SSC/Structure/BiPolytropes/51RenormaizePart2: Difference between revisions

From jetwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 191: Line 191:


===Additional Relations===
===Additional Relations===
====Core====
The analytically prescribed radial pressure gradient in the core can be obtained as follows.
The analytically prescribed radial pressure gradient in the core can be obtained as follows.


Line 439: Line 441:
</td></tr></table>
</td></tr></table>


Now, for the envelope we find that,
====Envelope====
Given that, for the envelope,
 
<table border="0" align="center" cellpadding="8">
 
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>
\tilde{M}_r
</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
  <td align="left">
<math>\mathcal{m}_\mathrm{surf}^{-1}~ \theta^{-1}_i \biggl( \frac{2}{\pi} \biggr)^{1/2}
A\biggl[ \sin(\eta-B) - \eta\cos(\eta-B) \biggr] \, ,</math>
  </td>
</tr>
 
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>
\tilde{r}
</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
  <td align="left">
<math>\mathcal{m}_\mathrm{surf}^{-2} \biggl( \frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c} \biggr)^{3} \theta^{-2}_i (2\pi)^{-1/2}\eta \, ,</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
we deduce that,
 
<table border="0" align="center" cellpadding="8">
 
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>
\frac{d\tilde{P}}{d\tilde{M}_r} = - \frac{\tilde{M}_r}{4\pi \tilde{r}^4}
</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
-\biggl(\frac{1}{4\pi}\biggr)
\mathcal{m}_\mathrm{surf}^{-1}~ \theta^{-1}_i \biggl( \frac{2}{\pi} \biggr)^{1/2}
A\biggl[ \sin(\eta-B) - \eta\cos(\eta-B) \biggr] \cdot
\biggl[
\mathcal{m}_\mathrm{surf}^{-2} \biggl( \frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c} \biggr)^{3} \theta^{-2}_i (2\pi)^{-1/2}\eta
\biggr]^{-4}
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>


==Example Models Along BiPolytrope Sequence 0.3100==
==Example Models Along BiPolytrope Sequence 0.3100==

Revision as of 12:50, 19 August 2022

Radial Oscillations in (nc,ne) = (5,1) Bipolytropes

Logically, this chapter extends the discussion — specifically the subsection titled, Try Again — found in the "Ramblings" chapter in which we introduced a total-mass-based renormalization of models along sequences of (nc,ne)=(5,1) bipolytropes.

Building Each Model

Basic Equilibrium Structure

Most of the details underpinning the following summary relations can be found here.

New Normalization
ρ~ ≡ ρ[(KcG)3/21Mtot]−5;
P~ ≡ P[Kc−10G9Mtot6];
r~ ≡ r[(KcG)5/2Mtot−2],
M~r ≡ MrMtot;
H~ ≡ H[Kc−5/2G3/2Mtot].

Quantity

Core
0≤ξ≤ξi


θ=[1+13ξ2]−1/2
dθdξ=−ξ3[1+13ξ2]−3/2

Envelope
ηi≤η≤ηs


ϕ=A[sin⁡(η−B)η]
dϕdη=−Aη2[sin⁡(η−B)−ηcos⁡(η−B)]

r~

𝓂surf−2(μeμc)4(32π)1/2ξ

𝓂surf−2(μeμc)3θi−2(2π)−1/2η

ρ~

𝓂surf5(μeμc)−10(1+13ξ2)−5/2

𝓂surf5(μeμc)−9θi5ϕ

P~

𝓂surf6(μeμc)−12(1+13ξ2)−3

𝓂surf6(μeμc)−12θi6ϕ2

M~r

𝓂surf−1(μeμc)2(2⋅3π)1/2[ξ3(1+13ξ2)−3/2]

𝓂surf−1θi−1(2π)1/2(−η2dϕdη)

Note that, for a given specification of the molecular-weight ratio, μe/μc, and the interface location, ξi,

θi = (1+13ξi2)−1/2,
ηi = (μeμc)3θi2ξi,
Λi = ξi3[(μeμc)−11θi2ξi2−1],
A = ηi(1+Λi2)1/2,
ηs = π2+ηi+tan−1(Λi),

in which case,

𝓂surf = (2π)1/2Aηsθi,
ρ~c =

𝓂surf5(μeμc)−10,

ν≡McoreMtot = (μeμc)23[ξi3θi4Aηs],
q≡rcoreR = (μeμc)3[ξiθi2ηs].

Additional Relations

Core

The analytically prescribed radial pressure gradient in the core can be obtained as follows.

dM~rdξ =

𝓂surf−1(μeμc)2(2⋅3π)1/2{3ξ2(1+13ξ2)−3/2−ξ4(1+13ξ2)−5/2}

  =

𝓂surf−1(μeμc)2(2⋅3π)1/2{3ξ2(1+13ξ2)−ξ4}(1+13ξ2)−5/2

  =

𝓂surf−1(μeμc)2(2⋅3π)1/2{3ξ2(1+13ξ2)−5/2}

⇒dξdM~r =

𝓂surf(μeμc)−2(π2⋅3)1/2{13ξ2(1+13ξ2)5/2}.

Also,

dP~dξ =

−𝓂surf6(μeμc)−12{2ξ(1+13ξ2)−4}

Hence,

dP~dM~r =

−𝓂surf6(μeμc)−12{2ξ(1+13ξ2)−4}⋅𝓂surf(μeμc)−2(π2⋅3)1/2{13ξ2(1+13ξ2)5/2}

  =

−𝓂surf7(μeμc)−14(2π33)1/21ξ(1+13ξ2)−3/2.

For comparison, in hydrostatic balance we expect …

dPdMr=dPdr⋅drdMr

=

−GMrρr2⋅14πr2ρ=−GMr4πr4

⇒dP~dM~r=[dPdMr]⋅[Kc−10G9Mtot6]Mtot

=

−GMr4πr4[Kc−10G9Mtot7]

 

=

−M~r4πr4[Kc−10G10Mtot8]

 

=

−M~r4πr~4

 

=

−14π𝓂surf−1(μeμc)2(2⋅3π)1/2[ξ3(1+13ξ2)−3/2]⋅{𝓂surf−2(μeμc)4(32π)1/2ξ}−4

 

=

−{𝓂surf7(μeμc)−14(22π232)}14π(2⋅3π)1/2[1ξ(1+13ξ2)−3/2]

 

=

−{𝓂surf7(μeμc)−14}(2⋅π33)1/2[1ξ(1+13ξ2)−3/2].

This matches our earlier expression, as it should.

Takeaway Expression

dP~dM~r

=

−M~r4πr~4

Envelope

Given that, for the envelope,

M~r

=

𝓂surf−1θi−1(2π)1/2A[sin⁡(η−B)−ηcos⁡(η−B)],

r~

=

𝓂surf−2(μeμc)3θi−2(2π)−1/2η,

we deduce that,

dP~dM~r=−M~r4πr~4

=

−(14π)𝓂surf−1θi−1(2π)1/2A[sin⁡(η−B)−ηcos⁡(η−B)]⋅[𝓂surf−2(μeμc)3θi−2(2π)−1/2η]−4

Example Models Along BiPolytrope Sequence 0.3100

For the case of (nc,ne)=(5,1) and μe/μc=0.3100, we consider here the examination of models with three relatively significant values of the core/envelope interface:

  • Model D (ξi,ρ¯/ρc,q,ν)≈(2.06061,1.1931E+02,0.16296,0.13754): Approximate location along the sequence of the model with the maximum fractional core radius.
  • Model C (ξi,ρ¯/ρc,q,ν)≈(2.69697,3.0676E+02,0.15819,0.19161): Approximate location along the sequence of the onset of fundamental-mode instability.
  • Model A (ξi,ρ¯/ρc,q,ν)≈(9.0149598,1.1664E+06,0.075502255,0.337217006): Exact location along the sequence of the model with the maximum fractional core mass.

Model C

Here we examine a discrete representation of a model along the μe/μc=0.31 sequence whose core/envelope interface is located a ξi=2.69697.

See Also

Tiled Menu

Appendices: | VisTrailsEquations | VisTrailsVariables | References | Ramblings | VisTrailsImages | myphys.lsu | ADS |