Appendix/Ramblings/T6CoordinatesPt2
Concentric Ellipsoidal (T6) Coordinates (Part 2)
Orthogonal Coordinates
Speculation5
Spherical Coordinates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Use λ1 Instead of r
Here, as above, we define,
|
|
|
|
Using this expression to eliminate "x" (in favor of λ1) in each of the three spherical-coordinate definitions, we obtain,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After a bit of additional algebraic manipulation, we find that,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
where,
|
|
|
|
|
As a check, let's set , which should reduce to the normal spherical coordinate system.
|
Relationship To T3 Coordinates
If we set, , but continue to assume that , we expect to see a representation that resembles our previously discussed, T3 Coordinates. Note, for example, that the new "radial" coordinate is,
|
|
|
|
and, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We also see that,
|
|
|
|
Again Consider Full 3D Ellipsoid
Let's try to replace everywhere, with . This gives,
|
|
|
|
which means that,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Now, notice that,
|
|
|
|
and,
|
|
|
|
Hence,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
where,
|
|
|
|
Solving the quadratic equation, we have,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tentative Summary
|
Partial Derivatives & Scale Factors
First Coordinate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
where,
As a result, the associated unit vector is,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notice that,
|
|
|
|
Second Coordinate (1st Try)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a result, the associated unit vector is,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notice that,
|
|
|
|
Let's check to see if this "second" unit vector is orthogonal to the "first."
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Coordinate (2nd Try)
Let's try,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hence,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
So, the associated unit vector is,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Checking orthogonality …
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If , we have …
|
|
|
|
which, in turn, means …
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and,
|
|
|
|
Speculation6
Determine λ2
This is very similar to the above, Speculation2. Try,
|
|
|
|
in which case,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The associated scale factor is, then,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
where,
|
|
|
|
The associated unit vector is, then,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recalling that the unit vector associated with the "first" coordinate is,
|
|
|
|
where,
|
|
|
|
let's check to see whether the "second" unit vector is orthogonal to the "first."
|
|
|
|
Hooray!
Direction Cosines for Third Unit Vector
Now, what is the unit vector, , that is simultaneously orthogonal to both these "first" and the "second" unit vectors?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Is this a valid unit vector? First, note that …
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Then we have,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
which means that, . Hooray! Again (11/11/2020)!
| Direction Cosine Components for T6 Coordinates | ||||||||||||||
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
Let's double-check whether this "third" unit vector is orthogonal to both the "first" and the "second" unit vectors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q. E. D.
Search for Third Coordinate Expression
Let's try …
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hence,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is overly cluttered! Let's try, instead …
|
Now, let's assume that,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Looking ahead …
Then, for example,
|
As a result, we have,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wow! Really close! (13 November 2020)
Just for fun, let's see what we get for . It is given by the expression,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiddle Around
Let …
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
With this shorthand in place, we can write,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We therefore also recognize that,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Now, if — and it is a BIG "if" — , then we have,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
But if this is the correct expression for and its three partial derivatives, then it must be true that,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Well … the right-hand side of this expression is identical to the right-hand side of the above expression, where we showed that it equals . That is to say, we are now showing that,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
And this is precisely what, just a few lines above, we hypothesized the functional expression for ought to be. EUREKA!
Summary
In summary, then …
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No! Once again this does not work. The direction cosines — and, hence, the components of the unit vector — are not correct!
Speculation7
| Direction Cosine Components for T6 Coordinates | ||||||||||||||
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
On my white-board I have shown that, if
then everything will work out as long as,
|
|
|
|
where,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Let's check this out.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Appendices: | VisTrailsEquations | VisTrailsVariables | References | Ramblings | VisTrailsImages | myphys.lsu | ADS | |