Appendix/Ramblings/DarkMatterMusings: Difference between revisions

From jetwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Line 18: Line 18:
<ul>
<ul>
<li>[http://www.phys.lsu.edu/~tohline/TinsleyNotes1978.pdf Notes from Beatrice Tinsley] showing that she, too, had given some thought to the implications of a <math>1/r</math> force-law for gravity in 1978.</li>
<li>[http://www.phys.lsu.edu/~tohline/TinsleyNotes1978.pdf Notes from Beatrice Tinsley] showing that she, too, had given some thought to the implications of a <math>1/r</math> force-law for gravity in 1978.</li>
<li>Early interactions with Vera Rubin.</li>
<li>[[DarkMatter/VeraRubin|Early interactions with Vera Rubin]].</li>
<li>[[DarkMatter/UniformSphere|Attraction associated with a uniform-density sphere]] &#8212; my derivation in the early '80s, with the kind assistance of LSU Professor Attipat K. Rajagopal.</li>
<li>[[DarkMatter/UniformSphere|Attraction associated with a uniform-density sphere]] &#8212; my derivation in the early '80s, with the kind assistance of LSU Professor Attipat K. Rajagopal.</li>
<li>[[DarkMatter/CK2015|Remarks on Christodoulou &amp; Kazanas (2015)]].</li>
<li>[[DarkMatter/CK2015|Remarks on Christodoulou &amp; Kazanas (2015)]].</li>

Revision as of 14:21, 3 January 2022

Musings Regarding Dark Matter and Dark Energy

[Joel E. Tohline recollection on 3/8/2015] It was during my first year (July 1978 - June 1979) as a J. Willard Gibbs Instructor in the Astronomy Department at Yale University that I started wondering whether the nearly ubiquitous display of "flat rotation curves" in disk galaxies might be explained, not via the dark matter hypothesis, but by invoking a 1/r force-law for gravity at large distances. My reasoning was simple:

  1. I was uncomfortable with the "dark matter" hypothesis, which smelled to me like the story of aether, all over again.
  2. If Isaac Newton had been handed Vera Rubin's observations — which showed that orbital velocities were approximately constant with distance — instead of Kepler's observations — which showed that orbital velocities behaved as vr1/2 — he likely would have hypothesized that the gravitational acceleration due to a central point mass is proportional to r1 instead of r2.

While I put quite a lot of thought into this idea in the late '70s and early '80s — and I still give it some thought from time to time because I consider the astrophysics community's fundamental understanding of "dark matter" and now, too, "dark energy" to be weak — I produced only two publications on the topic, neither of which was in a refereed archival journal:

From time to time, I plan to post here some of the research notes that I have generated on this topic over the years, as well as recollections of discussions of the topic that I have had with professional colleagues. I begin by posting a scanned copy of one of my most cherished possessions from my time at Yale.

See Also

Tiled Menu

Appendices: | VisTrailsEquations | VisTrailsVariables | References | Ramblings | VisTrailsImages | myphys.lsu | ADS |