Appendix/Ramblings/51BiPolytropeStability/RethinkEnvelope: Difference between revisions
| Line 668: | Line 668: | ||
<td align="center"><math>\equiv</math></td> | <td align="center"><math>\equiv</math></td> | ||
<td align="left"><math>3^{-1 / 2} \biggl[ \biggl(\frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c}\biggr)^{-1}\theta_i^{-2}\biggr] </math></td> | <td align="left"><math>3^{-1 / 2} \biggl[ \biggl(\frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c}\biggr)^{-1}\theta_i^{-2}\biggr] </math></td> | ||
</tr> | |||
</table> | |||
==Earlier Examples== | |||
In our [[SSC/Stability/BiPolytropes/HeadScratching#Through_the_Envelope|earlier analysis]], we determined that the following relations hold in an equilibrium bipolytrope. | |||
<table border="1" align="center" width="80%" cellpadding="8"><tr><td align="left"> | |||
Keep in mind that, once <math>\mu_e/\mu_c</math> and <math>\xi_i</math> have been specified, other [[SSC/Structure/BiPolytropes/Analytic51#Parameter_Values|parameter values at the interface]] are: | |||
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center"> | |||
<tr> | |||
<td align="right"> | |||
<math>\theta_i</math> | |||
</td> | |||
<td align="center"> | |||
<math>=</math> | |||
</td> | |||
<td align="left"> | |||
<math> | |||
\biggl( 1 + \frac{1}{3}\xi^2_i \biggr)^{-1 / 2} \, , | |||
</math> | |||
</td> | |||
</tr> | |||
<tr> | |||
<td align="right"> | |||
<math>\eta_i</math> | |||
</td> | |||
<td align="center"> | |||
<math>=</math> | |||
</td> | |||
<td align="left"> | |||
<math> | |||
\biggl(\frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c}\biggr) \sqrt{3}~\theta_i^2 \xi_i \, , | |||
</math> | |||
</td> | |||
</tr> | |||
<tr> | |||
<td align="right"> | |||
<math>\Lambda_i</math> | |||
</td> | |||
<td align="center"> | |||
<math>=</math> | |||
</td> | |||
<td align="left"> | |||
<math> | |||
\frac{1}{\eta_i} + \biggl( \frac{d\phi}{d\eta}\biggr)_i | |||
= | |||
\biggl(\frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c}\biggr)^{-1} \frac{1}{\sqrt{3} \xi_i \theta_i^2} - \frac{\xi_i}{\sqrt{3}} \, , | |||
</math> | |||
</td> | |||
</tr> | |||
<tr> | |||
<td align="right"> | |||
<math>A</math> | |||
</td> | |||
<td align="center"> | |||
<math>=</math> | |||
</td> | |||
<td align="left"> | |||
<math> | |||
\eta_i(1+\Lambda_i^2)^{1 / 2} \, , | |||
</math> | |||
</td> | |||
</tr> | |||
<tr> | |||
<td align="right"> | |||
<math>B</math> | |||
</td> | |||
<td align="center"> | |||
<math>=</math> | |||
</td> | |||
<td align="left"> | |||
<math> | |||
\eta_i - \frac{\pi}{2} + \tan^{-1}(\Lambda_i) \, , | |||
</math> | |||
</td> | |||
</tr> | |||
<tr> | |||
<td align="right"> | |||
<math>\eta_s</math> | |||
</td> | |||
<td align="center"> | |||
<math>=</math> | |||
</td> | |||
<td align="left"> | |||
<math> | |||
B + \pi \, . | |||
</math> | |||
</td> | |||
</tr> | |||
</table> | |||
</td></tr></table> | |||
As a test case, let's draw from the [[SSC/Stability/BiPolytropes/HeadScratching#Selected_Models|accompanying <b>B2</b> model]] for which, <math>\mu_e/\mu_c = 0.25</math> and <math>\xi_i = 2.4782510</math> and … | |||
<table border="1" align="center" cellpadding="8"> | |||
<tr> | |||
<td align="center"><math>\theta_i</math></td> | |||
<td align="center"><math>\eta_i</math></td> | |||
<td align="center"><math>\Lambda_i</math></td> | |||
<td align="center"><math>A</math></td> | |||
<td align="center"><math>B</math></td> | |||
<td align="center"><math>\eta_s</math></td> | |||
<td align="center" bgcolor="grey"> </td> | |||
<td align="center"><math>Q_\rho</math></td> | |||
<td align="center"><math>Q_m</math></td> | |||
<td align="center"><math>Q_r</math></td> | |||
</tr> | |||
<tr> | |||
<td align="center">0.572857</td> | |||
<td align="center">0.352159</td> | |||
<td align="center">1.408807</td> | |||
<td align="center">0.608404</td> | |||
<td align="center">-0.265127</td> | |||
<td align="center"><math>2.876465</math></td> | |||
<td align="center" bgcolor="grey"> </td> | |||
<td align="center">0.00938349</td> | |||
<td align="center">13.558308</td> | |||
<td align="center">7.0373055</td> | |||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
</table> | </table> | ||
Revision as of 13:01, 31 May 2023
Rethink Handling of n = 1 Envelope
Solution Steps
Drawing from an accompanying discussion …
- Step 1: Choose and .
- Step 2: Adopt boundary conditions at the center of the core ( and at ), then solve the Lane-Emden equation to obtain the solution, , and its first derivative, throughout the core; the radial location, , at which first goes to zero identifies the natural surface of an isolated polytrope that has a polytropic index .
- Step 3 Choose the desired location, , of the outer edge of the core.
- Step 4: Specify and ; the structural profile of, for example, , , and is then obtained throughout the core — over the radial range, and — via the relations shown in the column of Table 1.
- Step 5: Specify the ratio and adopt the boundary condition, ; then use the interface conditions as rearranged and presented in Table 3 to determine, respectively:
- The gas density at the base of the envelope, ;
- The polytropic constant of the envelope, , relative to the polytropic constant of the core, ;
- The ratio of the two dimensionless radial parameters at the interface, ;
- The radial derivative of the envelope solution at the interface, .
- Step 6: The last sub-step of solution step 5 provides the boundary condition that is needed — in addition to our earlier specification that — to derive the desired particular solution, , of the Lane-Emden equation that is relevant throughout the envelope; knowing also provides the relevant structural first derivative, , throughout the envelope.
- Step 7: The surface of the bipolytrope will be located at the radial location, and , at which first drops to zero.
- Step 8: The structural profile of, for example, , , and is then obtained throughout the envelope — over the radial range, and — via the relations provided in the column of Table 1.
Setup
Drawing from the accompanying Table 1, we have …
|
Core |
Envelope |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
sol'n: |
sol'n: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From an accompanying discussion of bipolytropes, we know that the solution to the pair of Lane-Emden equations is …
and,
Adopting the same normalizations as before, we have,
|
Core |
Envelope |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Interface Conditions
Now, at the core-envelope interface …
- By choice,
Hence,
Also, setting the value of equal across the boundary gives us,
|
|
||
|
|
|
As a result, throughout the envelope,
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In summary, then,
|
Core |
Envelope |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
This matches our earlier derivation. Remember, as well, that , that is to say,
Suppose we use as the primary abscissa. Throughout the envelope, for various values of , we set
where,
Earlier Examples
In our earlier analysis, we determined that the following relations hold in an equilibrium bipolytrope.
|
Keep in mind that, once and have been specified, other parameter values at the interface are:
|
As a test case, let's draw from the accompanying B2 model for which, and and …
| 0.572857 | 0.352159 | 1.408807 | 0.608404 | -0.265127 | 0.00938349 | 13.558308 | 7.0373055 |
Profiles of Physical Variables
Let's begin by choosing the value of at which the core-envelope interface will occur. For example, setting means that and that,
|
|
|
|
This means that we will be outside the core — and, hopefully, inside the envelope — for all values of , which means for all values of .
See Also
- Rappaport, Verbunt, & Joss (1983, ApJ, 275, 713) — A New Technique for Calculations of Binary Stellar Evolution, with Application to Magnetic Braking.
|
Appendices: | VisTrailsEquations | VisTrailsVariables | References | Ramblings | VisTrailsImages | myphys.lsu | ADS | |