Appendix/Ramblings/PowerSeriesExpressions

From jetwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Approximate Power-Series Expressions

Broadly Used Mathematical Expressions (shown here without proof)

Binomial

(1±x)n

=

1±nx+[n(n1)2!]x2±[n(n1)(n2)3!]x3+[n(n1)(n2)(n3)4!]x4±      for (x2<1)

LaTeX mathematical expressions cut-and-pasted directly from
NIST's Digital Library of Mathematical Functions

As a primary point of reference, note that according to §1.2 of NIST's Digital Library of Mathematical Functions, the binomial theorem states that,

(a+b)n

=

an+(n1)an1b+(n2)an2b2++(nn1)abn1+bn,

where, for nonnegative integer values of k and n and kn, the notation,

(nk)

=

n!(nk)!k!=(nnk).


Our Example:  Setting a=1 gives,

(1+b)n

=

1+(n1)b+(n2)b2+(n3)b3+(n4)b4+

 

=

1+n!(n1)!b+n!(n2)!2!b2+n!(n3)!3!b3+n!(n4)!4!b4+

 

=

1+nb+[n(n1)2!]b2+[n(n1)(n2)3!]b3+[n(n1)(n2)(n3)4!]b4+


Note, for example, that,

(1+x)1

=

1x+x2x3+x4x5+;

(1+x)2

=

12x+3x24x3+5x46x5+;

(1+x)3

=

13x+[342]x2[34523]x3+[3456234]x4[345672345]x5+

 

=

13x+6x210x3+15x421x5+;

(1+x)4

=

14x+[452]x2[45623]x3+[4567234]x4[456782345]x5+

 

=

14x+10x220x3+35x456x5+.


See also:

Exponential

ex

=

1+x+x22!+x33!+x44!+


Expressions with Astrophysical Relevance

Polytropic Lane-Emden Function

We seek a power-series expression for the polytropic, Lane-Emden function, ΘH(ξ) — expanded about the coordinate center, ξ=0 — that approximately satisfies the Lane-Emden equation,

1ξ2ddξ(ξ2dΘHdξ)=ΘHn

A general power-series should be of the form,

ΘH

=

θ0+aξ+bξ2+cξ3+dξ4+eξ5+fξ6+gξ7+hξ8+

First derivative:

dΘHdξ

=

a+2bξ+3cξ2+4dξ3+5eξ4+6fξ5+7gξ6+8hξ7+

Left-hand-side of Lane-Emden equation:

1ξ2ddξ(ξ2dΘHdξ)

=

2aξ+23b+223cξ+225dξ2+235eξ3+237fξ4+237gξ5+2332hξ6+

Right-hand-side of Lane-Emden equation (adopt the normalization, θ0=1, then use the binomial theorem recursively):

ΘHn

=

1+nF+[n(n1)2!]F2+[n(n1)(n2)3!]F3+[n(n1)(n2)(n3)4!]F4+

where,

F

aξ+bξ2+cξ3+dξ4+eξ5+fξ6+gξ7+hξ8+

 

=

aξ[1+baξ+caξ2+daξ3+eaξ4+faξ5+gaξ6+haξ7+].

First approximation:  Assume that e=f=g=h=0, in which case the LHS contains terms only up through ξ2. This means that we must ignore all terms on the RHS that are of higher order than ξ2; that is,

ΘHn

1+nF+[n(n1)2!]F2

 

1+n(aξ+bξ2)+[n(n1)2!]a2ξ2

 

1+naξ+[nb+n(n1)a22]ξ2.

Expressions for the various coefficients can now be determined by equating terms on the LHS and RHS that have like powers of ξ. Remembering to include a negative sign on the RHS, we find:

Term LHS RHS Implication

ξ1:

2a

0

a=0

ξ0:

23b

1

b=16

ξ1:

223c

na

c=0

ξ2:

225d

[nb+n(n1)a22]

d=+n120

By including higher and higher order terms in the series expansion for ΘH, and proceeding along the same line of deductive reasoning, one finds:

  • Expressions for the four coefficients, a,b,c,d, remain unchanged.
  • The coefficient is zero for all other terms that contain odd powers of ξ; specifically, for example, e=g=0.
  • The coefficients of ξ6 and ξ8 are, respectively,

f

=

n378(n518);

h

=

n(122n2183n+70)3265920.


In summary, the desired, approximate power-series expression for the polytropic Lane-Emden function is:

For Spherically Symmetric Configurations

θ

=

1ξ26+n120ξ4n378(n518)ξ6+[n(122n2183n+70)3265920]ξ8+

NOTE:  For cylindrically symmetric, rather than spherically symmetric, configurations, the analogous power-series expression appears as equation (15) in the article by J. P. Ostriker (1964, ApJ, 140, 1056) titled, The Equilibrium of Polytropic and Isothermal Cylinders.

Isothermal Lane-Emden Function

Here we seek a power-series expression for the isothermal, Lane-Emden function — expanded about the coordinate center — that approximately satisfies the isothermal Lane-Emden equation; making the variable substitution (sorry for the unnecessary complication!), ψ(ξ)w(r), the governing ODE is,

d2wdr2+2rdwdr

=

ew.

A general power-series should be of the form,

w

=

w0+ar+br2+cr3+dr4+er5+fr6+gr7+hr8+

Derivatives:

dwdr

=

a+2br+3cr2+4dr3+5er4+6fr5+7gr6+8hr7+;

d2wdr2

=

2b+23cr+223dr2+225er3+235fr4+237gr5+237hr6+.

Put together, then, the left-hand-side of the isothermal Lane-Emden equation becomes:

d2wdr2+2rdwdr

=

2b+23cr+223dr2+225er3+235fr4+237gr5+237hr6+2r[a+2br+3cr2+4dr3+5er4+6fr5+7gr6+8hr7]+

 

=

2ar+r0(6b)+r1(223c)+r2(223d+23d)+r3(225e+25e)+r4(235f+223f)+r5(237g+27g)+r6(237h+24h)+

Drawing on the above power-series expression for an exponential function, and adopting the convention that w0=0, the right-hand-side becomes,

ew

=

e0earebr2ecr3edr4eer5efr6egr7ehr8

 

=

[1ar+a2r22!a3r33!+a4r44!a5r55!+a6r66!+]

 

 

×[1br2+b2r42!b3r63!+]×[1cr3+c2r62!+]×[1dr4]×[1er5]×[1fr6]

 

[1ar+a2r22a3r36+a4r424a5r5524+a6r63024]×[1cr3+c2r62br2+bcr5+b2r42b3r66]×[1dr4er5fr6]

 

{[1ar+a2r22a3r36+a4r424a5r5524+a6r63024]dr4[1ar+a2r22]er5[1ar]fr6}

 

 

×[1br2cr3+b2r42+bcr5+r6(c22b36)]

 

[1ar+a2r22a3r36+a4r424a5r5524+a6r63024dr4+adr5a2dr62er5+aer6fr6]

 

 

×[1br2cr3+b2r42+bcr5+r6(c22b36)]

 

[1ar+a2r22a3r36+r4(a424d)+r5(adea5524)+r6(a63024a2d2+aef)]×[1br2cr3+b2r42+bcr5+r6(c22b36)]

 

1ar+a2r22a3r36+r4(a424d)+r5(adea5524)+r6(a63024a2d2+aef)

 

 

br2[1ar+a2r22a3r36+r4(a424d)]cr3[1ar+a2r22a3r36]+b2r42[1ar+a2r22]+bcr5[1ar]+r6(c22b36)

Expressions for the various coefficients can now be determined by equating terms on the LHS and RHS that have like powers of r. Beginning with the highest order terms, we initially find,

Term LHS RHS Implication

r1:

2a

0

a=0

r0:

6b

1

b=+16

r1:

223c

a

c=a223=0

r2:

(223d+23d)

a22b

d=120(a22b)=1120

With this initial set of coefficient values in hand, we can rewrite (and significantly simplify) our approximate expression for the RHS, namely,

ew

1dr4er5fr6br2(1dr4)+b2r42b3r66

 

=

1br2+r4(b22d)er5+r6(bdb36f).

Continuing, then, with equating terms with like powers on both sides of the equation, we find,

Term LHS RHS Implication

r3:

30e

0

e=0

r4:

(235f+223f)

(b22d)

f=1237(12332+12335)=123357

r5:

(237g+27g)

e

g=0

r6:

(237h+24h)

(bdb36f)

h=12332(124325+12434+123357)=61263657


Result:

For Spherically Symmetric Configurations

w(r)

=

r26r4120+r6189061r81,632,960+.


See also:

  • Equation (377) from §22 in Chapter IV of C67).


NOTE:  For cylindrically symmetric, rather than spherically symmetric, configurations, an analytic expression for the function, w(r), is presented as equation (56) in a paper by J. P. Ostriker (1964, ApJ, 140, 1056) titled, The Equilibrium of Polytropic and Isothermal Cylinders.

Displacement Function for Polytropic LAWE

The LAWE for polytropic spheres may be written as,

0

=

d2xdξ2+[4ξ(n+1)θ(dθdξ)]dxdξ+(n+1)θ[σc26γαξ(dθdξ)]x

 

=

θd2xdξ2+[4θ(n+1)ξ(dθdξ)]1ξdxdξ+(n+1)6[σc2γ6αξ(dθdξ)]x,

where, θ(ξ) is the polytropic Lane-Emden function describing the configuration's unperturbed radial density distribution, and γ, σc2, and α(34/γ) are constants. Here we seek a power-series expression for the displacement function, x(r), expanded about the center of the configuration, that approximately satisfies this LAWE.

First we note that, near the center, an accurate power-series expression for the polytropic Lane-Emden function is,

θ

=

1ξ26+n120ξ4n378(n518)ξ6+

Hence,

dθdξ

13[ξn10ξ3+n21(n518)ξ5].

Therefore, near the center of the configuration, the LAWE may be written as,

6θd2xdξ2+{12θ(n+1)ξ[ξn10ξ3+n21(n518)ξ5]}2ξdxdξ

(n+1){σc2γ2αξ[ξn10ξ3+n21(n518)ξ5]}x

6[1ξ26+n120ξ4]d2xdξ2+{12[1ξ26+n120ξ4](n+1)[ξ2n10ξ4]}2ξdxdξ

(n+1){𝔉+2α[n10ξ2n21(n518)ξ4]}x

(6ξ2+n20ξ4)d2xdξ2+[12(n+3)ξ2+n(n+2)10ξ4]2ξdxdξ

(n+1)[𝔉+nα5ξ22nα21(n518)ξ4]x,

where, 𝔉(σc2/γ2α) and, for present purposes, we have kept terms in the series no higher than ξ4.


Displacement Finite at Center

Let's adopt a power-series expression for the displacement function of a form that is finite at the center of the configuration, namely,

x

=

1+aξ+bξ2+cξ3+dξ4+eξ5+fξ6

1ξdxdξ

=

aξ+2b+3cξ+4dξ2+5eξ3+6fξ4+

and,

d2xdξ2

=

2b+6cξ+12dξ2+20eξ3+30fξ4+

Substituting these expressions into the LAWE gives,

(6ξ2+n20ξ4)(2b+6cξ+12dξ2+20eξ3+30fξ4)+[12(n+3)ξ2+n(n+2)10ξ4](2aξ+4b+6cξ+8dξ2+10eξ3+12fξ4)

(n+1)[𝔉+nα5ξ22nα21(n518)ξ4](1+aξ+bξ2+cξ3+dξ4)

Expressions for the various coefficients can now be determined by equating terms on the LHS and RHS that have like powers of ξ.

Term LHS RHS Implication

ξ1:

24a

0

a=0

ξ0:

(12b+48b)

(n+1)𝔉

b=(n+1)𝔉60

ξ1:

[36c+72c2a(n+3)]

a(n+1)𝔉

108c=2a(n+3)a(n+1)𝔉c=0

ξ2:

[72d2b+96d4b(n+3)]

[b(n+1)𝔉n(n+1)α5]

d=(n+1){nα+𝔉[(4n+14)(n+1)𝔉]10080}

In summary, the desired, approximate power-series expression for the polytropic displacement function is:

x(ξ)

=

1(n+1)𝔉60ξ2(n+1){nα+𝔉[(4n+14)(n+1)𝔉]10080}ξ4+

Displacement Function for Isothermal LAWE

The LAWE for isothermal spheres may be written as,

d2xdr2+[4r(dwdr)]1rdxdr

=

[σc26γαr(dwdr)]x,

where, w(r) is the isothermal Lane-Emden function describing the configuration's unperturbed radial density distribution, and γ, σc2, and α(34/γ) are constants. Here we seek a power-series expression for the displacement function, x(r), expanded about the center of the configuration, that approximately satisfies this LAWE.

First we note that, near the center, an accurate power-series expression for the isothermal Lane-Emden function is,

w(r)

=

r26r4120+r6189061r81,632,960+.

Hence,

dwdr

r3r330+r5315.

Therefore, near the center of the configuration, the LAWE may be written as,

d2xdr2+[4(r23r430+r6315)]1rdxdr

16[σc2γ2α(1r210+r4105)]x.

Let's now adopt a power-series expression for the displacement function of the form,

x

=

1+ar+br2+cr3+dr4+

1rdxdr

=

ar+2b+3cr+4dr2+

and,

d2xdr2

=

2b+6cr+12dr2+

Substituting these expressions into the LAWE gives,

2b+6cr+12dr2+[4(r23r430+r6315)][ar+2b+3cr+4dr2]

16[σc2γ2α(1r210+r4105)](1+ar+br2+cr3+dr4).

Keeping terms only up through r2 leads to the following simplification:

2b+6cr+12dr2+4[ar+2b+3cr+4dr2]r23[ar+2b]

𝔉6(1+ar+br2)α3(r210)

where,

𝔉σc2γ2α.

Finally, balancing terms of like powers on both sides of the equation leads us to conclude the following:

Term LHS RHS Implication

r1:

4a

0

a=0

r0:

2b+8b

𝔉6

b=𝔉60

r1:

6c+12ca3

a𝔉6

c=0

r2:

12d+16d2b3

𝔉b6α30

28d=130[5b(4𝔉)α]d=110080[𝔉(𝔉4)12α]

In summary, the desired, approximate power-series expression for the isothermal displacement function is:

x(r)

=

1𝔉60r2+110080[𝔉(𝔉4)12α]r4+

Maclaurin Spheroid Index Symbols

In our accompanying discussion of the equilibrium properties of models along the Maclaurin spheroid sequence, we find the "Index Symbols" expressions,

A1

=

1e2[sin1ee(1e2)1/2](1e2)1/2,

A3

=

2e2[(1e2)1/2sin1ee](1e2)1/2,

where,

e

[1(ca)2]1/2       (always positive).

Our aim, here, is to derive a power-series expression for these two index symbols (a) in the case of nearly spherical configurations (e1), and (b) in the case of an infinitesimally thin disk (c/a1).

Nearly Spherical Configurations

On p. 457 of [CRC], we find that,

sin1ee

=

1+[123]e2+[13245]e4+[1352467]e6+[135724689]e8+       for,       (e2<1,π2<sin1e<π2).

Also, from the above binomial-theorem expression, we have,

(1e2)1/2

=

112e2+[12(121)2!]e4[12(121)(122)3!]e6+[12(121)(122)(123)4!]e8      for (e4<1)

 

=

1[12]e2[123]e4[124]e6[527]e8

So we can write,

1(1e2)1/2[sin1ee]

=

{1[12]e2[123]e4[124]e6[527]e8}×{1+[123]e2+[13245]e4+[1352467]e6+[135724689]e8+}

 

=

{1+[123]e2+[13245]e4+[1352467]e6+[135724689]e8}e22{1+[123]e2+[13245]e4+[1352467]e6}

 

 

e423{1+[123]e2+[13245]e4}e624{1+[123]e2}[527]e8+𝒪(e10)

 

=

1+e2[12312]+e4[132451223123]+e6[13524671213245123123124]

 

 

+e8[13572468912135246712313245124123527]+𝒪(e10)

 

=

1e2[13]+e4[3225352335]+e6[3523275735724357]+e8[3527222325223372235732527273257]+𝒪(e10)

 

=

1e2[13]e4[235]e6[23357]+e8[201263257]+𝒪(e10)

Hence,

e2A1

=

1(1e2)

 

=

e2[23]e4[235]e6[23357]+e8[201263257]+𝒪(e10)

A1

=

23e2[235]e4[23357]+e6[201263257]+𝒪(e8).

And,

(e22)A3

=

11

 

=

e2[13]+e4[235]+e6[23357]e8[201263257]+𝒪(e10)

A3

=

23+e2[2235]+e4[24357]e6[201253257]+𝒪(e8).

This looks okay, in the sense that (2A1+A3)=2.

Infinitesimally Thin Axisymmetric Disk

As e1 — that is, in the case of an infinitesimally thin, axisymmetric disk — the preferred small parameter is,

ca

=

(1e2)1/21.

Recognizing as well that,

sin1e

=

cos1(1e2)1/2=cos1(ca)

2sin1ee3(1e2)1/2

=

(ca)[cos1(ca)][1c2a2]3/2,

the expressions for the pair of relevant index symbols may be rewritten as,

A1

=

2(ca)2(1c2a2)1,

A32

=

(1c2a2)12.

Pulling agin from p. 457 of [CRC], we find that,

cos1(ca)

=

π2ca{1+[123](ca)2+[13245](ca)4+[1352467](ca)6+[135724689](ca)8+}       for,       (c2a2<1,0<cos1(ca)<π).

And referring again to the above binomial-theorem expression, we find for (c2/a2<1),

[1c2a2]3/2

=

1+32(ca)2+[32(321)2!](ca)4[32(321)(322)3!](ca)6+[32(321)(322)(323)4!](ca)8

 

=

1+32(ca)2+[32(32+1)2!](ca)4+[32(32+1)(32+2)3!](ca)6+[32(32+1)(32+2)(32+3)4!](ca)8+

 

=

1+32(ca)2+[35222!](ca)4+[357233!](ca)6+[3579244!](ca)8+

 

=

1+32(ca)2+[3523](ca)4+[5724](ca)6+[57927](ca)8+

We therefore can write,

2

=

{π2(ca)(ca)2[123](ca)4[13245](ca)6[1352467](ca)8[135724689](ca)10}

 

 

×{1+32(ca)2+[3523](ca)4+[5724](ca)6+[57927](ca)8+}

 

=

π2(ca)(ca)2[123](ca)4[13245](ca)6[1352467](ca)8[135724689](ca)10

 

 

+32(ca)2{π2(ca)(ca)2[123](ca)4[13245](ca)6[1352467](ca)8}

 

 

+[3523](ca)4{π2(ca)(ca)2[123](ca)4[13245](ca)6}

 

 

+[5724](ca)6{π2(ca)(ca)2[123](ca)4}+[57927](ca)8{π2(ca)(ca)2}+𝒪(c10a10)

 

=

π2(ca)(ca)2[123](ca)4[13245](ca)6[1352467](ca)8+π[322](ca)3[32](ca)4[122](ca)6[32245](ca)8

 

 

+π[3524](ca)5[3523](ca)6[524](ca)8+π[5725](ca)7[5724](ca)8+π[57928](ca)9+𝒪(c10a10)

 

=

π2(ca)(ca)2+π[322](ca)3[123+32](ca)4+π[3524](ca)5[13245+122+3523](ca)6

 

 

+π[5725](ca)7[1352467+32245+524+5724](ca)8+π[57928](ca)9+𝒪(c10a10)

 

=

π2(ca)(ca)2+π[322](ca)3[53](ca)4+π[3524](ca)5[115](ca)6+π[5725](ca)7[9357](ca)8+π[57928](ca)9+𝒪(c10a10).

Frequency (temporary)

ω02

=

2πGρ[A1A3(1e2)]

ΩMc2ω02πGρ

=

2(32e2)(1e2)1/2sin1ee36(1e2)e2,

Taylor Series (Hunter77)

First (Unsuccessful) Try

First:

f0

=

f3+(3Δ)f3'+12(3Δ)2f3'+16(3Δ)3f3'+124(3Δ)4f3iv+𝒪(Δ5)

 

=

f3(3Δ)f3'+322(Δ)2f3'322(Δ)3f3'+3323(Δ)4f3iv+𝒪(Δ5)

322(Δ)2f3'

=

f3f0(3Δ)f3'322(Δ)3f3'+3323(Δ)4f3iv+𝒪(Δ5)

Note that, replacing the (Δ)3f3' term with the expression derived in the Second step, below, gives,

322(Δ)2f3'

=

f3f0(3Δ)f3'+3323(Δ)4f3iv+𝒪(Δ5)

 

 

322{[2232]f0f1+f3[532]+[23](Δ)f3'+[56](Δ)4f3iv}[32]

 

=

f3f03(Δ)f3'+3323(Δ)4f3iv+𝒪(Δ5)

 

 

+{3f0+[3322]f1+[1522]f3+[32](Δ)f3'+[32523](Δ)4f3iv}

 

=

2f0+[3322]f1+[1+1522]f3+[332](Δ)f3'+[332332523](Δ)4f3iv+𝒪(Δ5)

 

=

2f0+[3322]f1+[1922]f3+[92](Δ)f3'+[94](Δ)4f3iv+𝒪(Δ5)

Then, replacing the (Δ)4f3iv term with the expression derived in the Third step, below, gives,

322(Δ)2f3'

=

2f0+[3322]f1+[1922]f3+[92](Δ)f3'+𝒪(Δ5)

 

 

+[94]{[132]f0+[12]f1f2+[11232]f3+[23](Δ)f3'}[223]

 

=

2f0+[3322]f1+[1922]f3+[92](Δ)f3'+𝒪(Δ5)

 

 

+{[3]f0+[332]f133f2+[3112]f3+[232](Δ)f3'}

 

=

f0+[3323322]f133f2+[3112+1922]f3+[23292](Δ)f3'+𝒪(Δ5)

 

=

f0+[3322]f133f2+[51722]f3+[3252](Δ)f3'+𝒪(Δ5)


Second:

f1

=

f3+(2Δ)f3'+12(2Δ)2f3'+16(2Δ)3f3'+124(2Δ)4f3iv+𝒪(Δ5)

 

=

f32(Δ)f3'+2(Δ)2f3'223(Δ)3f3'+23(Δ)4f3iv+𝒪(Δ5)

 

=

f32(Δ)f3'223(Δ)3f3'+23(Δ)4f3iv+𝒪(Δ5)

 

 

[2232][f3f0(3Δ)f3'322(Δ)3f3'+3323(Δ)4f3iv+𝒪(Δ5)]

 

=

[2232]f0+f3[12232]+[2232(3Δ)2(Δ)]f3'+[(2232)322(Δ)3223(Δ)3]f3'

 

 

+[23(Δ)4(2232)3323(Δ)4]f3iv+𝒪(Δ5)

 

=

[2232]f0+f3[532]+[23](Δ)f3'+[23](Δ)3f3'+[56](Δ)4f3iv+𝒪(Δ5)

[23](Δ)3f3'

=

[2232]f0f1+f3[532]+[23](Δ)f3'+[56](Δ)4f3iv+𝒪(Δ5)

Now, replacing the (Δ)4f3iv term with the expression derived in the Third step, below, gives,

[23](Δ)3f3'

=

[2232]f0f1+f3[532]+[23](Δ)f3'+𝒪(Δ5)

 

 

+[56]{[132]f0+[12]f1f2+[11232]f3+[23](Δ)f3'}[223]

 

=

[2232]f0f1+f3[532]+[23](Δ)f3'+𝒪(Δ5)

 

 

+{[2532]f0+[5]f1+[25]f2+[51132]f3+[2253](Δ)f3'}

 

=

[22322532]f0+[4]f1+[25]f2+[532+51132]f3+[225323](Δ)f3'+𝒪(Δ5)

 

=

[23]f0+[4]f1+[25]f2+[2253]f3+[2113](Δ)f3'+𝒪(Δ5)


Third:

f2

=

f3+(Δ)f3'+12(Δ)2f3'+16(Δ)3f3'+124(Δ)4f3iv+𝒪(Δ5)

 

=

f3+[1](Δ)f3'+[12](Δ)2f3'+[123](Δ)3f3'+[1233](Δ)4f3iv+𝒪(Δ5)

 

=

f3+[1](Δ)f3'+[1233](Δ)4f3iv+𝒪(Δ5)

 

 

+[12]{2f0+[3322]f1+[1922]f3+[92](Δ)f3'+[94](Δ)4f3iv}[232]

 

 

+[123]{[2232]f0f1+f3[532]+[23](Δ)f3'+[56](Δ)4f3iv}[32]

 

=

f3+[1](Δ)f3'+[1233](Δ)4f3iv+𝒪(Δ5)

 

 

+{[232]f0+[322]f1+[192232]f3+[12](Δ)f3'+[14](Δ)4f3iv}

 

 

+{[132]f0+[122]f1+f3[52232]+[123](Δ)f3'+[5233](Δ)4f3iv}

 

=

f3+[1](Δ)f3'+[1233](Δ)4f3iv+𝒪(Δ5)

 

 

+{[132232]f0+[322122]f1+[52232192232]f3+[12123](Δ)f3'+[145233](Δ)4f3iv}

 

=

[132]f0+[12]f1+[11232]f3+[23](Δ)f3'+[1223](Δ)4f3iv+𝒪(Δ5)

[1223](Δ)4f3iv

=

[132]f0+[12]f1f2+[11232]f3+[23](Δ)f3'+𝒪(Δ5)

And, finally:

f4

=

f3+(Δ)f3'+12(Δ)2f3'+16(Δ)3f3'+124(Δ)4f3iv+𝒪(Δ5)

 

=

f3+(Δ)f3'+𝒪(Δ5)

 

 

+12{f0+[3322]f133f2+[51722]f3+[3252](Δ)f3'}[232]

 

 

+16{[23]f0+[4]f1+[25]f2+[2253]f3+[2113](Δ)f3'}[32]

 

 

+124{[132]f0+[12]f1f2+[11232]f3+[23](Δ)f3'}[223]

 

=

f3+(Δ)f3'+𝒪(Δ5)

 

 

+{[132]f0+[322]f1+[3]f2+[5172232]f3+[52](Δ)f3'}

 

 

+{[123]f0+[1]f1+[52]f2+[53]f3+[1123](Δ)f3'}

 

 

+{[1232]f0+[122]f1+[12]f2+[112232]f3+[13](Δ)f3'}

 

=

[132+123+1232]f0+[3221122]f1+[3+52+12]f2+𝒪(Δ5)

 

 

+[1517223253112232]f3+[1+52+1123+13](Δ)f3'

 

=

[13]f0+[2]f1+[6]f2+[103]f3+[173](Δ)f3'+𝒪(Δ5)

Result:

Definitely WRONG!

f4

=

13f02f1+6f2103f3+173(Δ)f3'+𝒪(Δ5).

When I used an Excel spreadsheet to test this out against a parabola, the integration quickly became wildly unstable, strongly suggesting that there is an error in the derivation. My first attempt to uncover this error produced a new coefficient on the (Δ)f3', namely,

Somewhat Improved

f4

=

13f02f1+6f2103f3+4(Δ)f3'+𝒪(Δ5).

Although it showed improvement, this expression still blows up. So I have not bothered to revise the original (definitely WRONG!) derivation. Instead, let's start all over and approach it with a more gradual derivation.

Second Try

We will work from the following foundation expression in which f4 is the variable that we desire to evaluate, and the "known" quantities are:   f3, f3', f2, f1, and f0.

f4

=

f3+(Δ)f3'+12(Δ)2f3'+16(Δ)3f3'+124(Δ)4f3iv+𝒪(Δ5)

Let's use similar Taylor-series expansions for f2, f3, etc. in order to eliminate the f3' term, the f3' term, etc.

f2

=

f3+(Δ)f3'+12(Δ)2f3'+16(Δ)3f3'+124(Δ)4f3iv+𝒪(Δ5)

f1

=

f3+(2Δ)f3'+12(2Δ)2f3'+16(2Δ)3f3'+124(2Δ)4f3iv+𝒪(Δ5)

f0

=

f3+(3Δ)f3'+12(3Δ)2f3'+16(3Δ)3f3'+124(3Δ)4f3iv+𝒪(Δ5)


First:

12(Δ)2f3'

=

f3+(Δ)f3'f2+16(Δ)3f3'+124(Δ)4f3iv+𝒪(Δ5)

12(Δ)2f3'

=

f3+(Δ)f3'+f2+16(Δ)3f3'124(Δ)4f3iv+𝒪(Δ5)

f4

=

f3+(Δ)f3'f3+(Δ)f3'+f2+𝒪(Δ3)

 

=

f2+2(Δ)f3'+𝒪(Δ3)

𝒪(Δ3)

f4

=

f2+2(Δ)f3'+𝒪(Δ3)

This expression works very well for a parabola.


Second:

f1

=

f3+(2)Δf3'+2(Δ)2f3'+[236]Δ3f3'+[24233]Δ4f3iv+𝒪(Δ5)

 

=

f3+(2)Δf3'+[236]Δ3f3'+[24233]Δ4f3iv+𝒪(Δ5)

 

 

+2{f3+(Δ)f3'+f2+123(Δ)3f3'1233(Δ)4f3iv}[2]

 

=

f3[122]+(222)Δf3'+22f2+[23236]Δ3f3'+[24233123]Δ4f3iv+𝒪(Δ5)

 

=

f3[3]+(2)Δf3'+22f2+[23]Δ3f3'+[12]Δ4f3iv+𝒪(Δ5)

[23]Δ3f3'

=

f1+22f23f3+2Δf3'+[12]Δ4f3iv+𝒪(Δ5)

This also allows us to improve the expression for the f3' term, as initially derived in the "First" subsection, above. Namely,

12(Δ)2f3'

=

f2f3+(Δ)f3'124(Δ)4f3iv+𝒪(Δ5)

 

 

+16{f1+22f23f3+2Δf3'+[12]Δ4f3iv}[32]

 

=

14f1+2f2+[74]f3+[32](Δ)f3'+[1223](Δ)4f3iv+𝒪(Δ5)

Hence, an improved expression for f4 is,

f4

=

f3+(Δ)f3'+𝒪(Δ4)

 

 

+{14f1+2f2+[74]f3+[32](Δ)f3'}

 

 

+16{f1+22f23f3+2Δf3'}[32]

 

=

12f1+3f232f3+3(Δ)f3'+𝒪(Δ4)


𝒪(Δ4)

f4

=

12f1+3f232f3+3(Δ)f3'+𝒪(Δ4)



Third:

f0

=

f3+(3Δ)f3'+12(3Δ)2f3'+16(3Δ)3f3'+124(3Δ)4f3iv+𝒪(Δ5)

 

=

f3+[3](Δ)f3'+[3323](Δ)4f3iv+𝒪(Δ5)

 

 

+32{14f1+2f2+[74]f3+[32](Δ)f3'+[1223](Δ)4f3iv}

 

 

+[3322]{f1+22f23f3+2Δf3'+[12]Δ4f3iv}

 

=

f3+[3](Δ)f3'+[3323](Δ)4f3iv+𝒪(Δ5)

 

 

+{[324]f1+[232]f2+[3274]f3+[332](Δ)f3'+[322](Δ)4f3iv}

 

 

+{[3322]f1+[33]f2+[3422]f3+[332]Δf3'+[3323]Δ4f3iv}

 

=

[3322324]f1+[23233]f2+[1+34223274]f3+[3323323](Δ)f3'+[3323+3223323](Δ)4f3iv+𝒪(Δ5)

 

=

[322]f1+[32]f2+[112]f3+[3](Δ)f3'+[322](Δ)4f3iv+𝒪(Δ5)

[322](Δ)4f3iv

=

f0+[322]f1+[32]f2+[112]f3+[3](Δ)f3'+𝒪(Δ5)

Hence,

12(Δ)2f3'

=

14f1+2f2+[74]f3+[32](Δ)f3'+𝒪(Δ5)

 

 

+[1223]{f0+[322]f1+[32]f2+[112]f3+[3](Δ)f3'}[223]

 

=

14f1+2f2+[74]f3+[32](Δ)f3'+𝒪(Δ5)

 

 

+{[132]f0+[12]f1+f2+[11232]f3+[13](Δ)f3'}

 

=

[132]f0+[1214]f1+3f2+[1123274]f3+[13+32](Δ)f3'+𝒪(Δ5)

 

=

[132]f0+[34]f1+3f2+[5172232]f3+[1123](Δ)f3'+𝒪(Δ5)

And,

[23]Δ3f3'

=

f1+22f23f3+2Δf3'+𝒪(Δ5)

 

 

+[12]{f0+[322]f1+[32]f2+[112]f3+[3](Δ)f3'}[223]

 

=

f1+22f23f3+2Δf3'+𝒪(Δ5)

 

 

+{[23]f0+[3]f1+[23]f2+[113]f3+[2](Δ)f3'}

 

=

[23]f0+[4]f1+[25]f2+[2253]f3+[4](Δ)f3'+𝒪(Δ5)


Finally, then:

f4

=

f3+(Δ)f3'+12(Δ)2f3'+16(Δ)3f3'+124(Δ)4f3iv+𝒪(Δ5)

 

=

f3+(Δ)f3'+𝒪(Δ5)

 

 

+12{[132]f0+[34]f1+3f2+[5172232]f3+[1123](Δ)f3'}[2]

 

 

+123{[23]f0+[4]f1+[25]f2+[2253]f3+[4](Δ)f3'}[32]

 

 

+1233{f0+[322]f1+[32]f2+[112]f3+[3](Δ)f3'}[223]

 

=

f3+(Δ)f3'+𝒪(Δ5)

 

 

+{[132]f0+[34]f1+3f2+[5172232]f3+[1123](Δ)f3'}

 

 

+122{[23]f0+[4]f1+[25]f2+[2253]f3+[4](Δ)f3'}

 

 

+1232{f0+[322]f1+[32]f2+[112]f3+[3](Δ)f3'}

 

=

f3+(Δ)f3'+𝒪(Δ5)

 

 

+{[132]f0+[34]f1+3f2+[5172232]f3+[1123](Δ)f3'}

 

 

+{[123]f0+[1]f1+[52]f2+[53]f3+[1](Δ)f3'}

 

 

{[1232]f0+[122]f1+[12]f2+[112232]f3+[123](Δ)f3'}

 

=

[132+123+1232]f0+[134122]f1+[3+52+12]f2+[1517223253112232]f3+[2+1123+123](Δ)f3'+𝒪(Δ5)

 

=

[13]f0+[2]f1+[6]f2+[253]f3+[4](Δ)f3'+𝒪(Δ5)


𝒪(Δ5)

f4

=

13f02f1+6f2253f3+4(Δ)f3'+𝒪(Δ5)


Tiled Menu

Appendices: | VisTrailsEquations | VisTrailsVariables | References | Ramblings | VisTrailsImages | myphys.lsu | ADS |