Appendix/Ramblings/LedouxVariationalPrinciple

From jetwiki
Revision as of 18:51, 23 July 2021 by Jet53man (talk | contribs) (Created page with "__FORCETOC__ <!-- __NOTOC__ will force TOC off --> =Ledoux's Variational Principle (Supporting Derivations)= An User:Tohline/SSC/VariationalPrinciple#Ledoux.27s_Variation...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Ledoux's Variational Principle (Supporting Derivations)

An accompanying chapter presents a summary discussion of Ledoux's variational principle, emphasizing how it relates to stability analyses that are built upon free-energy arguments. The detailed derivations presented below provide the foundation upon which that summary discussion has been built.


Material that appears after this point in our presentation is under development and therefore
may contain incorrect mathematical equations and/or physical misinterpretations.
|   Go Home   |


Our Initial Explorations

Review by Ledoux and Walraven (1958)

Here we are especially interested in understanding the origin of equation (59.10) of P. Ledoux & Th. Walraven (1958), which appears in §59 (pp. 464 - 466) of their Handbuch der Physik article.

From our accompanying summary of the set of nonlinear governing relations, we highlight the

Euler + Poisson Equations
d2rdt2=4πr2dPdmGmr2

Repeating a result from our separate derivation, linearization of the two terms on the righthand side of this equation gives,

r2dPdm

r02[1+xeiωt]2{dP0dm[1+peiωt]+P0eiωtdpdm}r02dP0dm[1+(2x+p)eiωt]+P0r02eiωtdpdm

Gmr2

Gmr02[1+xeiωt]2Gmr02[12xeiωt].

Adopting the terminology of Ledoux & Walraven (1958), the "variation" of each of these terms is obtained by subtracting off the leading order pieces — which presumably cancel in equilibrium. In particular, drawing a parallel with their equation (59.1), we can write,

δ(Gmr2)

Gmr02[2xeiωt].

And, drawing a parallel with their equation (59.2), we have,

δ(1ρdPdr)=δ(4πr2dPdm)

4πr02dP0dm[(2x+p)eiωt]4πP0r02eiωtdpdm

 

=

{Gmr02[(2x)]4πr02dP0dm[(p)]4πP0r02dpdm}eiωt

 

=

{(2Gmr02)x1ρ0ddr0[P0p]}eiωt.

Now, if we combined the linearized continuity equation and the linearized (adiabatic form of the) first law of thermodynamics, as derived elsewhere, we can write,

p=γgd

=

γg[3x+r0dxdr0]

 

=

γgr02ddr0(r03x).

Hence,

δ(1ρdPdr)

{(2Gmr02)x+1ρ0ddr0[γgP0r02ddr0(r03x)]}eiωt.

So, given that a mapping from our notation to that used by Ledoux & Walraven (1958) requires xeiωtζ/r0, I understand the origins of their equations (59.1) and (59.2). But I do not yet understand how … "Accordingly, the acting forces per unit volume can be considered as deriving from a potential density"

ρ0𝒱

=

(2Gmr03)ρ0ζ2+γgP02[1r02(r02ζ)r0]2.

It is clear that, once I understand the origin of this expression for the potential density, I will understand how the "Lagrangian density" as defined by their equation (47.8), viz.,

=ρ0[𝒦𝒱],

becomes (see their equation 59.5),

=

ρ02ζ˙2+(2Gmr03)ρ0ζ2γgP02[1r02(r02ζ)r0]2.

Noting that, ζ˙=iωr0xeiωt, this in turn gives,

L0R4πr02dr0

=

4π0R{ρ02ζ˙2+(2Gmr03)ρ0ζ2γgP02[1r02(r02ζ)r0]2}r02dr0

 

=

4πe2iωt0R{ρ02(iωr0x)2+(2Gmr03)ρ0(r0x)2γgP02[1r02(r03x)r0]2}r02dr0

 

=

2πe2iωt0R{ρ0ω2r02x24r0x2dP0dr0γgP0r04[3r02x+r03xr0]2}r02dr0

 

=

2πe2iωt0R{ρ0ω2r04x2γgP0r04(xr0)24r03x2dP0dr03γgP0[3r02x2+2r03xxr0]}dr0

 

=

2πe2iωt0R{ρ0ω2r04x2γgP0r04(xr0)24r03x2dP0dr0+r03x2ddr0(3γgP0)ddr0[3γgr03x2P0]}dr0

 

=

2πe2iωt{0Rρ0ω2r04x2dr00RγgP0r04(xr0)2dr0+0Rr03x2ddr0[(3γg4)P0]dr0[3γgr03x2P0]0R}.

The group of terms inside the curly braces, here, matches the group of terms inside the curly braces of Ledoux & Walraven's equation (59.8) if we acknowledge that:

  1. Our ω2 has the same meaning as, but the opposite sign of, their σ2.
  2. Our last term goes to zero because, r0=0 at the center, while P0=0 at the surface.

LP41 Again

After setting the last term to zero, this last expression can be rewritten as,

2e2iωtL

=

ω20R4πρ0r04x2dr00R4πγgP0r04(xr0)2dr0(3γg4)0R4πρ0r03x2(1ρ0dP0dr0)dr0

 

=

ω20Rx2r02dmγg0R[r0(xr0)]2P0dV(3γg4)0Rr0x2(Gmr02)dm

[2e2iωt0Rx2r02dm]L

=

ω2+{γg0R[r0(xr0)]2P0dV+(3γg4)0Rx2(Gmr0)dm0Rx2r02dm}.

As is explained in detail in §59 (pp. 464 - 465) of Ledoux & Walraven (1958), and summarized in §1 of Ledoux & Pekeris (1941), the function inside the curly braces of this last expression will be minimized if the radially dependent displacement function, x, is set equal to the eigenfunction of the fundamental mode of radial oscillation, x0; and, after evaluation, the minimum value of this expression will be equal to (the negative of) the square of the fundamental-mode oscillation frequency, ω2. This explicit mathematical statement is contained within equation (8) of Ledoux & Pekeris and within equation (59.10) of Ledoux & Walraven.

Now, as we have discussed separately — see, also, p. 64, Equation (12) of [C67] — the gravitational potential energy of the unperturbed configuration is given by the integral,

Wgrav

=

0M(Gmr0)dm;

for adiabatic systems, the internal energy is,

Uint=1(γg1)0RP0dV;

and — see the text at the top of p. 126 of Ledoux & Pekeris (1941) — the moment of inertia of the configuration about its center is,

I=0Mr02dm.

Hence, the function to be minimized may be written as,

 

 

{γg(γg1)0R[r0(xr0)]2dUint(3γg4)0Rx2dWgrav0Rx2dI}.

This expression appears in equation (9) of Ledoux & Pekeris (1941).

Chandrasekhar (1964)

In a paper titled, A General Variational Principle Governing the Radial and the Non-Radial Oscillations of Gaseous Masses, S. Chandrasekhar (1964, ApJ, 139, 664) independently derived the Ledoux-Pekeris Lagrangian.

The Lagrangian Expression using Chandrasekhar's Notation

First, let's show that the Lagrangian expression derived by Chandrasekhar is, indeed, equivalent to the one presented by Ledoux & Pekeris. Returning to the second line of our effort to simplify the above definition of the Lagrangian, and making the substitution, ψr03x, we have,

2L

=

4πe2iωt0R{ρ0(iωψr02)2+(4Gmr03)ρ0(ψr02)2γgP0[1r02(ψ)r0]2}r02dr0

 

=

4πe2iωt0R{ω2ρ0(ψr0)24(dP0dr0)(ψ2r03)γgP0[1r0(ψ)r0]2}dr0

 

=

4πe2iωt0R{ω2ρ0ψ2+4(dP0dr0)(ψ2r0)+γgP0[ψr0]2}dr0r02.

This integral expression matches the integral expression that appears in equation (49) of Chandrasekhar (1964), if we accept that our squared frequency, ω2, has the opposite sign to Chandrasekhar's σ2. Chandrasekhar acknowledged that, for radial modes of oscillation, his result was the same as that derived earlier by Ledoux and his collaborators.

Chandrasekhar's Independent Derivation

Now, let's follow Chandrasekhar's lead and derive the Lagrangian directly from the governing LAWE. We begin with a version of the LAWE that appears above in our review of the paper by Ledoux & Pekeris (1941), namely,

0

=

ddr[r4Γ1Pdξdr]+[σ2ρr4+(3Γ14)r3dPdr]ξ.

We will develop the Lagrangian expression by following the guidance provided at the top of p. 666 of S. Chandrasekhar (1964, ApJ, 139, 664). First, we multiply the LAWE through by the fractional displacement, ξ; second, we make the substitution, ξψ/r3, in order to shift to Chandrasekhar's variable notation; then we multiply through by dr and integrate from the center (r=0) to the surface (r=R) of the configuration.

Multiplying through by the fractional displacement gives,

σ2ρr4ξ2

=

ξddr[r4Γ1Pdξdr](3Γ14)r3ξ2(dPdr).

Next, making the stated variable substitution gives,

σ2ρψ2r2

=

(ψr3)ddr[r4Γ1Pddr(ψr3)](3Γ14)(ψ2r3)(dPdr)

 

=

(ψr3)ddr[rΓ1Pdψdr3Γ1Pψ](3Γ14)(ψ2r3)(dPdr)

 

=

(43Γ1)(ψ2r3)(dPdr)(ψr3)ddr[rΓ1Pdψdr]+3Γ1(ψ2r3)dPdr+3Γ1P(ψr3)dψdr

 

=

4(ψ2r3)(dPdr)+3Γ1P(ψr3)dψdr{ddr[rΓ1P(ψr3)dψdr]rΓ1Pdψdrddr(ψr3)}

 

=

4(ψ2r3)(dPdr)+3Γ1P(ψr3)dψdr+Γ1Pr2[dψdr]2[3Γ1Pψr3]dψdrddr[Γ1Pψr2(dψdr)]

 

=

4(ψ2r3)(dPdr)+Γ1Pr2[dψdr]2ddr[Γ1Pψr2(dψdr)].

Finally, integrating over the volume gives,

0R(σ2ρψ2)drr2

=

0R[Γ1P(dψdr)2+4ψ2r(dPdr)]drr2[Γ1Pψr2(dψdr)]0R,

which is identical to equation (49) of Chandrasekhar (1964), if the last term — the difference of the central and surface boundary conditions — is set to zero.

Examples

Ledoux's Expression

Returning to the last line of our above definition of the Lagrangian, that is,

L

=

2πe2iωt{0Rρ0ω2r04x2dr00RγgP0r04(xr0)2dr0+0Rr03x2ddr0[(3γg4)P0]dr0[3γgr03x2P0]0R},

let's attempt to evaluate the terms inside the curly braces for the case of pressure-truncated polytropic configurations because, as has been discussed separately, we have an analytic expression for the eigenvector of the fundamental-mode of radial oscillation. Dividing through by PcReq3 and making the substitution, r0/Reqξ/ξ~, gives,

L{}PcReq3

=

0Rρ0ω2PcReq3r04x2dr00RγgP0PcReq3r04(xr0)2dr0+0Rr03x2ddr0[(3γg4)P0PcReq3]dr03γgxsurf2PePc

 

=

0ξ~ω2[ρcReq2Pc](ρ0ρc)(ξξ~)4x2dξξ~0ξ~γg(P0Pc)(ξξ~)4[x(ξ/ξ~)]2dξξ~+0ξ~(ξξ~)x2dd(ξ/ξ~)[(3γg4)P0Pc]dξξ~3γgxsurf2PePc

 

=

ω2[ρcReq2Pcξ~5]0ξ~θnξ4x2dξγgξ~30ξ~θn+1ξ4[xξ]2dξ+(3γg4)ξ~0ξ~ξx2ddξ[θn+1]dξ[3γgPePc]xsurf2

 

=

ω2[ρcReq2Pcξ~5]0ξ~θnξ4x2dξ[3γgPePc]xsurf2+1ξ~30ξ~[(3γg4)ξ~2ξx2dθn+1dξγgθn+1ξ4(xξ)2]dξ

where, we have set the pressure at the (truncated) surface to the value, P0|surface=Pe.

Chandra's Expression

Normalization

Alternatively, starting from Chandrasekhar's expression,

2L{}

=

0R{ω2ρ0(r03x)2+4(dP0dr0)(r03x)2r0+γgP0[(r03x)r0]2}dr0r02

2L{}PcReq3

=

0R{ω2ρcPc(ρ0ρc)r04x2+4r03x2ddr0(P0Pc)+γgP0r02Pc[(r03x)r0]2}dr0Req3

 

=

0ξ~{ω2ρcReq2Pc(ρ0ρc)(ξξ~)4x2+4ξ~x2(ξξ~)3ddξ(P0Pc)+γgP0Pc(ξξ~)2[(ξ/ξ~)(ξ3xξ~3)]2}dξξ~

 

=

0ξ~{ω2ρcReq2ξ~4Pc(θnξ4)x2+(4ξ~2)x2ξ3[dθn+1dξ]+γgξ~2(θn+1ξ2)[(ξ3x)ξ]2}dξξ~

 

=

1ξ~30ξ~{ω2ρcReq2ξ~2Pc(θnξ4)x2+4x2ξ3[dθn+1dξ]+γg(θn+1ξ2)[(ξ3x)ξ]2}dξ.

Known Analytic Eigenfunction

Now, let's plug in the known eigenfunction for the marginally unstable configuration, namely,

Exact Solution to the (3n<) Polytropic LAWE

σc2=0

      and      

xP3(n1)2n[1+(n3n1)(1ξθn)dθdξ].

Given that, from the Lane-Emden equation,

θ'θn=12θ'ξθn,

we recognize that,

d(ξ3xP)dξ

=

3(n1)2ndξ3dξ+3(n3)2nddξ(ξ2θ'θn)

 

=

32(n1)ξ22n+3(n3)ξ22n[θ'θn+2θ'ξθnn(θ')2θn+1]

 

=

3ξ22n{3(n1)(n3)[1+n(θ')2θn+1]}

 

=

3ξ22{2+(3n)[(θ')2θn+1]}.

General Evaluation

Therefore, returning to Chandrasekhar's expression for the Lagrangian and evaluating the sum of the last two terms inside the curly braces gives,

{2}xP

{4x2ξ3[dθn+1dξ]+γg(θn+1ξ2)[d(ξ3x)dξ]2}xP

 

=

4(n+1){3(n1)2n[1+(n3n1)(θ'ξθn)]}2ξ3θnθ'

 

 

+(n+1)n(θn+1ξ2)32ξ422{2+(3n)[(θ')2θn+1]}2

 

=

4(n+1)32(n1)222n2[1+(n3n1)(θ'ξθn)]2ξ3θnθ'

 

 

+(n+1)n(θn+1ξ2)32ξ422[2+(3n)(θ')2θn+1]2

 

=

32(n+1)ξ222n2{22(n1)2[1+(n3n1)(θ'ξθn)]2ξθnθ'+nθn+1[2+(3n)(θ')2θn+1]2}

 

=

32(n+1)ξ222n2{22[(n1)ξθn+(n3)θ']2θ'ξθn+nθn+1[2θn+1+(3n)(θ')2]2}

 

=

32(n+1)ξ22n2θn+1{nξ[2θn+1+(3n)(θ')2]2+22θθ'[(n1)ξθn+(n3)θ']2}

 

=

32(n+1)ξ22n2θn+1{nξ[22θ2(n+1)+4(3n)θn+1(θ')2+(3n)2(θ')4]

 

 

+22θθ'[(n1)2ξ2θ2n+2(n1)(n3)ξθnθ'+(n3)2(θ')2]}

 

=

32(n+1)ξ22n2θn+1{nξ[22θ2(n+1)+(3n)2(θ')4]+22θθ'[(n1)2ξ2θ2n+(n3)2(θ')2]

 

 

+[23(n1)(n3)4n(n3)]ξθn+1(θ')2}

 

=

32(n+1)ξ22n2θn+1{nξ[22θ2(n+1)+(3n)2(θ')4]+22θθ'[(n1)2ξ2θ2n+(n3)2(θ')2]+22(n25n+6)ξθn+1(θ')2}

Application to n = 5 Polytropic Configuration

Let's try plugging in expressions for n = 5 configurations, for which the Lane-Emden function is known analytically. Specifically,

θn=5=(1+ξ23)1/2       and       θn=5'=ξ3(1+ξ23)3/2.

First Attempt

We have,

{2}xPn=5

=

233ξ52θ6{5ξ[θ12+(θ')4]+24θθ'[ξ2θ10+(θ')2]+23ξθ6(θ')2}

 

=

233ξ52(1+ξ23)3{5ξ[(1+ξ23)6+[ξ3(1+ξ23)3/2]4]

 

 

+24(1+ξ23)1/2[ξ3(1+ξ23)3/2][ξ2(1+ξ23)5+[ξ3(1+ξ23)3/2]2]

 

 

+23ξ(1+ξ23)3[ξ3(1+ξ23)3/2]2}

 

=

233ξ52(1+ξ23)3{5ξ[(1+ξ23)6+ξ434(1+ξ23)6]

 

 

24ξ3(1+ξ23)2[ξ2(1+ξ23)5+ξ232(1+ξ23)3]+2ξ33(1+ξ23)6}

 

=

233ξ252(1+ξ23)4{5(1+ξ23)[1+ξ434]+2ξ23(1+ξ23)24ξ23[1+132(1+ξ23)2]}

 

=

233ξ252(1+ξ23)4{535[35+34ξ2+3ξ4+ξ6]+232(3ξ2+ξ4)24ξ235[34+32+23ξ2+ξ4]}

 

=

2ξ23252(1+ξ23)4{5[35+34ξ2+3ξ4+ξ6]+233(3ξ2+ξ4)24[2325ξ2+23ξ4+ξ6]}

 

=

2ξ23252(1+ξ23)4{355+32ξ2[325+232255]+3ξ4[5+23225]+ξ6[524]}

 

=

2ξ23252(1+ξ23)4[3553297ξ233ξ411ξ6].

Second Attempt

First, we evaluate,

{xP}n=5

=

235[112ξ(1+ξ23)5/2ξ3(1+ξ23)3/2]

 

=

15[6(1+ξ23)]

 

=

1ξ235;

and,

{d(ξ3xP)dξ}n=5

=

3ξ2{1[(θ')2θ6]}

 

=

3ξ2{1[(1+ξ23)1/2]6[ξ3(1+ξ23)3/2]2}

 

=

3ξ2(1ξ232).

Then, returning to Chandrasekhar's expression for the Lagrangian and evaluating the sum of the last two terms inside the curly braces gives,

{2}xPn=5

=

{4x2ξ3[dθn+1dξ]+n+1n(θn+1ξ2)[d(ξ3x)dξ]2}xPn=5

 

=

[θn=5]5{233ξ3[xP]2[dθdξ]+235ξ2[θ][d(ξ3xP)dξ]2}n=5

 

=

[(1+ξ23)1/2]5{235ξ2[(1+ξ23)1/2][3ξ2(1ξ232)]2+233ξ3[3ξ2(1ξ232)]2[ξ3(1+ξ23)3/2]}

 

=

(1+ξ23)4{233ξ25(1ξ232)2(1+ξ23)2332ξ8(1ξ232)2}

 

=

135(1+ξ23)4(1ξ232)2{233ξ2(3+ξ2)23335ξ8}

 

=

232ξ25(1+ξ23)4(1ξ232)2{3+ξ2225ξ6}.

Normalizations

Returning to the last line of our derivation of the Ledoux & Walraven Lagrangian, we can write,

[2γg]e2iωtL+4π0Rρ0(ω2γg)r04x2dr0

=

4π{0RP0r04(xr0)2dr0+0Rr03x2ddr0[(34γg)P0]dr0[3r03x2P0]0R}

 

=

0R[r0(xr0)]24πP0r02dr0(34γg)0R[x2](r0ρ0dP0dr0)4πr02ρ0dr04π[3r03x2P0]0R

 

=

0R[r0(xr0)]24πP0r02dr0(34γg)0R[x2](GMrr0)4πr02ρ0dr0[3x]24πR33Pe.

Alternate Approach:   Integrate Over LAWE

As we have demonstrated, above, if we assume that Γ1 is constant throughout the configuration, our version of the LAWE can be straightforwardly rearranged to give equation (58.1) of Ledoux & Pekeris (1941), that is,

0

=

ddr[r4Γ1Pdxdr]+[σ2ρr4+(3Γ14)r3dPdr]x,

where, we are using x in place of ξ to represent the fractional Lagrangian displacement, δr/r. If we multiply this expression through by 4πdr and integrate over the entire volume of the configuration, we have,

0

=

4π0Rddr[r4Γ1Pdxdr]dr+0R[σ2xr2+(3Γ14)x(rρdPdr)]4πr2ρdr

 

=

[4πr4Γ1P(dxdr)]0R+0R[σ2xr2+(3Γ14)x(Gmr)]dm

 

=

[4πr4Γ1P(dxdr)]0R+σ20RxdI+0R(3Γ14)xdWgrav,

σ2

=

{0R(3Γ14)xdWgrav+[4πr4Γ1P(dxdr)]0R}[0RxdI]1,

where the definitions of dWgrav and dI are as provided, above. This last expression is the same as equation (59.17) of Ledoux & Pekeris (1941), except that:   these authors have retained a term allowing for radial variation of Γ1, whereas we have not; and we have retained a boundary term that can accommodate a nonzero surface pressure, whereas Ledoux & Pekeris have not.

See Also


Tiled Menu

Appendices: | VisTrailsEquations | VisTrailsVariables | References | Ramblings | VisTrailsImages | myphys.lsu | ADS |