SSC/Structure/BiPolytropes/51RenormaizePart2: Difference between revisions

From jetwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
=Radial Oscillations in (n<sub>c</sub>,n<sub>e</sub>) = (5,1) Bipolytropes=
=Radial Oscillations in (n<sub>c</sub>,n<sub>e</sub>) = (5,1) Bipolytropes=
Logically, this chapter extends the discussion &#8212; specifically the subsection titled, ''Try Again'' &#8212; found in the "Ramblings" chapter in which we [[SSC/Structure/BiPolytropes/Analytic51Renormalize#Try_Again|introduced a total-mass-based renormalization]] of models along sequences of <math>(n_c, n_e) = (5, 1)</math> bipolytropes.
Logically, this chapter extends the discussion &#8212; specifically the subsection titled, ''Try Again'' &#8212; found in the "Ramblings" chapter in which we [[SSC/Structure/BiPolytropes/Analytic51Renormalize#Try_Again|introduced a total-mass-based renormalization]] of models along sequences of <math>(n_c, n_e) = (5, 1)</math> bipolytropes.
==Building Each Model==
Most of the details underpinning the following summary relations can be [[SSC/Structure/BiPolytropes/Analytic51Renormalize#BiPolytrope_with_(nc,_ne)_=_(5,_1)|found here]].
<div align="center"><b>New Normalization</b></div>
<table border="0" align="center" cellpadding="5">
<tr>
  <td align="right"><math>\tilde\rho</math></td>
  <td align="center"><math>\equiv</math></td>
  <td align="left"><math>\rho \biggl[\biggl( \frac{K_c}{G} \biggr)^{3 / 2} \frac{1}{M_\mathrm{tot}} \biggr]^{-5} \, ;</math></td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right"><math>\tilde{P}</math></td>
  <td align="center"><math>\equiv</math></td>
  <td align="left"><math>P \biggl[K_c^{-10} G^{9} M_\mathrm{tot}^{6}  \biggr] \, ;</math></td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right"><math>\tilde{r}</math></td>
  <td align="center"><math>\equiv</math></td>
  <td align="left"><math>r \biggl[\biggl( \frac{K_c}{G} \biggr)^{5 / 2} M_\mathrm{tot}^{-2}  \biggr]\, ,</math></td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right"><math>\tilde{M}_r</math></td>
  <td align="center"><math>\equiv</math></td>
  <td align="left"><math>\frac{M_r}{M_\mathrm{tot}} \, ;</math></td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right"><math>\tilde{H}</math></td>
  <td align="center"><math>\equiv</math></td>
  <td align="left"><math>H \biggl[K_c^{-5 / 2} G^{3 / 2} M_\mathrm{tot} \biggr] \, .</math></td>
</tr>
</table>
<table border="1" align="center" cellpadding="8">
<tr>
  <td align="center">
Quantity
  </td>
  <td align="center">
Core
  </td>
  <td align="center">
Envelope
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="center">
<math>\tilde{r}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>\mathcal{m}_\mathrm{surf}^{-2} \biggl(\frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c}\biggr)^{4}
\biggl(\frac{3}{2\pi}\biggr)^{1/2} \xi</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="center">
<math>\tilde{\rho}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>\mathcal{m}_\mathrm{surf}^5 \biggl(\frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c}\biggr)^{-10}
\biggl( 1 + \frac{1}{3}\xi^2 \biggr)^{-5/2}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="center">
<math>\tilde{P}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>\mathcal{m}_\mathrm{surf}^6 \biggl(\frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c}\biggr)^{-12}
\biggl( 1 + \frac{1}{3}\xi^2 \biggr)^{-3} </math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="center">
<math>\tilde{M}_r</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>\mathcal{m}_\mathrm{surf}^{-1} \biggl(\frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c}\biggr)^{2}
\biggl( \frac{2\cdot 3}{\pi } \biggr)^{1/2} \biggl[ \xi^3 \biggl( 1 + \frac{1}{3}\xi^2 \biggr)^{-3/2} \biggr]
</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>


==Example Models Along BiPolytrope Sequence 0.3100==
==Example Models Along BiPolytrope Sequence 0.3100==

Revision as of 18:27, 18 August 2022

Radial Oscillations in (nc,ne) = (5,1) Bipolytropes

Logically, this chapter extends the discussion — specifically the subsection titled, Try Again — found in the "Ramblings" chapter in which we introduced a total-mass-based renormalization of models along sequences of (nc,ne)=(5,1) bipolytropes.

Building Each Model

Most of the details underpinning the following summary relations can be found here.

New Normalization
ρ~ ρ[(KcG)3/21Mtot]5;
P~ P[Kc10G9Mtot6];
r~ r[(KcG)5/2Mtot2],
M~r MrMtot;
H~ H[Kc5/2G3/2Mtot].

Quantity

Core

Envelope

r~

𝓂surf2(μeμc)4(32π)1/2ξ

ρ~

𝓂surf5(μeμc)10(1+13ξ2)5/2

P~

𝓂surf6(μeμc)12(1+13ξ2)3

M~r

𝓂surf1(μeμc)2(23π)1/2[ξ3(1+13ξ2)3/2]

Example Models Along BiPolytrope Sequence 0.3100

For the case of (nc,ne)=(5,1) and μe/μc=0.3100, we consider here the examination of models with three relatively significant values of the core/envelope interface:

  • (ξi,ρ¯/ρc,q,ν)(2.06061,1.1931E+02,0.16296,0.13754): Approximate location along the sequence of the model with the maximum fractional core radius.
  • (ξi,ρ¯/ρc,q,ν)(2.69697,3.0676E+02,0.15819,0.19161): Approximate location along the sequence of the onset of fundamental-mode instability.
  • (ξi,ρ¯/ρc,q,ν)(9.0149598,1.1664E+06,0.075502255,0.337217006): Exact location along the sequence of the model with the maximum fractional core mass.


See Also

Tiled Menu

Appendices: | VisTrailsEquations | VisTrailsVariables | References | Ramblings | VisTrailsImages | myphys.lsu | ADS |