Appendix/Ramblings/51AnalyticStabilitySynopsis: Difference between revisions
Created page with "__FORCETOC__ <!-- will force the creation of a Table of Contents --> <!-- __NOTOC__ will force TOC off --> =More Focused Search for Analytic EigenVector of (5,1) Bipolytropes= The ideas that are captured in this chapter have arisen after a review of a previous hunt for the desired analytic eigenvector and as an extension of our SSC/Structure/BiPolytropes/Analytic51Renormalize|accompanying "renormalization" of the A..." |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
The ideas that are captured in this chapter have arisen after a review of [[Appendix/Ramblings/BiPolytrope51AnalyticStability|a previous hunt for the desired analytic eigenvector]] and as an extension of our [[SSC/Structure/BiPolytropes/Analytic51Renormalize|accompanying "renormalization" of the Analytic51 bipolytrope]]. | The ideas that are captured in this chapter have arisen after a review of [[Appendix/Ramblings/BiPolytrope51AnalyticStability|a previous hunt for the desired analytic eigenvector]] and as an extension of our [[SSC/Structure/BiPolytropes/Analytic51Renormalize|accompanying "renormalization" of the Analytic51 bipolytrope]]. | ||
==Review of Attempt 4B== | |||
===Structure=== | |||
From a separate search that we labeled [[Appendix/Ramblings/BiPolytrope51AnalyticStability#Attempt_4B|Attempt 4B]], we draw the following information regarding the structure of the envelope. | |||
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center"> | |||
<tr> | |||
<td align="right"> | |||
<math>\phi</math> | |||
</td> | |||
<td align="center"> | |||
<math>=</math> | |||
</td> | |||
<td align="left"> | |||
<math>a_0 \biggl[ \frac{\sin(\eta - b_0)}{\eta} \biggr] \, ,</math> | |||
</td> | |||
</tr> | |||
</table> | |||
and, | |||
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center"> | |||
<tr> | |||
<td align="right"> | |||
<math>\frac{d\phi}{d\eta}</math> | |||
</td> | |||
<td align="center"> | |||
<math>=</math> | |||
</td> | |||
<td align="left"> | |||
<math>\frac{a_0}{\eta^2} \biggl[ \eta \cos(\eta - b_0) - \sin(\eta - b_0) \biggr] \, ,</math> | |||
</td> | |||
</tr> | |||
</table> | |||
and, | |||
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center"> | |||
<tr> | |||
<td align="right"> | |||
<math>\frac{d^2\phi}{d\eta^2}</math> | |||
</td> | |||
<td align="center"> | |||
<math>=</math> | |||
</td> | |||
<td align="left"> | |||
<math> | |||
- \frac{a_0}{\eta} \cdot \sin(\eta - b_0) | |||
- | |||
\frac{2a_0}{\eta^2} \cdot \cos(\eta - b_0) | |||
+ | |||
\frac{2a_0}{\eta^3} \cdot \sin(\eta - b_0) \, . | |||
</math> | |||
</td> | |||
</tr> | |||
</table> | |||
This satisfies the Lane-Emden equation for any values of the parameter pair, <math>~a_0</math> and <math>~b_0</math>. Note that, | |||
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center"> | |||
<tr> | |||
<td align="right"> | |||
<math>Q \equiv - \frac{d\ln \phi}{d\ln\eta}</math> | |||
</td> | |||
<td align="center"> | |||
<math>=</math> | |||
</td> | |||
<td align="left"> | |||
<math>\biggl[1 - \eta \cot(\eta - b_0) \biggr] </math> | |||
</td> | |||
</tr> | |||
<tr> | |||
<td align="right"> | |||
<math>\Rightarrow~~~ \eta \cot(\eta - b_0) </math> | |||
</td> | |||
<td align="center"> | |||
<math>=</math> | |||
</td> | |||
<td align="left"> | |||
<math>(1 - Q ) \, .</math> | |||
</td> | |||
</tr> | |||
</table> | |||
===LAWE=== | |||
Now, guided by a [[SSC/Stability/n1PolytropeLAWE#Succinct_Demonstration|separate parallel discussion]] we also showed in [[Appendix/Ramblings/BiPolytrope51AnalyticStability#Attempt_4B|Attempt 4B]] that, in the case of a bipolytropic configuration for which <math>n_e=1</math>, the | |||
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center"> | |||
<tr> | |||
<td align="center" colspan="4"><font color="maroon"><b>Trial Displacement Function</b></font></td> | |||
</tr> | |||
<tr> | |||
<td align="right"> | |||
<math>~\sigma_c^2 = 0</math> | |||
</td> | |||
<td align="center"> | |||
and | |||
</td> | |||
<td align="left"> | |||
<math>~x_P </math> | |||
</td> | |||
<td align="left"> | |||
<math>~ \equiv \frac{3c_0 (n-1)}{2n}\biggl[1 + \biggl(\frac{n-3}{n-1}\biggr) \biggl( \frac{1}{\eta \phi^{n}}\biggr) \frac{d\phi}{d\eta}\biggr] </math> | |||
</td> | |||
</tr> | |||
<tr> | |||
<td align="right" colspan="3"> | |||
| |||
</td> | |||
<td align="left"> | |||
<math>~= -\biggl( \frac{3c_0}{\eta \phi}\biggr) \frac{d\phi}{d\eta} = \frac{3c_0}{\eta^2} \cdot Q \, , </math> | |||
</td> | |||
</tr> | |||
</table> | |||
satisfies the governing LAWE precisely, namely, | |||
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center"> | |||
<tr> | |||
<td align="right"> | |||
<math>~0</math> | |||
</td> | |||
<td align="center"> | |||
<math>~=</math> | |||
</td> | |||
<td align="left"> | |||
<math>~ | |||
\frac{d^2x_P}{d\eta^2} + \biggl[4 - 2Q\biggr]\frac{1}{\eta}\cdot \frac{dx_P}{d\eta} - 2Q\cdot \frac{x_P}{\eta^2} \, . | |||
</math> | |||
</td> | |||
</tr> | |||
</table> | |||
While it is rather amazing that we have been able to identify this analytic solution to the LAWE, the solution seems troubling because it blows up at the surface, where, <math>\eta_s - b_0 = \pi</math>. We will ignore this undesired behavior for the time being. | |||
=See Also= | =See Also= | ||
{{ SGFfooter }} | {{ SGFfooter }} | ||
Revision as of 18:31, 7 July 2022
More Focused Search for Analytic EigenVector of (5,1) Bipolytropes
The ideas that are captured in this chapter have arisen after a review of a previous hunt for the desired analytic eigenvector and as an extension of our accompanying "renormalization" of the Analytic51 bipolytrope.
Review of Attempt 4B
Structure
From a separate search that we labeled Attempt 4B, we draw the following information regarding the structure of the envelope.
|
|
|
|
and,
|
|
|
|
and,
|
|
|
|
This satisfies the Lane-Emden equation for any values of the parameter pair, and . Note that,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LAWE
Now, guided by a separate parallel discussion we also showed in Attempt 4B that, in the case of a bipolytropic configuration for which , the
| Trial Displacement Function | |||
|
|
and |
|
|
|
|
|
||
satisfies the governing LAWE precisely, namely,
|
|
|
|
While it is rather amazing that we have been able to identify this analytic solution to the LAWE, the solution seems troubling because it blows up at the surface, where, . We will ignore this undesired behavior for the time being.
See Also
|
Appendices: | VisTrailsEquations | VisTrailsVariables | References | Ramblings | VisTrailsImages | myphys.lsu | ADS | |