Appendix/Ramblings/DarkMatterMusings: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
<ul> | <ul> | ||
<li>[http://www.phys.lsu.edu/~tohline/TinsleyNotes1978.pdf Notes from Beatrice Tinsley] showing that she, too, had given some thought to the implications of a <math>1/r</math> force-law for gravity in 1978.</li> | <li>[http://www.phys.lsu.edu/~tohline/TinsleyNotes1978.pdf Notes from Beatrice Tinsley] showing that she, too, had given some thought to the implications of a <math>1/r</math> force-law for gravity in 1978.</li> | ||
<li>Early interactions with Vera Rubin.</li> | <li>[[DarkMatter/VeraRubin|Early interactions with Vera Rubin]].</li> | ||
<li>[[DarkMatter/UniformSphere|Attraction associated with a uniform-density sphere]] — my derivation in the early '80s, with the kind assistance of LSU Professor Attipat K. Rajagopal.</li> | <li>[[DarkMatter/UniformSphere|Attraction associated with a uniform-density sphere]] — my derivation in the early '80s, with the kind assistance of LSU Professor Attipat K. Rajagopal.</li> | ||
<li>[[DarkMatter/CK2015|Remarks on Christodoulou & Kazanas (2015)]].</li> | <li>[[DarkMatter/CK2015|Remarks on Christodoulou & Kazanas (2015)]].</li> | ||
Revision as of 14:21, 3 January 2022
Musings Regarding Dark Matter and Dark Energy
[Joel E. Tohline recollection on 3/8/2015] It was during my first year (July 1978 - June 1979) as a J. Willard Gibbs Instructor in the Astronomy Department at Yale University that I started wondering whether the nearly ubiquitous display of "flat rotation curves" in disk galaxies might be explained, not via the dark matter hypothesis, but by invoking a force-law for gravity at large distances. My reasoning was simple:
- I was uncomfortable with the "dark matter" hypothesis, which smelled to me like the story of aether, all over again.
- If Isaac Newton had been handed Vera Rubin's observations — which showed that orbital velocities were approximately constant with distance — instead of Kepler's observations — which showed that orbital velocities behaved as — he likely would have hypothesized that the gravitational acceleration due to a central point mass is proportional to instead of .
While I put quite a lot of thought into this idea in the late '70s and early '80s — and I still give it some thought from time to time because I consider the astrophysics community's fundamental understanding of "dark matter" and now, too, "dark energy" to be weak — I produced only two publications on the topic, neither of which was in a refereed archival journal:
From time to time, I plan to post here some of the research notes that I have generated on this topic over the years, as well as recollections of discussions of the topic that I have had with professional colleagues. I begin by posting a scanned copy of one of my most cherished possessions from my time at Yale.
- Notes from Beatrice Tinsley showing that she, too, had given some thought to the implications of a force-law for gravity in 1978.
- Early interactions with Vera Rubin.
- Attraction associated with a uniform-density sphere — my derivation in the early '80s, with the kind assistance of LSU Professor Attipat K. Rajagopal.
- Remarks on Christodoulou & Kazanas (2015).
- Radial Dependence of the Strong Nuclear Force
See Also
|
Appendices: | VisTrailsEquations | VisTrailsVariables | References | Ramblings | VisTrailsImages | myphys.lsu | ADS | |