SSC/Structure/BiPolytropes/AnalyzeStepFunction: Difference between revisions

From jetwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 363: Line 363:


<font color="red"><b>STEP 4:</b></font> &nbsp; Show how <math>dP/dm</math> varies with <math>m</math>, according to this analytic prescription, and compare it against the pressure gradient behavior obtained in STEP 3.  Do they match?
<font color="red"><b>STEP 4:</b></font> &nbsp; Show how <math>dP/dm</math> varies with <math>m</math>, according to this analytic prescription, and compare it against the pressure gradient behavior obtained in STEP 3.  Do they match?
<table border="1" width="80%" align="center" cellpadding="5">
<tr>
  <td align="center">[[File:FiniteDifferenceLAWE01.png|600px|Finite-Difference Representation of n = 5 Core]]</td>
</tr>
</table>


<font color="red"><b>STEP 5:</b></font> &nbsp; Guess the eigenvector, <math>{\delta r}_i</math>, remembering that a reasonably good trial eigenfunction for the core is,
<font color="red"><b>STEP 5:</b></font> &nbsp; Guess the eigenvector, <math>{\delta r}_i</math>, remembering that a reasonably good trial eigenfunction for the core is,

Revision as of 14:11, 13 June 2022

More Careful Examination of Step Function Behavior

The ideas that are captured in this chapter have arisen as an extension of our accompanying "renormalization" of the Analytic51 bipolytrope.

Discontinuous Density Distribution

Expectations

From among the set of governing relations that apply to spherically symmetric configurations, we focus, first, on the combined,

Euler + Poisson Equations

dvrdt=1ρdPdrGMrr2

At the interface between the core and envelope of an equilibrium bipolytrope, both the core and the envelope must satisfy the relation,

1ρdPdr

=

GMrr2.

Now, the quantity on the right-hand side of this expression must be the same at the interface, when viewed either from the perspective of the core or from the perspective of the envelope. Therefore, at the interface, the equilibrium configuration must obey the relation,

[1ρdPdr]env,i

=

[1ρdPdr]core,i.


Now, if we set ρe=(μe/μc)ρc at the interface, then,

[dPdr]env,i

=

μeμc[dPdr]core,i.

Check Behavior

In step 4 of our accompanying analysis, we find that from the perspective of the core,

P*

=

(1+13ξ2)3,

      and,      

r*

=

(32π)1/2ξ.

Hence, at the interface,

dP*dr*|core={dξdr*dP*dξ}core

=

2(2π3)1/2[(1+13ξ2)4ξ]i

 

=

(4π3)θi8ri*.

While, in step 8 of that analysis, we find from the perspective of the envelope,

P*

=

θi6ϕ2,

      and,      

r*

=

(μeμc)1θi2(2π)1/2η.

Hence, at the interface,

dP*dr*|env={dηdr*dP*dη}env

=

{(μeμc)θi2(2π)1/2}2θi6[ϕdϕdη]i

 

=

2(2π)1/2θi8{(μeμc)}[31/2θi3(dθdξ)i]

 

=

23(6π)1/2θi8(μeμc)ξi

 

=

2(2π3)1/2θi8(μeμc)[(2π3)1/2ri*]

 

=

(4π3)θi8(μeμc)ri*.

Gratifyingly, we find as expected that,

[dP*dr*]env,i

=

μeμc[dP*dr*]core,i.

Discrete LAWE for Bipolytrope

Summary Set of Nonlinear Governing Relations

In summary, the following three one-dimensional ODEs define the physical relationship between the three dependent variables ρ, P, and r, each of which should be expressible as a function of the two independent (Lagrangian) variables, t and Mr:

Equation of Continuity
dρdt=4πρ2r2ddMr(drdt)2ρr(drdt)
,

Euler + Poisson Equations
d2rdt2=4πr2dPdMrGMrr2


Adiabatic Form of the
First Law of Thermodynamics

ρdPdtγgPdρdt=0.

March from the Center, Outward

We know the analytic structure of the equilibrium configuration. Let's choose a Lagrangian grid that is labeled by (r0)j and the corresponding enclosed mass, mj(r0), where the center of the spherical bipolytrope is labeled by j=0 while each subsequent grid "line" is labeled j. We will identify the mean density of each mass shell by the expression,

ρ¯j1/2

=

[ΔmVolume]j1/2=[mjmj1][4π3(rj3rj13)]1.

The pressure can be determined from knowledge of the density via knowledge of the (fixed) specific entropy, namely,

Pj1/2

=

(ρ¯j1/2)γexp[μ(γ1)s].

These two expressions, effectively, originate from the continuity equation and the adiabatic form of the first law of thermodynamics, respectively. They are relations that allow the determination of the mass density and the pressure, given fixed mass shells but varying mass-shell radial locations.

STEP 1:   From the analytically known equilibrium structure of the (nc,ne)=(5,1) bipolytrope, create a table that documents how the radial location of each mass shell, rj, varies with the enclosed mass, mj.

STEP 2:   Determine how ρ¯j1/2 varies with radial shell location, using the above continuity-equation relation. (Plot ρ¯ versus m obtained in this discrete manner, then also plot how ρ varies with m according to the analytic equilibrium structure; the plotted curves should be nearly, but not exactly, the same.)

STEP 3:   Determine how Pj1/2 varies with radial shell location, using the above 1st Law relation; also determine (and plot) how (dP/dm)j varies with m.

Now, what can we learn from the "Euler + Poisson Equation"? Well, for the equilibrium state, we should find that,

dPdm

=

Gm4πr4.

STEP 4:   Show how dP/dm varies with m, according to this analytic prescription, and compare it against the pressure gradient behavior obtained in STEP 3. Do they match?

Finite-Difference Representation of n = 5 Core

STEP 5:   Guess the eigenvector, δri, remembering that a reasonably good trial eigenfunction for the core is,

xαscale

=

1ξ215,

      where,      

ξ

=

(2π3)1/2r.

STEP 6:   Given that when a proper solution has been obtained,

d2rdt2

ω2δri,

at each radial shell we can determine what the value of ω2 would be as a result of our δri guess by rewriting the

Euler + Poisson Equations
d2rdt2=4πr2dPdMrGMrr2

to read,

+ωi2

1δriri2[4πri4dPdm+Gm].


STEP 7:   Alternatively, from our summary set of linearized equations, we expect …

P0ρ0dpdr0

(4x+p)g0+ω2r0x

ω2δr

P0ρ0dpdr0(4x+p)g0

 

=

(4πr02)P0d(δP/P0)dm4xg0+(δPP0)4πr02dP0dm

 

=

(4πr02)d(δP)dm+4δrr0[Gmr02]

 

=

(4πr02)dPdm+4δrr0[Gmr02](4πr02)dP0dm

 

=

(4πr02)dPdm+[1+4δrr0][Gmr02]

 

=

(4πr02)dPdm+[1+δrr0]4[Gmr02]

 

=

(4πr02)dPdm+rr04[Gmr02]


STEP 8:   Finally, we should guess a new eigenvector (then guess again, and again, and again …) until ω2 settles down to have the same value at all radial locations.

See Also

Tiled Menu

Appendices: | VisTrailsEquations | VisTrailsVariables | References | Ramblings | VisTrailsImages | myphys.lsu | ADS |