SSC/Structure/BiPolytropes/Analytic51Renormalize: Difference between revisions
| Line 304: | Line 304: | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
</table> | </table> | ||
we have, | we have throughout the envelope, | ||
<div align="center"> | <div align="center"> | ||
<table border="0" cellpadding="3"> | <table border="0" cellpadding="3"> | ||
| Line 316: | Line 317: | ||
<td align="left"> | <td align="left"> | ||
<math>\rho_0 \biggl( \frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c} \biggr) \theta^{5}_i \phi</math> | <math>\rho_0 \biggl( \frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c} \biggr) \theta^{5}_i \phi</math> | ||
</td> | |||
</tr> | |||
<tr> | |||
<td align="right"> | |||
| |||
</td> | |||
<td align="center"> | |||
<math>=</math> | |||
</td> | |||
<td align="left"> | |||
<math>\biggl\{\mathcal{m}_\mathrm{surf} \biggl(\frac{K_c}{G}\biggr)^{3 / 2} \biggl(\frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c}\biggr)^{-2} M_\mathrm{tot}^{-1}\biggr\}^5 | |||
\biggl( \frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c} \biggr) \theta^{5}_i \phi</math> | |||
</td> | </td> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
| Line 328: | Line 341: | ||
<td align="left"> | <td align="left"> | ||
<math>K_c \rho_0^{6/5} \theta^{6}_i \phi^{2}</math> | <math>K_c \rho_0^{6/5} \theta^{6}_i \phi^{2}</math> | ||
</td> | |||
</tr> | |||
<tr> | |||
<td align="right"> | |||
| |||
</td> | |||
<td align="center"> | |||
<math>=</math> | |||
</td> | |||
<td align="left"> | |||
<math>K_c \biggl\{\mathcal{m}_\mathrm{surf} \biggl(\frac{K_c}{G}\biggr)^{3 / 2} | |||
\biggl(\frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c}\biggr)^{-2} M_\mathrm{tot}^{-1}\biggr\}^6 | |||
\theta^{6}_i \phi^{2}</math> | |||
</td> | </td> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
| Line 340: | Line 366: | ||
<td align="left"> | <td align="left"> | ||
<math>\biggl[ \frac{K_c}{G \rho_0^{4/5}} \biggr]^{1/2} \biggl( \frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c} \biggr)^{-1} \theta^{-2}_i (2\pi)^{-1/2}\eta</math> | <math>\biggl[ \frac{K_c}{G \rho_0^{4/5}} \biggr]^{1/2} \biggl( \frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c} \biggr)^{-1} \theta^{-2}_i (2\pi)^{-1/2}\eta</math> | ||
</td> | |||
</tr> | |||
<tr> | |||
<td align="right"> | |||
| |||
</td> | |||
<td align="center"> | |||
<math>=</math> | |||
</td> | |||
<td align="left"> | |||
<math>\biggl[ \frac{K_c}{G } \biggr]^{1/2} | |||
\biggl\{\mathcal{m}_\mathrm{surf} \biggl(\frac{K_c}{G}\biggr)^{3 / 2} \biggl(\frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c}\biggr)^{-2} M_\mathrm{tot}^{-1}\biggr\}^{-2} | |||
\biggl( \frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c} \biggr)^{-1} \theta^{-2}_i (2\pi)^{-1/2}\eta</math> | |||
</td> | </td> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
| Line 352: | Line 391: | ||
<td align="left"> | <td align="left"> | ||
<math>\biggl[ \frac{K_c^3}{G^3 \rho_0^{2/5}} \biggr]^{1/2} \biggl( \frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c} \biggr)^{-2} \theta^{-1}_i \biggl( \frac{2}{\pi} \biggr)^{1/2} \biggl(-\eta^2 \frac{d\phi}{d\eta} \biggr)</math> | <math>\biggl[ \frac{K_c^3}{G^3 \rho_0^{2/5}} \biggr]^{1/2} \biggl( \frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c} \biggr)^{-2} \theta^{-1}_i \biggl( \frac{2}{\pi} \biggr)^{1/2} \biggl(-\eta^2 \frac{d\phi}{d\eta} \biggr)</math> | ||
</td> | |||
</tr> | |||
<tr> | |||
<td align="right"> | |||
| |||
</td> | |||
<td align="center"> | |||
<math>=</math> | |||
</td> | |||
<td align="left"> | |||
<math>\biggl[ \frac{K_c^3}{G^3} \biggr]^{1/2} | |||
\biggl\{\mathcal{m}_\mathrm{surf} \biggl(\frac{K_c}{G}\biggr)^{3 / 2} \biggl(\frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c}\biggr)^{-2} M_\mathrm{tot}^{-1}\biggr\}^{-1} | |||
\biggl( \frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c} \biggr)^{-2} \theta^{-1}_i \biggl( \frac{2}{\pi} \biggr)^{1/2} \biggl(-\eta^2 \frac{d\phi}{d\eta} \biggr)</math> | |||
</td> | </td> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
Revision as of 20:28, 13 May 2022
BiPolytrope with and
This chapter very closely parallels our original analytic derivation — see also, 📚 P. P. Eggleton, J. Faulkner, & R. C. Cannon (1998, MNRAS, Vol. 298, issue 3, pp. 831 - 834) — of the structure of bipolytropes in which the core has an polytropic index and the envelope has an polytropic index. Our primary objective, here, is to renormalize the principal set of variables, replacing the central density with the configuration's total mass, so that the mass is held fixed along each model sequence.
From Table 1 of our original analytic derivation, we see that,
where,
Steps 2 & 3
Based on the discussion presented elsewhere of the structure of an isolated polytrope, the core of this bipolytrope will have the following properties:
The first zero of the function and, hence, the surface of the corresponding isolated polytrope is located at . Hence, the interface between the core and the envelope can be positioned anywhere within the range, .
Step 4: Throughout the core ()
|
Specify: and |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specify: and |
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
|
New Normalization
|
After applying this new normalization, we have throughout the core,
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
Step 8: Throughout the envelope ()
Given (from above) that,
we have throughout the envelope,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Appendices: | VisTrailsEquations | VisTrailsVariables | References | Ramblings | VisTrailsImages | myphys.lsu | ADS | |