SSC/Structure/BiPolytropes/AnalyzeStepFunction: Difference between revisions
| Line 193: | Line 193: | ||
<td align="left"> | <td align="left"> | ||
<math> | <math> | ||
\biggl\{ \biggl( \frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c} \biggr) \theta^{2}_i (2\pi)^{1/2 | \biggl\{ \biggl( \frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c} \biggr) \theta^{2}_i (2\pi)^{1/2} \biggr\} | ||
2\theta_i^6 \biggl[ \phi \cdot \frac{d\phi}{d\eta}\biggr]_i | 2\theta_i^6 \biggl[ \phi \cdot \frac{d\phi}{d\eta}\biggr]_i | ||
</math> | </math> | ||
| Line 208: | Line 208: | ||
<td align="left"> | <td align="left"> | ||
<math> | <math> | ||
2(2\pi)^{1/2}\theta^{8}_i \biggl\{ \biggl( \frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c} \biggr) | 2(2\pi)^{1/2}\theta^{8}_i \biggl\{ \biggl( \frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c} \biggr) \biggr\} | ||
\biggl[ 3^{1 / 2} \theta_i^{-3} \biggl(\frac{d\theta}{d\xi}\biggr)_i\biggr] | \biggl[ 3^{1 / 2} \theta_i^{-3} \biggl(\frac{d\theta}{d\xi}\biggr)_i\biggr] | ||
</math> | </math> | ||
| Line 223: | Line 223: | ||
<td align="left"> | <td align="left"> | ||
<math> | <math> | ||
-~\tfrac{2}{3}(6\pi)^{1/2}\theta^{8}_i \biggl( \frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c} \biggr) | -~\tfrac{2}{3}(6\pi)^{1/2}\theta^{8}_i \biggl( \frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c} \biggr) \xi_i | ||
</math> | </math> | ||
</td> | </td> | ||
| Line 238: | Line 237: | ||
<td align="left"> | <td align="left"> | ||
<math> | <math> | ||
-~\ | -~2\biggl( \frac{2\pi}{3}\biggr)^{1/2}\theta^{8}_i \biggl( \frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c} \biggr) | ||
\biggl[ \biggl(\frac | \biggl[ \biggl( \frac{2\pi}{3}\biggr)^{1 / 2} r_i^*\biggr] | ||
</math> | </math> | ||
</td> | </td> | ||
| Line 253: | Line 252: | ||
<td align="left"> | <td align="left"> | ||
<math> | <math> | ||
-~\biggl(\frac{ | -~\biggl(\frac{4\pi}{3}\biggr) \theta^{8}_i \biggl( \frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c} \biggr)r_i^* \, . | ||
</math> | </math> | ||
</td> | </td> | ||
Revision as of 19:49, 10 June 2022
More Careful Examination of Step Function Behavior
The ideas that are captured in this chapter have arisen as an extension of our accompanying "renormalization" of the Analytic51 bipolytrope.
Discontinuous Density Distribution
Expectations
From among the set of governing relations that apply to spherically symmetric configurations, we focus, first, on the combined,
Euler + Poisson Equations
At the interface between the core and envelope of an equilibrium bipolytrope, both the core and the envelope must satisfy the relation,
|
|
|
|
Now, the quantity on the right-hand side of this expression must be the same at the interface, when viewed either from the perspective of the core or from the perspective of the envelope. Therefore, at the interface, the equilibrium configuration must obey the relation,
|
|
|
|
Now, if we set at the interface, then,
|
|
|
|
Check Behavior
In step 4 of our accompanying analysis, we find that from the perspective of the core,
|
|
|
|
and, |
|
|
|
Hence, at the interface,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
While, in step 8 of that analysis, we find from the perspective of the envelope,
|
|
|
|
and, |
|
|
|
Hence, at the interface,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Also
|
Appendices: | VisTrailsEquations | VisTrailsVariables | References | Ramblings | VisTrailsImages | myphys.lsu | ADS | |