SSC/Structure/BiPolytropes/51RenormaizePart3: Difference between revisions
| Line 653: | Line 653: | ||
<td align="right"><math>\rho_\mathrm{norm}</math></td> | <td align="right"><math>\rho_\mathrm{norm}</math></td> | ||
<td align="center"><math>\equiv</math></td> | <td align="center"><math>\equiv</math></td> | ||
<td align="left"><math>\biggl( \frac{ | <td align="left"><math>\biggl( \frac{K_c}{K_e} \biggr)^{5 / 4} \, ;</math></td> | ||
<td align="center" width="20%"> </td> | <td align="center" width="20%"> </td> | ||
<td align="right"><math>P_\mathrm{norm}</math></td> | <td align="right"><math>P_\mathrm{norm}</math></td> | ||
| Line 723: | Line 723: | ||
<td align="left"> | <td align="left"> | ||
<math> | <math> | ||
\biggl[ K_c^{5} K_e G^{-6} \biggr]^{1 / 4} \biggl( \frac{ | \biggl[ K_c^{5} K_e G^{-6} \biggr]^{1 / 4} \biggl( \frac{K_e}{G}\biggr)^{-3 / 2} | ||
\biggl( \frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c} \biggr)^{-3 / 2} | \biggl( \frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c} \biggr)^{-3 / 2} | ||
\biggl[ \biggl(\frac{3^2}{2^4\pi^2}\biggr) (2\pi)^{3 }\biggl( \frac{2}{\pi} \biggr) \biggr]^{1/2} | \biggl[ \biggl(\frac{3^2}{2^4\pi^2}\biggr) (2\pi)^{3 }\biggl( \frac{2}{\pi} \biggr) \biggr]^{1/2} | ||
| Line 739: | Line 739: | ||
</td> | </td> | ||
<td align="left"> | <td align="left"> | ||
<math>\biggl( \frac{ | <math>3\biggl( \frac{K_c}{K_e}\biggr)^{5 / 4} | ||
\biggl( \frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c} \biggr)^{-3 / 2} | \biggl( \frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c} \biggr)^{-3 / 2} | ||
\biggl | \biggl(-\frac{1}{\eta}\cdot \frac{d\phi}{d\eta} \biggr)_s \, . | ||
\biggl(-\frac{1}{\eta}\cdot \frac{d\phi}{d\eta} \biggr)_s | </math> | ||
</td> | |||
</tr> | |||
</table> | |||
Hence, the central-to-mean density of each equilibrium configuration is, | |||
<table border="0" cellpadding="3" align="center"> | |||
<tr> | |||
<td align="right" colspan="3"> | |||
<math>\frac{\rho_0}{\bar\rho }</math> | |||
</td> | |||
<td align="center"> | |||
<math>=</math> | |||
</td> | |||
<td align="left"> | |||
<math> | |||
\biggl\{ 3\biggl( \frac{K_c}{K_e}\biggr)^{5 / 4} | |||
\biggl( \frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c} \biggr)^{-3 / 2} | |||
\biggl(-\frac{1}{\eta}\cdot \frac{d\phi}{d\eta} \biggr)_s | |||
\biggr\}^{-1} | |||
\, . | |||
</math> | </math> | ||
</td> | </td> | ||
Revision as of 16:59, 11 November 2023
BiPolytrope with nc = 5 and ne = 1
After studying 📚 S. Yabushita (1975, MNRAS, Vol. 172, pp. 441 - 453) in depth, here we renormalize our original construction of bipolytropic models with such that both entropy values, , are held fixed along each model sequence.
Original Derivation
Throughout the Core
Drawing from our original derivation, throughout the core …
|
Specify: and |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Throughout the Envelope
|
|
Knowing: and from Step 5 |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interface Conditions
And at the interface …
|
|
Setting , , and |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New Normalization
From one of the interface conditions, we see that,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hence, throughout the core, we have,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
||
And, throughout the envelope …
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
||
| Adopted Normalizations | ||||||||||||||
|
|
Note that the configuration's mean density is,
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
||
Hence, the central-to-mean density of each equilibrium configuration is,
|
|
|
|
||
See Also
- M. Gabriel & M. L. Roth (1974, A&A, Vol. 32, p. 309) … On the Secular Stability of Models with an Isothermal Core
- M. Gabriel & P. Ledoux (1967, Annales d'Astrophysique, Vol. 30, p. 975) … Sur la Stabilité Séculaire des Modeéles a Noyaux Isothermes
In § 1 (p. 442) of 📚 Yabushita (1975) we find the following reference: "A somewhat similar problem has been investigated by Gabriel & Ledoux (1967). Gaseous configurations with an isothermal core and polytropic envelope of index 3 were studied by 📚 Henrich & Chandrasekhar (1941) and by 📚 Schönberg & Chandrasekhar (1942). As is well known there is an upper limit (Schönberg-Chandrasekhar limit) to the mass of the core for the configurations to be in hydrostatic equilibria. Gabriel & Ledoux have investigated the stability of these configurations and have shown that secular stability is lost at the configuration that corresponds to the Schönberg-Chandrasekhar limit."
|
Appendices: | VisTrailsEquations | VisTrailsVariables | References | Ramblings | VisTrailsImages | myphys.lsu | ADS | |