SSC/Structure/BiPolytropes/Analytic00

From jetwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

BiPolytrope with (nc, ne) = (0, 0)

Here we construct a bipolytrope in which both the core and the envelope have uniform densities, that is, the structure of both the core and the envelope will be modeled using an n=0 polytropic index. It should be possible for the entire structure to be described by closed-form, analytic expressions. Generally, we will follow the general solution steps for constructing a bipolytrope that we have outlined elsewhere. [On 1 February 2014, J. E. Tohline wrote: This particular system became of interest to me during discussions with Kundan Kadam about the relative stability of bipolytropes.]

Step 4: Throughout the core (0 ≤ χ ≤ χi)

Specify: P0 and ρ0

 

ρ

  = 

ρ0

 

 

P

  = 

P023πGρ02r2

  = 

P0(12π3χ2)

r

  = 

[P0Gρ02]1/2χ

  = 

[P0Gρ02]1/2χ

Mr

  = 

4π3ρ0r3

  = 

4π3ρ0[P0Gρ02]3/2χ3=4π3[P03G3ρ04]1/2χ3

Step 5: Interface Conditions

Specify: χi and ρe/ρ0, and demand …

 

Pei

  = 

Pci

  = 

P0(12π3χi2)

Step 6: Envelope Solution (χ ≥ χi)

ρ

  = 

ρe

P

  = 

Pei+(23πGρe)[2(ρ0ρe)ri3(1r1ri)ρe(r2ri2)]

 

  = 

Pei+2π3(ρeρ0)P0[2(1ρeρ0)χi3(1χ1χi)ρeρ0(χ2χi2)]

PP0

  = 

12π3χi2+2π3(ρeρ0)χi2[2(1ρeρ0)(1ξ1)ρeρ0(ξ21)]

Mr

  = 

4π3[ρ0ri3+ρe(r3ri3)]

 

  = 

4π3[P03G3ρ04]1/2[χi3+ρeρ0(χ3χi3)]

 

  = 

4π3[P03G3ρ04]1/2χi3[1+ρeρ0(ξ31)]


Step 7: Surface Boundary Condition

At the surface (that is, at r=R and Mr=Mtot), P/P0=0 and ξ=ξs=R/ri=1/q. Also, we can write,

χi=q[Gρ02R2P0]1/2;

and, from earlier derivations,

R3=3Mtot4πρ¯=3Mtot4πρ0(νq3);

ρeρ0=q3ν(1ν1q3).

Therefore, setting the pressure to zero at the surface means,

32πχi2

  = 

1(ρeρ0)[2(1ρeρ0)(q1)ρeρ0(1q21)]

(32π)q2[P0Gρ02R2]

  = 

1+(ρeρ0)[2(1ρeρ0)(1q)+ρeρ0(1q21)]

(32π)(4π3)2/3ν2/3[P03G3ρ04Mtot2]1/3

  = 

1+(ρeρ0)[2(1ρeρ0)(1q)+ρeρ0(1q21)]

{(6π)1ν2[P03G3ρ04Mtot2]}1/3

  = 

1+(ρeρ0)[2(1ρeρ0)(1q)+ρeρ0(1q21)]

It therefore seems prudent to define a function,

g(ν,q)

{1+(ρeρ0)[2(1ρeρ0)(1q)+ρeρ0(1q21)]}1/2

q2g2

=

q2+(ρeρ0)[2q2(1q)+(ρeρ0)(13q2+2q3)],

in which case the expressions for the equilibrium radius and equilibrium total mass are, respectively,

[Gρ02P0]1/2R

  = 

(32π)1/21qg;

[G3ρ04P03]1/2Mtot

  = 

(6π)1/21νg3.

Note that this means that,

χi2=(32π)1g2.

We can also combine these two expressions and eliminate direct reference to the central density, ρ0, obtaining,

[R4GMtot2]P0

  = 

(323π)ν2g2q4

 

=

(323π)ν2q6[q2+2(ρeρ0)q2(1q)+(ρeρ0)2(13q2+2q3)].

Thermal Energy Content

Knowing the pressure distribution throughout this bipolytropic configuration allows us to obtain an analytic expression for the configuration's total thermal content. Specifically, the differential contribution to the total thermal energy that is made by each spherical shell is,

dS=32(Pρ)dm=32(Pρ)4πρr2dr=6πR3P(x)x2dx,

where,

xrR.

(We are switching to a new normalization of the radial coordinate — using x in preference to χ — because, at the interface between the core and the envelope, x=q, while x=1 at the surface of the bipolytropic configuration.) Hence, the thermal content of the core and of the envelope will be given by performing the following integrals, respectively:

Score

=

6πR30qPcore(x)x2dx;

Senv

=

6πR3q1Penv(x)x2dx.

Drawing from the expressions obtained in step #4 and step #6, above, the relevant functions P(x) are,

Pcore

  = 

P023πGρ02r2=Pi+23πGρ02(ri2r2)

 

  = 

Pi+23πGρ02R2(q2x2)=Pi+323π(GMtot2R4)(ν2q6)(q2x2);

Penv

  = 

Pi(23πGρe)[2(ρ0ρe)ri3(1ri1r)+ρe(r2ri2)]

 

  = 

Pi(23πGρ02R2)ρeρ0[2(1ρeρ0)q3(1q1x)+ρeρ0(x2q2)]

 

  = 

Pi323π(GMtot2R4)(ν2q6)ρeρ0[2(1ρeρ0)q3(1q1x)+ρeρ0(x2q2)].


Reminder: For a given choice of the parameter set (Mtot,R,ν,q), — and remembering that choosing the parameter pair (ν,q) sets the density ratio via the expression, ρe/ρ0=[q3(1ν)]/[ν(1q3)] — the value of the pressure at the interface, Pi, is determined by setting boundary conditions at the surface of the configuration, namely, by setting x=1 and Penv=0 in the second expression. Then, the central pressure (Pcore=P0) is determined by setting x=0 and inserting the determined value for Pi in the first expression.

Hence,

Score

=

6πR30q{Pi+Π(q2x2)}x2dx

 

=

6πR3{[(Pi+q2Π)x33]0q[Πx55]0q}

 

=

(4π5)R3q5(5Pi2q2+Π),

Senv

=

6πR3q1{PiΠρeρ0(ae+bex+cex2)}x2dx

 

=

6πR3{[PiaeΠ(ρeρ0)]x33|q1[beΠ(ρeρ0)x22]q1[ceΠ(ρeρ0)x55]q1}

 

=

πR35{10[PiaeΠ(ρeρ0)](1q3)15[beΠ(ρeρ0)(1q2)]6[ceΠ(ρeρ0)(1q5)]}

 

=

πR35{10Pi(1q3)Π(ρeρ0)[10ae(1q3)+15be(1q2)+6ce(1q5)]}

 

=

πR35{10Pi(1q3)

 

 

+Π(ρeρ0)[30(ρeρ023)q2(1q3)+30(1ρeρ0)q3(1q2)6ρeρ0(1q5)]}

 

=

πR35{10Pi(1q3)+10Π(ρeρ0)q2[3q(1q2)2(1q3)]

 

 

+6Π(ρeρ0)2[5q2(1q3)5q3(1q2)(1q5)]}

 

=

πR35{10Pi(1q3)+10Π(ρeρ0)[2q2+3q3q5]+6Π(ρeρ0)2[1+5q25q3+q5]},

where,

Π323π(GMtot2R4)(ν2q6),

and, in the expression for Senv, we temporarily used the shorthand notation,

ae

3(23ρeρ0)q2,

be

2(1ρeρ0)q3,

ce

ρeρ0.

The total thermal energy (per unit volume) may therefore be written as,

(5πR3)Stot

=

4q5(5Pi2q2+Π)+10Pi(1q3)Π(ρeρ0)[10ae(1q3)+15be(1q2)+6ce(1q5)]

 

=

10Pi+2Π[2q55(ρeρ0)(2q23q3+q5)3(ρeρ0)2(15q2+5q3q5)],

or, because P0=Pi+Πq2, we can reference the central pressure instead of the pressure at the interface and write,

(5πR3)Stot

=

10P02Π[5q22q5+5(ρeρ0)(2q23q3+q5)+3(ρeρ0)2(15q2+5q3q5)].

Gravitational Potential Energy

In a separate discussion, we derived the following expression for the total gravitational potential energy of an (nc,ne)=(0,0) bipolytrope:

W

=3GMtot25R(ν2q)f(q,ρe/ρc),

where,

f(q,ρe/ρc)1+52(ρeρc)(1q21)+(ρeρc)2[(1q51)52(1q21)].

Adopting the parameters and normalizations used above in the context of the total thermal energy derivation, this can be rewritten as,

(5πR3)W

=22Π(2q5f)=22Π{2q5+5q3(ρeρc)(1q2)+(ρeρc)2[2(1q5)5q3(1q2)]}.

Virial Equilibrium

In order for this system to be in virial equilibrium, we must have (2Stot+W)=0, or,

Stot=W2.

The central pressure that is required in order to establish this virial equilibrium condition is,

10P0

=

2Π[5q22q5+5(ρeρ0)(2q23q3+q5)+3(ρeρ0)2(15q2+5q3q5)]

 

 

+2Π{2q5+5q3(ρeρc)(1q2)+(ρeρc)2[2(1q5)5q3(1q2)]}

5P0Π

=

5q2+5(ρeρ0)(2q23q3+q5)+3(ρeρ0)2(15q2+5q3q5)

 

 

+5(ρeρc)(q3q5)+(ρeρc)2(25q3+3q5)

P0Π

=

q2+2(ρeρ0)q2(1q)+(ρeρ0)2(13q2+2q3)

[R4GMtot2]P0

=

(323π)ν2q6[q2+2(ρeρ0)q2(1q)+(ρeρ0)2(13q2+2q3)].

Hooray! This precisely matches the expression for the central pressure, P0, that was obtained above at the end of step #7 of the detailed force balance derivation. It is very satisfying to see that the central pressure can be derived from demanding a balance of the thermal and gravitational potential energies via the virial equilibrium expression.

Note that, because P0=Pi+Πq2, we may alternatively write the solution in terms of the pressure at the interface, that is,

PiΠ

=

2(ρeρ0)q2(1q)+(ρeρ0)2(13q2+2q3)

 

=

q2(g21).

Free Energy

Now, let's see if we can derive the virial equilibrium condition — and, hence the correct central pressure — from the free energy.

Expression for Free Energy

Rewrite the expressions for Score and Senv, recognizing that, although we won't know its value until the equilibrium radius of the configuration has been determined, during a radial perturbation the dimensionless ratio,

Λ2q2Π5Pi=3225π(GMtot2R4Pi)(ν2q4)=(22π35)Gρ02ri2Pi,

will remain unchanged. Hence, we may write,

Score

=

2πq3R3Pic(1+Λ),

Senv

=

πR3Pie{2(1q3)+5Λ(ρeρ0)[2+3qq3]+3Λq2(ρeρ0)2[1+5q25q3+q5]}.

The free energy is, therefore,

𝔊

=

Utot+W

 

=

[23(γc1)]Score+[23(γe1)]Senv+W

 

=

BcoreR3Pic+BenvR3PieAgravR1,

where, for a given choice of the three parameters (Mtot,ν,q), the constant coefficients in this expression are,

Agrav

22π5[3GMtot223π(ν2q6)]{2q5+5q3(ρeρc)(1q2)+(ρeρc)2[2(1q5)5q3(1q2)]},

Bcore

[4πq33(γc1)](1+Λ),

Benv

[2π3(γe1)]{2(1q3)+5Λ(ρeρ0)[2+3qq3]+3Λq2(ρeρ0)2[1+5q25q3+q5]}.

Notice that, in the expression for 𝔊, we have been careful to maintain the separate identities of the interface pressure, depending on whether it is set by the core (Pic) or by the envelope (Pie), because they scale differently — along two separate adiabats — with density and, hence, with radius. Specifically,

Pic

=

Kcρ0γc=Kc[3Mtotν4πq3]γcR3γc,

Pie

=

Keρeγe=Ke[3Mtotν4πq3(ρeρ0)]γeR3γe.

With these pressure scalings in mind, the expression for the free energy becomes,

𝔊

=

Ccore[23(γc1)]R33γc+Cenv[23(γe1)]R33γeAgravR1,

where,

Ccore

2πq3Kc[3Mtotν4πq3]γc(1+Λ),

Cenv

πKe[3Mtotν4πq3(ρeρ0)]γe{2(1q3)+5Λ(ρeρ0)[2+3qq3]+3Λq2(ρeρ0)2[1+5q25q3+q5]}.

Equilibrium Condition

The equilibrium condition will be defined by determining at what radius, d𝔊/dR=0. Let's do this!

d𝔊dR

=

AgravR22CcoreR23γc2CenvR23γe

 

=

R1[AgravR2CcoreR33γc2CenvR33γe].

Setting this expression equal to zero means,

Agrav2R

=

CcoreR33γc+CenvR33γe

W2

=

CcoreR33γc+CenvR33γe

 

=

2πq3R3Pic(1+Λ)+πR3Pie{2(1q3)+5Λ(ρeρ0)[2+3qq3]+3Λq2(ρeρ0)2[1+5q25q3+q5]}.

If we now set the interface pressures equal to one another, that is,

Pie=Pic

=

Pi,

we obtain,

W2

=

2πq3R3(Pi+PiΛ)+πR3Pi{2(1q3)+5Λ(ρeρ0)[2+3qq3]+3Λq2(ρeρ0)2[1+5q25q3+q5]}

 

=

2πq3R3Pi+2πR3Pi(1q3)+πR3PiΛ{2q3+5(ρeρ0)[2+3qq3]+3q2(ρeρ0)2[1+5q25q3+q5]}

 

=

2πR3Pi+2πR3(q25)Π{2q3+5(ρeρ0)[2+3qq3]+3q2(ρeρ0)2[1+5q25q3+q5]}

 

=

(πR35){10Pi+2Π[2q5+5(ρeρ0)(2q2+3q3q5)+3(ρeρ0)2(1+5q25q3+q5)]}.

Now, according to our earlier derivation of the total thermal energy content of this (nc,ne)=(0,0) bipolytrope, the right-hand side of this last expression is Stot. Hence the equilibrium condition just derived from the first derivative of the free energy is precisely the virial equilibrium condition discussed above, namely,

W2

=

Stot.

This, in turn, means that from the free energy expression we are able to deduce the equilibrium values of the dimensionless radius, mass, and central pressure that were derived earlier from the hydrostatic balance equation, namely,

[Gρ02P0]1/2Req

  = 

(32π)1/21qg;

[G3ρ04P03]1/2Mtot

  = 

(6π)1/21νg3;

[R4GMtot2]P0

  = 

(323π)ν2g2q4.

Also, because P0=Pi+q2Π, we conclude that,

[R4GMtot2]Pi

  = 

(323π)ν2q4(g21).

Hence, the dimensionless structural parameter that appears in our free energy expression takes on the value,

1Λ

  = 

52(g21)=52(ρeρ0)[2(1ρeρ0)(1q)+ρeρ0(1q21)].

Stability Condition

Second Derivative of Free Energy

The relative stability of an equilibrium configuration can be determined by the sign of the second derivative of the free energy evaluated at the equilibrium radius; if the second derivative is negative, the system is dynamically unstable. The second derivative of the free energy is,

d2𝔊dR2|Req

=

[2AgravR32(23γc)CcoreR13γc2(23γe)CenvR13γe]eq

 

=

2Req2[W(23γc)CcoreR33γc(23γe)CenvR33γe]eq.

From the equilibrium condition derived above, we know that,

CenvR33γe

=

CcoreR33γc+W2.

Hence,

12Req2d2𝔊dR2|Req

=

Weq(23γc)CcoreReq33γc+(23γe)[CcoreR33γc+W2]eq

 

=

(232γe)Weq+3(γcγe)CcoreReq33γc.

But, from our above discussion, we can also write,

Ccore

=

2πq3PiReq3γc(1+Λ).

Hence,

[Req22]d2𝔊dR2|Req

=

6π(γcγe)q3PiReq3(1+Λ)+(232γe)Weq

[1PiReq]d2𝔊dR2|Req

=

12π(γcγe)q3(1+Λ)1PiReq3(43γe)[3GMtot25Req(ν2q)f]

 

=

12π(γcγe)q3(1+Λ)4π(43γe)q3Λf

d2𝔊dR2|Req

=

12πPiReq[(γcγe)q3(1+Λ)(43γe)q3Λf]

 

=

12πPiReq(γeγc)q3Λ[(γe43)(γeγc)f(1+1Λ)]

 

=

12πPiReq(γeγc)q3Λ[(γe43)(γeγc)f152(g21)].

Associated Oscillation Frequency

When a stable configuration is displaced (by a radial perturbation) from its equilibrium state, it should radially oscillate back and forth through its equilibrium radius at a frequency, ω𝔊, such that,

ω𝔊2

=

1Mtotd2𝔊dR2|Req.

Recognizing, from above, that

Pi

=

Pcq2Π

 

=

323π(GMtot2Req4)ν2q4(g21),

and that,

ρc

=

3Mtot4πGReq3νq3,

we can write,

PiReqMtot

=

(Gρc2)νq(g21).

Hence, the characteristic oscillation frequency is,

ω𝔊2

=

6πGρcνq(g21)(γeγc)q3Λ[(γe43)(γeγc)f152(g21)]

 

=

(2πGρc5)q2ν[2(3γe4)f+3(γeγc)(35g2)].

Summary

Given that we are only interested in bipolytropes having γe>γc, the leading coefficient of the derived stability condition will be positive. Hence, the bipolytropic configuration will be dynamically stable as long as,

(γe43)(γeγc)f[1+52(g21)]>0,

where,

f(q,ρe/ρc)

1+52(ρeρc)(1q21)+(ρeρc)2[(1q51)52(1q21)],

g2(q,ρe/ρc)

1+(ρeρ0)[2(1ρeρ0)(1q)+ρeρ0(1q21)].

It is also worth noting that the numerical value of the factor Λ that appears in the leading coefficient can be obtained from the relation,

1Λ

  = 

52(g21),

hence, the term,

(1+1Λ)

  = 

[1+52(g21)]=1+5(ρeρc)(1q)+52(ρeρc)2(1q23+2q).

It is also worth remembering that, in the (nc,ne)=(0,0) bipolytrope, the density drop at the interface is related to the two key parameters q and ν via the expression,

ρeρc

  = 

q3(1ν)ν(1q3).


The "Dynamical Stability" figure below shows a large segment of the (q,ν) model parameter space. The figure displays stability boundaries for four different choices of the core/envelope adiabatic pairs (γc,γe), as detailed in the accompanying "Stability Boundaries" table. (The corresponding polytropic indexes are also listed, where, γ=1+1/n.) Two bipolytrope model sequences are also drawn: One shows how the core-to-total mass ratio, ν, varies with increasing q when the density ratio at the core-envelope interface is ρe/ρc=1/2 (purple crosses); the other shows the same information, but for ρe/ρc=1/4 (purple asterisks). For a given choice of adiabatic indexes, equilibrium configurations that lie below the relevant stability boundary, along either sequence, are stable while configurations that lie above the relevant boundary are dynamically unstable.

Stability Boundaries

nc

ne

γc

γe

Marker

5

1

1.2

2

Light blue diamonds

5

32

1.2

1.6667

Light green triangles

20

1

1.05

2

Red squares

20

32

1.05

1.6667

Orange circles

 

It is important to emphasize that the stability analysis presented above is an approximation in the following sense: The underlying equilibrium structure of each model is that of an (nc,ne)=(0,0) bipolytrope, that is, both the core and the envelope have uniform (but different) densities; the gravitational potential energy, W and the thermal energy content of the component volumes, Score and Senv, are determined exactly. However, the relative stability of a configuration is determined by assuming that, when the bipolytropic configuration is perturbed from its equilibriums state, its core and envelope heat up (or cool) by evolving along (γc,γe) adiabats.

Bipolytrope Generalization

This subsection has been moved to another location because it more naturally stands on its own, that is, it should not be tied only to the discussion of the structure of (nc,ne)=(0,0) bipolytropes.


Material that appears after this point in our presentation is under development and therefore
may contain incorrect mathematical equations and/or physical misinterpretations.
|   Go Home   |


Plotting Free-Energy Surfaces

Thus far, we have been able to determine what the equilibrium radius of the bipolytrope is for any specified set of parameters, (Mtot,ν,q). Now let's examine how the free energy varies across the two-dimensional plane defined by the parameters, (q,ν). We begin by copying an informative segment from the above subsection where we developed an expression for the free energy.

The free energy is,

𝔊

=

Utot+W

 

=

[23(γc1)]Score+[23(γe1)]Senv+W

 

=

BcoreR3Pic+BenvR3PieAgravR1,

 

=

GMtot2Req[(Bcore+Benv)R4PiGMtot2Agrav*],

where, for a given choice of the three parameters (Mtot,ν,q), the constant coefficients in this expression are,

Agrav*

325(ν2q6){2q5+5q3(ρeρc)(1q2)+(ρeρc)2[2(1q5)5q3(1q2)]},

Bcore

[4πncq33](1+Λ),

Benv

[2πne3]{2(1q3)+5Λ(ρeρ0)[2+3qq3]+3Λq2(ρeρ0)2[1+5q25q3+q5]}.

Now, the condition derived above for the equilibrium radius is,

[R4GMtot2]Pi=(323π)ν2q4(g21).

Hence, the free energy expression becomes,

𝔊

=

GMtot2Req[(Bcore+Benv)(323π)ν2q4(g21)Agrav*].

Combining the same condition for the equilibrium radius with the expression for the pressure at the interface in the equilibrium configuration, namely,

Pi

=

Kc[3Mtotν4πq3]γcR3γc,

allows us to write the equilibrium radius in terms of Mtot and Kc. Specifically, we obtain,

R43γc

=

[GMtot2γcKc](3ν4πq3)1γc(ν2q)(g21)

GMtot2R

=

[G3γc3Mtot5γc6Kc]1/(3γc4)[(4πq33ν)γc1(ν2q)(g21)]1/(3γc4).

Finally, then, recognizing that γc=1+1/nc and, hence, 1/(3γc4)=nc/(3nc), we obtain,

𝔊

=

[KcncG3Mtot5nc]1/(nc3)[(4πq33ν)1/nc(ν2q)(g21)]nc/(nc3)[(Bcore+Benv)(323π)ν2q4(g21)Agrav*].


Related Discussions


Tiled Menu

Appendices: | VisTrailsEquations | VisTrailsVariables | References | Ramblings | VisTrailsImages | myphys.lsu | ADS |