ThreeDimensionalConfigurations/JacobiEllipsoids: Difference between revisions

From jetwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 1,194: Line 1,194:
</ul>
</ul>


If we combine the value of <math>\Omega^2</math> obtained from {{ EHS82 }} with the values of <math>(b/a, c/a)</math> obtained from [<b>[[Appendix/References#EFE|<font color="red">EFE</font>]]</b>], we find &hellip;
I have not (yet) found the corresponding value of <math>\Omega^2</math> in any of Chandrasekhar's publications, but if we combine the value of <math>\Omega^2</math> obtained from {{ EHS82 }} with the values of <math>(b/a, c/a)</math> obtained from [<b>[[Appendix/References#EFE|<font color="red">EFE</font>]]</b>], we find &hellip;
<ul>
<ul>
<li><math>\Omega^2/(\pi G \rho) = </math></li>
<li><math>\Omega^2/(\pi G \rho) = 0.2128</math></li>
<li>From the [[#Angular_Momentum_Constraint|above expression]], <math>\frac{L}{(GM^3\bar{a})^{1 / 2}} = </math> and <math>j^2 = \biggl( \frac{3}{2^8 \pi^4}  \biggr)^{1/3}  \frac{L^2}{(GM^3\bar{a})} = </math></li>
<li>From the [[#Angular_Momentum_Constraint|above expression]], <math>\frac{L}{(GM^3\bar{a})^{1 / 2}} = 0.48242</math> &nbsp; and &nbsp; <math>j^2 = \biggl( \frac{3}{2^8 \pi^4}  \biggr)^{1/3}  \frac{L^2}{(GM^3\bar{a})} = 0.01149</math></li>
</ul>
</ul>
This value of <math>j^2</math> is very close to the value obtained by {{ EHS82 }}.


=See Also=
=See Also=

Revision as of 18:31, 17 May 2023

Jacobi Ellipsoids

Jacobi
Ellipsoids

As has been detailed in an accompanying chapter, the gravitational potential anywhere inside or on the surface, (a1,a2,a3)(a,b,c), of an homogeneous ellipsoid may be given analytically in terms of the following three coefficient expressions:

A1

=

2(ba)(ca)[F(θ,k)E(θ,k)k2sin3θ],

A3

=

2(ba)[(b/a)sinθ(c/a)E(θ,k)(1k2)sin3θ],

A2

=

2(A1+A3),

where, F(θ,k) and E(θ,k) are incomplete elliptic integrals of the first and second kind, respectively, with arguments,

θ=cos1(ca)

      and      

k=[1(b/a)21(c/a)2]1/2.

[EFE], Chapter 3, §17, Eq. (32)

Equilibrium Conditions for Jacobi Ellipsoids

Pulling from Chapter 6 — specifically, §39 — of [EFE], we understand that the semi-axis ratios, (ba,ca) associated with Jacobi ellipsoids are given by the roots of the equation,

a2b2A12

=

c2A3,

[EFE], §39, Eq. (4)

and the associated value of the square of the equilibrium configuration's angular velocity is,

Ω2πGρ

=

2B12,

[EFE], §39, Eq. (5)

where,

A12

A1A2(a2b2),

[EFE], §21, Eq. (107)

B12

A2a2A12.

[EFE], §21, Eq. (105)


Taken together, we see that, written in terms of the two primary coefficients, A1 and A3, the pair of defining relations for Jacobi ellipsoids is:


fJ

(ba)2[2(1A1)A31(b/a)2](ca)2A3=0

and

Ω2πGρ

=

2{2(A1+A3)[2(1A1)A31(b/a)2]}

Roots of the Governing Relation

Constraint on Axis-Ratio Relationship

To simplify notation, here we will set,

χba

      and      

υca,

in which case the governing relation is,

fJ

=

χ21χ2[2(1A1)A3]υ2A3=0.

Our plan is to employ the Newton Raphson method to find the root(s) of the fJ=0 relation, typically holding υ fixed and using the Newton-Raphson technique to identify the corresponding "root" value of χ. Using this approach, the Newton Raphson technique requires specification of, not only the function, fJ, but also its first derivative,

fJ'

=

dfJdχ.

Let's determine the requisite expression, using a prime superscript to indicate differentiation with respect to χ.

fJ'

=

[2(1A1)A3][2χ(1χ2)2]χ21χ2[2A1'+A3']υ2A3',

where, given that θ does not depend on χ,

A1'

=

2υsin3θddχ{χk2[F(θ,k)E(θ,k)]}

 

=

2υk3sin3θ{[FE][k2χk']+χk[F'E']},

A3'

=

2sin3θddχ{χ(1k2)[χsinθυE(θ,k)]}

 

=

2(1k2)2sin3θ{[χsinθυE][(1k2)+2χkk']+χ(1k2)[sinθυE']},

k'

=

ddχ[1χ21υ2]1/2=χ(1χ2)1/2(1υ2)1/2,

F'

=

F(θ,k)kk',

E'

=

E(θ,k)kk'.

Now, according to online WolframResearch documentation — see, in particular, the subsection titled, "Representations of Derivatives" —

F(z|m)m

=

E(z|m)2(1m)mF(z|m)2msin(2z)4(1m)1msin2(z),

and,

E(z|m)m

=

E(z|m)F(z|m)2m,

where, zθ, and,

mk2dmdk=2k .

Hence, we have,

F'

=

[F(z|m)mdmdk]k'

 

=

[E(θ,k)2(1k2)k2F(θ,k)2k2sin(2θ)4(1k2)1k2sin2θ]2kk',

E'

=

[E(z|m)mdmdk]k'

 

=

[E(θ,k)F(θ,k)]k'k.

This, then, gives us all of the expressions necessary to specify the derivative, fJ' analytically.


Table 1:  Double-Precision Evaluations

Related to Table IV in [EFE], Chapter 6, §39 (p. 103)

         b/a      c/a            omega2              angmom              5L/M                fJ              fJderiv

        1.00   0.582724     3.742297785D-01     3.037510987D-01     4.232965627D+00     0.000000000D+00     0.000000000D+00
        0.96   0.570801     3.739782202D-01     3.039551227D-01     4.235808832D+00     1.377942479D-06     1.636908401D-01
        0.92   0.558330     3.731876801D-01     3.046006837D-01     4.244805137D+00    -6.821687132D-07     1.676406830D-01
        0.88   0.545263     3.717835971D-01     3.057488283D-01     4.260805266D+00     8.533280272D-07     1.715558312D-01
        0.84   0.531574     3.696959199D-01     3.074667323D-01     4.284745355D+00    -4.622993727D-08     1.754024874D-01
        0.80   0.517216     3.668370069D-01     3.098368632D-01     4.317774645D+00     2.805300664D-08     1.791408327D-01
        0.76   0.502147     3.631138118D-01     3.129555079D-01     4.361234951D+00     3.221800126D-07     1.827219476D-01
        0.72   0.486322     3.584232032D-01     3.169377270D-01     4.416729718D+00     3.274773094D-08     1.860866255D-01
        0.68   0.469689     3.526490289D-01     3.219229588D-01     4.486202108D+00     1.202999164D-08     1.891636215D-01
        0.64   0.452194     3.456641138D-01     3.280805511D-01     4.572012092D+00     2.681560312D-07     1.918668912D-01
        0.60   0.433781     3.373298891D-01     3.356184007D-01     4.677056841D+00     1.037186290D-08     1.940927000D-01
        0.56   0.414386     3.274928085D-01     3.447962894D-01     4.804956583D+00     1.071021385D-07     1.957166395D-01
        0.52   0.393944     3.159887358D-01     3.559412795D-01     4.960269141D+00     8.098003093D-08     1.965890756D-01
        0.48   0.372384     3.026414267D-01     3.694732246D-01     5.148845443D+00     1.255768368D-07     1.965308751D-01
        0.44   0.349632     2.872670174D-01     3.859399647D-01     5.378319986D+00     1.329168636D-08     1.953277019D-01
        0.40   0.325609     2.696779847D-01     4.060726774D-01     5.658882201D+00    -9.783004411D-08     1.927241063D-01
        0.36   0.300232     2.496925963D-01     4.308722159D-01     6.004479614D+00     1.044268276D-07     1.884168286D-01
        0.32   0.273419     2.271530240D-01     4.617497270D-01     6.434777459D+00    -4.469279448D-08     1.820477545D-01
        0.28   0.245083     2.019461513D-01     5.007767426D-01     6.978643856D+00     7.996820889D-08     1.731984783D-01
        0.24   0.215143     1.740514751D-01     5.511400218D-01     7.680488329D+00     1.099319693D-07     1.613864645D-01
        0.20   0.183524     1.436093757D-01     6.180687545D-01     8.613182979D+00     5.068010978D-08     1.460685065D-01
        0.16   0.150166     1.110438660D-01     7.109267615D-01     9.907218635D+00    -2.170751250D-08     1.266576761D-01
        0.12   0.115038     7.728058393D-02     8.487699974D-01     1.182815219D+01     3.613784147D-09     1.025686850D-01
        0.08   0.078166     4.416740942D-02     1.079303624D+00     1.504078558D+01     3.319018649D-08     7.332782508D-02
        0.04   0.039688     1.541513490D-02     1.582762691D+00     2.205680933D+01    -6.674246644D-09     3.882477311D-02

With regard to our Table 1 (immediately above): Given each pair of axis ratios, (ba,ca) — copied from Table IV of [EFE] (see columns 1 and 2 of our Table 1) — and the corresponding coefficient values, A1, A2, and A3, as tabulated in Table 2 of our accompanying discussion, we calculated corresponding values of Ω2 (column 3) and total angular momentum (column 4) in the units used in Table IV of [EFE], as well as (column 5) the total angular momentum in units used by Christodoulou, et al. (1995, ApJ, 446, 472) — see our related discussion of these physical quantities. We also have tabulated associated values of the function, fJ, (column 6) and its first derivative, fJ', (column 7) as defined immediately above. Notice that fJ is very nearly zero in all cases, which indicates that each axis-ratio pair indeed identifies a configuration that lies along the Jacobi sequence.

Table 2:  Jacobi Sequence

   b/a       c/a        A1        A2        A3      omega2       a       5L/M

  0.990699  0.580000  0.512818  0.518962  0.968220  0.374217  1.868761  4.233113
  0.901558  0.552381  0.481786  0.549836  0.968378  0.372621  1.960046  4.251259
  0.820783  0.524762  0.450993  0.580215  0.968792  0.368424  2.057217  4.299402
  0.747135  0.497143  0.420459  0.610088  0.969452  0.361716  2.161309  4.377683
  0.679613  0.469524  0.390210  0.639442  0.970348  0.352587  2.273548  4.486951
  0.617393  0.441905  0.360273  0.668258  0.971469  0.341129  2.395412  4.628802
  0.559798  0.414286  0.330684  0.696516  0.972800  0.327439  2.528716  4.805667
  0.506257  0.386667  0.301483  0.724187  0.974329  0.311620  2.675723  5.020964
  0.456291  0.359048  0.272719  0.751241  0.976040  0.293786  2.839307  5.279337
  0.409492  0.331429  0.244450  0.777636  0.977914  0.274062  3.023190  5.587020
  0.365507  0.303810  0.216744  0.803324  0.979931  0.252593  3.232298  5.952388
  0.324034  0.276190  0.189686  0.828246  0.982067  0.229546  3.473314  6.386811
  0.284807  0.248571  0.163376  0.852329  0.984295  0.205118  3.755577  6.906010
  0.247591  0.220952  0.137939  0.875480  0.986581  0.179549  4.092599  7.532311
  0.212179  0.193333  0.113527  0.897587  0.988885  0.153130  4.504785  8.298565
  0.178382  0.165714  0.090333  0.918505  0.991162  0.126229  5.024664  9.255452
  0.146026  0.138095  0.068601  0.938044  0.993355  0.099316  5.707871 10.486253
  0.114948  0.110476  0.048654  0.955953  0.995393  0.073010  6.659169 12.140357
  0.084989  0.082857  0.030927  0.971879  0.997194  0.048162  8.105501 14.522397
  0.055982  0.055238  0.016051  0.985298  0.998651  0.026008 10.663879 18.396951
  0.027738  0.027619  0.005032  0.995331  0.999637  0.008539 16.979084 26.660547

With regard to our Table 2 (immediately above): Here we specified twenty-one values of the axis ratio, ca, (column 2) and used our Newton-Raphson-based root finder to identify corresponding values of the companion axis ratio, ba, (column 1) that satisfies the governing relation, fJ=0.

Angular Momentum Constraint

Angular Momentum Determination

In the above tables, the square of the angular momentum, L2, for each equilibrium Jacobi ellipsoid has been determined in the following manner:

L2 = I2Ω2
  =

M2Ω252(a2+b2)2

  =

M252(Ω2πGρ)[3GM22abc](a2+b2)2

L2GM3a¯ =

152(Ω2πGρ)[322abc](a2+b2)2a¯

  =

32252(Ω2πGρ)(a2+b2)2a¯4.

[EFE], §39, p. 103, Eq. (16)

Normalizing in a different manner, we have:

L2 =

M252(Ω24πGρ)[4πGρ](a2+b2)2

j2L24πGM10/3ρ1/3 =

M4/352(Ω24πGρ)[ρ]4/3(a2+b2)2

  =

M4/352(Ω24πGρ)[3M4πabc]4/3(a2+b2)2

  =

12252[34π]4/3(Ω2πGρ)(a2+b2)2a¯4

  =

13[34π]4/3[L2GM3a¯]=0.049365924[L2GM3a¯].


Alternatively, let's choose a value for the system's total angular momentum, L>4.23296, and solve for the axis-ratio pair that identifies that configuration's location along the Jacobi sequence. We'll adopt the units used by Christodoulou et al (1995), that is, G=1, πρ=1 and M=5, hence,

a3

=

3Ma24π(bc)ρ=154(ba)1(ca)1.

Given that the relationship between L and Ω in equilibrium Jacobi ellipsoids is,

L

=

a2[1+(ba)2]Ω

 

=

[154(ba)1(ca)1]2/3[1+(ba)2]Ω

the constraint on Ω2 given above implies that,

L2[415(ba)(ca)]4/3[1+(ba)2]2

=

2{2(A1+A3)[2(1A1)A31(b/a)2]}.

Or, again adopting the shorthand notation,

χba

      and      

υca,

we seek roots of the function,

fL

L2[345425]1/3χ4/3υ4/3(1+χ2)2{[2(A1+A3)][2(1A1)A3](1χ2)1}=0.

As above, we will hold υ fixed and use the Newton-Raphson technique to identify the corresponding "root" value of χ. Hence, we need to specify, not only the function, fL, but also its first derivative,

fL'

fLχ.

 

=

[345425]1/3υ4/3χ{χ4/3(1+χ2)2[2(A1+A3)]χ4/3(1+χ2)2(1χ2)1[2(1A1)A3]}

 

=

[345425]1/3υ4/3{43χ7/3(1+χ2)2[2(A1+A3)]+4χ1/3(1+χ2)[2(A1+A3)]χ4/3(1+χ2)2(A1'+A3')

 

 

+43χ7/3(1+χ2)2(1χ2)1[2(1A1)A3]4χ1/3(1+χ2)(1χ2)1[2(1A1)A3]

 

 

2χ1/3(1+χ2)2(1χ2)2[2(1A1)A3]χ4/3(1+χ2)2(1χ2)1[2A1'A3']}

 

=

[35425]1/3υ4/3χ7/3(1+χ2){[12χ24(1+χ2)][2(A1+A3)]3χ(1+χ2)(A1'+A3')+3χ(1+χ2)(1χ2)1[2A1'+A3']

 

 

+(1χ2)2{4(1+χ2)(1χ2)[2(1A1)A3]12χ2(1χ2)[2(1A1)A3]6χ2(1+χ2)[2(1A1)A3]}}

 

=

[35425]1/3υ4/3χ7/3(1+χ2){[8χ24]A1+3χ(1+χ2)(1χ2)1[(1+χ2)A1'+χ2A3']

 

 

+2(1χ2)2[22A1A3][(4χ22)(1χ2)2+2(1+χ2)(1χ2)6χ2(1χ2)3χ2(1+χ2)]}

 

=

[35425]1/3υ4/3χ7/3(1+χ2){3χ(1+χ2)(1χ2)1[(1+χ2)A1'+χ2A3']

 

 

+[8χ24]A1+2(1χ2)2[22A1A3][χ29χ4+4χ6]}


What values of L should we choose? In association with our discussion of warped free-energy surfaces, we'd like to specify the eccentricity, e, of a Maclaurin spheroid and adopt the angular momentum of that configuration. According to our accompanying discussion of the properties of Maclaurin spheroids,

LMac2

=

22a4Ω2

 

=

23a4[A1A3(1e2)]Mac

 

=

23[3522(1e2)1/2]4/3[A1A3(1e2)]Mac

 

=

[23454]1/3(1e2)2/3{1e2[sin1ee(1e2)1/2](1e2)1/22e2[(1e2)1/2sin1ee](1e2)3/2}

 

=

[23454]1/3(1e2)2/3{1e2[sin1ee](1e2)1/2+2e2[sin1ee](1e2)3/21e2[(1e2)1/2](1e2)1/22e2[(1e2)1/2](1e2)3/2}

 

=

[23454]1/3(1e2)2/3{1e2[sin1ee](1e2)1/2[32e2]3(1e2)e2}

 

=

[23454]1/3(1e2)1/3e2{[sin1ee](1e2)1/2[32e2]3}.

Note, for example, that if e=0.85, the square-root of this expression gives, LMac=4.7148806, which matches the angular momentum that was used by Christodoulou et al (1995) to generate their Figure 3.

Sequence Plots

EFE Diagram

Jacobi Sequence: (blue) Points defined by data in Table IV of [EFE], Chapter 6, §39 (p. 103); (red) points generated here from above-defined roots of the governing relation. Figure 2 extracted from p. 902 of S. Chandrasekhar (1965)

"The Equilibrium and the Stability of the Riemann Ellipsoids. I"

ApJ, vol. 142, pp. 890-921 © American Astronomical Society

Jacobi Sequence

Chandrasekhar Figure2

  Original figure has been annotated (maroon-colored text and arrow added) for clarification.

Jacobi Sequence

Chandrasekhar Figure2

Other Sequence Depictions

Jacobi Omega2 versus J2 Jacobi Omega2 versus Tau Jacobi Tau versus J2

Note that,

j

(328π4)1/6L(GM3a¯)1/2.

Bifurcation from Maclaurin to Jacobi Sequence

According to Table IV of [EFE], Chapter 6, §39 (p. 103), the Jacobi Sequence bifurcates from the Maclaurin sequence at …

  • (b/a,c/a)=(1.000,0.582724)
  • Ω2/(πGρ)=0.374230ω02/(4πGρ)=0.093558
  • L/(GM3a¯)1/2=0.303751j2=(328π4)1/3L2(GM3a¯)=0.049365924(0.303751)2=0.004554731

According to Tables D.3 and D.4 (pp. 485 & 486) of [T87], the Jacobi Sequence bifurcates from the Maclaurin sequence at …

  • (a/a¯,b/a¯,c/a¯)=(1.197234,1.197234,0.697657)(b/a,c/a)=(1.000000,0.582724)
  • Ω2/(2πGρ)=0.1871148ω02/(4πGρ)=0.0935574
  • J/(GM3a¯)1/2=0.303751
  • τT/|W|=0.1375

Bifurcation of Poincaré's Sequence of Pear-Shaped Configurations from the Jacobian Sequence

According to Eq. (28) of [EFE], Chapter 6, §40 (p. 106), a pear-shaped configuration bifurcates from the Jacobi Sequence at …

  • (b/a,c/a)=(0.432232,0.345069)
  • Ω2/(πGρ)=0.284030ω02/(4πGρ)=0.0710075
  • From the above expression, L(GM3a¯)1/2=0.389536 and j2=(328π4)1/3L2(GM3a¯)=0.0074907

According to the first row of properties in Table I of 📚 Eriguchi, Hachisu, & Sugimoto (1982)

  • Ω2/(4πGρ)=0.07101
  • j2=(328π4)1/3L2(GM3a¯)=0.07821
  • τT/|W|=0.1628

Bifurcation of Dumbbell sequence from Jacobian Sequence

According the last pair of equations on p. 128 of [EFE], Chapter 6, §45, a dumbbell-shaped configuration (neutral point belonging to the fourth harmonic distortion) bifurcates from the Jacobi Sequence at …

  • (b/a)=(0.2972) and cos1(c/a)=75.081degrees(c/a)=0.2575.

Chronologically, this result for (b/a,c/a) appears first in Eq. (93) on p. 635 of 📚 S. Chandrasekhar (1967b, ApJ, Vol. 148, pp. 621 - 644) — referred to in [EFE] as Publication XXXII. Then, in Eq. (66) on p. 302 of 📚 S. Chandrasekhar (1968, ApJ, Vol. 152, pp. 293 - 304) — referred to in [EFE] as Publication XXXV — we find cos1(c/a)=75.068degrees, along with a footnote [5] which states, "The value cos1(c/a)=75.081degrees found earlier differs slightly; but the difference is not outside the limits of accuracy of the numerical evaluation."

According to the first row of properties in Table II of 📚 Eriguchi, Hachisu, & Sugimoto (1982)

  • Ω2/(4πGρ)=0.0532
  • j2=(328π4)1/3L2(GM3a¯)=0.01157
  • τT/|W|=0.1863

I have not (yet) found the corresponding value of Ω2 in any of Chandrasekhar's publications, but if we combine the value of Ω2 obtained from 📚 Eriguchi, Hachisu, & Sugimoto (1982) with the values of (b/a,c/a) obtained from [EFE], we find …

  • Ω2/(πGρ)=0.2128
  • From the above expression, L(GM3a¯)1/2=0.48242   and   j2=(328π4)1/3L2(GM3a¯)=0.01149

This value of j2 is very close to the value obtained by 📚 Eriguchi, Hachisu, & Sugimoto (1982).

See Also


Tiled Menu

Appendices: | VisTrailsEquations | VisTrailsVariables | References | Ramblings | VisTrailsImages | myphys.lsu | ADS |