SSC/Stability/Yabushita75: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
<div align="center"> | <div align="center"> | ||
<table border="0" cellpadding="3"> | <table border="0" cellpadding="3" width="50%"> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<td align="center" colspan=" | <td align="center" colspan="4"> | ||
Specify: <math>c_s^2</math> and <math>\rho_0 ~\Rightarrow</math> | Specify: <math>c_s^2</math> and <math>\rho_0 ~\Rightarrow</math> | ||
</td> | </td> | ||
| Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
<math>\biggl[ \frac{c_s^2}{4\pi G\rho_0} \biggr]^{1/2} \xi</math> | <math>\biggl[ \frac{c_s^2}{4\pi G\rho_0} \biggr]^{1/2} \xi</math> | ||
</td> | </td> | ||
<td align="right">(2.2)</td> | |||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
| Line 59: | Line 60: | ||
<math>\rho_0 e^{-\psi}</math> | <math>\rho_0 e^{-\psi}</math> | ||
</td> | </td> | ||
<td align="right">(2.2)</td> | |||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
| Line 71: | Line 73: | ||
<math>c_s^2 \rho_0 e^{-\psi}</math> | <math>c_s^2 \rho_0 e^{-\psi}</math> | ||
</td> | </td> | ||
<td align="right">(2.1)</td> | |||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
| Line 83: | Line 86: | ||
<math>\biggl[ \frac{c_s^6}{4\pi G^3\rho_0} \biggr]^{1/2} \biggl( \xi^2 \frac{d\psi}{d\xi} \biggr)</math> | <math>\biggl[ \frac{c_s^6}{4\pi G^3\rho_0} \biggr]^{1/2} \biggl( \xi^2 \frac{d\psi}{d\xi} \biggr)</math> | ||
</td> | </td> | ||
<td align="right">(2.3)</td> | |||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr><td colspan="4" align="center">{{ Yabushita75 }}, § 2, pp. 442-443</td></tr> | |||
</table> | </table> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
After adopting the substitute notation, <math>c_s^2 \rightarrow K_1</math> and <math>\rho_0 \rightarrow \lambda_c</math>, it is clear that these last four parameter-profile expressions are identical to the ones that appear, respectively, as equations (2.2), (2.1) and (2.3) of {{ Yabushita75 }}. | After adopting the substitute notation, <math>c_s^2 \rightarrow K_1</math> and <math>\rho_0 \rightarrow \lambda_c</math>, it is clear that these last four parameter-profile expressions are identical to the ones that appear, respectively, as equations (2.2), (2.1) and (2.3) of {{ Yabushita75 }}. | ||
=See Also= | =See Also= | ||
Revision as of 19:52, 6 November 2023
Stability of a BiPolytrope with an Isothermal Core
This analysis pulls largely from 📚 S. Yabushita (1975, MNRAS, Vol. 172, pp. 441 - 453); the focus is on bipolytropes having . In an accompanying discussion, we summarize the steps that Yabushita took — from 1968 and 1974, to 1975 — that led up to his discovery of an analytic description of the isothermal displacement function.
Equilibrium Structure
We will follow the accompanying formal recipe for building a bipolytropic model, using the step-by-step construction of Milne's (1930) configurations as a guide.
Step 1
The 📚 Yabushita (1975) bipolytrope has an isothermal core and an polytropic envelope.
Steps 2 & 3
Throughout the core, the properties of this bipolytrope can be expressed in terms of the Lane-Emden function, , which derives from a solution of the 2nd-order ODE,
subject to the boundary conditions,
and at .
The solution, , extends to infinity, so the interface between the core and the envelope can be positioned anywhere within the range, .
Step4: Throughout the core
|
Specify: and |
|||
|
|
|
|
(2.2) |
|
|
|
|
(2.2) |
|
|
|
|
(2.1) |
|
|
|
|
(2.3) |
| 📚 Yabushita (1975), § 2, pp. 442-443 | |||
After adopting the substitute notation, and , it is clear that these last four parameter-profile expressions are identical to the ones that appear, respectively, as equations (2.2), (2.1) and (2.3) of 📚 Yabushita (1975).
See Also
- M. Gabriel & M. L. Roth (1974, A&A, Vol. 32, p. 309) … On the Secular Stability of Models with an Isothermal Core
- M. Gabriel & P. Ledoux (1967, Annales d'Astrophysique, Vol. 30, p. 975) … Sur la Stabilité Séculaire des Modeéles a Noyaux Isothermes
In § 1 (p. 442) of 📚 Yabushita (1975) we find the following reference: "A somewhat similar problem has been investigated by Gabriel & Ledoux (1967). Gaseous configurations with an isothermal core and polytropic envelope of index 3 were studied by 📚 Henrich & Chandrasekhar (1941) and by 📚 Schönberg & Chandrasekhar (1942). As is well known there is an upper limit (Schönberg-Chandrasekhar limit) to the mass of the core for the configurations to be in hydrostatic equilibria. Gabriel & Ledoux have investigated the stability of these configurations and have shown that secular stability is lost at the configuration that corresponds to the Schönberg-Chandrasekhar limit."
|
Appendices: | VisTrailsEquations | VisTrailsVariables | References | Ramblings | VisTrailsImages | myphys.lsu | ADS | |