Appendix/Ramblings/PPToriPt2A: Difference between revisions

From jetwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
 
Line 3: Line 3:
=Stability Analyses of PP Tori (Part 2)=
=Stability Analyses of PP Tori (Part 2)=


<font color="red"><b>[Comment by J. E. Tohline on 24 May 2016]</b></font> &nbsp; This chapter contains a set of technical notes and accompanying discussion that I put together several months ago as I was trying to gain a foundational understanding of the results of a large study of instabilities in self-gravitating tori published by the Imamura &amp; Hadley collaboration.  I have come to appreciate that some of the logic and interpretation of published results that are presented, below, has serious flaws.  Therefore, anyone reading this should be quite cautious in deciding what subsections provide useful insight.  I have written a separate chapter titled, "[[User:Tohline/Apps/ImamuraHadleyCollaboration#Characteristics_of_Unstable_Eigenvectors_in_Self-Gravitating_Tori|Characteristics of Unstable Eigenvectors in Self-Gravitating Tori]]," that contains a much more trustworthy analysis of this very interesting problem.
<font color="red"><b>[Comment by J. E. Tohline on 24 May 2016]</b></font> &nbsp; This chapter contains a set of technical notes and accompanying discussion that I put together several months ago as I was trying to gain a foundational understanding of the results of a large study of instabilities in self-gravitating tori published by the Imamura &amp; Hadley collaboration.  I have come to appreciate that some of the logic and interpretation of published results that are presented, below, has serious flaws.  Therefore, anyone reading this should be quite cautious in deciding what subsections provide useful insight.  I have written a separate chapter titled, "[[Apps/ImamuraHadleyCollaboration#Characteristics_of_Unstable_Eigenvectors_in_Self-Gravitating_Tori|Characteristics of Unstable Eigenvectors in Self-Gravitating Tori]]," that contains a much more trustworthy analysis of this very interesting problem.


{{ SGFworkInProgress }}
{{ SGFworkInProgress }}


This is a direct extension of our [[User:Tohline/Appendix/Ramblings/PPTori#Check_Validity_of_Blaes85_Eigenvector|Part 1 discussion]].  Here we continue our effort to check the validity of the Blaes85 eigenvector.  The relevant reference is:
This is a direct extension of our [[Appendix/Ramblings/PPToriPt1A#Check_Validity_of_Blaes85_Eigenvector|Part 1 discussion]].  Here we continue our effort to check the validity of the Blaes85 eigenvector.  The relevant reference is:


*  [http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1985MNRAS.216..553B Blaes (1985), MNRAS, 216, 553] (''aka'' Blaes85) &#8212; ''Oscillations of slender tori.''
*  [http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1985MNRAS.216..553B Blaes (1985), MNRAS, 216, 553] (''aka'' Blaes85) &#8212; ''Oscillations of slender tori.''
Line 443: Line 443:
Evaluating various terms using the parameter set, &nbsp;&nbsp;
Evaluating various terms using the parameter set, &nbsp;&nbsp;
<math>~(n, \theta, x/\beta) = (1, \tfrac{\pi}{3}, \tfrac{1}{4})</math>
<math>~(n, \theta, x/\beta) = (1, \tfrac{\pi}{3}, \tfrac{1}{4})</math>
&nbsp;&nbsp; as [[User:Tohline/Appendix/Ramblings/PPTori#Examples|begun in our "Part 1" analysis]], we have:
&nbsp;&nbsp; as [[Appendix/Ramblings/PPToriPt1A#Examples|begun in our "Part 1" analysis]], we have:
<div align="center">
<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">

Latest revision as of 19:25, 20 September 2021

Stability Analyses of PP Tori (Part 2)

[Comment by J. E. Tohline on 24 May 2016]   This chapter contains a set of technical notes and accompanying discussion that I put together several months ago as I was trying to gain a foundational understanding of the results of a large study of instabilities in self-gravitating tori published by the Imamura & Hadley collaboration. I have come to appreciate that some of the logic and interpretation of published results that are presented, below, has serious flaws. Therefore, anyone reading this should be quite cautious in deciding what subsections provide useful insight. I have written a separate chapter titled, "Characteristics of Unstable Eigenvectors in Self-Gravitating Tori," that contains a much more trustworthy analysis of this very interesting problem.


Material that appears after this point in our presentation is under development and therefore
may contain incorrect mathematical equations and/or physical misinterpretations.
|   Go Home   |


This is a direct extension of our Part 1 discussion. Here we continue our effort to check the validity of the Blaes85 eigenvector. The relevant reference is:

Start From Scratch

Basic Equations from Blaes85

  Blaes85

Eq. No.

(βη)2

=

x2(1+xb);

(2.6)

b

3cosθcos3θ;

(2.6)

f

=

1η2.

(2.5)

  Blaes85

Eq. No.

LHSL^W

=

fx22Wx2+f2Wθ2+[fx(12xcosθ)(1xcosθ)+nx2fx]Wx

 

 

 

+[fxsinθ(1xcosθ)+nfθ]Wθ+[2nx2m2β2(1xcosθ)4m2x2f(1xcosθ)2]W

(4.2)

RHS

=

2nm2β2(βη)2[M(νm)2+Nm(νm)]W

(4.1)

 

=

2nm2β2[x2(νm)2+2x2(1xcosθ)2(νm)]W

(4.2)

WA00

=

1+β2m2{2η2cos2θ3η24(n+1)(4n+1)4(n+1)2±i[233(n+1)]1/2ηcosθ}

(4.13)

νm

=

1±i[32(n+1)]1/2β

(4.14)

Our Manipulation of These Equations

Analytic

Λ22(n+1)2m2[WA001]

=

β2{23(n+1)2η2cos2θ3η2(n+1)2(4n+1)±i[273(n+1)3]1/2ηcosθ}

 

=

(4n+1)β2+(βη)2(n+1)2[23cos2θ3]±iβ[273(n+1)3]1/2(βη)cosθ;

WA00

=

1+[m2(n+1)]2Λ


LHSA00

=

[m2(n+1)]2f[x22Λx2+2Λθ2]+[m2(n+1)]2[fx(12xcosθ)(1xcosθ)+nx2fx]Λx

 

 

+[m2(n+1)]2[fxsinθ(1xcosθ)+nfθ]Λθ+[2nx2m2β2(1xcosθ)4m2x2f(1xcosθ)2]{1+[m2(n+1)]2Λ}

 

=

[m2(n+1)]2f{[x22Λx2+2Λθ2]+[x(12xcosθ)(1xcosθ)]Λx+[xsinθ(1xcosθ)]Λθ[m2x2(1xcosθ)2][22(n+1)2m2+Λ]}

 

 

+n[m2(n+1)]2{x2fxΛx+fθΛθ+[2x2m2β2(1xcosθ)4][22(n+1)2m2+Λ]}

 

=

x2f(1xcosθ)2[m2(n+1)]2{(1xcosθ)2[2Λx2+1x22Λθ2]+(1xcosθ)x[(12xcosθ)Λx+sinθΛθ][22(n+1)2+m2Λ]}

 

 

+x2nβ2(1xcosθ)4[m2(n+1)]2{β2(1xcosθ)4[fxΛx+1x2fθΛθ]+[23(n+1)2+2m2Λ]}.

Also,

RHSA00

=

2nx2β2(1xcosθ)2[m2(n+1)]2[(1xcosθ)2(νm)2+2(νm)][22(n+1)2+m2Λ]

 

=

x2nβ2(1xcosθ)4[m2(n+1)]2[(1xcosθ)4(νm)2+2(1xcosθ)2(νm)][23(n+1)2+2m2Λ].

Putting the two together implies,

Definition of Eigenvalue Problem Associated with the Stability of Slim, Papaloizou-Pringle Tori

0

=

1x2[LHSA00RHSA00][2(n+1)m]2(1xcosθ)4

 

=

f(1xcosθ)2{(1xcosθ)2[2Λx2+1x22Λθ2]+(1xcosθ)x[(12xcosθ)Λx+sinθΛθ][22(n+1)2+m2Λ]}

 

 

+nβ2{(1xcosθ)4[Λx(β2f)x+Λθ(β2f/x2)θ]+[(1xcosθ)4(νm)2+2(1xcosθ)2(νm)+1][23(n+1)2+2m2Λ]}.

The first line of this governing, two-line expression contains the function, f, as a leading factor, while the leading factor in the second line is the ratio, n/β2. Presumably the three terms (hereafter, TERM1, TERM2, & TERM3, respectively) inside the curly brackets on the first line must cancel — to a sufficiently high order in x — and, independently, the two terms (hereafter, TERM4 & Term5, respectively) inside the curly brackets on the second line must cancel. Furthermore, these cancellations must occur separately for the real parts and the imaginary parts of each bracketed expression.

Example Evaluation

Evaluating various terms using the parameter set,    (n,θ,x/β)=(1,π3,14)    as begun in our "Part 1" analysis, we have:

TERM1

(1xcosθ)2[2Λx2+1x22Λθ2]

 

=

(723)2{6523+124[4.269531250]}±i(723)2{[30.76957507]+124(1)[5.773638858]}β

 

=

7226[8.39184570±i30.40872264β].

TERM2

(1xcosθ)x[(12xcosθ)Λx+sinθΛθ]

 

=

725[0.931640625±i13.86780926β].

TERM3

[22(n+1)2+m2Λ]

 

=

{24+m2[5β2+0.167968750±i8.031189202β]}.

The sum of these three terms gives,

TERM1 + TERM2 + TERM3

=

7226[8.39184570±i30.40872264β]+725[0.931640625±i13.86780926β]

 

 

{24+m2[5β2+0.167968750±i8.031189202β]}

 

=

6.425006860.2037963924+5m2β2m20.167968750

 

 

±i[23.28167827+3.033583288.031189202m2]β

 

=

9.77878953+5m2β2m20.167968750±i[26.315261558.031189202m2]β

Moving on to the last pair of terms …

TERM4

=

x4[(2+3xb)Λx3sin3θΛθ]

 

=

x4[(2+3xb)[1.515625000±i36.23373732β]3sin3θ[2.388335684±i(1)15.36617018β]]

 

=

x4[9.248046874±i139.7753772β]

TERM5 (Case B)

=

[4[10.75β2±i(1)3β]+22[1±i0.75β]+1][25+2m21[5β+0.167968750±i8.031189202β]]

 

=

[4[10.75β2]22+1][[2510β+(2)0.167968750]±i[(2)8.031189202β]]

 

 

±3β[24][i[2510β+(2)0.167968750][(2)8.031189202β]]

 

=

[4[10.75β2]22+1][[2510β+(2)0.167968750]]±(1)3β[24][[(2)8.031189202β]]

 

 

±i{[4[10.75β2]22+1][[(2)8.031189202β]]+3β[24][[2510β+(2)0.167968750]]}.

Evaluating this TERM5 expression for the case of β=1, we have,


TERM5 (Case B)

=

[0.25422+1][[2510+(2)0.167968750]]±(1)3[24][[(2)8.031189202]]

 

 

±i{[4[10.75]22+1][[(2)8.031189202]]+3[24][[2510+(2)0.167968750]]}

 

=

[0.38470459][22.3359375]±(1)[0.31080502][16.0623784]

 

 

±i{[0.38470459][16.0623784]+[0.31080502][22.3359375]}

 

=

[13.58500545]±i[0.76285080].

Testing for Expected Cancellations

Note first that, adopting the shorthand notation,

(1xcosθ)

2

=

12β(xβ)cosθ+β2(xβ)2cos2θ;

3

=

13β(xβ)cosθ+3β2(xβ)2cos2θ+𝒪(β3);

4

=

14β(xβ)cosθ+6β2(xβ)2cos2θ4β3(xβ)3cos3θ+β4(xβ)4cos4θ.


Real Parts

TERM1

Re[TERM12]

=

2(n+1)[23(n+1)cos2θ3](1+3xb)+24(n+1)2(sin2θcos2θ)

 

 

+β(xβ)[243(n+1)2cos3θ+24(n+1)2cos5θ+32(n+1)(16n+19)sin2θcosθ2323(n+1)2sin2θcos3θ]

 

=

24(n+1)2cos2θ6(n+1)+24(n+1)2(12cos2θ)+3bβ(xβ)[24(n+1)2cos2θ6(n+1)]

 

 

+β(xβ)[243(n+1)2cos3θ+24(n+1)2cos5θ+32(n+1)(16n+19)sin2θcosθ2323(n+1)2sin2θcos3θ]

 

=

6(n+1)+24(n+1)2(1cos2θ)+β(xβ)cosθ{243(n+1)2[3cos2θcos4θ]18(n+1)[3cos2θ]

 

 

243(n+1)2cos2θ+24(n+1)2cos4θ+32(n+1)(16n+19)(1cos2θ)2323(n+1)2(cos2θcos4θ)}

 

=

6(n+1)+24(n+1)2(1cos2θ)+β(xβ)cosθ{32(n+1)(16n+19)233(n+1)+2432(n+1)2cos2θ+232(n+1)cos2θ

 

 

243(n+1)2cos2θ32(n+1)(16n+19)cos2θ2323(n+1)2cos2θ243(n+1)2cos4θ+24(n+1)2cos4θ+2323(n+1)2cos4θ}

 

=

6(n+1)+24(n+1)2(1cos2θ)+β(xβ)cosθ{32(n+1)(16n+13)

 

 

+cos2θ[23(n+1)2(18236)+32(n+1)(216n19)]+23(n+1)2cos4θ[23+2+23]}

 

=

6(n+1)+24(n+1)2(1cos2θ)+β(xβ)(n+1)cosθ{32(16n+13)

 

 

cos2θ[232n+241]+2319(n+1)cos4θ}

Re[TERM1(n+1)]

=

[6+24(n+1)24(n+1)cos2θ][12β(xβ)cosθ+β2(xβ)2cos2θ]

 

 

+β(xβ)cosθ{32(16n+13)cos2θ[232n+241]+2319(n+1)cos4θ}[12β(xβ)cosθ+β2(xβ)2cos2θ]

 

=

[6+24(n+1)24(n+1)cos2θ]+β(xβ)cosθ[1225(n+1)+25(n+1)cos2θ]

 

 

+β(xβ)cosθ{32(16n+13)cos2θ[232n+241]+2319(n+1)cos4θ}

 

 

2β2(xβ)2cos2θ{32(16n+13)cos2θ[232n+241]+2319(n+1)cos4θ}

 

 

2β2(xβ)2cos2θ[323(n+1)+23(n+1)cos2θ]

 

 

+β3(xβ)3cos3θ{32(16n+13)cos2θ[232n+241]+2319(n+1)cos4θ}

 

=

[6+24(n+1)24(n+1)cos2θ]

 

 

+β(xβ)cosθ{(112n+97)cos2θ[200n+209]+2319(n+1)cos4θ}

 

 

2β2(xβ)2cos2θ{(136n+112)cos2θ[224n+233]+2319(n+1)cos4θ}

 

 

+β3(xβ)3cos3θ{32(16n+13)cos2θ[232n+241]+2319(n+1)cos4θ}.

TERM2

Re[TERM2]

=

6(n+1)+24(n+1)2cos2θ

 

 

β(xβ)(n+1)cosθ{[15+24(n+1)]cos2θ[9+237(n+1)]+233(n+1)cos4θ}

 

 

+β2(xβ)2(n+1){92232(1+2n)cos2θ[9+32(n+1)]cos4θ+23(n+1)cos6θ}

 

=

(n+1)[6+24(n+1)cos2θ]

 

 

β(xβ)(n+1)cosθ{[31+16n]cos2θ[65+56n]+233(n+1)cos4θ}

 

 

+β2(xβ)2(n+1){92232(1+2n)cos2θ[9+32(n+1)]cos4θ+23(n+1)cos6θ}

Re[TERM2(n+1)]

=

[6+24(n+1)cos2θ][1β(xβ)cosθ]

 

 

β(xβ)cosθ{[31+16n]cos2θ[65+56n]+233(n+1)cos4θ}[1β(xβ)cosθ]

 

 

+β2(xβ)2{92232(1+2n)cos2θ[9+32(n+1)]cos4θ+23(n+1)cos6θ}[1β(xβ)cosθ]

 

=

[6+24(n+1)cos2θ]β(xβ)cosθ[6+24(n+1)cos2θ]

 

 

β(xβ)cosθ{[31+16n]cos2θ[65+56n]+233(n+1)cos4θ}

 

 

+β2(xβ)2{[31+16n]cos2θ[65+56n]cos4θ+233(n+1)cos6θ}

 

 

+β2(xβ)2{92232(1+2n)cos2θ[9+32(n+1)]cos4θ+23(n+1)cos6θ}

 

 

β3(xβ)3cosθ{92232(1+2n)cos2θ[9+32(n+1)]cos4θ+23(n+1)cos6θ}

 

=

[6+24(n+1)cos2θ]

 

 

β(xβ)cosθ{[31+16n6]cos2θ[65+56n]+24(n+1)cos2θ+233(n+1)cos4θ}

 

 

+β2(xβ)2{9[5+56n]cos2θ[106+88n]cos4θ+25(n+1)cos6θ}

 

 

β3(xβ)3cosθ{92232(1+2n)cos2θ[9+32(n+1)]cos4θ+23(n+1)cos6θ}


Sum of TERM1 and TERM2

Re[TERM1+TERM2(n+1)]

=

[6+24(n+1)cos2θ]+[6+24(n+1)24(n+1)cos2θ]

 

 

+β(xβ)cosθ{233[3+4n]255(n+1)cos2θ+27(n+1)cos4θ}

 

 

+β2(xβ)2{9[5+56n]cos2θ[106+88n]cos4θ+25(n+1)cos6θ}

 

 

2β2(xβ)2cos2θ{(136n+112)cos2θ[224n+233]+2319(n+1)cos4θ}

 

 

β3(xβ)3cosθ{92232(1+2n)cos2θ[9+32(n+1)]cos4θ+23(n+1)cos6θ}

 

 

+β3(xβ)3cos3θ{32(16n+13)cos2θ[232n+241]+2319(n+1)cos4θ}


TERM3

Re[TERM3]

=

22(n+1)2+m2(4n+1)β2m2β2(xβ)2(n+1)2[23cos2θ3]

 

 

m2β3(xβ)3(n+1)2b[23cos2θ3]

Re[TERM3(n+1)]

=

22(n+1)+m2[(4n+1)(n+1)]β2m2β2(xβ)2(n+1)[23cos2θ3]

 

 

m2β3(xβ)3(n+1)b[23cos2θ3].

Sum of TERM1 + TERM2 + TERM3

Therefore,

Re[TERM1+TERM2+TERM3(n+1)]

=

[6+24(n+1)cos2θ]+[6+24(n+1)24(n+1)cos2θ]22(n+1)

 

 

+β(xβ)cosθ{233[3+4n]255(n+1)cos2θ+27(n+1)cos4θ}

 

 

+β2(xβ)2{9[5+56n]cos2θ[106+88n]cos4θ+25(n+1)cos6θ}

 

 

2β2(xβ)2cos2θ{(136n+112)cos2θ[224n+233]+2319(n+1)cos4θ}

 

 

+m2[(4n+1)(n+1)]β2m2β2(xβ)2(n+1)[23cos2θ3]

 

 

β3(xβ)3cosθ{92232(1+2n)cos2θ[9+32(n+1)]cos4θ+23(n+1)cos6θ}

 

 

+β3(xβ)3cos3θ{32(16n+13)cos2θ[232n+241]+2319(n+1)cos4θ}

 

 

m2β3(xβ)3(n+1)b[23cos2θ3]

 

=

12n+β(xβ)cosθ{233[3+4n]255(n+1)cos2θ+27(n+1)cos4θ}+𝒪(β2)

TERM4

Re[TERM44]

=

{(n+1)[23(n+1)cos2θ3]x(2+3xb)}[x(2+3xb)]

 

 

+(n+1)sinθ{24(n+1)(βη)2cosθ+3x3sin2θ[323(n+1)cos2θ]}[3xsin3θ]

 

=

(n+1)[23(n+1)cos2θ3]x2(2+3xb)2

 

 

3x3(n+1)sin4θ{24(n+1)(1+xb)cosθ+3xsin2θ[23(n+1)cos2θ3]}

 

=

x222(n+1)[23(n+1)cos2θ3](1+3xb2)2

 

 

x3243(n+1)2cosθsin4θ(1+xb)x432(n+1)sin6θ[23(n+1)cos2θ3].

 

=

x{x[18.37695315]+x2[72.5625]+x3[7.59375]}=x[9.24804688].

Or, continuing to develop the analytic power-law expression,

Re[TERM44]

=

β2(xβ)2(n+1)[23(n+1)cos2θ3][4+12β(xβ)b+9β2(xβ)2b2]

 

 

β3(xβ)3243(n+1)2cosθsin4θ[1+β(xβ)b]β4(xβ)432(n+1)sin6θ[23(n+1)cos2θ3]

 

β2(xβ)222(n+1)[23(n+1)cos2θ3]β3(xβ)3223(n+1)[23(n+1)cos2θ3]bβ3(xβ)3243(n+1)2cosθsin4θ

Re[TERM4]

β2(xβ)222(n+1)[23(n+1)cos2θ3]β3(xβ)3223(n+1)[23(n+1)cos2θ3]b

 

 

β3(xβ)3243(n+1)2cosθsin4θ+β3(xβ)324(n+1)[23(n+1)cos2θ3]cosθ \, .

TERM5

Now, let's examine the TERM5 expressions.

Re[TERM5]

=

Re[4(νm)2+22(νm)+1]Re[23(n+1)2+2m2Λ]Im[4(νm)2+22(νm)+1]Im[23(n+1)2+2m2Λ]

Case B:

=

{4[13β22(n+1)]+22(1)+1}{23(n+1)2+2m2[(4n+1)β2+(n+1)2(23cos2θ3)x2(1+xb)]}

 

 

{4(1)[23β2(n+1)]1/2+22[3β22(n+1)]1/2}2m2β[273(n+1)3]1/2cosθx(1+xb)1/2

 

=

{122+43β242(n+1)}{[23(n+1)22m2(4n+1)β2]+x22m2(n+1)2(23cos2θ3)(1+xb)}

 

 

xβ2m2[24][21032(n+1)2]1/2cosθ(1+xb)1/2

 

=

{12[12β(xβ)cosθ+β2(xβ)2cos2θ]+[14β(xβ)cosθ+6β2(xβ)2cos2θ4β3(xβ)3cos3θ+β4(xβ)4cos4θ]

 

 

3β22(n+1)[14β(xβ)cosθ+6β2(xβ)2cos2θ+𝒪(β3)]}

 

 

×{[23(n+1)22m2(4n+1)β2]+β2(xβ)22m2(n+1)2(23cos2θ3)+β3(xβ)32m2(n+1)2(23cos2θ3)b}

 

 

β3(xβ)m2[21032(n+1)2]1/2cosθ[β0(11)+2β(xβ)cosθ5β2(xβ)2cos2θ+𝒪(β3)]

 

 

×[1+β(xβ)b2β2(xβ)2b223+β3(xβ)3b324+𝒪(β4)]

 

=

{β0(12+1)+(44)β(xβ)cosθ+(62)β2(xβ)2cos2θ4β3(xβ)3cos3θ+β4(xβ)4cos4θ

 

 

3β22(n+1)[14β(xβ)cosθ+6β2(xβ)2cos2θ+𝒪(β3)]}

 

 

×{23(n+1)2+2m2β2[(4n+1)+(xβ)2(n+1)2(23cos2θ3)]+β3(xβ)32m2(n+1)2(23cos2θ3)b}

 

 

β3(xβ)m2[21032(n+1)2]1/2cosθ[β0(11)+2β(xβ)cosθ5β2(xβ)2cos2θ+𝒪(β3)]

 

 

×[1+β(xβ)b2β2(xβ)2b223+β3(xβ)3b324+𝒪(β4)]

 

{4β2(xβ)2cos2θ3β22(n+1)4β3(xβ)3cos3θ+23β3(n+1)(xβ)cosθ+𝒪(β4)}

 

 

×{23(n+1)2+2m2β2[(4n+1)+(xβ)2(n+1)2(23cos2θ3)]+β3(xβ)32m2(n+1)2(23cos2θ3)b}

 

 

β4(xβ)m2[21032(n+1)2]1/2cosθ[2(xβ)cosθ5β(xβ)2cos2θ+𝒪(β3)]

 

 

×[1+β(xβ)b2β2(xβ)2b223+β3(xβ)3b324+𝒪(β4)]

 

23(n+1)2{4β2(xβ)2cos2θ3β22(n+1)4β3(xβ)3cos3θ+23β3(n+1)(xβ)cosθ+𝒪(β4)}.

Sum of TERM4 and TERM5

When added together, we obtain,

Re[TERM4+TERM5]

=

β2(xβ)2422(n+1)[23(n+1)cos2θ3](1+3xb2)2

 

 

β3(xβ)34243(n+1)2cosθsin4θ(1+xb)β4(xβ)4432(n+1)sin6θ[23(n+1)cos2θ3]

 

 

+{122+4}{23(n+1)2+2m2β2[(4n+1)+(xβ)2(n+1)2(23cos2θ3)(1+xb)]}

 

 

3β242(n+1){23(n+1)2+2m2β2[(4n+1)+(xβ)2(n+1)2(23cos2θ3)(1+xb)]}

 

 

β3(xβ)m2[24][21032(n+1)2]1/2cosθ(1+xb)1/2

 

=

β023(n+1)2{122+4}

 

 

β22m2[122+4][(4n+1)(xβ)2(n+1)2(23cos2θ3)(1+xb)]

 

 

β24223(n+1)+β2(xβ)2422(n+1)[323(n+1)cos2θ](1+3xb2)2

 

 

β30(xβ)m2[24][21032(n+1)2]1/2cosθ(1+xb)1/2

 

 

β30(xβ)34243(n+1)2cosθsin4θ(1+xb)β40(xβ)4432(n+1)sin6θ[23(n+1)cos2θ3]

 

 

+3β404m2(n+1)[(4n+1)(xβ)2(n+1)2(23cos2θ3)(1+xb)]

 

β023(n+1)2{12[12β(xβ)cosθ+β2(xβ)2cos2θ+𝒪(β3)0]+[14β(xβ)cosθ+6β2(xβ)2cos2θ+𝒪(β3)0]}

 

 

β22m2[12+1][(4n+1)(xβ)2(n+1)2(23cos2θ3)(1+x0b)]

 

 

β2223(n+1)+β2(xβ)222(n+1)[323(n+1)cos2θ](1+3x0b2)2

 

β023(n+1)2{12+1}+β1(xβ)23(n+1)2{4cosθ4cosθ}

 

 

+β2(xβ)225(n+1)2cos2θ

 

 

β22m2[12+1][(4n+1)(xβ)2(n+1)2(23cos2θ3)]

 

 

β2223(n+1)[1(xβ)2]β2(xβ)2[25(n+1)2cos2θ]

 

=

β2223(n+1)[1(xβ)2].

So we see that the coefficients of the lowest-order (β0andβ1) terms are zero, and the coefficient of the β2 term is almost zero! My analysis the second time around gives,


Re[TERM4+TERM5]

β2(xβ)222(n+1)[23(n+1)cos2θ3]β3(xβ)3223(n+1)[23(n+1)cos2θ3]b

 

 

β3(xβ)3243(n+1)2cosθsin4θ+β3(xβ)324(n+1)[23(n+1)cos2θ3]cosθ

 

 

+23(n+1)2{4β2(xβ)2cos2θ3β22(n+1)4β3(xβ)3cos3θ+23β3(n+1)(xβ)cosθ}

 

β2(xβ)222(n+1)[23(n+1)cos2θ]+β2(xβ)2223(n+1)

 

 

+23(n+1)2{4β2(xβ)2cos2θ3β22(n+1)}

 

=

β2(xβ)2[25(n+1)2cos2θ]+β2(xβ)2223(n+1)

 

 

+β2(xβ)2[25(n+1)2cos2θ]β2223(n+1)

 

=

β2223(n+1)[1(xβ)2].

Exactly the same as the first time around.

Imaginary Parts

TERM1

Im[TERM12]

=

βcosθ[233(n+1)3]1/2[b(4+3xb)(1+xb)3/2]

 

 

+1x2(1)β[273(n+1)3]1/2{(βη)cosθ+3x3sin2θ2(βη)(5cos2θ2)+32x6sin6θcosθ22(βη)3}

 

=

βb04[4b+12β(xβ)b2][1+β(xβ)b]3/2

 

 

βb022xcosθ[1+β(xβ)b]1/2{22cosθ+23β(xβ)sin2θ(5cos2θ2)[1+β(xβ)b]1+32β2(xβ)2sin6θcosθ[1+β(xβ)b]2}

TERM2

Im[TERM22]

=

β[253(n+1)31+x(3cosθcos3θ)]1/2{2cosθx[27cos2θ+3cos4θ]

 

 

x2cosθ[9+4cos2θcos4θ]}

 

=

βb02cosθ[1+β(xβ)b]1/2{2cosθβ(xβ)[27cos2θ+3cos4θ]β2(xβ)2cosθ[9+4cos2θcos4θ]}.

TERM3

Im[TERM3]

m2β[273(n+1)3]1/2(βη)cosθ

 

=

m2β2b0(xβ)[1+β(xβ)b]1/2.

TERM4

Im[TERM44]

=

{βcosθ[253(n+1)3]1/2x(2+3xb)(βη)}[x(2+3xb)]

 

 

βsinθ[273(n+1)3(βη)2]1/2{1+3x32[sin2θcosθ(βη)2]}[3xsin3θ]

 

=

x2βcosθ[273(n+1)3]1/2(1+xb)1/2(1+3xb2)2

 

 

x23βsin4θ[273(n+1)3]1/2(1+xb)1/2{1+3x2[sin2θcosθ(1+xb)]}

 

=

x{[109.8335164]+x[119.7674436]}=34.94384433

Alternatively we can write,

Im[TERM44]

=

{βcosθ[253(n+1)3]1/2x(2+3xb)(βη)}[x(2+3xb)]

 

 

βsinθ[273(n+1)3(βη)2]1/2{1+3x32[sin2θcosθ(βη)2]}[3xsin3θ]

 

=

2b0β2(xβ)(1+3xb2)2(1+xb)1/23b0β3(xβ)2[sin4θcosθ](1+xb)1/2

 

 

9b02β4(xβ)3sin6θ(1+xb)1/2


Im[TERM4β2]

=

{2b0(xβ)(1+3xb2)2(1+xb)1/23b0β(xβ)2[sin4θcosθ](1+xb)1/29b02β2(xβ)3sin6θ(1+xb)1/2}

 

 

×{14β(xβ)cosθ+6β2(xβ)2cos2θ4β3(xβ)3cos3θ+(xβ)4cos4θ}

=

{27.458379106.776315890.70914934}×[0.58618164]={34.94384433}×[0.58618164]=20.48343998

 

2b0(xβ)(1+3xb2)2(1+xb)1/23b0β(xβ)2[sin4θcosθ](1+xb)1/29b02β2(xβ)3sin6θ(1+xb)1/2

 

 

+8b0β(xβ)2(1+3xb2)2(1+xb)1/2cosθ+12b0β2(xβ)3[sin4θcosθ](1+xb)1/2cosθ

 

 

12b0β2(xβ)3(1+3xb2)2(1+xb)1/2cos2θ

 

2b0(xβ)(1+3xb2)2(1+xb)1/2+b0β(xβ)2{8(1+3xb2)2(1+xb)1/2cosθ3[sin4θcosθ](1+xb)1/2}

 

 

+β2b0(xβ)3{92sin6θ(1+xb)1/2+12[sin4θcosθ](1+xb)1/2cosθ12(1+3xb2)2(1+xb)1/2cos2θ}

 

2b0(xβ)(1+3xb2)2(1+xb)1/2+b0β(xβ)2{8cosθ3[sin4θcosθ]}.

TERM5

Im[TERM5]

=

Re[4(νm)2+22(νm)+1]Im[23(n+1)2+2m2Λ]+Im[4(νm)2+22(νm)+1]Re[23(n+1)2+2m2Λ]

Case B:

=

x2βm2{122+43β242(n+1)}[273(n+1)3]1/2cosθ(1+xb)1/2

 

 

+β[23(n+1)]1/2[24]{[23(n+1)22m2(4n+1)β2]+x22m2(n+1)[23(n+1)cos2θ3](1+xb)}

 

=

m21{122+43β242(n+1)}2βx[32.12475681]+3β[24]{[2510m21β2]+2m2x2[2.6875]}

 

=

m21{0.38470459}[16.06237841]+[0.31080502]{22.3359375}=0.76285080.


Let's rewrite both of these expressions in terms of a power series in β.

Im[TERM5]

=

β2(xβ)2m2b0{12[12β(xβ)cosθ+β2(xβ)2cos2θ+𝒪(β3)]

 

 

+[14β(xβ)cosθ+6β2(xβ)2cos2θ+𝒪(β3)][13β22(n+1)]}{1+β(xβ)b2β2(xβ)2b28+𝒪(β3)}

 

 

+β[23(n+1)]1/2[β0(11)+2β(xβ)cosθ5β2(xβ)2cos2θ+4β3(xβ)3cos3θ+𝒪(β4)]{23(n+1)2}

 

 

+β[23(n+1)]1/2[β0(11)+2β(xβ)cosθ5β2(xβ)2cos2θ+4β3(xβ)3cos3θ+𝒪(β4)]{2m2(4n+1)β2}

 

 

+β[23(n+1)]1/2[β0(11)+2β(xβ)cosθ5β2(xβ)2cos2θ+4β3(xβ)3cos3θ+𝒪(β4)]{x22m2(n+1)[23(n+1)cos2θ3]}

 

 

+β[23(n+1)]1/2[β0(11)+2β(xβ)cosθ5β2(xβ)2cos2θ+4β3(xβ)3cos3θ+𝒪(β4)]{x3b2m2(n+1)[23(n+1)cos2θ3]}

Im[TERM5β2]

=

(xβ)2m2b0{β0(12+1)+4β(xβ)cosθ2β2(xβ)2cos2θ4β(xβ)cosθ+6β2(xβ)2cos2θ3β22(n+1)+𝒪(β3)}

 

 

×{1+β(xβ)b2β2(xβ)2b28+𝒪(β3)}

 

 

+b0[(11)βcosθ+2β0(xβ)5β(xβ)2cosθ+4β2(xβ)3cos2θ+𝒪(β3)]

 

 

m2(4n+1)[233(n+1)]1/2[β1(11)+2β2(xβ)cosθ5β3(xβ)2cos2θ+4β4(xβ)3cos3θ+𝒪(β5)]

 

 

+m2[23(n+1)cos2θ3][233(n+1)]1/2[β1(xβ)2(11)+2β2(xβ)3cosθ5β3(xβ)4cos2θ+4β4(xβ)5cos3θ+𝒪(β3)]

 

 

+m2b[23(n+1)cos2θ3][233(n+1)]1/2[β2(xβ)3(11)+2β3(xβ)4cosθ5β4(xβ)5cos2θ+4β5(xβ)6cos3θ+𝒪(β3)]

Dropping all terms on the right-hand-side that are 𝒪(β3) or higher, we have,

Im[TERM5β2]

=

(xβ)2m2b0{β0(12+1)+(44)β(xβ)cosθ+4β2(xβ)2cos2θβ2[32(n+1)]+𝒪(β3)0}

 

 

×{1+β(xβ)b2β2(xβ)2b28+𝒪(β3)0}

 

 

+b0[(11)βcosθ+2β0(xβ)5β(xβ)2cosθ+4β2(xβ)3cos2θ+𝒪(β3)0]

 

 

m2(4n+1)[233(n+1)]1/2[β1(11)+2β2(xβ)cosθ+𝒪(β3)0]

 

 

+m2[23(n+1)cos2θ3][233(n+1)]1/2[β1(xβ)2(11)+2β2(xβ)3cosθ+𝒪(β3)0]

 

 

+m2b[23(n+1)cos2θ3][233(n+1)]1/2[β2(xβ)3(11)+𝒪(β3)0]

 

m2b0{[3(n+1)](xβ)+8(xβ)3cos2θ}×{β2+𝒪(β3)0}

 

 

+b0[2β0(xβ)5β(xβ)2cosθ+4β2(xβ)3cos2θ]

 

 

m2(4n+1)[233(n+1)]1/2[2β2(xβ)cosθ]

 

 

+m2[23(n+1)cos2θ3][233(n+1)]1/2[2β2(xβ)3cosθ]

 

2b0β0(xβ)5b0β(xβ)2cosθ+4b0β2(xβ)3cos2θ

 

 

+β2m2{[3b0(n+1)](xβ)+8b0(xβ)3cos2θ(4n+1)[233(n+1)]1/2[2(xβ)cosθ]+[23(n+1)cos2θ3][233(n+1)]1/2[2(xβ)3cosθ]}.

Together

Together, then, we have:

Im[TERM4+TERM5b0β2]

2(xβ)(1+3xb2)2(1+xb)1/2+β(xβ)2{8cosθ3[sin4θcosθ]}+2β0(xβ)5β(xβ)2cosθ

 

2(xβ)(1+3xb)(1xb2)+2(xβ)+β(xβ)2{3cosθ3[sin4θcosθ]}

 

(xβ)[2+5bx]+2(xβ)+3βcosθ(xβ)2{cos2θsin4θ}

 

=

(xβ)(2+2)5β(xβ)2[3cosθcos3θ]+3βcosθ(xβ)2{cos2θ[12cos2θ+cos4θ]}

 

=

(xβ)(2+2)5βcosθ(xβ)2[3cos2θcos4θ]+3βcosθ(xβ)2{1+3cos2θcos4θ}

 

=

(xβ)(2+2)+βcosθ(xβ)2{3+9cos2θ3cos4θ15cos2θ+5cos4θ}

 

=

(xβ)(2+2)βcosθ(xβ)2{3+6cos2θ2cos4θ}


Beta Error Plot
Beta Error Plot

Material that appears after this point in our presentation is under development and therefore
may contain incorrect mathematical equations and/or physical misinterpretations.
|   Go Home   |


When added together, we obtain,

Im[TERM4+TERM5]

=

β2(xβ)4cosθ[293(n+1)3]1/2(1+xb)1/2(1+3xb2)2

 

 

β30(xβ)234sin4θ[273(n+1)3]1/2(1+xb)1/2{1+3x2[sin2θcosθ(1+xb)]}

 

 

+β2(xβ)2m2[122+4][273(n+1)3]1/2cosθ(1+xb)1/2

 

 

β40(xβ)[3m24(n+1)][273(n+1)3]1/2cosθ(1+xb)1/2

 

 

β[273(n+1)3]1/2[24]

 

 

+β30[23(n+1)]1/2[24][2m2(4n+1)(xβ)22m2(n+1)2(23cos2θ3)(1+xb)]

 

β1[273(n+1)3]1/2{[12β(xβ)cosθ+𝒪(β2)0][14β(xβ)cosθ+𝒪(β2)0]}

 

 

β2(xβ)cosθ[293(n+1)3]1/2(1+x0b)1/2(1+3x0b2)2

 

 

+β2(xβ)2m2[12+1][273(n+1)3]1/2cosθ(1+x0b)1/2

 

β1[273(n+1)3]1/2[11]

 

 

β2(xβ)cosθ[293(n+1)3]1/2β2(xβ)cosθ[293(n+1)3]1/2

 

 

+β2(xβ)2m2[12+1][273(n+1)3]1/2cosθ

Summary

As stated above, the eigenvalue problem that must be solved in order to identify the eigenfunction, Λ(x,θ), and eigenfrequency, (ν/m), of unstable (as well as stable) nonaxisymmetric modes in slim (β1), polytropic (n) PP tori with uniform specific angular momentum is defined by the following two-dimensional (x,θ), 2nd-order PDE:

0

=

f(1xcosθ)2{TERM1+TERM2+TERM3}+nβ2{TERM4+TERM5},

where, f(x,θ) is the enthalpy distribution in the unperturbed, axisymmetric torus, and

TERM1

(1xcosθ)2[2Λx2+1x22Λθ2],

TERM2

(1xcosθ)x[(12xcosθ)Λx+sinθΛθ],

TERM3

[22(n+1)2+m2Λ],

TERM4

(1xcosθ)4[Λx(β2f)x+Λθ(β2f/x2)θ],

TERM5

[(1xcosθ)4(νm)2+2(1xcosθ)2(νm)+1][23(n+1)2+2m2Λ].

We also should appreciate that,

f2f(1xcosθ)2

=

(1η2)(12xcosθ+x2cos2θ)

 

=

[1(xβ)2β(xβ)3b][12β(xβ)cosθ+β2(xβ)2cos2θ]

 

=

[1(xβ)2][12β(xβ)cosθ+β2(xβ)2cos2θ]β(xβ)3b[12β(xβ)cosθ+β2(xβ)2cos2θ]

 

=

[1(xβ)2][12β(xβ)cosθ+β2(xβ)2cos2θ]+𝒪(β3).

If an exact solution, (Λ,ν/m), to this eigenvalue problem were plugged into this governing PDE, we would expect that both of the following summations would be exactly zero at all meridional-plane (x,θ) locations throughout the torus:

0

=

TERM1+TERM2+TERM3,

0

=

TERM4+TERM5.

While an exact analytic solution to this eigenvalue problem is not (yet) known, Blaes (1985) has determined that a good approximate solution is an eigenvector defined by the complex eigenfrequency,

νm

=

1±i[32(n+1)]1/2β,

and, simultaneously, the complex eigenfunction,

Λ

=

(4n+1)β2+(βη)2(n+1)2[23cos2θ3]±iβ[273(n+1)3]1/2(βη)cosθ,

where,

(βη)2

=

x2[1+x(3cosθcos3θ)].


Real Components of Various Terms
Order f2TERM1 f2TERM2 f2TERM3 nβ2TERM4 nβ2TERM5
𝒪(β2) --- --- --- --- nβ2(12+1)
𝒪(β1) --- --- --- --- nβ2(44)
𝒪(β0) (n+1)[6+24(n+1)24(n+1)cos2θ]f2 (n+1)[6+24(n+1)cos2θ]f2 22(n+1)2f2 n(xβ)222(n+1)[23(n+1)cos2θ3] 23n(n+1)2[4(xβ)2cos2θ32(n+1)]

Σ

=

(n+1){[6+24(n+1)24(n+1)cos2θ6+24(n+1)cos2θ22(n+1)][1(xβ)2]n(xβ)2[25(n+1)cos2θ]+12n(xβ)2+25n(n+1)(xβ)2cos2θ12n}

 

=

(n+1){[12+12(n+1)][1(xβ)2]+12n(xβ)212n}

 

=

0.     Amazing!


Beta Error Plot
Beta Error Plot

We have plugged this "Blaes85" approximate eigenvector into the five separate "TERM" expressions — analytically evaluating partial (1st and 2nd) derivatives along the way, as appropriate — then, with the aid of an Excel spreadsheet, have numerically evaluated each of the expressions over a range of coordinate locations

(0<x/β<1;0θ2π)

. The appropriate numerical sums of these TERMs are, indeed, nearly zero for slim

(β1)

configurations.


The log-log plot shown here, on the right, illustrates the behavior of the "TERM4 + TERM5" sum for the example parameter set, (n,θ,x/β)=(1,π3,14). As the blue diamonds illustrate, the real part of this sum drops by approximately two orders of magnitude for every factor of ten drop in β. The total drop is roughly eight orders of magnitude over the displayed range, β=1104. As the salmon-colored squares in the same plot indicate, the imaginary part of the sum, "TERM4 + TERM5," is even closer to zero, dropping roughly 12 orders of magnitude over the same range of β. This indicates that, with the Blaes85 eigenvector, the real part of the sum of this pair of terms differs from zero by a residual whose leading-order term varies as β2 while the corresponding imaginary part of the sum differs from zero by a residual whose leading-order term varies as β3.


As our above analytic analysis shows, when each of the expressions for TERM4 and TERM5 is rewritten as a power series in β, a sum of the two analytically specified TERMs results in precise cancellation of leading-order terms. For the imaginary component of this sum, our derived expression for the residual is,

Im(45)

Im[TERM4+TERM5]

 

=

β3(xβ)2[273(n+1)3]1/2[3+6cos2θ2cos4θ]+𝒪(β4).

The dotted, salmon-colored line of slope 3 that has been drawn in our accompanying log-log plot was generated using this analytic expression for the β3-residual term. It appears to precisely thread through the points (the salmon-colored squares) whose plot locations have been determined via our numerical spreadsheet evaluation of the imaginary component of the "TERM4 + TERM5" sum. Additional confirmation that we have derived the correct analytic expression for Im(45) comes from subtracting this analytically defined β3 residual from the numerically determined sum: The result is the green-dashed curve in the accompanying log-log plot, which appears to be a line of slope 4.


Analogously, for the real component of this sum, the precise expression for the residual is,

Re(45)

Re[TERM4+TERM5]

 

=

β2223(n+1)[1(xβ)2]+𝒪(β3).

The dotted, light blue line of slope 2 that has been drawn in our accompanying log-log plot was generated using this analytic expression for the β2-residual term. It appears to precisely thread through the points (the light blue diamonds) whose plot locations have been determined via our numerical spreadsheet evaluation of the real part of the "TERM4 + TERM5" sum. Notice that at the surface of the torus — that is, when x/β=1 — this β2-residual goes to zero, in which case the leading order term in the "real" component residual will be drop to 𝒪(β3).

See Also


Tiled Menu

Appendices: | VisTrailsEquations | VisTrailsVariables | References | Ramblings | VisTrailsImages | myphys.lsu | ADS |