\mathfrak{f}_W = 1</math>.  But, instead of being uniform throughout the configuration, in the [[SSC/Structure/UniformDensity#Summary|detailed force-balance model]], the pressure drops from the center to the surface according to the relation,
<div align="center">
<div align="center">
<math>\frac{P(x)}{P_c} = 1 - x^2 \, .</math>
<math>\frac{P(x)}{P_c} = 1 - x^2 \, .</math>
Line 384: Line 384:
</table>
</table>
</div>
</div>
where, in the last step as was [[User:Tohline/SSC/VirialEquilibrium/UniformDensity#Comparison_with_Detailed_Force-Balance_Model|recognized above]], we have set,
where, in the last step as was [[SSC/VirialEquilibrium/UniformDensity#Comparison_with_Detailed_Force-Balance_Model|recognized above]], we have set,
<div align="center">
<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
Line 424: Line 424:


===Comparison with Detailed Force-Balance Model===
===Comparison with Detailed Force-Balance Model===
It is reasonable to ask how close this virial expression for the equilibrium radius is to the [[User:Tohline/SSC/Structure/UniformDensity#Uniform-Density_Sphere_Embedded_in_an_External_Medium|exact result]].  As before, from a free-energy analysis alone, the best we can do is assume that both structural form factors, <math>~\mathfrak{f}_W</math> and <math>\mathfrak{f}_A</math>, are of order unity.  But we can do better than this.  To begin with, because <math>~\rho</math> is uniform throughout the configuration, <math>~\mathfrak{f}_W = 1</math>, even though the configuration is truncated by the imposed external pressure.  We need to reassess how <math>~\mathfrak{f}_A</math> is evaluated, however, because the pressure does not drop to zero at the surface of the configuration.
It is reasonable to ask how close this virial expression for the equilibrium radius is to the [[SSC/Structure/UniformDensity#Uniform-Density_Sphere_Embedded_in_an_External_Medium|exact result]].  As before, from a free-energy analysis alone, the best we can do is assume that both structural form factors, <math>~\mathfrak{f}_W</math> and <math>\mathfrak{f}_A</math>, are of order unity.  But we can do better than this.  To begin with, because <math>~\rho</math> is uniform throughout the configuration, <math>~\mathfrak{f}_W = 1</math>, even though the configuration is truncated by the imposed external pressure.  We need to reassess how <math>~\mathfrak{f}_A</math> is evaluated, however, because the pressure does not drop to zero at the surface of the configuration.


Going back to our [[User:Tohline/SphericallySymmetricConfigurations/Virial#Energy_Content_for_a_System_of_a_Given_Size_and_Internal_Structure|original definition of the thermodynamic energy reservoir for spherically symmetric adiabatic systems]],
Going back to our [[SSCpt1/Virial#Energy_Content_for_a_System_of_a_Given_Size_and_Internal_Structure|original definition of the thermodynamic energy reservoir for spherically symmetric adiabatic systems]],
<div align="center">
<div align="center">
<math>\mathfrak{W}_A = \frac{1}{({\gamma_g}-1)}  \int_0^R  4\pi r^2 P dr  
<math>\mathfrak{W}_A = \frac{1}{({\gamma_g}-1)}  \int_0^R  4\pi r^2 P dr  
  \, ,</math>
  \, ,</math>
</div>
</div>
we begin by normalizing the radial coordinate to <math>~R_0</math>, the radius of the isolated (''i.e.,'' not truncated) sphere, because we know [[User:Tohline/SSC/Structure/UniformDensity#Summary|from the detailed force-balanced solution]] that, structurally, the pressure varies with <math>~r</math> inside the configuration as,
we begin by normalizing the radial coordinate to <math>~R_0</math>, the radius of the isolated (''i.e.,'' not truncated) sphere, because we know [[SSC/Structure/UniformDensity#Summary|from the detailed force-balanced solution]] that, structurally, the pressure varies with <math>~r</math> inside the configuration as,
<div align="center">
<div align="center">
<math>\frac{P(x)}{P_c} = 1 - x^2 \, ,</math>
<math>\frac{P(x)}{P_c} = 1 - x^2 \, ,</math>
Line 491: Line 491:
</math>
</math>
</div>
</div>
Plugging this expression for <math>~\mathfrak{f}_A</math> along with <math>~\mathfrak{f}_W = 1</math> into the [[User:Tohline/SSC/VirialEquilibrium/UniformDensity#Comparison_with_Detailed_Force-Balance_Model_2|just-derived virial equilibrium solution]] gives,
Plugging this expression for <math>~\mathfrak{f}_A</math> along with <math>~\mathfrak{f}_W = 1</math> into the [[SSC/VirialEquilibrium/UniformDensity#Comparison_with_Detailed_Force-Balance_Model_2|just-derived virial equilibrium solution]] gives,


<div align="center">
<div align="center">
Line 540: Line 540:
</table>
</table>
</div>
</div>
This result exactly matches the solution for the equilibrium radius of a pressure-truncated, uniform-density sphere that has been [[User:Tohline/SSC/Structure/UniformDensity#Uniform-Density_Sphere_Embedded_in_an_External_Medium|derived elsewhere]].
This result exactly matches the solution for the equilibrium radius of a pressure-truncated, uniform-density sphere that has been [[SSC/Structure/UniformDensity#Uniform-Density_Sphere_Embedded_in_an_External_Medium|derived elsewhere]].




=See Also=
=See Also=
<ul>
<ul>
<li>[[User:Tohline/SphericallySymmetricConfigurations/IndexFreeEnergy#Index_to_Free-Energy_Analyses|Index to a Variety of Free-Energy and/or Virial Analyses]]</li>
<li>[[SphericallySymmetricConfigurations/IndexFreeEnergy#Index_to_Free-Energy_Analyses|Index to a Variety of Free-Energy and/or Virial Analyses]]</li>
</ul>
</ul>




{{ SGFfooter }}
{{ SGFfooter }}

Latest revision as of 17:13, 14 October 2021

Uniform-Density Sphere

Review

In an introductory discussion of the virial equilibrium structure of spherically symmetric configurations — see especially the section titled, Energy Extrema — we deduced that a system's equilibrium radius, Req, measured relative to a reference length scale, R0, i.e., the dimensionless equilibrium radius,

χeqReqR0,

is given by the root(s) of the following equation:

2Cχ2+(1δ1γg)3(γg1)Bχ33γg+δ1γgBIAχ13Dχ3=0,

where the definitions of the various coefficients are,

A

35GMtot2R0𝔣W,

B

KMtot(γg1)(3Mtot4πR03)γg1𝔣A=cs¯2Mtot(γg1)𝔣A,

BI

3cs2Mtot𝔣M,

C

5J24MtotR02𝔣T,

D

43πR03Pe.

Once the pressure exerted by the external medium (Pe), and the configuration's mass (Mtot), angular momentum (J), and specific entropy (via K) — or, in the isothermal case, sound speed (cs) — have been specified, the values of all of the coefficients are known and χeq can be determined.

Adiabatic Evolution of an Isolated Sphere

Here we seek to determine the equilibrium radius of a non-rotating configuration (J=0) that undergoes adiabatic compression/expansion (δ1γg=0) and that is not confined by an external medium (Pe=0).

Solution

In this case, the statement of virial equilibrium is simplified considerably. Specifically, χeq is given by the root(s) of the equation,

Aχeq1

=

3(γg1)Bχeq33γg

χeq3γg4

=

3(γg1)BA

 

=

[3KMtot(3Mtot4πR03)γg1𝔣A][35GMtot2R0𝔣W]1

 

=

(1R0)3γg4[5(34π)γg1(KG)M(γg2)𝔣A𝔣W].

In other words,

Req=[5(34π)γg1(KG)M(γg2)𝔣A𝔣W]1/(3γg4).

Comparison with Detailed Force-Balance Model

This derived solution will look more familiar if, instead of K, we express the solution in terms of the central pressure,

Pc=Kρ0γg,

where, for this uniform-density sphere, ρ0=3Mtot/(4πReq3). Hence,

K

=

Pc(4πReq33Mtot)γg,

and the solution takes the form,

Req3γg4

=

5(4π3)(PcReq3γgGMtot2)𝔣A𝔣W

Req4

=

(320π)(GMtot2Pc)𝔣W𝔣A.

Or, solving for the central pressure,

Pc

=

(320π𝔣W𝔣A)GMtot2Req4.

This should be compared with our detailed force-balance solution of the interior structure of an isolated, nonrotating, uniform-density sphere, which gives the precise expression,

Pc

=

(38π)GMtot2Req4.

The expression for Pc derived from our identification of an extremum in the free energy is identical to the expression derived from the more precise, detailed force-balance analysis, except that the leading numerical coefficients differ by a factor of (5𝔣A/2𝔣W).

From a free-energy analysis alone, the best we can do is assume that both structural form factors, 𝔣W and 𝔣A, are of order unity. But knowing the detailed force-balance solution allows us to evaluate both form factors. From our introductory discussion of the free energy function, their respective definitions are,

𝔣W

3501{0x[ρ(x)ρc]x2dx}[ρ(x)ρc]xdx,

𝔣A

301[P(x)Pc]x2dx.

Now, because the configuration under discussion has a uniform density, we should set ρ(x)/ρc=1 in the definition of 𝔣W which, after evaluation of the nested integrals, gives 𝔣W=1. But, instead of being uniform throughout the configuration, in the detailed force-balance model, the pressure drops from the center to the surface according to the relation,

P(x)Pc=1x2.

Integrating over this function, in accordance with the definition of 𝔣A, gives,

𝔣A

301(1x2)x2dx=3[x33x55]01=25.

Hence, the ratio,

5𝔣A2𝔣W=1,

which brings into perfect agreement the two separate determinations of the equilibrium expressions for Req and Pc in terms of one another and the total mass.

This demonstrates that the free-energy approach to determining the equilibrium radius of a spherical configuration is only handicapped by its inability to precisely nail down values of the structural form factors. But this is not a severe limitation as the (dimensionless) form factors are generally of order unity. In contrast, the free-energy analysis brings with it a capability to readily evaluate the global stability of equilibrium configurations.


Adiabatic Evolution of Pressure-truncated Sphere

Here we seek to determine the equilibrium radius of a non-rotating configuration (J=0) that undergoes adiabatic compression/expansion (δ1γg=0) and that is embedded in a hot, tenuous external medium whose confining pressure, Pe, truncates the configuration.

Solution

In this case, virial equilibrium implies that χeq is given by the root(s) of the equation,

3(γg1)Bχ33γgAχ13Dχ3=0.

Hence,

D

=

(γg1)Bχeq3γgA3χeq4

4π3R03Pe

=

[KMtot(3Mtot4πR03)γg1𝔣A]χeq3γg[15GMtot2R0𝔣W]χeq4

Pe

=

[K(3Mtot4πReq3)γg𝔣A][(320π)GMtot2Req4𝔣W]

 

=

Pc𝔣A(320π)GMtot2Req4𝔣W,

where, in the last step as was recognized above, we have set,

K

=

Pc(4πReq33Mtot)γg.

Hence, for any external pressure, Pe<Pc, the pressure-confined equilibrium radius is,

Req

=

[(320π)GMtot2Pc𝔣W𝔣A(1PePc1𝔣A)1]1/4.

Comparison with Detailed Force-Balance Model

It is reasonable to ask how close this virial expression for the equilibrium radius is to the exact result. As before, from a free-energy analysis alone, the best we can do is assume that both structural form factors, 𝔣W and 𝔣A, are of order unity. But we can do better than this. To begin with, because ρ is uniform throughout the configuration, 𝔣W=1, even though the configuration is truncated by the imposed external pressure. We need to reassess how 𝔣A is evaluated, however, because the pressure does not drop to zero at the surface of the configuration.

Going back to our original definition of the thermodynamic energy reservoir for spherically symmetric adiabatic systems,

𝔚A=1(γg1)0R4πr2Pdr,

we begin by normalizing the radial coordinate to R0, the radius of the isolated (i.e., not truncated) sphere, because we know from the detailed force-balanced solution that, structurally, the pressure varies with r inside the configuration as,

P(x)Pc=1x2,

where, xr/R0. Integrating only out to the edge of the truncated sphere, which we will identify as Re and, correspondingly,

xeReR0=(1PePc)1/2,

we have,

𝔚A

=

4πPcR03(γg1)0xe(1x2)x2dx

 

=

4πPcR03(γg1)[x33x55]0xe=Pc(γg1)(4πRe33)[135xe2]

 

=

Mtot(γg1)(Pcρc)[135(1PePc)].

Hence, in the case of a pressure-truncated, uniform-density sphere, we surmise that the relevant structural form factor is,

𝔣A=135(1PePc)=25+35PePc.

Plugging this expression for 𝔣A along with 𝔣W=1 into the just-derived virial equilibrium solution gives,

(320π)GMtot2Req4

=

Pc[25+35PePc]Pe

 

=

25Pc(1PePc)

Req

=

[(323π)GM2Pc(1PePc)1]1/4.

This result exactly matches the solution for the equilibrium radius of a pressure-truncated, uniform-density sphere that has been derived elsewhere.


See Also


Tiled Menu

Appendices: | VisTrailsEquations | VisTrailsVariables | References | Ramblings | VisTrailsImages | myphys.lsu | ADS |