Appendix/Ramblings/Bordeaux

From jetwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Université de Bordeaux (Part 1)

Spheroid-Ring Systems

Through a research collaboration at the Université de Bordeaux, B. Basillais & J. -M. Huré (2019), MNRAS, 487, 4504-4509 have published a paper titled, Rigidly Rotating, Incompressible Spheroid-Ring Systems: New Bifurcations, Critical Rotations, and Degenerate States.

We discuss this topic in a separate, accompanying chapter.

Exterior Gravitational Potential of Toroids

J. -M. Huré, B. Basillais, V. Karas, A. Trova, & O. Semerák (2020), MNRAS, 494, 5825-5838 have published a paper titled, The Exterior Gravitational Potential of Toroids. Here we examine how their work relates to the published work by C.-Y. Wong (1973, Annals of Physics, 77, 279), which we have separately discussed in detail.

Our Presentation of Wong's (1973) Result

Summary:  First three terms in Wong's (1973) expression for the gravitational potential at any point, P(ϖ, z), outside of a uniform-density torus.
Wong diagram
Wong diagram

(aGM)ΦW0(ϖ,z)|exterior

=

−(233π3)ΥW0(η0){ar1⋅K(k)},

(aGM)ΦW1(ϖ,z)|exterior

=

−(233π3)ΥW1(η0)×cos⁡θ{ar2⋅E(k)},

(aGM)ΦW2(ϖ,z)|exterior

=

−(233π3)ΥW2(η0)×cos⁡(2θ){[r12+r222r1r2]ar2⋅E(k)−ar1⋅K(k)},

where, once the major ( R ) and minor ( d ) radii of the torus — as well as the vertical location of its equatorial plane (Z0) — have been specified, we have,

a2

≡

R2−d2       and,       cosh⁡η0≡Rd⇒sinh⁡η0=ad,

r12

≡

(ϖ+a)2+(z−Z0)2,

r22

≡

(ϖ−a)2+(z−Z0)2,

cos⁡θ

≡

[r12+r22−4a22r1r2],

k

≡

[r12−r22r12]1/2=[4aϖr12]1/2=[4aϖ(ϖ+a)2+(z−Z0)2]1/2.


  Leading Coefficient Expressions … … evaluated for:    Rd=cosh⁡η0=3

ΥW0(η0)

≡

[sinh⁡η0cosh⁡η0]{K(k0)⋅K(k0)[cosh⁡η0(1−cosh⁡η0)]+2K(k0)⋅E(k0)[cosh⁡2η0+1]−E(k0)⋅E(k0)[cosh⁡η0(1+cosh⁡η0)]},

7.134677

ΥW1(η0)

≡

[sinh⁡η0cosh⁡η0]{K(k0)⋅K(k0)[cosh⁡η0(1−cosh⁡η0)]+2K(k0)⋅E(k0)[(3cosh⁡2η0−1)]−5E(k0)⋅E(k0)[cosh⁡η0(1+cosh⁡η0)]},

0.130324

ΥW2(η0)

≡

23/232[sinh⁡η0cosh⁡η0]{K(k0)⋅K(k0)⋅cosh⁡η0(1−cosh⁡η0)[16cosh⁡2η0−13]+2K(k0)⋅E(k0)[16cosh⁡4η0−13cosh⁡2η0+3]

 

 

 

−E(k0)⋅E(k0)⋅cosh⁡η0(1+cosh⁡η0)[3+16cosh⁡2η0]},

0.003153
where,

k0

≡

[2cosh⁡η0+1]1/2.

0.707106781

NOTE: In evaluating these "leading coefficient expressions" for the case, R/d=3, we have used the complete elliptic integral evaluations, K(k0) = 1.854074677 and E(k0) = 1.350643881.

Setup

From our accompanying discussion of Wong's (1973) derivation, the exterior potential is given by the expression,

(aGM)ΦW(η,θ)

=

−D0(cosh⁡η−cos⁡θ)1/2∑n=0nmaxϵncos⁡(nθ)Cn(cosh⁡η0)Pn−12(cosh⁡η),

Wong (1973), §II.D, p. 294, Eqs. (2.59) & (2.61)

where,

D0

≡

23/23π2[sinh3η0cosh⁡η0]=23/23π2[(R2−d2)3/2d2R],

Cn(cosh⁡η0)

≡

(n+12)Qn+12(cosh⁡η0)Qn−122(cosh⁡η0)−(n−32)Qn−12(cosh⁡η0)Qn+122(cosh⁡η0)

Wong (1973), §II.D, p. 294, Eq. (2.63)

and where, in terms of the major ( R ) and minor ( d ) radii of the torus — or their ratio, ε ≡ d/R,

cosh⁡η0

=

Rd=1ϵ,

sinh⁡η0

=

ad=1d[R2−d2]1/2=1ϵ[1−ϵ2]1/2.

These expressions incorporate a number of basic elements of a toroidal coordinate system. In what follows, we will also make use of the following relations:

Once the primary scale factor, a, has been specified, the illustration shown at the bottom of this inset box — see also our accompanying set of similar figures used by other researchers — helps in explaining how transformations can be made between any two of the referenced coordinate pairs: (ϖ,z), (η,θ), (r1,r2).

ϖ

=

asinh⁡η(cosh⁡η−cos⁡θ)

     ⇒     

cos⁡θ

=

cosh⁡η−asinh⁡ηϖ

z−Z0

=

asin⁡θ(cosh⁡η−cos⁡θ)

     ⇒     

sin⁡θ

=

(z−Z0)ϖ⋅sinh⁡η

Given that (sin2θ + cos2θ) = 1, we have,

1

=

[(z−Z0)ϖ⋅sinh⁡η]2+[cosh⁡η−asinh⁡ηϖ]2

⇒coth⁡η

=

12aϖ[ϖ2+a2+(z−Z0)2].

We deduce as well that,

2coth⁡η+1

=

4aϖ(ϖ+a)2+(z−Z0)2,        and,

sinh⁡η+cosh⁡η

=

ϖ2+a2+(z−Z0)2(ϖ+a)2+(z−Z0)2.


Given the definitions,

r12

=

(ϖ+a)2+(z−Z0)2,

r22

=

(ϖ−a)2+(z−Z0)2,

we can use the transformations,

ϖ

=

(r12−r22)4a     and,

(z−Z0)2

=

r22−116a2[r12−r22−4a2]2,     or,

(z−Z0)2

=

r12−116a2[r12−r22+4a2]2.

Or we can use the transformations,

η

=

ln⁡(r1r2),

cos⁡θ

=

r12+r22−4a22r1r2.


Additional potentially useful relations can be found in an accompanying chapter wherein we present a variety of basic elements of a toroidal coordinate system.

Wong diagram
Wong diagram

Leading (n = 0) Term

Wong's Expression

Now, from our separate derivation we have,

P−1/2(cosh⁡η)

=

2π(sinh⁡η)−1/2Q−1/2(coth⁡η).

And if we make the function-argument substitution, z→coth⁡η, in the "Key Equation,"

Q−12(z)

=

2z+1K(2z+1)

Abramowitz & Stegun (1995), p. 337, eq. (8.13.3)

we can write,

P−1/2(cosh⁡η)

=

2π(sinh⁡η)−1/2kK(k),

where, from above, we recognize that,

k≡[2coth⁡η+1]1/2=[4aϖ(ϖ+a)2+(z−Z0)2]1/2.

So, the leading (n = 0) term gives,

(aGM)ΦW0(η,θ)

=

−D0(cosh⁡η−cos⁡θ)1/2C0(cosh⁡η0)P−12(cosh⁡η)

 

=

−D0C0(cosh⁡η0)[asinh⁡ηϖ]1/22π(sinh⁡η)−1/2kK(k)

 

=

−D0C0(cosh⁡η0)π[2aϖ]1/2kK(k)

 

=

−C0(cosh⁡η0)⋅233π3[sinh3η0cosh⁡η0]a[(ϖ+a)2+(z−Z0)2]1/2⋅K(k).

Thin-Ring Evaluation of C0

In an accompanying discussion of the thin-ring approximation, we showed that as cosh⁡η0→∞

C0(x)|x→∞

=

(3π222)1cosh2η0.

Hence, in this limit we can write,

(aGM)ΦW0(η,θ)|thin−ring

=

−2π[sinh⁡η0cosh⁡η0]31a[(ϖ+a)2+(z−Z0)2]1/2⋅K(k).

More General Evaluation of C0

NOTE of CAUTION: In our above evaluation of the toroidal function, Q−12(z), we appropriately associated the function argument, z, with the hyperbolic-cotangent of η; that is, we made the substitution, z→coth⁡η. Here, as we assess the behavior of, and evaluate, the leading coefficient, C0, an alternate substitution is appropriate, namely, z0→cosh⁡η0; we affix the subscript zero to this function argument in an effort to minimize possible confusion with the argument, z.

Drawing from our accompanying tabulation of Toroidal Function Evaluations, we have more generally,

2C0(cosh⁡η0)

=

[Q+12(cosh⁡η0)][Q−122(cosh⁡η0)]+3[Q−12(cosh⁡η0)][Q+122(cosh⁡η0)]

 

=

[cosh⁡η0k0K(k0)−[2(cosh⁡η0+1)]1/2E(k0)]×{4cosh⁡η0E(k0)−(cosh⁡η0−1)K(k0)[23(cosh⁡η0+1)(cosh⁡η0−1)2]1/2}

 

 

−322[k0K(k0)]×{cosh⁡η0k0K(k0)−(cosh⁡2η0+3)[2(cosh⁡η0−1)(cosh⁡2η0−1)]1/2E(k0)},

where,

k0

≡

[2cosh⁡η0+1]1/2⇒(cosh⁡η0+1)=2k02.

Looking back at our previous numerical evaluation of C0(cosh⁡η0) when z0=cosh⁡η0=3⇒k0=2−1/2, we see that,

Appendix Expression: Q−12(z0)

=

k0K(k0)

Hence MF53 value, Q−12(3)

=

1.311028777⇒K(k0)=1.854074677

Appendix Expression: Q+12(z0)

=

zk0K(k0)−[2(z+1)]1/2E(k0)

Hence MF53 value, Q+12(3)

=

0.1128885424⇒E(k0)=1.350643881

Appendix Expression: Q−122(z0)

=

[23(z−1)(z2−1)]−1/2[4zE(k0)−(z−1)K(k0)]

Hence, Q−122(3)

=

1.104816977, which matches MF53 value

Additional derivation: Q+122(z0)

=

−122{zk0K(k0)−(z2+3)[2(z−1)(z2−1)]1/2E(k0)}

Hence, Q+122(3)

=

0.449302588


⇒C0(3)

=

12Q+12(3)⋅Q−122(3)+32Q−12(3)⋅Q+122(3)=0.945933522.


Attempting to simplify this expression, we have,

2C0(cosh⁡η0)

=

{cosh⁡η0k0K(k0)−(2k0)E(k0)}×{4cosh⁡η0E(k0)−(cosh⁡η0−1)K(k0)[22k0−1(cosh⁡η0−1)]}

 

 

−322[k0K(k0)]×{cosh⁡η0k0K(k0)−(cosh⁡2η0+3)[k02(cosh⁡η0−1)2]1/2E(k0)}

⇒23(cosh⁡η0−1)C0(cosh⁡η0)

=

{cosh⁡η0k02K(k0)−2E(k0)}×{4cosh⁡η0E(k0)−(cosh⁡η0−1)K(k0)}

 

 

−3k0K(k0)×{cosh⁡η0(cosh⁡η0−1)k0K(k0)−(cosh⁡2η0+3)k0E(k0)}

 

=

−K(k0)⋅K(k0)[(cosh⁡η0−1)⋅cosh⁡η0k02+3cosh⁡η0(cosh⁡η0−1)k02]

 

 

+K(k0)⋅E(k0)[22cosh2η0k02+2(cosh⁡η0−1)+3k02(cosh⁡2η0+3)]−E(k0)⋅E(k0)[23cosh⁡η0]

⇒[23(cosh⁡η0−1)k02]C0(cosh⁡η0)

=

−K(k0)⋅K(k0)[(cosh⁡η0−1)⋅cosh⁡η0+3cosh⁡η0(cosh⁡η0−1)]

 

 

+K(k0)⋅E(k0)[22cosh2η0+2k02(cosh⁡η0−1)+3(cosh⁡2η0+3)]−E(k0)⋅E(k0)[23cosh⁡η0k02]

⇒(cosh2η0−1)C0(cosh⁡η0)

=

K(k0)⋅K(k0)[cosh⁡η0(1−cosh⁡η0)]+2K(k0)⋅E(k0)[cosh⁡2η0+1]−E(k0)⋅E(k0)[cosh⁡η0(1+cosh⁡η0)]

This last, simplifed expression gives, as above, C0(3)=0.945933523. TERRIFIC!

Finally then, for any choice of η0,

(aGM)ΦW0(η,θ)|exterior

=

−233π3[sinh⁡η0cosh⁡η0]a[(ϖ+a)2+(z−Z0)2]1/2⋅K(k)

 

 

×{K(k0)⋅K(k0)[cosh⁡η0(1−cosh⁡η0)]+2K(k0)⋅E(k0)[cosh⁡2η0+1]−E(k0)⋅E(k0)[cosh⁡η0(1+cosh⁡η0)]}.

Second (n = 1) Term

The second (n = 1) term in Wong's (1973) expression for the exterior potential is,

(aGM)ΦW1(η,θ)

=

−D0(cosh⁡η−cos⁡θ)1/2⋅2cos⁡θ⋅C1(cosh⁡η0)P+12(cosh⁡η),

where, D0 is the same as above, and,

C1(cosh⁡η0)

≡

32Q+32(cosh⁡η0)Q+122(cosh⁡η0)+12Q+12(cosh⁡η0)Q+322(cosh⁡η0).

Now, from our accompanying table of "Toroidal Function Evaluations", it appears as though,

P+12(cosh⁡η)

=

2π(sinh⁡η)+1/2k−1E(k),

where, as above,

k

≡

[2coth⁡η+1]1/2.

Hence, we have,

(aGM)ΦW1(η,θ)

=

−233π3[sinh3η0cosh⁡η0]C1(cosh⁡η0)[cos⁡θ⋅(cosh⁡η−cos⁡θ)1/2(sinh⁡η)+1/2]k−1E(k)

 

=

−233π3[sinh3η0cosh⁡η0]C1(cosh⁡η0)⋅cos⁡θ{asinh2ηϖ⋅coth⁡η+12}1/2E(k)

 

=

−233π3[sinh3η0cosh⁡η0]C1(cosh⁡η0)⋅cos⁡θ{(a2ϖ)[r12−r222r1r2]2⋅[2r12r12−r22]}1/2E(k)

 

=

−233π3[sinh3η0cosh⁡η0]C1(cosh⁡η0)⋅cos⁡θ{(a2)[4ar12−r22][r12−r222r1r2]2⋅[2r12r12−r22]}1/2E(k)

 

=

−23a3π3[sinh3η0cosh⁡η0]C1(cosh⁡η0)[cos⁡θr2]E(k)=−23a3π3[sinh3η0cosh⁡η0]C1(cosh⁡η0)[cos⁡θ(ϖ−a)2+(z−Z0)2]E(k)

 

=

−23a3π3[sinh3η0cosh⁡η0]C1(cosh⁡η0)[r12+r22−4a22r1r22]E(k).

 

From the above function tabulations & evaluations — for example, K(k0)=1.854074677 and E(k0)=1.350643881 — and a separate listing of Example Recurrence Relations, we have,

Appendix Expression: Q−12(z0)

=

k0K(k0)

Appendix Expression: Q+12(z0)

=

zk0K(k0)−[2(z+1)]1/2E(k0)

Qm−120 recurrence with m = 2: Q+32(z0)

=

43zQ+12(z0)−13Q−12(z0)

 

=

43z{zk0K(k0)−[2(z+1)]1/2E(k0)}−13k0K(k0)

 

=

13[(4z2−1)k0K(k0)−4z[2(z+1)]1/2E(k0)]

Hence, Q+32(3)

=

0.014544576.


Appendix Expression: Q−122(z0)

=

[23(z−1)(z2−1)]−1/2[4zE(k0)−(z−1)K(k0)]

Additional derivation: Q+122(z0)

=

−122{zk0K(k0)−(z2+3)[2(z−1)(z2−1)]1/2E(k0)}

Then, letting μ→2 and, for all m ≥ 2, letting ν→(m−12) in the "Key Equation,"

(ν−μ+1)Pν+1μ(z)

=

(2ν+1)zPνμ(z)−(ν+μ)Pν−1μ(z)

Abramowitz & Stegun (1995), p. 334, eq. (8.5.3)

NOTE: Qνμ, as well as Pνμ, satisfies this same recurrence relation.

we have,

(m−32)Qm+122(z)

=

(2m)zQm−122(z)−(m+32)Qm−322(z).

Therefore, specifically for m = 1, we obtain the recurrence relation,

Q+322(z0)

=

5Q−122(z0)−4zQ+122(z0)

 

=

5{[23(z−1)(z2−1)]−1/2[4zE(k0)−(z−1)K(k0)]}+z{zk0K(k0)−(z2+3)[2(z−1)(z2−1)]1/2E(k0)}

 

=

21/2[(z−1)(z2−1)]−1/2{[5z]−z(z2+3)}E(k0)+{z2k0−[(z−1)(z2−1)]−1/2[2−3/2⋅5(z−1)]}K(k0)

 

=

2−3/2(z+1)−1/2[4z2−5]K(k0)−21/2[(z−1)(z2−1)]−1/2(z2−2)zE(k0)

Hence, Q+322(3)

=

0.132453829.


⇒C1(3)

=

32Q+32(3)⋅Q+122(3)+12Q+12(3)⋅Q+322(3)=0.017278633.


While keeping in mind that,

z0

=

cosh⁡η0,

      and,      

k02

=

2cosh⁡η0+1=2z0+1,

let's attempt to express this leading coefficient, C1(cosh⁡η0), entirely in terms of the pair of complete elliptic integral functions.

2C1(z0)

=

3[Q+32(z0)]×[Q+122(z0)]+[Q+12(z0)]×[5Q−122(z0)−4zQ+122(z0)]

 

=

[3Q+32(z0)−4zQ+12(z0)]×[Q+122(z0)]+[5Q+12(z0)]×[Q−122(z0)]

 

=

−122{(4z2−1)k0K(k0)−4z[2(z+1)]1/2E(k0)−4z[zk0K(k0)−[2(z+1)]1/2E(k0)]}×{zk0K(k0)−(z2+3)[2(z−1)(z2−1)]1/2E(k0)}

 

 

+5[zk0K(k0)−[2(z+1)]1/2E(k0)]×{[23(z−1)(z2−1)]−1/2[4zE(k0)−(z−1)K(k0)]}

 

=

122⋅k0K(k0)×{zk0K(k0)−(z2+3)[2(z−1)(z2−1)]1/2E(k0)}

 

 

+5[23(z−1)(z2−1)]−1/2[zk0K(k0)−[2(z+1)]1/2E(k0)]×{4zE(k0)−(z−1)K(k0)}

 

=

K(k0)⋅K(k0){zk0222−5[23(z−1)(z2−1)]−1/2⋅zk0(z−1)}+E(k0)⋅E(k0){−5[23(z−1)(z2−1)]−1/2⋅[2(z+1)]1/2⋅4z}

 

 

+K(k0)⋅E(k0){−122⋅k0(z2+3)[2(z−1)(z2−1)]1/2+5[23(z−1)(z2−1)]−1/2⋅4z2k0+5[23(z−1)(z2−1)]−1/2⋅[2(z+1)]1/2⋅(z−1)}.

Hence,

2[(z−1)(z2−1)]1/2C1(z0)

=

zk0⋅K(k0)⋅K(k0){k022[(z−1)(z2−1)]1/2−5(z−1)23/2}−10z(z+1)1/2⋅E(k0)⋅E(k0)

 

 

+2−3/2K(k0)⋅E(k0){k0[19z2−3]+5(z−1)[2(z+1)]1/2}

⇒23/2[(z−1)k0]C1(z0)

=

zk0⋅K(k0)⋅K(k0){k022[21/2(z−1)k0]−5(z−1)23/2}−[23/2⋅5zk0]E(k0)⋅E(k0)

 

 

+2−3/2K(k0)⋅E(k0){k0[19z2−3]+10(z−1)k0}

⇒C1(z0)

=

[2(3z2−1)(z2−1)]K(k0)⋅E(k0)−[z(z+1)]K(k0)⋅K(k0)−[5z(z−1)]E(k0)⋅E(k0)

⇒(z02−1)C1(z0)

=

2(3z2−1)K(k0)⋅E(k0)−z0(z0−1)K(k0)⋅K(k0)−5z0(z0+1)E(k0)⋅E(k0).

Hence, we have,

(aGM)ΦW1(η,θ)

=

−23a3π3[sinh3η0cosh⁡η0]C1(cosh⁡η0)[r12+r22−4a22r1r22]E(k).

Third (n = 2) Term

Part A

The third (n = 2) term in Wong's (1973) expression for the exterior potential is,

(aGM)ΦW2(η,θ)

=

−D0(cosh⁡η−cos⁡θ)1/2⋅2cos⁡(2θ)⋅C2(cosh⁡η0)P+32(cosh⁡η),

where, D0 is the same as above, and,

C2(cosh⁡η0)

≡

52Q+52(cosh⁡η0)Q+322(cosh⁡η0)−12Q+32(cosh⁡η0)Q+522(cosh⁡η0).

In order to evaluate C2(z), we will need the following pair of expressions in addition to the ones already used:

Qm−120 recurrence with m = 3, gives:     Q+52(z0)

=

85zQ+32(z0)−35Q+12(z0)

⇒15Q+52(z0)

=

8z[(4z2−1)k0K(k0)−4z[2(z+1)]1/2E(k0)]−9[zk0K(k0)−[2(z+1)]1/2E(k0)]

 

=

zk0K(k0)[8(4z2−1)−9]+[2(z+1)]1/2E(k0)[−32z2+9]

 

=

zk0K(k0)[32z2−17]+[2(z+1)]1/2E(k0)[9−32z2].

Hence,     Q+52(3)

=

0.002080867.

And, setting m = 2 in the above recurrence relation for Qm+122(z) gives,

[(m−32)Qm+122(z)]m=2

=

[(2m)zQm−122(z)−(m+32)Qm−322(z)]m=2

⇒Q+522(z)

=

8zQ+322(z)−7Q+122(z)

 

=

8z[5Q−122(z0)−4zQ+122(z0)]−7Q+122(z)

 

=

40zQ−122(z0)−[32z2+7]Q+122(z0)

 

=

40z{[23(z−1)(z2−1)]−1/2[4zE(k0)−(z−1)K(k0)]}

 

 

+[32z2+7]4{zk0K(k0)−(z2+3)[2(z−1)(z2−1)]1/2E(k0)}

⇒4Q+522(z)

=

25⋅5z{21/2[(z−1)(z2−1)]−1/2[zE(k0)]−2−3/2[(z−1)(z2−1)]−1/2[(z−1)K(k0)]}

 

 

+[32z2+7]{zk0K(k0)−21/2(z2+3)[(z−1)(z2−1)]−1/2E(k0)}

 

=

{211/2⋅5[z2]−21/2[32z2+7](z2+3)}[(z−1)(z2−1)]−1/2E(k0)

 

 

−27/2⋅5{[(z−1)(z2−1)]−1/2(z−1)}zK(k0)+[32z2+7]{21/2[z+1]−1/2}zK(k0)

 

=

21/2{32z2−33}z[z+1]−1/2K(k0)−21/2{32z4−57z2+21}[(z−1)(z2−1)]−1/2E(k0)

 

=

21/2[z+1]−1/2[z−1]−1[(32z2−33)z(z−1)K(k0)−(32z4−57z2+21)E(k0)].

Hence,     Q+522(3)

=

0.03377378.

Part B

Let's evaluate C2(z) specifically for the case where z=cosh⁡η0=3, using the already separately evaluated values of the four relevant toroidal functions. We find,

2C2(3)

=

5Q+52(3)Q+322(3)−Q+32(3)Q+522(3)

 

=

5⋅(0.002080867)×(0.132453829)−(0.014544576)×(0.03377378)

 

=

8.868687×10−4.

Next, let's develop a consolidated expression for C2(z0) that replaces all the toroidal functions with complete elliptic integrals of the first and second kind.

2C2(z0)

=

5Q+52(z0)Q+322(z0)−Q+32(z0)Q+522(z0)

 

=

13{zk0K(k0)[32z2−17]+[2(z+1)]1/2E(k0)[9−32z2]}×{2−3/2(z+1)−1/2[4z2−5]K(k0)−21/2[(z−1)(z2−1)]−1/2(z2−2)zE(k0)}

 

 

−122⋅3{(4z2−1)k0K(k0)−4z[2(z+1)]1/2E(k0)}×{21/2[z+1]−1/2[z−1]−1[(32z2−33)z(z−1)K(k0)−(32z4−57z2+21)E(k0)]}

⇒22⋅3(z2−1)C2(z0)

=

{K(k0)z[32z2−17]+(z+1)E(k0)[9−32z2]}×{(z−1)[4z2−5]K(k0)−4(z2−2)zE(k0)}

 

 

−{(4z2−1)K(k0)−4z(z+1)E(k0)}×{(32z2−33)z(z−1)K(k0)−(32z4−57z2+21)E(k0)}

 

=

{(z−1)[32z2−17][4z2−5]zK(k0)⋅K(k0)−4(z2−2)z2[32z2−17]K(k0)⋅E(k0)}

 

 

+{(z−1)(z+1)[9−32z2][4z2−5]K(k0)⋅E(k0)−4(z2−2)z(z+1)[9−32z2]E(k0)⋅E(k0)}

 

 

+{(32z4−57z2+21)(4z2−1)K(k0)⋅E(k0)−(32z2−33)z(z−1)(4z2−1)K(k0)⋅K(k0)}

 

 

+{4z(z+1)(32z2−33)z(z−1)K(k0)⋅E(k0)−4z(z+1)(32z4−57z2+21)E(k0)⋅E(k0)}

 

=

(z−1){[(32z2−17)(4z2−5)z]−[(32z2−33)z(4z2−1)]}K(k0)⋅K(k0)

 

 

+{[(z−1)(z+1)(9−32z2)(4z2−5)]−[4(z2−2)z2(32z2−17)]

 

 

+[(32z4−57z2+21)(4z2−1)]+[4z(z+1)(32z2−33)z(z−1)]}K(k0)⋅E(k0)

 

 

−2z(z+1){[2(32z4−57z2+21)]+2[(z2−2)(9−32z2)]}E(k0)⋅E(k0)

 

=

z(z−1){[52−64z2]}K(k0)⋅K(k0)−4z(z+1){[3+16z2]}E(k0)⋅E(k0)

 

 

+{[5(32z4−41z2+9)]−[(32z4−57z2+21)]

 

 

+4z2[(32z4−57z2+21)+(32z4−65z2+33)+(−32z4+41z2−9)+(−32z4+81z2−34)]}K(k0)⋅E(k0)

 

=

4z(z−1){13−16z2}K(k0)⋅K(k0)−4z(z+1){[3+16z2]}E(k0)⋅E(k0)+8{16z4−13z2+3}K(k0)⋅E(k0).

Finally, let's evaluate this consolidated expression for the specific case of z0=cosh⁡η0=3, remembering that in this specific case k0=2−1/2, K(k0)=1.854074677, and E(k0)=1.350643881. We find,

2C2(z0)

=

[2⋅3(z2−1)]−1{4z(z−1)[13−16z2]K(k0)⋅K(k0)−4z(z+1)[3+16z2]E(k0)⋅E(k0)+8[16z4−13z2+3]K(k0)⋅E(k0)}

 

=

[48]−1{−24[131]K(k0)⋅K(k0)−48[147]E(k0)⋅E(k0)+8[1182]K(k0)⋅E(k0)}

 

=

8.8708×10−4.

This matches the numerically evaluated expression, from above (6/30/2020). There is a tremendous amount of cancellation between the three key terms in this expression, so the match is only to three significant digits.

Part C

Next …

Useful Relations from Above

cosh⁡η

=

r12+r222r1r2;

sinh⁡η

=

r12−r222r1r2;

ϖ

=

r12−r222a;

cosh⁡η−cos⁡θ

=

2a2r1r2;

cos⁡θ

=

r12+r22−4a22r1r2;

2coth⁡η+1

=

4aϖr12.


Now, from our tabulation of example recurrence relations, we see that,

P+32(cosh⁡η)

=

43⋅cosh⁡ηP+12(cosh⁡η)−13P−12(cosh⁡η)

 

=

43⋅cosh⁡η[2π(sinh⁡η)+1/2k−1E(k)]−13[2π(sinh⁡η)−1/2kK(k)]

 

=

21/23π[4cosh⁡η(sinh⁡η)+1/2k−1E(k)−(sinh⁡η)−1/2kK(k)],

where, as above,

k≡[2coth⁡η+1]1/2=[4aϖ(ϖ+a)2+(z−Z0)2]1/2=[4aϖr12]1/2.

So we have,

(aGM)ΦW2(η,θ)

=

−25/23π2[sinh3η0cosh⁡η0]C2(cosh⁡η0)cos⁡(2θ){(cosh⁡η−cos⁡θ)1/2P+32(cosh⁡η)}

 

=

−2332π3[sinh3η0cosh⁡η0]C2(cosh⁡η0)cos⁡(2θ)(2a2r1r2)1/2{4cosh⁡η(sinh⁡η)+1/2k−1E(k)−(sinh⁡η)−1/2kK(k)}

 

=

−2332π3[sinh3η0cosh⁡η0]C2(cosh⁡η0)cos⁡(2θ)(2a2r1r2)1/2

 

 

×{4[r12+r222r1r2][r12−r222r1r2]+1/2[4ar12(r12−r222a)]−1/2E(k)−[r12−r222r1r2]−1/2[4ar12(r12−r222a)]1/2K(k)}

 

=

−29/232π3[sinh3η0cosh⁡η0]C2(cosh⁡η0)cos⁡(2θ)×{[r12+r222r1r2]ar2⋅E(k)−ar1⋅K(k)}.

Finally, inserting the expression for sinh2η0C2(cosh⁡η0)=(z02−1)C2(z0) that we have derived, above, gives,

(aGM)ΦW2(η,θ)

=

−29/233π3[sinh⁡η0cosh⁡η0]×cos⁡(2θ){[r12+r222r1r2]ar2⋅E(k)−ar1⋅K(k)}

 

 

×{z(z−1)[13−16z2]K(k0)⋅K(k0)−z(z+1)[3+16z2]E(k0)⋅E(k0)+2[16z4−13z2+3]K(k0)⋅E(k0)}.

Summary

Once the major ( R ) and minor ( d ) radii of the torus have been specified, two key model parameters can be immediately determined, namely,

a2≡R2−d2,       and,       cosh⁡η0≡Rd,

in which case also, sinh⁡η0=a/d. Once the mass-density ( ρ0 ) of the torus has been specified, the torus mass is given by the expression,

M=2π2ρ0d2R.

In addition to the principal pair of meridional-plane coordinates, (ϖ,z), it is useful to define the pair of distances,

r12

≡

(ϖ+a)2+(z−Z0)2,

r22

≡

(ϖ−a)2+(z−Z0)2,

where, the equatorial plane of the torus is located at z=Z0. As we have shown above, the leading (n = 0) term in Wong's (1973) series-expression for the gravitational potential anywhere outside the torus is,

(aGM)ΦW0(ϖ,z)|exterior

=

−233π3[sinh⁡η0cosh⁡η0]ar1⋅K(k)

 

 

×{K(k0)⋅K(k0)[cosh⁡η0(1−cosh⁡η0)]+2K(k0)⋅E(k0)[cosh⁡2η0+1]−E(k0)⋅E(k0)[cosh⁡η0(1+cosh⁡η0)]}.

where, the two distinctly different arguments — one with, and one without a zero subscript — of the complete elliptic-integral functions are,

k

≡

[2coth⁡η+1]1/2=[4aϖ(ϖ+a)2+(z−Z0)2]1/2=[4aϖr12]1/2=[r12−r22r12]1/2,

k0

≡

[2cosh⁡η0+1]1/2.

As we also have shown above, the second (n = 1) term in Wong's (1973) series-expression for the exterior gravitational potential is,

(aGM)ΦW1(ϖ,z)|exterior

=

−233π3[sinh⁡η0cosh⁡η0][r12+r22−4a22r1r2]ar2⋅E(k)

 

 

×{K(k0)⋅K(k0)[cosh⁡η0(1−cosh⁡η0)]+2K(k0)⋅E(k0)[(3cosh⁡2η0−1)]−5E(k0)⋅E(k0)[cosh⁡η0(1+cosh⁡η0)]}.

Note that a transformation from the (r1,r2) coordinate pair to the toroidal-coordinate pair (η,θ) includes the expression,

cos⁡θ

=

r12+r22−4a22r1r2.

So this (n = 1) term's explicit dependence on "cos(nθ)" is clear. Finally, the third (n = 2) term in Wong's (1973) series-expression for the exterior gravitational potential is,

(aGM)ΦW2(η,θ)

=

−233π3[sinh⁡η0cosh⁡η0]×cos⁡(2θ){[r12+r222r1r2]ar2⋅E(k)−ar1⋅K(k)}

 

 

×23/232{K(k0)⋅K(k0)⋅cosh⁡η0(1−cosh⁡η0)[16cosh⁡2η0−13]+2K(k0)⋅E(k0)[16cosh⁡4η0−13cosh⁡2η0+3]

 

 

−E(k0)⋅E(k0)⋅cosh⁡η0(1+cosh⁡η0)[3+16cosh⁡2η0]}.

The Huré, et al (2020) Presentation


Material that appears after this point in our presentation is under development and therefore
may contain incorrect mathematical equations and/or physical misinterpretations.
|   Go Home   |


Notation

In Huré, et al. (2020), the major and minor radii of the torus surface ("shell") are labeled, respectively, Rc and b, and their ratio is denoted,

e≡bRc.

Huré, et al. (2020), §2, p. 5826, Eq. (1)

The authors work in cylindrical coordinates, (R,Z), whereas we refer to this same coordinate-pair as, (ϖW,zW). The quantity,

Δ2

≡

[R+(Rc+bcos⁡θH)]2+[Z−bsin⁡θH]2.

Huré, et al. (2020), §2, p. 5826, Eqs. (5) & (7)

We have affixed the subscript "H" to their meridional-plane angle, θ, to clarify that it has a different coordinate-base definition from the meridional-plane angle, θ, that appears in our above discussion of Wong's (1973) work. In their paper, the subscript "0" is used in the case of an infinitesimally thin hoop (b→0), that is to say,

Δ02

=

[R+Rc]2+Z2.

Huré, et al. (2020), §3, p. 5827, Eq. (13)

Generally, the argument (modulus) of the complete elliptic integral functions is,

kH

=

2Δ[R(Rc+bcos⁡θH)]1/2,

Huré, et al. (2020), §2, p. 5826, Eq. (4)

and, as stated in the first sentence of their §3, reference may also be made to the complementary modulus,

k'H

≡

[1−kH2]1/2.

(Again, we have affixed the subscript "H" in order to differentiate from the modulus employed by Wong (1973).) And in the case of an infinitesimally thin hoop (b→0),

[kH2]0

=

4RRcΔ02.

Huré, et al. (2020), §3, p. 5827, Eq. (12)

Key Finding

On an initial reading, it appears as though the most relevant section of the Huré, et al. (2020) paper is §8 titled, The Solid Torus. They write the gravitational potential in terms of the series expansion,

Ψgrav(r→)

≈

Ψ0+∑n=1NΨn,

Huré, et al. (2020), §7, p. 5831, Eq. (42)

where, after setting Mtot=2π2ρ0b2Rc and acknowledging that V0,0=1, we can write,

Ψ0

=

−GMtotr[rΔ0⋅2πK([kH]0)]

Huré, et al. (2020), §8, p. 5832, Eqs. (52) & (53)

and,

1e2[Ψ1+Ψ2]

=

−Gπρ0Rcb24(k'H)2Δ03{[Δ02−2Rc(Rc+R)]E(kH)−(k'H)2Δ02K(kH)}.

Huré, et al. (2020), §8, p. 5832, Eq. (54)

Rewriting this last expression in a form that can more readily be compared with Wong's work, we obtain,

23πe2[Ψ1+Ψ2GM]

=

−1(k'H)2Δ03{[Δ02−2Rc(Rc+R)]E(kH)−(k'H)2Δ02K(kH)}

 

=

−[Δ02−2Rc(Rc+R)(1−kH2)Δ02]E(kH)Δ0+K(kH)Δ0.

Hence, also,

Ψ0GM+[Ψ1+Ψ2GM]

=

−2π{K([kH]0)Δ0}+e223π{K(kH)Δ0−[Δ02−2Rc(Rc+R)(1−kH2)Δ02]E(kH)Δ0}

 

=

−2πΔ0{K([kH]0)−e224⋅K(kH)}−2πΔ0⋅e224{[Δ02−2Rc(Rc+R)(1−kH2)Δ02]}E(kH)

⇒−πΔ02[Ψ0+Ψ1+Ψ2GM]

=

K([kH]0)−e224⋅K(kH)+e224[Δ02−2Rc(Rc+R)(1−kH2)Δ02]E(kH).

Compare First Terms

Rewriting the first term in the Huré, et al. (2020) series expression for the potential, we have,

Ψ0GM

=

−2π{K([kH]0)[(ϖW+Rc)2+zW2]1/2},

where,

[kH]0

=

[4ϖWRcΔ02]1/2={4ϖWRc(ϖW+Rc)2+zW2}1/2.

For comparison, the first term in Wong's expression is,

ΦW0GM

=

−(233π3)ΥW0(η0){K(k)r1},

where,

a2

≡

R2−d2⇒a=Rc(1−e2)1/2,

r12

≡

[ϖ+Rc(1−e2)1/2]2+[z−Z0]2,

k

≡

{4ϖRc(1−e2)1/2[ϖ+Rc(1−e2)1/2]2+[z−Z0]2}1/2,

ΥW0(η0)

=

sinh⁡η0cosh⁡η0{K(k0)⋅K(k0)[cosh⁡η0(1−cosh⁡η0)]+2K(k0)⋅E(k0)[cosh⁡2η0+1]−E(k0)⋅E(k0)[cosh⁡η0(1+cosh⁡η0)]},

 

=

(1−e2)1/2e2{−K(k0)⋅K(k0)(1−e)+2K(k0)⋅E(k0)(1+e2)−E(k0)⋅E(k0)(1+e)},

k0

=

[21+1/e]1/2=[2e1+e]1/2.

This expression is correct for any value of the aspect ratio, e. But let's set Z0=0 — as Huré, et al. (2020) have done — then see how the expression simplifies for an infinitesimally thin hoop, that is, if we let e→0. First we note that,

k|e→0

=

{4ϖRc[ϖ+Rc]2+z2}1/2,

so in this limit the modulus of the complete elliptic integral of the first kind becomes identical to the modulus used by Huré, et al. (2020), [kH]0. Next, we note that,

r1|e→0

=

[(ϖ+Rc)2+z2]1/2.

As a result, we can write,

ΦW0GM|e→0

=

Ψ0GM⋅[(223π2)ΥW0(η0)]e→0.

Now let's evaluate the coefficient, ΥW0, in the limit of e→0.


ΥW0, in the limit of e→0.

First, drawing from our separate examination of the behavior of complete elliptic integral functions, we appreciate that,

22π2[K(k0)⋅E(k0)]

=

1+125k04+125k06+𝒪(k08),

22π2[K(k0)⋅K(k0)]

=

1+12k02+1125k04+1726k06+𝒪(k08),

22π2[E(k0)⋅E(k0)]

=

1−12k02−125k04−126k06+𝒪(k08).

Next, employing the binomial expansion, we find that,

k02

=

2e(1+e)−1

 

=

2e(1−e+e2−e3+e4−e5+⋯);

and,

k04

=

4e2(1+e)−2

 

=

4e2(1−2e+3e2−4e3+5e4−6e5+⋯).

Hence, we have,

22π2[e2(1−e2)1/2]ΥW0(η0)

=

−(1−e)[1+12k02+1125k04+𝒪(k06)]

 

 

+2(1+e2)[1+125k04+𝒪(k06)]

 

 

−(1+e)[1−12k02−125k04+𝒪(k06)]

 

=

−(1−e)[1+e(1−e+e2−e3+e4−e5+⋯)+1123⋅e2(1−2e+3e2−4e3+5e4−6e5+⋯)+𝒪(e3)]

 

 

+2(1+e2)[1+123⋅e2(1−2e+3e2−4e3+5e4−6e5+⋯)+𝒪(e3)]

 

 

−(1+e)[1−e(1−e+e2−e3+e4−e5+⋯)−123⋅e2(1−2e+3e2−4e3+5e4−6e5+⋯)+𝒪(e3)]

 

=

−(1−e)[1+e(1−e)+1123⋅e2]+2(1+e2)[1+123⋅e2]−(1+e)[1−e(1−e)−123⋅e2]+𝒪(e3)

 

=

−[1+e(1−e)+1123⋅e2]+e[1+e]+2[1+123⋅e2]+2e2−[1−e(1−e)−123⋅e2]−e[1−e]+𝒪(e3)

 

=

−1−e+e2−1123⋅e2+e+e2+2+122⋅e2+2e2−1+e−e2+123⋅e2−e+e2+𝒪(e3)

 

=

e223[25−11+3]+𝒪(e3)

 

=

3e2+𝒪(e3)

⇒223π2ΥW0(η0)

=

[1+𝒪(e1)]⋅(1−e2)1/2

⇒[223π2ΥW0(η0)]e→0

=

1.

Given that,

[223π2ΥW0(η0)]e→0

=

1,

we conclude that,

ΦW0GM|e→0

=

Ψ0GM,

that is, we conclude that Ψ0 matches ΦW0 in the limit of, e→0.

Go to Higher Order

Let's keep higher order terms in Wong's n = 0 component, and let's examine contributions to the same order that come from Wong's n = 1 and (if necessary) n = 2 components.

First, note that,

−πΔ02[ΦW0GM]

=

Δ0(223π2)ΥW0(η0){K(k)r1}.


Keeping Higher Order in Wong's First Component

22π2[K(k0)⋅E(k0)]

=

1+125k04+125k06+231213k08+𝒪(k010),

22π2[K(k0)⋅K(k0)]

=

1+12k02+1125k04+1726k06+1787213k8+𝒪(k010),

22π2[E(k0)⋅E(k0)]

=

1−12k02−125k04−126k06−77213k08+𝒪(k010).

Add One Additional Term

22π2[K(k)⋅E(k)]

=

{1+(12)2k2+(1⋅32⋅4)2k4+(1⋅3⋅524⋅3)2k6+(1⋅3⋅5⋅727⋅3)2k8+⋯+[(2n−1)!!2nn!]2k2n+⋯}

 

 

×{1−122k2−12⋅322⋅42k4−(1⋅3⋅524⋅3)2k65−(1⋅3⋅5⋅727⋅3)2k87−⋯[(2n−1)!!2nn!]2k2n2n−1−⋯}

 

=

{1−122k2−12⋅322⋅42k4−(1⋅3⋅524⋅3)2k65−(1⋅3⋅5⋅727⋅3)2k87}+{(12)2k2}×{1−122k2−12⋅322⋅42k4−(1⋅3⋅524⋅3)2k65}

 

 

+{(1⋅32⋅4)2k4}×{1−122k2−12⋅322⋅42k4}+{(1⋅3⋅524⋅3)2k6}×{1−122k2}+(1⋅3⋅5⋅727⋅3)2k8+𝒪(k10)

 

=

{1−122k2−326k4−(528)k6−(52⋅7214)k8}+{(122)k2−124k4−328k6−5210k8}

 

 

+(3226)k4−(3228)k6−(33212)k8+(5228)k6−(52210)k8+(52⋅72214)k8+𝒪(k10)

 

=

1+[122−122]k2+[3226−326−124]k4+[5228−528−328−3228]k6+[(52⋅72214)−(52210)−(33212)−5210−(52⋅7214)]k8+𝒪(k10)

 

=

1+125k4+125k6+231213k8+𝒪(k10)

22π2[K(k)⋅K(k)]

=

{1+(12)2k2+(1⋅32⋅4)2k4+(1⋅3⋅524⋅3)2k6+(1⋅3⋅5⋅727⋅3)2k8+⋯+[(2n−1)!!2nn!]2k2n+⋯}

 

 

×{1+(12)2k2+(1⋅32⋅4)2k4+(1⋅3⋅524⋅3)2k6+(1⋅3⋅5⋅727⋅3)2k8+⋯+[(2n−1)!!2nn!]2k2n+⋯}

 

=

{1+122k2+3226k4+5228k6+52⋅72214k8}×{1+122k2+3226k4+5228k6+52⋅72214k8}+𝒪(k10)

 

=

{1+122k2+3226k4+5228k6+52⋅72214k8}+122k2{1+122k2+3226k4+5228k6}+3226k4{1+122k2+3226k4}+{5228k6}{1+122k2}+{52⋅72214k8}+𝒪(k10)

 

=

{1+122k2+3226k4+5228k6+52⋅72214k8}+{122k2+124k4+3228k6+52210k8}+{3226k4+3228k6+34212k8}+{5228k6+52210k8}+{52⋅72214k8}+𝒪(k10)

 

=

1+[122+122]k2+[3226+124+3226]k4+[5228+3228+3228+5228]k6+[52⋅72214+52210+34212+52210+52⋅72214]k8+𝒪(k10)

 

=

1+12k2+1125k4+1726k6+1787213k8+𝒪(k10)


22π2[E(k)⋅E(k)]

=

{1−122k2−12⋅322⋅42k4−(1⋅3⋅524⋅3)2k65−(1⋅3⋅5⋅727⋅3)2k87−⋯[(2n−1)!!2nn!]2k2n2n−1−⋯}

 

 

×{1−122k2−12⋅322⋅42k4−(1⋅3⋅524⋅3)2k65−(1⋅3⋅5⋅727⋅3)2k87−⋯[(2n−1)!!2nn!]2k2n2n−1−⋯}

 

=

{1−122k2−326k4−528k6−52⋅7214k8}×{1−122k2−326k4−528k6−52⋅7214k8}+𝒪(k10)

 

=

{1−122k2−326k4−528k6−52⋅7214k8}+{−122k2}×{1−122k2−326k4−528k6}

 

 

+{−326k4}×{1−122k2−326k4}+{−528k6}×{1−122k2}+{−52⋅7214k8}+𝒪(k10)

 

=

{1−122k2−326k4−528k6−52⋅7214k8}+{−122k2+124k4+328k6+5210k8}

 

 

+{−326k4+328k6+32212k8}+{−528k6+5210k8}+{−52⋅7214k8}+𝒪(k10)

=

1+[−122−122]k2+[−326+124−326]k4+[−528+328+328−528]k6+[−52⋅7214+5210+32212+5210−52⋅7214]k8+𝒪(k10)

=

1+[−222]k2+[−325+225]k4+[−527+327]k6+[−52⋅7213+5⋅24213+2⋅32213]k8+𝒪(k10)

 

=

1−12k2−125k4−126k6−77213k8+𝒪(k10)


Next, employing the binomial expansion, we find that,

k02

=

2e(1+e)−1

 

=

2e(1−e+e2−e3+e4−e5+⋯);

k04

=

4e2(1+e)−2

 

=

4e2(1−2e+3e2−4e3+5e4−6e5+⋯);

k06

=

23e3(1+e)−3

 

=

23e3(1−3e+6e2−10e3+15e4−21e5+⋯);

k08

=

24e4(1+e)−4

 

=

24e4(1−4e+10e2−20e3+35e4−56e5+⋯).

Hence, we have,

22π2[e2(1−e2)1/2]ΥW0(η0)

=

−(1−e)[1+12k02+1125k04+1726k06+1787213k08+𝒪(k010)]

 

 

+2(1+e2)[1+125k04+125k06+231213k08+𝒪(k010)]

 

 

−(1+e)[1−12k02−125k04−126k06−77213k08+𝒪(k010)]

 

=

−(1−e)[1+e(1−e+e2−e3)+1123⋅e2(1−2e+3e2)+1726⋅23e3(1−3e)+1787213⋅24e4+𝒪(e5)]

 

 

+2(1+e2)[1+125⋅4e2(1−2e+3e2)+12523e3(1−3e)+231213⋅24e4+𝒪(e5)]

 

 

−(1+e)[1−e(1−e+e2−e3)−125⋅4e2(1−2e+3e2)−12623e3(1−3e)−7721324e4+𝒪(e5)]

 

=

−2−9(1−e)[512(1+e−e2+e3−e4)+704⋅(e2−2e3+3e4)+1088⋅(e3−3e4)+1787⋅e4+𝒪(e5)]

 

 

+(1+e2)2−9[1024+128⋅(e2−2e3+3e4)+256(e3−3e4)+462⋅e4+𝒪(e5)]

 

 

−2−9(1+e)[512(1−e+e2−e3+e4)−64⋅(e2−2e3+3e4)−64(e3−3e4)−77e4+𝒪(e5)]

 

=

−2−9(1−e)[512+512e+192e2+e3(512−1408+1088)+e4(704−512−3264+1787)+𝒪(e5)]

 

 

+2−9(1+e2)[1024+128e2+e3(−256+256)+e4(384−768+462)+𝒪(e5)]

 

 

−2−9(1+e)[512−512e+e2(512−64)+e3(−512+128−64)+e4(512−192−192−77)+𝒪(e5)]

 

=

−2−9(1−e)[512+512e+192e2+192e3−1285e4+𝒪(e5)]

 

 

+2−9(1+e2)[1024+128e2+78e4+𝒪(e5)]

 

 

−2−9(1+e)[512−512e+448e2−448e3+51e4+𝒪(e5)]

 

=

2−9[(−192+128−448)e2+(−192+448)e3+(1285+78−51)e4+𝒪(e5)]

 

 

+2−9e[1024e+(192−448)e2+(192+448)e3+𝒪(e4)]+2−9e2[1024+128e2+𝒪(e3)]

 

=

2−9[(−192+128−448)e2+2048e2+(1285+78−51)e4+(192+448)e4+128e4+𝒪(e5)]

 

=

2−9[1536e2+2080e4+𝒪(e5)]

 

=

3e2+[5⋅1324]e4+𝒪(e5)

⇒223π2ΥW0(η0)

=

[1+(5⋅1324⋅3)e2+𝒪(e3)]⋅(1−e2)1/2.

Hence,

−πΔ02[ΦW0GM]

=

[1+𝒪(e2)]⋅(1−e2)1/2{K(k)r1}Δ0,

or, more precisely,

−πΔ02[ΦW0GM]

=

[1+(5⋅1324⋅3)e2+𝒪(e3)]⋅(1−e2)1/2{K(k)r1}Δ0.

Next Factors

Now,

Δ02

=

(ϖW+Rc)2+zW2,

r12

=

[ϖW+Rc(1−e2)1/2]2+zW2,

⇒r12−Δ02

=

[ϖW+Rc(1−e2)1/2]2+zW2−[(ϖW+Rc)2+zW2]

 

=

ϖW2+2ϖWRc(1−e2)1/2+Rc2(1−e2)+zW2−[ϖW2+2ϖWRc+Rc2+zW2]

 

=

2ϖWRc[(1−e2)1/2−1]−e2Rc2.


Again, drawing from the binomial theorem, we have,

(1−e2)1/2

=

1−12e2+[12(−12)2]e4−[12(−12)(−32)3!]e6+[12(−12)(−32)(−52)4!]e8+⋯

 

=

1−12e2−123e4−124e6−527e8−𝒪(e10).


⇒r12−Δ02

=

ϖWRc[−e2−122e4−123e6−526e8−𝒪(e10)]−e2Rc2

⇒r12Δ02

=

1−e2[Rc(Rc+ϖW)Δ02]−ϖWRcΔ02[122e4+123e6+526e8+𝒪(e10)]


Now Work on Elliptic Integral Expressions

From a separate discussion we can draw the series expansion of K(k), specifically,

2K(k)π

=

1+(12)2k2+(1⋅32⋅4)2k4+(1⋅3⋅524⋅3)2k6+⋯

where,

k24

≡

14[r12−r22r12]=[aϖr12]=[aϖ(ϖ+a)2+(z−Z0)2]

 

=

ϖWRc(1−e2)1/2[ϖW+Rc(1−e2)1/2]2+zW2.

Also,

2K(kH)π

=

1+(12)2kH2+(1⋅32⋅4)2kH4+(1⋅3⋅524⋅3)2kH6+⋯

where,

kH24

=

1Δ2[R(Rc+bcos⁡θH)]

 

=

ϖW(Rc+bcos⁡θH)[ϖW+(Rc+bcos⁡θH)]2+[zW−bsin⁡θH]2.

What we want to do is write K(k) in terms of K(kH). Let's try …

2K(k)π

=

2K(kH)π+δK,


where,

δK

≡

2K(k)π−2K(kH)π

 

=

{1+k24+(1⋅32⋅4)2k4+(1⋅3⋅524⋅3)2k6+⋯}−{1+kH24+(1⋅32⋅4)2kH4+(1⋅3⋅524⋅3)2kH6+⋯}

 

≈

{1+k24}−{1+kH24}=k24−kH24

 

=

ϖWRc(1−e2)1/2[ϖW+Rc(1−e2)1/2]2+zW2−ϖW(Rc+bcos⁡θH)[ϖW+(Rc+bcos⁡θH)]2+[zW−bsin⁡θH]2

 

=

{ϖWRc(1−e2)1/2}{ϖW2+Rc2+zW2+2ϖWRc(1−e2)1/2−Rc2e2}−1

 

 

−{ϖWRc(1+ecos⁡θH)}{[ϖW+Rc(1+ecos⁡θH)]2+[zW−Rcesin⁡θH]2}−1

 

≈

{ϖWRc[1−12e2+𝒪(e4)]}{ϖW2+Rc2+zW2+2ϖWRc[1−12e2+𝒪(e4)]−Rc2e2}−1

 

 

−{ϖWRc[1+ecos⁡θH]}{ϖW2+2ϖWRc(1+ecos⁡θH)+Rc2(1+2ecos⁡θH+e2cos⁡2θH)+zW2−2zWRcesin⁡θH+Rc2e2sin⁡θH2}−1

 

≈

{ϖWRc−e2[ϖWRc2]+𝒪(e4)}{[(ϖW+Rc)2+zW2]−e2[ϖWRc+Rc2]+𝒪(e4)}−1

 

 

−{ϖWRc+e[ϖWRccos⁡θH]}{[(ϖW2+Rc)2+zW2]+2Rce(Rccos⁡θH+ϖWcos⁡θH−zWsin⁡θH)+Rc2e2}−1

 

≈

{ϖWRc[(ϖW+Rc)2+zW2][1−12e2]}{1−e2[ϖWRc+Rc2(ϖW+Rc)2+zW2]}−1

 

 

−{ϖWRc[(ϖW2+Rc)2+zW2][1+ecos⁡θH]}{1+e[2Rc(Rccos⁡θH+ϖWcos⁡θH−zWsin⁡θH)(ϖW2+Rc)2+zW2]+e2[Rc2(ϖW2+Rc)2+zW2]}−1

 

≈

ϖWRc[(ϖW+Rc)2+zW2][1−12e2]{1+e2[ϖWRc+Rc2(ϖW+Rc)2+zW2]}

 

 

−ϖWRc[(ϖW2+Rc)2+zW2][1+ecos⁡θH]{1−e[2Rc(Rccos⁡θH+ϖWcos⁡θH−zWsin⁡θH)(ϖW2+Rc)2+zW2]−e2[Rc2(ϖW2+Rc)2+zW2]}

 

≈

−e⋅ϖWRc[(ϖW2+Rc)2+zW2][cos⁡θH−2Rc(Rccos⁡θH+ϖWcos⁡θH−zWsin⁡θH)(ϖW2+Rc)2+zW2]

 

 

+e2⋅ϖWRc[(ϖW+Rc)2+zW2]{[ϖWRc+Rc2(ϖW+Rc)2+zW2−12]−[Rc2(ϖW2+Rc)2+zW2]−cos⁡θH[2Rc(Rccos⁡θH+ϖWcos⁡θH−zWsin⁡θH)(ϖW2+Rc)2+zW2]}

 

≈

−e⋅ϖWRc[(ϖW2+Rc)2+zW2][(ϖW2+Rc)2+zW2][cos⁡θH[(ϖW2+Rc)2+zW2]−2Rc(Rccos⁡θH+ϖWcos⁡θH−zWsin⁡θH)]

 

 

+12e2⋅ϖWRc[(ϖW+Rc)2+zW2][(ϖW2+Rc)2+zW2]{2(ϖWRc+Rc2)−[(ϖW2+Rc)2+zW2]−2Rc2−4Rccos⁡θH(Rccos⁡θH+ϖWcos⁡θH−zWsin⁡θH)}

 

≈

−e⋅ϖWRcΔ02[cos⁡θH−2Rc(Rccos⁡θH+ϖWcos⁡θH−zWsin⁡θH)Δ02]

 

 

+e2⋅ϖWRc2Δ04{2(ϖWRc+Rc2)−[(ϖW2+Rc)2+zW2]−2Rc2−4Rccos⁡θH(Rccos⁡θH+ϖWcos⁡θH−zWsin⁡θH)}.


Let's subtract K([kH]0) from the potential expression. But first, let's adopt the shorthand notation …

Given that,

−πΔ02[ΦW0GM]

=

{K(k)}Δ0r1(223π2)ΥW0(η0)

 

=

{K(k)}[r12Δ02]−1/2[1+(5⋅1324⋅3)e2+𝒪(e3)]⋅(1−e2)1/2

 

=

{K(k)}{1+e22[Rc(Rc+ϖW)Δ02]+𝒪(e4)}[1+(5⋅1324⋅3)e2+𝒪(e3)]⋅[1−12e2−𝒪(e4)]

let's define the variable, 𝒜, such that,

−πΔ02[ΦW0GM]

=

{K(k)}{1+e2𝒜}

⇒{1+e2⋅𝒜}

=

{1+e22[Rc(Rc+ϖW)Δ02]+𝒪(e4)}[1+(5⋅1324⋅3)e2+𝒪(e3)]⋅[1−12e2−𝒪(e4)]

 

≈

{1+e22[Rc(Rc+ϖW)Δ02]}[1+(5⋅1324⋅3)e2][1−12e2]

 

≈

{1+e22[Rc(Rc+ϖW)Δ02]+(5⋅1324⋅3)e2−12e2}

⇒2𝒜

≈

[Rc(Rc+ϖW)Δ02]+(4123⋅3).


We can therefore write,

−πΔ02[ΦW0GM]−K([kH]0)

≈

−K([kH]0)+{K(kH)+π2⋅δK}{1+e2⋅𝒜}

 

≈

−K([kH]0)+K(kH){1+e2⋅𝒜}+π2⋅δK,

where we should keep in mind that δk is 𝒪(e1). So, let's examine the piece,

2π[K(kH)−K([kH]0)]

=

{1+kH24+(1⋅32⋅4)2kH4+(1⋅3⋅524⋅3)2kH6+⋯}−{1+kH24+(1⋅32⋅4)2kH4+(1⋅3⋅524⋅3)2kH6+⋯}e→0

 

≈

kH24−[kH24]e→0

 

=

[ϖWRc(1+ecos⁡θH)[ϖW+Rc(1+ecos⁡θH)]2+[zW−Rcesin⁡θH]2]−[ϖWRc(1+ecos⁡θH)[ϖW+Rc(1+ecos⁡θH)]2+[zW−Rcesin⁡θH]2]e→0

 

=

ϖWRc(1+ecos⁡θH){[ϖW+Rc(1+ecos⁡θH)]2+[zW−Rcesin⁡θH]2}−1−[ϖWRc(ϖW+Rc)2+zW2]

 

=

ϖWRc(1+ecos⁡θH){ϖW2+2ϖWRc(1+ecos⁡θH)+Rc2(1+2ecos⁡θH+e2cos⁡2θH)+zW2−2zWRcesin⁡θH+Rc2e2sin⁡2θH}−1

 

 

−[ϖWRc(ϖW+Rc)2+zW2]

 

=

−[ϖWRc(ϖW+Rc)2+zW2]+[ϖWRc(1+ecos⁡θH)(ϖW+Rc)2+zW2]{1+e[2ϖWRccos⁡θH+2Rc2cos⁡θH−2zWRcsin⁡θH](ϖW+Rc)2+zW2+e2[Rc2cos2θH+Rc2sin2θH](ϖW+Rc)2+zW2}−1

 

≈

−[ϖWRc(ϖW+Rc)2+zW2]+[ϖWRc(1+ecos⁡θH)(ϖW+Rc)2+zW2]{1−e[2ϖWRccos⁡θH+2Rc2cos⁡θH−2zWRcsin⁡θH](ϖW+Rc)2+zW2

 

 

−e2[Rc2cos2θH+Rc2sin2θH](ϖW+Rc)2+zW2+e2[2ϖWRccos⁡θH+2Rc2cos⁡θH−2zWRcsin⁡θH]2[(ϖW+Rc)2+zW2]2}

 

≈

[ϖWRc(ϖW+Rc)2+zW2]{−e[2ϖWRccos⁡θH+2Rc2cos⁡θH−2zWRcsin⁡θH](ϖW+Rc)2+zW2

 

 

−e2[Rc2cos2θH+Rc2sin2θH](ϖW+Rc)2+zW2+e2[2ϖWRccos⁡θH+2Rc2cos⁡θH−2zWRcsin⁡θH]2[(ϖW+Rc)2+zW2]2}

 

 

+[ϖWRc(ϖW+Rc)2+zW2]{ecos⁡θH[(ϖW+Rc)2+zW2]−e2cos⁡θH[2ϖWRccos⁡θH+2Rc2cos⁡θH−2zWRcsin⁡θH](ϖW+Rc)2+zW2}

 

≈

[ϖWRcΔ02]{ecos⁡θH−eRccos⁡θH[2ϖW+2Rc−2zWtan⁡θH]Δ02−e2Rc2Δ02

 

 

−e2cos⁡θH[2ϖWRccos⁡θH+2Rc2cos⁡θH−2zWRcsin⁡θH]Δ02+e2[2ϖWRccos⁡θH+2Rc2cos⁡θH−2zWRcsin⁡θH]2Δ04}.

Now we have,

−πΔ02[ΦW0GM]−K([kH]0)

≈

−K([kH]0)+K(kH){1+e2⋅𝒜}+π2⋅δK

⇒−Δ0[ΦW0GM]

≈

2πK([kH]0)+2π[K(kH)−K([kH]0)]+δK+2πK(kH)e2⋅𝒜.

But, as we have just demonstrated,

2π[K(kH)−K([kH]0)]+δK

≈

[ϖWRcΔ02]{ecos⁡θH−eRccos⁡θH[2ϖW+2Rc−2zWtan⁡θH]Δ02−e2Rc2Δ02

 

 

−e2cos⁡θH[2ϖWRccos⁡θH+2Rc2cos⁡θH−2zWRcsin⁡θH]Δ02+e2[2ϖWRccos⁡θH+2Rc2cos⁡θH−2zWRcsin⁡θH]2Δ04}

 

 

−e⋅ϖWRcΔ02[cos⁡θH−2Rc(Rccos⁡θH+ϖWcos⁡θH−zWsin⁡θH)Δ02]

 

 

+e2⋅ϖWRc2Δ04{2(ϖWRc+Rc2)−[(ϖW2+Rc)2+zW2]−2Rc2−4Rccos⁡θH(Rccos⁡θH+ϖWcos⁡θH−zWsin⁡θH)}.

 

≈

[e2⋅ϖWRcΔ04]{−Rc2−cos⁡θH[2ϖWRccos⁡θH+2Rc2cos⁡θH−2zWRcsin⁡θH]

 

 

+(ϖWRc+Rc2)−12[(ϖW2+Rc)2+zW2]−Rc2−2Rccos⁡θH(Rccos⁡θH+ϖWcos⁡θH−zWsin⁡θH)

 

 

+[2ϖWRccos⁡θH+2Rc2cos⁡θH−2zWRcsin⁡θH]2Δ02}

TEMPORARY BREAK HERE

Hence,

−πΔ02[ΦW0GM]

≈

K([kH]0)+K(kH)e2⋅𝒜+π2[e2⋅ϖWRcΔ04]{−Rc2−cos⁡θH[2ϖWRccos⁡θH+2Rc2cos⁡θH−2zWRcsin⁡θH]

 

 

+(ϖWRc+Rc2)−12[(ϖW2+Rc)2+zW2]−Rc2−2Rccos⁡θH(Rccos⁡θH+ϖWcos⁡θH−zWsin⁡θH)

 

 

+[2ϖWRccos⁡θH+2Rc2cos⁡θH−2zWRcsin⁡θH]2Δ02}

Include Second Wong Term

(aGM)ΦW1(ϖ,z)|exterior

=

−(233π3)ΥW1(η0)×cos⁡θ{ar2⋅E(k)}

⇒−πΔ02[ΦW1GM]

=

(223π2)ΥW1(η0)×cos⁡θ{Δ0r2⋅E(k)};

Leading (Upsilon) Coefficient

ΥW1(η0)

≡

[sinh⁡η0cosh⁡η0]{K(k0)⋅K(k0)[cosh⁡η0(1−cosh⁡η0)]+2K(k0)⋅E(k0)[(3cosh⁡2η0−1)]−5E(k0)⋅E(k0)[cosh⁡η0(1+cosh⁡η0)]}

⇒[e2(1−e2)1/2]ΥW1(η0)

=

−(1−e)K(k0)⋅K(k0)+2(3−e2)K(k0)⋅E(k0)−5(1+e)E(k0)⋅E(k0).

⇒22π2[e2(1−e2)1/2]ΥW1(η0)

=

−(1−e)[1+12k02+1125k04+1726k06+1787213k08+𝒪(k010)]

 

 

+2(3−e2)[1+125k04+125k06+231213k08+𝒪(k010)]

 

 

−5(1+e)[1−12k02−125k04−126k06−77213k08+𝒪(k010)]

 

=

−(1−e)[1+12⋅2e(1−e+e2−e3)+1125⋅4e2(1−2e+3e2)+1726⋅23e3(1−3e)+1787213⋅24e4+𝒪(e5)]

 

 

+2(3−e2)[1+125⋅4e2(1−2e+3e2)+125⋅23e3(1−3e)+231213⋅24e4+𝒪(e5)]

 

 

−5(1+e)[1−12⋅2e(1−e+e2−e3)−125⋅4e2(1−2e+3e2)−126⋅23e3(1−3e)−77213⋅24e4+𝒪(e5)]

 

=

−2−9(1−e)[29+29e(1−e+e2−e3)+26⋅11⋅e2(1−2e+3e2)+26⋅17⋅e3(1−3e)+1787⋅e4+𝒪(e5)]

 

 

+2−9(6−2e2)[29+26⋅e2(1−2e+3e2)+27⋅e3(1−3e)+231⋅e4+𝒪(e5)]

 

 

−2−9(5+5e)[29−29⋅e(1−e+e2−e3)−26⋅e2(1−2e+3e2)−26⋅e3(1−3e)−77⋅e4+𝒪(e5)]

⇒211π2[e2(1−e2)1/2]ΥW1(η0)

=

−29−29e(1−e+e2−e3)−26⋅11⋅e2(1−2e+3e2)−26⋅17⋅e3(1−3e)−1787⋅e4

 

 

+29e+29e2(1−e+e2)+26⋅11⋅e3(1−2e)+26⋅17⋅e4

 

 

+6[29+26⋅e2(1−2e+3e2)+27⋅e3(1−3e)+231⋅e4]−210e2−27⋅e4

 

 

+5[−29+29⋅e(1−e+e2−e3)+26⋅e2(1−2e+3e2)+26⋅e3(1−3e)+77⋅e4]

 

 

+5[−29e+29⋅e2(1−e+e2)+26⋅e3(1−2e)+26⋅e4]+𝒪(e5)

 

=

29(e2−e3+e4)−26⋅11(e2−2e3+3e4)−26⋅17(e3−3e4)−1787e4

 

 

+29(e2−e3+e4)+26⋅11(e3−2e4)+26⋅17e4

 

 

+3⋅27(e2−2e3+3e4)+3⋅28(e3−3e4)+2⋅32⋅7⋅11⋅e4−210e2−27⋅e4

 

 

+5⋅29(−e2+e3−e4)+5⋅26(e2−2e3+3e4)+5⋅26(e3−3e4)+5⋅77e4

 

 

+5⋅29(e2−e3+e4)+5⋅26(e3−2e4)+5⋅26e4+𝒪(e5)

 

=

e2[29−26⋅11+29+3⋅27−210−5⋅29+5⋅26+5⋅29]

 

 

+e3[−29−27⋅11−26⋅17−29+26⋅11−3⋅28+3⋅28+5⋅29−5⋅27+5⋅26−5⋅29+5⋅26]

 

 

+e4[29−3⋅11⋅26+3⋅17⋅26−1787+29−11⋅27+17⋅26+32⋅27−32⋅28+2⋅32⋅7⋅11−27−5⋅29+3⋅5⋅26−3⋅5⋅26+5⋅7⋅11+5⋅29−5⋅27+5⋅26]+𝒪(e5)

 

=

e2[−26⋅11+3⋅27+5⋅26]+e3[−210−27⋅11−26⋅17+26⋅11]

 

 

+e4[210−1787+2⋅32⋅7⋅11+5⋅7⋅11+26⋅(3⋅17−3⋅11−22+17+18−36−2−10+5)]+𝒪(e5)

 

=

26e2[0]−28⋅11e3+e4[210−1787+7⋅11⋅23−28⋅3]+𝒪(e5)

 

=

−28⋅11e3+24⋅3⋅5e4+𝒪(e5)

⇒22π2[e2(1−e2)1/2]ΥW1(η0)

=

−112e3+3⋅525e4+𝒪(e5).

Floating Comparison Summary

As shown above, the first three terms of the Huré, et al. (2020) series expression may be written as,

−πΔ02[Ψ0+Ψ1+Ψ2GM]

=

K([kH]0)−e224⋅K(kH)+e224[Δ02−2Rc(Rc+R)(1−kH2)Δ02]E(kH).

Let's see how it compares to the first term of Wong's (1973) expression which, as shown separately above, can be written in the form,

−πΔ02[ΦW0GM]

=

Δ0(223π2)ΥW0(η0){K(k)r1}.


First, as shown above,

223π2ΥW0(η0)

=

[1+(5⋅1324⋅3)e2+𝒪(e3)]⋅(1−e2)1/2.

Note that, in order to determine the functional form of the 𝒪(e2) term in this expression, we will have to include k08 terms in the various expressions for products of elliptic integrals. Second, we have shown that,

r12Δ02

=

1−e2[Rc(Rc+ϖW)Δ02]−ϖWRcΔ02[122e4+123e6+526e8+𝒪(e10)]

⇒Δ0r1

≈

1+e2[Rc(Rc+ϖW)2Δ02],       and we are defining δK such that,

K(k)

=

K(kH)+π2⋅δK.


Hence,

−πΔ02[ΦW0GM]

≈

{K(kH)+π2⋅δK}{1+e2[Rc(Rc+ϖW)2Δ02]}[1+(5⋅1324⋅3)e2+𝒪(e3)]⋅(1−e2)1/2

 

≈

K([kH]0)+K(kH)e2⋅𝒜+π2[e2⋅ϖWRcΔ04]{−Rc2−cos⁡θH[2ϖWRccos⁡θH+2Rc2cos⁡θH−2zWRcsin⁡θH]

 

 

+(ϖWRc+Rc2)−12[(ϖW2+Rc)2+zW2]−Rc2−2Rccos⁡θH(Rccos⁡θH+ϖWcos⁡θH−zWsin⁡θH)

 

 

+[2ϖWRccos⁡θH+2Rc2cos⁡θH−2zWRcsin⁡θH]2Δ02},

and,

𝒜

≈

[Rc(Rc+ϖW)2Δ02]+(4124⋅3).


Second,

−πΔ02[ΦW1GM]

=

E(k){Δ0⋅cos⁡θr2}[(223π2)ΥW1(η0)]

 

=

{E(kH)+π2⋅δE}{Δ0⋅cos⁡θr2}[−(112⋅3)e+(525)e2+𝒪(e5)]⋅(1−e2)1/2.

Geometric Factor

By definition,

Δ02

=

(ϖW+Rc)2+zW2,

r12

=

[ϖW+Rc(1−e2)1/2]2+zW2,

r22

=

[ϖW−Rc(1−e2)1/2]2+zW2,

cos2θ

=

[r12+r22−4Rc2(1−e2)2r1r2]2.

Hence,

r22−Δ02⋅cos2θ

=

See Also

Tiled Menu

Appendices: | VisTrailsEquations | VisTrailsVariables | References | Ramblings | VisTrailsImages | myphys.lsu | ADS |