SSC/Structure/BiPolytropes/51RenormaizePart3: Difference between revisions
| Line 326: | Line 326: | ||
= | = | ||
\biggl[ \biggl( \frac{K_e}{K_c} \biggr)^{-5 / 4} \biggl( \frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c} \biggr)^{-5 / 2} \theta^{-5}_i \biggr] | \biggl[ \biggl( \frac{K_e}{K_c} \biggr)^{-5 / 4} \biggl( \frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c} \biggr)^{-5 / 2} \theta^{-5}_i \biggr] | ||
= | |||
\rho_\mathrm{norm}\biggl[ \biggl( \frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c} \biggr)^{-5 / 2} \theta^{-5}_i \biggr] | |||
\, . | \, . | ||
</math> | </math> | ||
| Line 349: | Line 351: | ||
</td> | </td> | ||
<td align="left"> | <td align="left"> | ||
<math>\ | <math> | ||
\rho_\mathrm{norm} \biggl[ \biggl( \frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c} \biggr)^{-5 / 2} \theta^{-5}_i \biggr] | |||
\biggl( 1 + \frac{1}{3}\xi^2 \biggr)^{-5/2}</math> | \biggl( 1 + \frac{1}{3}\xi^2 \biggr)^{-5/2}</math> | ||
</td> | </td> | ||
| Line 381: | Line 384: | ||
</td> | </td> | ||
<td align="left"> | <td align="left"> | ||
<math>K_c \biggl[ \biggl( \frac{K_e}{K_c} \biggr)^{-3 / 2} | <math> | ||
\biggl( \frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c} \biggr)^{-3 } \theta^{-6}_i \biggr]\biggl( 1 + \frac{1}{3}\xi^2 \biggr)^{-3}</math> | K_c \biggl[ \biggl( \frac{K_e}{K_c} \biggr)^{-3 / 2} | ||
\biggl( \frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c} \biggr)^{-3 } \theta^{-6}_i \biggr]\biggl( 1 + \frac{1}{3}\xi^2 \biggr)^{-3} | |||
= | |||
P_\mathrm{norm}\biggl[ | |||
\biggl( \frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c} \biggr)^{-3 } \theta^{-6}_i \biggr]\biggl( 1 + \frac{1}{3}\xi^2 \biggr)^{-3} | |||
</math> | |||
</td> | </td> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
| Line 414: | Line 422: | ||
</td> | </td> | ||
<td align="left"> | <td align="left"> | ||
<math>\biggl[ \frac{K_c}{G} \biggr]^{1/2} | <math> | ||
\biggl[ \frac{K_c}{G} \biggr]^{1/2} | |||
\biggl[ \biggl( \frac{K_e}{K_c} \biggr)^{1 / 2} \biggl( \frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c} \biggr) \theta^{2}_i \biggr] | \biggl[ \biggl( \frac{K_e}{K_c} \biggr)^{1 / 2} \biggl( \frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c} \biggr) \theta^{2}_i \biggr] | ||
\biggl(\frac{3}{2\pi}\biggr)^{1/2} \xi</math> | \biggl(\frac{3}{2\pi}\biggr)^{1/2} \xi | ||
= | |||
r_\mathrm{norm} | |||
\biggl[ \biggl( \frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c} \biggr) \theta^{2}_i \biggr] | |||
\biggl(\frac{3}{2\pi}\biggr)^{1/2} \xi | |||
</math> | |||
</td> | </td> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
| Line 489: | Line 503: | ||
<td align="left"> | <td align="left"> | ||
<math> | <math> | ||
\ | \rho_\mathrm{norm} \biggl[ \biggl( \frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c} \biggr)^{-3 / 2} \biggr]\phi | ||
</math> | </math> | ||
</td> | </td> | ||
| Line 521: | Line 535: | ||
</td> | </td> | ||
<td align="left"> | <td align="left"> | ||
<math>K_c \biggl[ \biggl( \frac{K_e}{K_c} \biggr)^{-3 / 2} \biggl( \frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c} \biggr)^{-3} \biggr] \phi^{2}</math> | <math> | ||
K_c \biggl[ \biggl( \frac{K_e}{K_c} \biggr)^{-3 / 2} \biggl( \frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c} \biggr)^{-3} \biggr] \phi^{2} | |||
= | |||
P_\mathrm{norm}\biggl[ \biggl( \frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c} \biggr)^{-3} \biggr] \phi^{2} | |||
</math> | |||
</td> | </td> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
| Line 553: | Line 571: | ||
</td> | </td> | ||
<td align="left"> | <td align="left"> | ||
<math>\biggl[ \frac{K_c}{G } \biggr]^{1/2} | <math> | ||
\biggl( \frac{K_e}{K_c} \biggr)^{1 / 2} (2\pi)^{-1/2}\eta</math> | \biggl[ \frac{K_c}{G } \biggr]^{1/2} \biggl( \frac{K_e}{K_c} \biggr)^{1 / 2} (2\pi)^{-1/2}\eta | ||
= | |||
r_\mathrm{norm}(2\pi)^{-1/2}\eta | |||
</math> | |||
</td> | </td> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
Revision as of 22:02, 10 November 2023
BiPolytrope with nc = 5 and ne = 1
After studying 📚 S. Yabushita (1975, MNRAS, Vol. 172, pp. 441 - 453) in depth, here we renormalize our original construction of bipolytropic models with such that both entropy values, , are held fixed along each model sequence.
Original Derivation
Throughout the Core
Drawing from our original derivation, throughout the core …
|
Specify: and |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Throughout the Envelope
|
|
Knowing: and from Step 5 |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interface Conditions
And at the interface …
|
|
Setting , , and |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New Normalization
From one of the interface conditions, we see that,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hence, throughout the core, we have,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
And, throughout the envelope …
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
See Also
- M. Gabriel & M. L. Roth (1974, A&A, Vol. 32, p. 309) … On the Secular Stability of Models with an Isothermal Core
- M. Gabriel & P. Ledoux (1967, Annales d'Astrophysique, Vol. 30, p. 975) … Sur la Stabilité Séculaire des Modeéles a Noyaux Isothermes
In § 1 (p. 442) of 📚 Yabushita (1975) we find the following reference: "A somewhat similar problem has been investigated by Gabriel & Ledoux (1967). Gaseous configurations with an isothermal core and polytropic envelope of index 3 were studied by 📚 Henrich & Chandrasekhar (1941) and by 📚 Schönberg & Chandrasekhar (1942). As is well known there is an upper limit (Schönberg-Chandrasekhar limit) to the mass of the core for the configurations to be in hydrostatic equilibria. Gabriel & Ledoux have investigated the stability of these configurations and have shown that secular stability is lost at the configuration that corresponds to the Schönberg-Chandrasekhar limit."
|
Appendices: | VisTrailsEquations | VisTrailsVariables | References | Ramblings | VisTrailsImages | myphys.lsu | ADS | |