SSC/Stability/n1PolytropeLAWE: Difference between revisions

From jetwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(11 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 159: Line 159:
</table>
</table>
</div>
</div>


{{ SGFworkInProgress }}
{{ SGFworkInProgress }}


<span id="WorkInProgress">&nbsp;</span>


<table border="1" align="center" width="80%" cellpadding="8"><tr><td align="left">
<table border="1" align="center" width="80%" cellpadding="8"><tr><td align="left">
Line 282: Line 282:
<tr>
<tr>
   <td align="right">
   <td align="right">
<math>~\sigma^2</math>
<math>\sigma^2</math>
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="center">
   <td align="center">
<math>~\equiv</math>
<math>\equiv</math>
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="left">
   <td align="left">
<math>
<math>
~\frac{\omega^2}{2\pi G\rho_c \gamma_g} \, ,
\frac{\omega^2}{2\pi G\rho_c \gamma_g} \, ,
</math>
</math>
   </td>
   </td>
Line 296: Line 296:
<tr>
<tr>
   <td align="right">
   <td align="right">
<math>~\alpha</math>
<math>\alpha</math>
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="center">
   <td align="center">
<math>~\equiv</math>
<math>\equiv</math>
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="left">
   <td align="left">
<math>
<math>
~3-\frac{4}{\gamma_g}
3-\frac{4}{\gamma_g}
\, .
\, .
</math>
</math>
Line 317: Line 317:
<tr>
<tr>
   <td align="right">
   <td align="right">
<math>~ \frac{1}{\xi^2 \sin^2\xi} \cdot \frac{d}{d\xi}\biggl[ \xi^2 \sin^2\xi \frac{dx}{d\xi} \biggr]
<math>\frac{1}{\xi^2 \sin^2\xi} \cdot \frac{d}{d\xi}\biggl[ \xi^2 \sin^2\xi \frac{dx}{d\xi} \biggr]
</math>
</math>
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="center">
   <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
<math>=</math>
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="left">
   <td align="left">
<math>
<math>
~\frac{1}{\xi^2 \sin\xi} \biggl[ 2\alpha ( \sin\xi - \xi \cos \xi ) - \sigma^2 \xi^3 \biggr]  x  
\frac{1}{\xi^2 \sin\xi} \biggl[ 2\alpha ( \sin\xi - \xi \cos \xi ) - \sigma^2 \xi^3 \biggr]  x  
</math>
</math>
   </td>
   </td>
Line 335: Line 335:
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="center">
   <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
<math>=</math>
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="left">
   <td align="left">
<math>
<math>
~- \biggl[ \frac{2\alpha}{\xi^2} \biggl( \frac{\xi \cos \xi}{\sin\xi} -1\biggr) + \sigma^2 \biggl( \frac{\xi}{\sin\xi}\biggr) \biggr]  x  
- \biggl[ \frac{2\alpha}{\xi^2} \biggl( \frac{\xi \cos \xi}{\sin\xi} -1\biggr) + \sigma^2 \biggl( \frac{\xi}{\sin\xi}\biggr) \biggr]  x  
</math>
</math>
   </td>
   </td>
Line 349: Line 349:
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="center">
   <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
<math>=</math>
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="left">
   <td align="left">
<math>
<math>
~- \biggl[ \frac{2\alpha}{\xi^2} \frac{\xi^2}{\sin\xi}  \cdot \frac{d}{d\xi} \biggl( \frac{\sin\xi}{\xi} \biggr)  
- \biggl[ \frac{2\alpha}{\xi^2} \frac{\xi^2}{\sin\xi}  \cdot \frac{d}{d\xi} \biggl( \frac{\sin\xi}{\xi} \biggr)  
+ \sigma^2 \biggl( \frac{\xi}{\sin\xi}\biggr) \biggr]  x  
+ \sigma^2 \biggl( \frac{\xi}{\sin\xi}\biggr) \biggr]  x  
</math>
</math>
Line 364: Line 364:
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="center">
   <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
<math>=</math>
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="left">
   <td align="left">
<math>
<math>
~- \biggl[ \frac{2\alpha}{\xi} \frac{d}{d\xi}\biggl( \frac{\sin\xi}{\xi} \biggr) + \sigma^2 \biggr]  \biggl( \frac{\xi}{\sin\xi}\biggr) x \, ,
- \biggl[ \frac{2\alpha}{\xi} \frac{d}{d\xi}\biggl( \frac{\sin\xi}{\xi} \biggr) + \sigma^2 \biggr]  \biggl( \frac{\xi}{\sin\xi}\biggr) x \, ,
</math>
</math>
   </td>
   </td>
Line 379: Line 379:
<tr>
<tr>
   <td align="right">
   <td align="right">
<math>~ \frac{d}{d\xi} \biggl( \frac{\sin\xi}{\xi} \biggr)
<math>\frac{d}{d\xi} \biggl( \frac{\sin\xi}{\xi} \biggr)
</math>
</math>
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="center">
   <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
<math>=</math>
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="left">
   <td align="left">
<math>
<math>
~\frac{\sin\xi}{\xi^2} \biggl[ \frac{\xi \cos\xi}{\sin\xi} - 1 \biggr] \, .
\frac{\sin\xi}{\xi^2} \biggl[ \frac{\xi \cos\xi}{\sin\xi} - 1 \biggr] \, .
</math>
</math>
   </td>
   </td>
Line 394: Line 394:
</div>
</div>


It would seem that the eigenfunction, <math>~x(\xi)</math>, should be expressible in terms of trigonometric functions and powers of <math>~\xi</math>; indeed, it appears as though the expression governing this eigenfunction would simplify considerably if <math>~x \propto \sin\xi/\xi</math>.  With this in mind, we have made some attempts to ''guess'' the exact form of the eigenfunction.  Here is one such attempt.
It would seem that the eigenfunction, <math>x(\xi)</math>, should be expressible in terms of trigonometric functions and powers of <math>~\xi</math>; indeed, it appears as though the expression governing this eigenfunction would simplify considerably if <math>x \propto \sin\xi/\xi</math>.  With this in mind, we have made some attempts to ''guess'' the exact form of the eigenfunction.  Here is one such attempt.


===First Guess (n1)===
===First Guess (n1)===
Let's try,
Let's try,
<div align="center">
<div align="center">
<math>~x = \frac{\sin\xi}{\xi}  \, ,</math>
<math>x = \frac{\sin\xi}{\xi}  \, ,</math>
</div>
</div>
which means,
which means,
Line 406: Line 406:
<tr>
<tr>
   <td align="right">
   <td align="right">
<math>~x^' \equiv \frac{dx}{d\xi}</math>
<math>x^' \equiv \frac{dx}{d\xi}</math>
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="center">
   <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
<math>=</math>
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="left">
   <td align="left">
<math>
<math>
~\frac{\sin\xi}{\xi^2} \biggl[ \frac{\xi \cos\xi}{\sin\xi} - 1 \biggr]
\frac{\sin\xi}{\xi^2} \biggl[ \frac{\xi \cos\xi}{\sin\xi} - 1 \biggr]
\, .
\, .
</math>
</math>
Line 429: Line 429:
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="center">
   <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
<math>=</math>
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="left">
   <td align="left">
<math>
<math>
~- \biggl[ \frac{2\alpha}{\xi} \frac{d}{d\xi}\biggl( \frac{\sin\xi}{\xi} \biggr) + \sigma^2 \biggr]  \biggl( \frac{\xi}{\sin\xi}\biggr) x
- \biggl[ \frac{2\alpha}{\xi} \frac{d}{d\xi}\biggl( \frac{\sin\xi}{\xi} \biggr) + \sigma^2 \biggr]  \biggl( \frac{\xi}{\sin\xi}\biggr) x
= - \biggl[ \frac{2\alpha x^'}{\xi} + \sigma^2 \biggr] \, .
= - \biggl[ \frac{2\alpha x^'}{\xi} + \sigma^2 \biggr] \, .
</math>
</math>
Line 449: Line 449:
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="center">
   <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
<math>=</math>
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="left">
   <td align="left">
<math>~ \frac{x^'}{\xi}
<math>\frac{x^'}{\xi}
\biggl\{ \frac{\xi}{(\xi^2 \sin^2\xi)x^'} \cdot \frac{d[ (\xi^2 \sin^2\xi)x^']}{d\xi} \biggr\}
\biggl\{ \frac{\xi}{(\xi^2 \sin^2\xi)x^'} \cdot \frac{d[ (\xi^2 \sin^2\xi)x^']}{d\xi} \biggr\}
</math>
</math>
Line 463: Line 463:
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="center">
   <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
<math>=</math>
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="left">
   <td align="left">
<math>~ \frac{x^'}{\xi}
<math>\frac{x^'}{\xi}
\biggl[\frac{d\ln[ (\xi^2 \sin^2\xi)x^']}{d\ln\xi} \biggr] \, .
\biggl[\frac{d\ln[ (\xi^2 \sin^2\xi)x^']}{d\ln\xi} \biggr] \, .
</math>
</math>
Line 479: Line 479:
<tr>
<tr>
   <td align="right">
   <td align="right">
<math>~ \frac{x^'}{\xi}
<math>\frac{x^'}{\xi}
\biggl[\frac{d\ln[ (\xi^2 \sin^2\xi)x^']}{d\ln\xi} +2\alpha \biggr]  
\biggl[\frac{d\ln[ (\xi^2 \sin^2\xi)x^']}{d\ln\xi} +2\alpha \biggr]  
</math>
</math>
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="center">
   <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
<math>=</math>
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="left">
   <td align="left">
<math>
<math>
~-\sigma^2  
-\sigma^2  
</math>
</math>
   </td>
   </td>
Line 495: Line 495:
<tr>
<tr>
   <td align="right">
   <td align="right">
<math>~ \Rightarrow ~~~~~  
<math>\Rightarrow ~~~  
\biggl[\frac{d\ln[ (\xi^2 \sin^2\xi)x^']^{1/(2\alpha)}}{d\ln\xi} +1 \biggr]  
\biggl[\frac{d\ln[ (\xi^2 \sin^2\xi)x^']^{1/(2\alpha)}}{d\ln\xi} +1 \biggr]  
</math>
</math>
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="center">
   <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
<math>=</math>
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="left">
   <td align="left">
<math>
<math>
~- \frac{\sigma^2}{2\alpha }  \biggl( \frac{\xi}{x^'} \biggr)
- \frac{\sigma^2}{2\alpha }  \biggl( \frac{\xi}{x^'} \biggr)
</math>
</math>
   </td>
   </td>
Line 511: Line 511:
<tr>
<tr>
   <td align="right">
   <td align="right">
<math>~ \Rightarrow ~~~~~  
<math>\Rightarrow ~~~  
\frac{d\ln[ (\xi^2 \sin^2\xi)x^']^{-1/(2\alpha)}}{d\ln\xi}  
\frac{d\ln[ (\xi^2 \sin^2\xi)x^']^{-1/(2\alpha)}}{d\ln\xi}  
</math>
</math>
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="center">
   <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
<math>=</math>
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="left">
   <td align="left">
<math>
<math>
~1 + \frac{\sigma^2}{2\alpha }  \biggl( \frac{\xi}{x^'} \biggr) \, .
1 + \frac{\sigma^2}{2\alpha }  \biggl( \frac{\xi}{x^'} \biggr) \, .
</math>
</math>
   </td>
   </td>
Line 527: Line 527:
</div>
</div>
[<font color="red">Comment from J. E. Tohline on 6 April 2015:</font> I'm not sure what else to make of this.]
[<font color="red">Comment from J. E. Tohline on 6 April 2015:</font> I'm not sure what else to make of this.]


===Second Guess (n1)===
===Second Guess (n1)===
Line 854: Line 853:
<div align="center">
<div align="center">
<math>
<math>
~\sin\xi \biggl[ \xi^2 x^{''} + 2\xi x^' - 2\alpha x \biggr]
\sin\xi \biggl[ \xi^2 x^{''} + 2\xi x^' - 2\alpha x \biggr]
+ \cos\xi \biggl[ 2\xi^2 x^' + 2\alpha \xi x \biggr]
+ \cos\xi \biggl[ 2\xi^2 x^' + 2\alpha \xi x \biggr]
+\sigma^2 \xi^3 x = 0 \, .
+\sigma^2 \xi^3 x = 0 \, .
Line 861: Line 860:
Now, let's try:
Now, let's try:
<div align="center">
<div align="center">
<math>~x = a_0 + b_1 \xi \sin\xi + c_2 \xi^2 \cos\xi  \, ,</math>
<math>x = a_0 + b_1 \xi \sin\xi + c_2 \xi^2 \cos\xi  \, ,</math>
</div>
</div>
which means,
which means,
Line 868: Line 867:
<tr>
<tr>
   <td align="right">
   <td align="right">
<math>~x^' </math>
<math>x^' </math>
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="center">
   <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
<math>=</math>
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="left">
   <td align="left">
<math>
<math>
~b_1 \sin\xi + b_1 \xi \cos\xi + 2c_2 \xi \cos\xi - c_2\xi^2 \sin\xi  
b_1 \sin\xi + b_1 \xi \cos\xi + 2c_2 \xi \cos\xi - c_2\xi^2 \sin\xi  
</math>
</math>
   </td>
   </td>
Line 885: Line 884:
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="center">
   <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
<math>=</math>
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="left">
   <td align="left">
<math>
<math>
~(b_1 - c_2\xi^2 ) \sin\xi + (b_1  + 2c_2)\xi \cos\xi \, ,
(b_1 - c_2\xi^2 ) \sin\xi + (b_1  + 2c_2)\xi \cos\xi \, ,
</math>
</math>
   </td>
   </td>
Line 896: Line 895:
<tr>
<tr>
   <td align="right">
   <td align="right">
<math>~x^{''} </math>
<math>x^{''} </math>
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="center">
   <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
<math>=</math>
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="left">
   <td align="left">
<math>
<math>
~(- 2c_2\xi ) \sin\xi + (b_1 - c_2\xi^2 ) \cos\xi  
(- 2c_2\xi ) \sin\xi + (b_1 - c_2\xi^2 ) \cos\xi  
+ (b_1  + 2c_2 )\cos\xi - (b_1  + 2c_2 )\xi \sin\xi  
+ (b_1  + 2c_2 )\cos\xi - (b_1  + 2c_2 )\xi \sin\xi  
</math>
</math>
Line 914: Line 913:
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="center">
   <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
<math>=</math>
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="left">
   <td align="left">
<math>
<math>
~-(2c_2+b_1 + 2c_2 ) \xi \sin\xi + (2b_1 + 2c_2 - c_2\xi^2  ) \cos\xi  \, .
-(2c_2+b_1 + 2c_2 ) \xi \sin\xi + (2b_1 + 2c_2 - c_2\xi^2  ) \cos\xi  \, .
</math>
</math>
   </td>
   </td>
Line 934: Line 933:
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="center">
   <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
<math>=</math>
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="left">
   <td align="left">
<math>
<math>
~\sin\xi \biggl\{ \xi^2 \biggl[ -(2c_2+b_1 + 2c_2 ) \xi \sin\xi + (2b_1 + 2c_2 - c_2\xi^2  ) \cos\xi \biggr]  
\sin\xi \biggl\{ \xi^2 \biggl[ -(2c_2+b_1 + 2c_2 ) \xi \sin\xi + (2b_1 + 2c_2 - c_2\xi^2  ) \cos\xi \biggr]  
+ 2\xi \biggl[ (b_1 - c_2\xi^2 ) \sin\xi + (b_1  + 2c_2)\xi \cos\xi  \biggr]  
+ 2\xi \biggl[ (b_1 - c_2\xi^2 ) \sin\xi + (b_1  + 2c_2)\xi \cos\xi  \biggr]  
- 2\alpha \biggl[ a_0 + (b_1 \xi) \sin\xi + (c_2 \xi^2) \cos\xi  \biggr] \biggr\}
- 2\alpha \biggl[ a_0 + (b_1 \xi) \sin\xi + (c_2 \xi^2) \cos\xi  \biggr] \biggr\}
Line 966: Line 965:
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="center">
   <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
<math>=</math>
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="left">
   <td align="left">
<math>
<math>
~\sin\xi \biggl\{  \biggl[ -(2c_2+b_1 + 2c_2 ) \xi^3 \sin\xi + (2b_1 + 2c_2 - c_2\xi^2  ) \xi^2\cos\xi \biggr]  
\sin\xi \biggl\{  \biggl[ -(2c_2+b_1 + 2c_2 ) \xi^3 \sin\xi + (2b_1 + 2c_2 - c_2\xi^2  ) \xi^2\cos\xi \biggr]  
+ \biggl[ 2(b_1 - c_2\xi^2 )\xi \sin\xi + 2(b_1  + 2c_2)\xi^2 \cos\xi  \biggr]  
+ \biggl[ 2(b_1 - c_2\xi^2 )\xi \sin\xi + 2(b_1  + 2c_2)\xi^2 \cos\xi  \biggr]  
- 2\alpha \biggl[ a_0 + (b_1 \xi) \sin\xi + (c_2 \xi^2) \cos\xi  \biggr] \biggr\}
- 2\alpha \biggl[ a_0 + (b_1 \xi) \sin\xi + (c_2 \xi^2) \cos\xi  \biggr] \biggr\}
Line 998: Line 997:
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="center">
   <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
<math>=</math>
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="left">
   <td align="left">
<math>
<math>
~\sin\xi \biggl\{-  2\alpha a_0 +  \biggl[ -(2c_2+b_1 + 2c_2 ) \xi^3  + 2(b_1 - c_2\xi^2 )\xi  - 2\alpha (b_1 \xi) \biggr]\sin\xi  
\sin\xi \biggl\{-  2\alpha a_0 +  \biggl[ -(2c_2+b_1 + 2c_2 ) \xi^3  + 2(b_1 - c_2\xi^2 )\xi  - 2\alpha (b_1 \xi) \biggr]\sin\xi  
+ \biggl[ (2b_1 + 2c_2 - c_2\xi^2  ) \xi^2 + 2(b_1  + 2c_2)\xi^2  - 2\alpha (c_2 \xi^2) \biggr] \cos\xi  \biggr\}
+ \biggl[ (2b_1 + 2c_2 - c_2\xi^2  ) \xi^2 + 2(b_1  + 2c_2)\xi^2  - 2\alpha (c_2 \xi^2) \biggr] \cos\xi  \biggr\}
</math>
</math>
Line 1,029: Line 1,028:
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="center">
   <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
<math>=</math>
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="left">
   <td align="left">
<math>
<math>
~\sigma^2 a_0 \xi^3 +  \biggl[ -(2c_2+b_1 + 2c_2 ) \xi^3  + 2(b_1 - c_2\xi^2 )\xi  - 2\alpha (b_1 \xi) \biggr]\sin^2\xi  
\sigma^2 a_0 \xi^3 +  \biggl[ -(2c_2+b_1 + 2c_2 ) \xi^3  + 2(b_1 - c_2\xi^2 )\xi  - 2\alpha (b_1 \xi) \biggr]\sin^2\xi  
+ \biggl[ 2(b_1  + 2c_2)\xi^3  + 2c_2 \alpha \xi^3\biggr] \biggl(1-\sin^2\xi \biggr)
+ \biggl[ 2(b_1  + 2c_2)\xi^3  + 2c_2 \alpha \xi^3\biggr] \biggl(1-\sin^2\xi \biggr)
</math>
</math>
Line 1,073: Line 1,072:
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="center">
   <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
<math>=</math>
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="left">
   <td align="left">
<math>
<math>
~\biggl[ \sigma^2 a_0  +  2(b_1  + 2c_2)  + 2c_2 \alpha \biggr]\xi^3 +  \biggl\{+ 2(b_1 )\xi  - 2\alpha (b_1 \xi)  +[-2c_2  
\biggl[ \sigma^2 a_0  +  2(b_1  + 2c_2)  + 2c_2 \alpha \biggr]\xi^3 +  \biggl\{+ 2(b_1 )\xi  - 2\alpha (b_1 \xi)  +[-2c_2  
- 2(b_1  + 2c_2)  - 2c_2 \alpha  -(2c_2+b_1 + 2c_2 )] \xi^3  \biggr\} \sin^2\xi  
- 2(b_1  + 2c_2)  - 2c_2 \alpha  -(2c_2+b_1 + 2c_2 )] \xi^3  \biggr\} \sin^2\xi  
</math>
</math>
Line 1,106: Line 1,105:
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="left">
   <td align="left">
<math>~+
<math>+
\sin\xi \biggl[\sigma^2b_1 \xi^4 -  2\alpha a_0  \biggr] + \xi \cos\xi \biggl[\sigma^2 c_2 \xi^4 + 2a_0\alpha \biggr]  
\sin\xi \biggl[\sigma^2b_1 \xi^4 -  2\alpha a_0  \biggr] + \xi \cos\xi \biggl[\sigma^2 c_2 \xi^4 + 2a_0\alpha \biggr]  
</math>
</math>
Line 1,117: Line 1,116:
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="center">
   <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
<math>=</math>
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="left">
   <td align="left">
<math>
<math>
~[ \sigma^2 a_0  +  2(b_1  + 2c_2)  + 2c_2 \alpha ]\xi^3 +   
[ \sigma^2 a_0  +  2(b_1  + 2c_2)  + 2c_2 \alpha ]\xi^3 +   
\biggl\{2 b_1(1-\alpha) - [2c_2(5+\alpha) + 3b_1] \xi^2 \biggr\} \xi \sin^2\xi  
\biggl\{2 b_1(1-\alpha) - [2c_2(5+\alpha) + 3b_1] \xi^2 \biggr\} \xi \sin^2\xi  
</math>
</math>
Line 1,150: Line 1,149:
<tr>
<tr>
   <td align="right">
   <td align="right">
<math>~x</math>
<math>x</math>
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="center">
   <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
<math>=</math>
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="left">
   <td align="left">
<math>
<math>
~x_s \sin\xi + x_c \cos\xi + x_1 \sin^2\xi + x_2 \cos^2\xi + x_3 \sin\xi \cos\xi\, ,
x_s \sin\xi + x_c \cos\xi + x_1 \sin^2\xi + x_2 \cos^2\xi + x_3 \sin\xi \cos\xi\, ,
</math>
</math>
   </td>
   </td>
Line 1,164: Line 1,163:
</table>
</table>
</div>
</div>
where <math>~x_s, x_c, x_1, x_2,</math> and <math>~x_3</math> are five separate, as yet, unspecified (polynomial?) functions of <math>~\xi</math>.  This also means that,
where <math>x_s, x_c, x_1, x_2,</math> and <math>x_3</math> are five separate, as yet, unspecified (polynomial?) functions of <math>\xi</math>.  This also means that,
<div align="center">
<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="5">
<table border="0" cellpadding="5">
<tr>
<tr>
   <td align="right">
   <td align="right">
<math>~x^'</math>
<math>x^'</math>
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="center">
   <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
<math>=</math>
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="left">
   <td align="left">
<math>
<math>
~(x_s^' - x_c)\sin\xi + (x_c^' + x_s)\cos\xi + (x_1^' - x_3)\sin^2\xi + (x_2^' + x_3)\cos^2\xi + (x_3^' + 2x_1 -2x_2)\sin\xi \cos\xi \, ;
(x_s^' - x_c)\sin\xi + (x_c^' + x_s)\cos\xi + (x_1^' - x_3)\sin^2\xi + (x_2^' + x_3)\cos^2\xi + (x_3^' + 2x_1 -2x_2)\sin\xi \cos\xi \, ;
</math>
</math>
   </td>
   </td>
Line 1,188: Line 1,187:
<tr>
<tr>
   <td align="right">
   <td align="right">
<math>~x^{''}</math>
<math>x^{''}</math>
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="center">
   <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
<math>=</math>
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="left">
   <td align="left">
<math>
<math>
~(x_s^{''} - 2x_c^{'} - x_s)\sin\xi + (x_c^{''} + 2x_s^' -x_c)\cos\xi  
(x_s^{''} - 2x_c^{'} - x_s)\sin\xi + (x_c^{''} + 2x_s^' -x_c)\cos\xi  
+ (x_1^{''} -2x_3^' -2x_1 + 2x_2)\sin^2\xi + (x_2^{''} + 2x_3^'+ 2x_1 - 2x_2)\cos^2\xi  
+ (x_1^{''} -2x_3^' -2x_1 + 2x_2)\sin^2\xi + (x_2^{''} + 2x_3^'+ 2x_1 - 2x_2)\cos^2\xi  
+ (x_3^{''} + 4x_1^' -4x_2^' - 4x_3)\sin\xi \cos\xi \, .
+ (x_3^{''} + 4x_1^' -4x_2^' - 4x_3)\sin\xi \cos\xi \, .
Line 1,212: Line 1,211:
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="center">
   <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
<math>=</math>
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="left">
   <td align="left">
<math>
<math>
~~\sin\xi \biggl\{ \xi^2 \biggl[~(x_s^{''} - 2x_c^{'} - x_s)\sin\xi + (x_c^{''} + 2x_s^' -x_c)\cos\xi  
\sin\xi \biggl\{ \xi^2 \biggl[~(x_s^{''} - 2x_c^{'} - x_s)\sin\xi + (x_c^{''} + 2x_s^' -x_c)\cos\xi  
+ (x_1^{''} -2x_3^' -2x_1 + 2x_2)\sin^2\xi + (x_2^{''} + 2x_3^'+ 2x_1 - 2x_2)\cos^2\xi  
+ (x_1^{''} -2x_3^' -2x_1 + 2x_2)\sin^2\xi + (x_2^{''} + 2x_3^'+ 2x_1 - 2x_2)\cos^2\xi  
+ (x_3^{''} + 4x_1^' -4x_2^' - 4x_3)\sin\xi \cos\xi  \biggr]  
+ (x_3^{''} + 4x_1^' -4x_2^' - 4x_3)\sin\xi \cos\xi  \biggr]  
Line 1,298: Line 1,297:
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="center">
   <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
<math>=</math>
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="left">
   <td align="left">
<math>
<math>
~\biggl[(x_s^{''} - 2x_c^{'} - x_s)\xi^2 + 2\xi (x_s^' - x_c) -2\alpha x_s + \sigma^2 \xi^3 x_1  \biggr]\sin^2\xi  
\biggl[(x_s^{''} - 2x_c^{'} - x_s)\xi^2 + 2\xi (x_s^' - x_c) -2\alpha x_s + \sigma^2 \xi^3 x_1  \biggr]\sin^2\xi  
+ \biggl[(x_c^{''} + 2x_s^' -x_c)\xi^2 + 2\xi (x_c^' + x_s) - 2\alpha x_c + 2\xi^2 (x_s^' - x_c) + 2\alpha \xi x_s + \sigma^2 \xi^3 x_3 \biggr] \sin\xi \cos\xi  
+ \biggl[(x_c^{''} + 2x_s^' -x_c)\xi^2 + 2\xi (x_c^' + x_s) - 2\alpha x_c + 2\xi^2 (x_s^' - x_c) + 2\alpha \xi x_s + \sigma^2 \xi^3 x_3 \biggr] \sin\xi \cos\xi  
</math>
</math>
Line 1,357: Line 1,356:
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="center">
   <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
<math>=</math>
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="left">
   <td align="left">
<math>
<math>
~\biggl[(x_s^{''} - 2x_c^{'} - x_s)\xi^2 + 2\xi (x_s^' - x_c) -2\alpha x_s + \sigma^2 \xi^3 x_1  \biggr]\sin^2\xi  
\biggl[(x_s^{''} - 2x_c^{'} - x_s)\xi^2 + 2\xi (x_s^' - x_c) -2\alpha x_s + \sigma^2 \xi^3 x_1  \biggr]\sin^2\xi  
+ \biggl[(x_c^{''} + 2x_s^' -x_c)\xi^2 + 2\xi (x_c^' + x_s) - 2\alpha x_c + 2\xi^2 (x_s^' - x_c) + 2\alpha \xi x_s + \sigma^2 \xi^3 x_3 \biggr] \sin\xi \cos\xi  
+ \biggl[(x_c^{''} + 2x_s^' -x_c)\xi^2 + 2\xi (x_c^' + x_s) - 2\alpha x_c + 2\xi^2 (x_s^' - x_c) + 2\alpha \xi x_s + \sigma^2 \xi^3 x_3 \biggr] \sin\xi \cos\xi  
</math>
</math>
Line 1,434: Line 1,433:
<tr>
<tr>
   <td align="right">
   <td align="right">
<math>~\sin\xi </math>
<math>\sin\xi </math>
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="center">
   <td align="center">
Line 1,445: Line 1,444:
<tr>
<tr>
   <td align="right">
   <td align="right">
<math>~\sin^2 \xi</math>
<math>\sin^2 \xi</math>
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="center">
   <td align="center">
Line 1,451: Line 1,450:
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="left">
   <td align="left">
<math>~(x_s^{''} - 2x_c^{'} - x_s)\xi^2 + 2\xi (x_s^' - x_c) -2\alpha x_s + \sigma^2 \xi^3 x_1 =0</math>
<math>(x_s^{''} - 2x_c^{'} - x_s)\xi^2 + 2\xi (x_s^' - x_c) -2\alpha x_s + \sigma^2 \xi^3 x_1 =0</math>
   </td>
   </td>
</tr>
</tr>
Line 1,457: Line 1,456:
<tr>
<tr>
   <td align="right">
   <td align="right">
<math>~\sin^2\xi \cos\xi</math>
<math>\sin^2\xi \cos\xi</math>
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="center">
   <td align="center">
Line 1,463: Line 1,462:
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="left">
   <td align="left">
<math>~(x_3^{''} + 4x_1^' -4x_2^' - 4x_3)\xi^2 + 2\xi (x_3^' + 2x_1 -2x_2) - 2\alpha x_3 + 2\xi^2 (x_1^' - x_3) +  2\alpha \xi x_1   
<math>(x_3^{''} + 4x_1^' -4x_2^' - 4x_3)\xi^2 + 2\xi (x_3^' + 2x_1 -2x_2) - 2\alpha x_3 + 2\xi^2 (x_1^' - x_3) +  2\alpha \xi x_1   
-2\xi^2 (x_2^' + x_3) -  2\alpha \xi x_2  =0</math>
-2\xi^2 (x_2^' + x_3) -  2\alpha \xi x_2  =0</math>
   </td>
   </td>
Line 1,470: Line 1,469:
<tr>
<tr>
   <td align="right">
   <td align="right">
<math>~\sin\xi \cos\xi</math>
<math>\sin\xi \cos\xi</math>
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="center">
   <td align="center">
Line 1,476: Line 1,475:
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="left">
   <td align="left">
<math>~(x_c^{''} + 2x_s^' -x_c)\xi^2 + 2\xi (x_c^' + x_s) - 2\alpha x_c + 2\xi^2 (x_s^' - x_c) + 2\alpha \xi x_s + \sigma^2 \xi^3 x_3 =0</math>
<math>(x_c^{''} + 2x_s^' -x_c)\xi^2 + 2\xi (x_c^' + x_s) - 2\alpha x_c + 2\xi^2 (x_s^' - x_c) + 2\alpha \xi x_s + \sigma^2 \xi^3 x_3 =0</math>
   </td>
   </td>
</tr>
</tr>
Line 1,482: Line 1,481:
<tr>
<tr>
   <td align="right">
   <td align="right">
<math>~\sin\xi \cos^2\xi</math>
<math>\sin\xi \cos^2\xi</math>
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="center">
   <td align="center">
Line 1,488: Line 1,487:
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="left">
   <td align="left">
<math>~(x_2^{''} + 2x_3^'+ 2x_1 - 2x_2)\xi^2 + 2\xi (x_2^' + x_3) - 2\alpha x_2 + 2\xi^2 (x_3^' + 2x_1 -2x_2)+  2\alpha \xi  x_3  
<math>(x_2^{''} + 2x_3^'+ 2x_1 - 2x_2)\xi^2 + 2\xi (x_2^' + x_3) - 2\alpha x_2 + 2\xi^2 (x_3^' + 2x_1 -2x_2)+  2\alpha \xi  x_3  
- (x_1^{''} -2x_3^' -2x_1 + 2x_2)\xi^2 - 2\xi (x_1^' - x_3) + 2\alpha x_1 =0</math>
- (x_1^{''} -2x_3^' -2x_1 + 2x_2)\xi^2 - 2\xi (x_1^' - x_3) + 2\alpha x_1 =0</math>
   </td>
   </td>
Line 1,495: Line 1,494:
<tr>
<tr>
   <td align="right">
   <td align="right">
<math>~\cos^2\xi</math>
<math>\cos^2\xi</math>
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="center">
   <td align="center">
Line 1,501: Line 1,500:
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="left">
   <td align="left">
<math>~2\xi^2 (x_c^' + x_s ) +  2\alpha \xi x_c + \sigma^2 \xi^3 x_2 =0</math>
<math>2\xi^2 (x_c^' + x_s ) +  2\alpha \xi x_c + \sigma^2 \xi^3 x_2 =0</math>
   </td>
   </td>
</tr>
</tr>
Line 1,507: Line 1,506:
<tr>
<tr>
   <td align="right">
   <td align="right">
<math>~\cos\xi</math>
<math>\cos\xi</math>
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="center">
   <td align="center">
Line 1,513: Line 1,512:
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="left">
   <td align="left">
<math>~2\xi^2 (x_2^' + x_3)+  2\alpha \xi x_2 + \sigma^2 \xi^3 x_c =0</math>
<math>2\xi^2 (x_2^' + x_3)+  2\alpha \xi x_2 + \sigma^2 \xi^3 x_c =0</math>
   </td>
   </td>
</tr>
</tr>
Line 1,526: Line 1,525:
<tr>
<tr>
   <td align="right">
   <td align="right">
<math>~x_c</math>
<math>x_c</math>
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="center">
   <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
<math>=</math>
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="left">
   <td align="left">
<math>~\xi^\beta (A_c)</math>
<math>\xi^\beta (A_c)</math>
   </td>
   </td>
</tr>
</tr>
Line 1,538: Line 1,537:
<tr>
<tr>
   <td align="right">
   <td align="right">
<math>~x_2</math>
<math>x_2</math>
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="center">
   <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
<math>=</math>
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="left">
   <td align="left">
<math>~\xi^\beta (C_2 \xi^2)</math>
<math>\xi^\beta (C_2 \xi^2)</math>
   </td>
   </td>
</tr>
</tr>
Line 1,550: Line 1,549:
<tr>
<tr>
   <td align="right">
   <td align="right">
<math>~x_3</math>
<math>x_3</math>
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="center">
   <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
<math>=</math>
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="left">
   <td align="left">
<math>~\xi^\beta (B_3 \xi)</math>
<math>\xi^\beta (B_3 \xi)</math>
   </td>
   </td>
</tr>
</tr>
Line 1,562: Line 1,561:
<tr>
<tr>
   <td align="right">
   <td align="right">
<math>~\Rightarrow~</math> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Coefficient of "<math>~\cos\xi</math>" term
<math>\Rightarrow~</math> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Coefficient of "<math>~\cos\xi</math>" term
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="center">
   <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
<math>=</math>
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="left">
   <td align="left">
<math>~\xi^\beta [2\xi^2 (2C_2\xi + (B_3 \xi))+  2\alpha \xi (C_2 \xi^2) + \sigma^2 \xi^3 (A_c)]</math>
<math>\xi^\beta [2\xi^2 (2C_2\xi + (B_3 \xi))+  2\alpha \xi (C_2 \xi^2) + \sigma^2 \xi^3 (A_c)]</math>
   </td>
   </td>
</tr>
</tr>
Line 1,577: Line 1,576:
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="center">
   <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
<math>=</math>
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="left">
   <td align="left">
<math>~\xi^{\beta+3} [2(2C_2 + B_3 )+  2\alpha C_2  + \sigma^2 (A_c)]</math>
<math>\xi^{\beta+3} [2(2C_2 + B_3 )+  2\alpha C_2  + \sigma^2 (A_c)]</math>
   </td>
   </td>
</tr>
</tr>
Line 1,586: Line 1,585:
<tr>
<tr>
   <td align="right">
   <td align="right">
<math>~\Rightarrow ~~~~ \sigma^2</math>
<math>\Rightarrow ~~~~ \sigma^2</math>
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="center">
   <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
<math>=</math>
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="left">
   <td align="left">
<math>~- \frac{2}{A_c} \biggl[B_3 +  (2+\alpha) C_2 \biggr]</math>
<math>- \frac{2}{A_c} \biggl[B_3 +  (2+\alpha) C_2 \biggr]</math>
   </td>
   </td>
</tr>
</tr>
</table>
</table>
</div>
</div>


===Sixth Guess (n1)===
===Sixth Guess (n1)===
Line 1,959: Line 1,957:


====Graphical Reassessment====
====Graphical Reassessment====
[[Image:TrialN1Eigenfunction.png|border|300px|right]]Before plowing ahead and plugging these expressions into the polytropic wave equation, I plotted the trial eigenfunction, <math>~\epsilon(\xi/\pi)</math> (see the blue curve in the accompanying "Trial Eigenfunction" figure), and noticed that it passes through <math>~\pm \infty</math> midway through the configuration.  This is a very unphysical behavior.  On the other hand, the inverse of this function (see the red curve) exhibits a relatively desirable behavior because it increases monotonically from negative one at the center.  As plotted, however, the function has one node.  In searching for the eigenfunction of the fundamental mode of oscillation, it might be better to add "1" to the inverse of the function and thereby get rid of all nodes.  (Keep in mind, however, that the red curve might be displaying the eigenfunction associated with the first overtone.)
[[Image:TrialN1Eigenfunction.png|border|300px|right]]Before plowing ahead and plugging these expressions into the polytropic wave equation, I plotted the trial eigenfunction, <math>\epsilon(\xi/\pi)</math> (see the blue curve in the accompanying "Trial Eigenfunction" figure), and noticed that it passes through <math>\pm \infty</math> midway through the configuration.  This is a very unphysical behavior.  On the other hand, the inverse of this function (see the red curve) exhibits a relatively desirable behavior because it increases monotonically from negative one at the center.  As plotted, however, the function has one node.  In searching for the eigenfunction of the fundamental mode of oscillation, it might be better to add "1" to the inverse of the function and thereby get rid of all nodes.  (Keep in mind, however, that the red curve might be displaying the eigenfunction associated with the first overtone.)


Let's therefore try,
Let's therefore try,
<div align="center">
<div align="center">
<math>~x = 1 + \frac{1}{\epsilon} = 1 - \frac{1}{2} \biggl[\xi \cdot \frac{\cos\xi}{\sin\xi} + 1 \biggr]
<math>x = 1 + \frac{1}{\epsilon} = 1 - \frac{1}{2} \biggl[\xi \cdot \frac{\cos\xi}{\sin\xi} + 1 \biggr]
= \frac{1}{2} \biggl[1- \xi \cdot \frac{\cos\xi}{\sin\xi} \biggr] \, .</math>
= \frac{1}{2} \biggl[1- \xi \cdot \frac{\cos\xi}{\sin\xi} \biggr] \, .</math>
</div>
</div>
Line 1,973: Line 1,971:
<tr>
<tr>
   <td align="right">
   <td align="right">
<math>~x^'</math>
<math>x^'</math>
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="center">
   <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
<math>=</math>
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="left">
   <td align="left">
<math>~
<math>
\frac{1}{2}\biggl[\xi - \frac{\cos\xi}{\sin\xi} + \xi \cdot \frac{\cos^2\xi}{\sin^2\xi} \biggr]
\frac{1}{2}\biggl[\xi - \frac{\cos\xi}{\sin\xi} + \xi \cdot \frac{\cos^2\xi}{\sin^2\xi} \biggr]
</math>
</math>
Line 1,990: Line 1,988:
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="center">
   <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
<math>=</math>
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="left">
   <td align="left">
Line 2,004: Line 2,002:
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="center">
   <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
<math>=</math>
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="left">
   <td align="left">
Line 2,021: Line 2,019:
<tr>
<tr>
   <td align="right">
   <td align="right">
<math>~x^{''}</math>
<math>x^{''}</math>
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="center">
   <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
<math>=</math>
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="left">
   <td align="left">
Line 2,038: Line 2,036:
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="center">
   <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
<math>=</math>
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="left">
   <td align="left">
<math>~
<math>
1 - \frac{\cos\xi}{\sin^3\xi}\biggl[\xi - \sin\xi \cos\xi \biggr] \, .
1 - \frac{\cos\xi}{\sin^3\xi}\biggl[\xi - \sin\xi \cos\xi \biggr] \, .
</math>
</math>
Line 2,056: Line 2,054:
<tr>
<tr>
   <td align="right">
   <td align="right">
<math>~-\sigma^2 \xi^3 x</math>
<math>-\sigma^2 \xi^3 x</math>
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="center">
   <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
<math>=</math>
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="left">
   <td align="left">
<math>~
<math>
\sin\xi \biggl[ \xi^2 x^{''} + 2\xi x^' - 2\alpha x \biggr]
\sin\xi \biggl[ \xi^2 x^{''} + 2\xi x^' - 2\alpha x \biggr]
+ \cos\xi \biggl[ 2\xi^2 x^' + 2\alpha \xi x \biggr] \, .
+ \cos\xi \biggl[ 2\xi^2 x^' + 2\alpha \xi x \biggr] \, .
Line 2,078: Line 2,076:
<tr>
<tr>
   <td align="right">
   <td align="right">
<math>~\xi^2 x^{''} + 2\xi x^' - 2\alpha x </math>
<math>\xi^2 x^{''} + 2\xi x^' - 2\alpha x </math>
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="center">
   <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
<math>=</math>
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="left">
   <td align="left">
<math>~
<math>
\xi^2 - \frac{\cos\xi}{\sin^3\xi}\biggl(\xi^3 - \xi^2\sin\xi \cos\xi \biggr)  
\xi^2 - \frac{\cos\xi}{\sin^3\xi}\biggl(\xi^3 - \xi^2\sin\xi \cos\xi \biggr)  
+ \frac{1}{\sin^2\xi}\biggl(\xi^2 - \xi \sin\xi \cos\xi \biggr)  
+ \frac{1}{\sin^2\xi}\biggl(\xi^2 - \xi \sin\xi \cos\xi \biggr)  
Line 2,097: Line 2,095:
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="center">
   <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
<math>=</math>
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="left">
   <td align="left">
<math>~ \frac{1}{\sin^3\xi} \biggl[
<math>\frac{1}{\sin^3\xi} \biggl[
\xi^2 \sin^3\xi - \cos\xi (\xi^3 - \xi^2\sin\xi \cos\xi )  
\xi^2 \sin^3\xi - \cos\xi (\xi^3 - \xi^2\sin\xi \cos\xi )  
+ \sin\xi (\xi^2 - \xi \sin\xi \cos\xi )  
+ \sin\xi (\xi^2 - \xi \sin\xi \cos\xi )  
Line 2,114: Line 2,112:
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="center">
   <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
<math>=</math>
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="left">
   <td align="left">
<math>~ \frac{1}{\sin^3\xi} \biggl[
<math>\frac{1}{\sin^3\xi} \biggl[
\xi^2 \sin\xi (1-\cos^2\xi) + \xi^2\sin\xi \cos^2\xi - \xi^3 \cos\xi  
\xi^2 \sin\xi (1-\cos^2\xi) + \xi^2\sin\xi \cos^2\xi - \xi^3 \cos\xi  
+ \xi^2\sin\xi - \xi \sin^2\xi \cos\xi  
+ \xi^2\sin\xi - \xi \sin^2\xi \cos\xi  
Line 2,131: Line 2,129:
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="center">
   <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
<math>=</math>
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="left">
   <td align="left">
<math>~ - \alpha + \frac{1}{\sin^3\xi} \biggl[
<math>- \alpha + \frac{1}{\sin^3\xi} \biggl[
2\xi^2 \sin\xi  - \xi^3 \cos\xi - \xi \sin^2\xi \cos\xi + \alpha \xi \cos\xi \sin^2\xi  
2\xi^2 \sin\xi  - \xi^3 \cos\xi - \xi \sin^2\xi \cos\xi + \alpha \xi \cos\xi \sin^2\xi  
\biggr] \, ;
\biggr] \, ;
Line 2,149: Line 2,147:
<tr>
<tr>
   <td align="right">
   <td align="right">
<math>~2\xi^2 x^' + 2\alpha \xi x </math>
<math>2\xi^2 x^' + 2\alpha \xi x </math>
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="center">
   <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
<math>=</math>
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="left">
   <td align="left">
Line 2,173: Line 2,171:
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="center">
   <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
<math>=</math>
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="left">
   <td align="left">
Line 2,190: Line 2,188:
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="center">
   <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
<math>=</math>
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="left">
   <td align="left">
Line 2,206: Line 2,204:
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="center">
   <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
<math>=</math>
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="left">
   <td align="left">
Line 2,221: Line 2,219:
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="center">
   <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
<math>=</math>
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="left">
   <td align="left">
Line 2,241: Line 2,239:
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="center">
   <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
<math>=</math>
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="left">
   <td align="left">
<math>
<math>
~-\frac{\xi \sigma^2}{2} \biggl( \frac{ \xi^2 }{\sin\xi} \biggr) \biggl[\sin\xi - \xi \cos\xi \biggr] \, .
-\frac{\xi \sigma^2}{2} \biggl( \frac{ \xi^2 }{\sin\xi} \biggr) \biggl[\sin\xi - \xi \cos\xi \biggr] \, .
</math>
</math>
   </td>
   </td>
Line 2,260: Line 2,258:
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="center">
   <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
<math>=</math>
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="left">
   <td align="left">
<math>
<math>
1+\sin^2\xi  - \biggl(\frac{\sin\xi}{\xi}\biggr) \cos\xi  - \alpha \biggl( \frac{\sin^2\xi}{\xi^2} +\cos^2\xi \biggr)   
1+\sin^2\xi  - \biggl(\frac{\sin\xi}{\xi}\biggr) \cos\xi  - \alpha \biggl( \frac{\sin^2\xi}{\xi^2} +\cos^2\xi \biggr)   
+ \frac{\xi \sigma^2}{2} \biggl[\sin\xi - \xi \cos\xi \biggr] \, .
+ \frac{\xi \sigma^2}{2} \biggl[\sin\xi - \xi \cos\xi \biggr] \, .
Line 7,413: Line 7,410:


=See Also=
=See Also=


* Radial Oscillations of [[SSC/Stability/UniformDensity#The_Stability_of_Uniform-Density_Spheres|Uniform-density sphere]]
* Radial Oscillations of [[SSC/Stability/UniformDensity#The_Stability_of_Uniform-Density_Spheres|Uniform-density sphere]]
Line 7,424: Line 7,420:
* In an accompanying [[Appendix/Ramblings/SphericalWaveEquation#Playing_With_Spherical_Wave_Equation|Chapter within our "Ramblings" Appendix]], we have played with the adiabatic wave equation for polytropes, examining its form when the primary perturbation variable is an enthalpy-like quantity, rather than the radial displacement of a spherical mass shell.  This was done in an effort to mimic the approach that has been taken in studies of the [[Apps/ImamuraHadleyCollaboration#Papaloizou-Pringle_Tori|stability of Papaloizou-Pringle tori]].
* In an accompanying [[Appendix/Ramblings/SphericalWaveEquation#Playing_With_Spherical_Wave_Equation|Chapter within our "Ramblings" Appendix]], we have played with the adiabatic wave equation for polytropes, examining its form when the primary perturbation variable is an enthalpy-like quantity, rather than the radial displacement of a spherical mass shell.  This was done in an effort to mimic the approach that has been taken in studies of the [[Apps/ImamuraHadleyCollaboration#Papaloizou-Pringle_Tori|stability of Papaloizou-Pringle tori]].


* <math>~n=3</math> &hellip;  
* <math>n=3</math> &hellip;  
** {{ Eddington18full }}, ''On the Pulsations of a Gaseous Star and the Problem of the Cepheid Variables. &nbsp; Part I.''
** {{ Eddington18full }}, ''On the Pulsations of a Gaseous Star and the Problem of the Cepheid Variables. &nbsp; Part I.''
** {{ Schwarzschild41full }}, ''Overtone Pulsations of the Standard Model'':  This work is referenced in &sect;38.3 of [<b>[[Appendix/References#KW94|<font color="red">KW94</font>]]</b>].  It contains an analysis of the radial modes of oscillation of <math>~n=3</math> polytropes, assuming various values of the adiabatic exponent.
** {{ Schwarzschild41full }}, ''Overtone Pulsations of the Standard Model'':  This work is referenced in &sect;38.3 of [<b>[[Appendix/References#KW94|<font color="red">KW94</font>]]</b>].  It contains an analysis of the radial modes of oscillation of <math>~n=3</math> polytropes, assuming various values of the adiabatic exponent.


* <math>~n=2</math> &hellip;  
* <math>n=2</math> &hellip;  
** {{ Miller29full }}, ''The Effect of Distribution of Density on the Period of Pulsation of a Star''
** {{ Miller29full }}, ''The Effect of Distribution of Density on the Period of Pulsation of a Star''
** [http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1961MNRAS.122..409P C. Prasad &amp; H. S. Gurm (1961, MNRAS, 122, 409)], ''Radial Pulsations of the Polytrope, n = 2''
** {{ PG61full }}, ''Radial Pulsations of the Polytrope, n = 2''


* <math>~n=\tfrac{3}{2}</math> &hellip;  D. Lucas (1953, Bul. Soc. Roy. Sci. Liege, 25, 585) &hellip; Citation obtained from the Prasad &amp; Gurm (1961) article.
* <math>n=\tfrac{3}{2}</math> &hellip;  D. Lucas (1953, Bul. Soc. Roy. Sci. Liege, 25, 585) &hellip; Citation obtained from the Prasad &amp; Gurm (1961) article.


* <math>~n=1</math> &hellip;  Citation also appears at the beginning of this chapter, and in the Prasad &amp; Gurm (1961) article.
* <math>n=1</math> &hellip;  Citation also appears at the beginning of this chapter, and in the Prasad &amp; Gurm (1961) article.
** {{ Chatterji51full }}, ''Radial Oscillations of a Gaseous Star of Polytropic Index I''  
** {{ Chatterji51full }}, ''Radial Oscillations of a Gaseous Star of Polytropic Index I''  
** {{ Chatterji52full }}, ''Anharmonic Pulsations of a Polytropic Model of Index Unity''
** {{ Chatterji52full }}, ''Anharmonic Pulsations of a Polytropic Model of Index Unity''

Latest revision as of 18:41, 25 May 2022

Radial Oscillations of n = 1 Polytropic Spheres

As far as we have been able to ascertain, the first technical examination of radial oscillation modes in n=1 polytropes was performed — using numerical techniques — in 1951 by L. D. Chatterji; at the time, he was in the Mathematics Department of Allahabad University. His two papers on this topic were published in, what is now referred to as, the Proceedings of the Indian National Science Academy (PINSA). The citations that immediately follow this opening paragraph provide inks to both of these papers by Chatterji, but the links may be insecure. (Citations/links to articles that provide analyses of models having other polytropic indexes are provided at the bottom of this chapter.) Apparently Springer is archiving recent PINSA volumes, but their holdings do not date back as early as 1951.

Groundwork

In an accompanying discussion, we derived the so-called,

Adiabatic Wave (or Radial Pulsation) Equation

d2xdr02+[4r0(g0ρ0P0)]dxdr0+(ρ0γgP0)[ω2+(43γg)g0r0]x=0

whose solution gives eigenfunctions that describe various radial modes of oscillation in spherically symmetric, self-gravitating fluid configurations. Because this widely used form of the radial pulsation equation is not dimensionless but, rather, has units of inverse length-squared, we have found it useful to also recast it in the following dimensionless form:

d2xdχ02+[4χ0(ρ0ρc)(P0Pc)1(g0gSSC)]dxdχ0+(ρ0ρc)(P0Pc)1(1γg)[τSSC2ω2+(43γg)(g0gSSC)1χ0]x=0,

where,

gSSCPcRρc,       and       τSSC[R2ρcPc]1/2.

In a separate discussion, we showed that specifically for isolated, polytropic configurations, this linear adiabatic wave equation (LAWE) can be rewritten as,

0

=

d2xdξ2+[4(n+1)V(ξ)ξ]dxdξ+[ω2γgθ(n+14πGρc)(34γg)(n+1)V(x)ξ2]x

 

=

d2xdξ2+[4ξ(n+1)θ(dθdξ)]dxdξ+(n+1)θ[σc26γgαξ(dθdξ)]x,

where we have adopted the dimensionless frequency notation,

σc2

3ω22πGρc.

Here we focus on an analysis of the specific case of isolated, n=1 polytropic configurations, whose unperturbed equilibrium structure can be prescribed in terms of analytic functions. Our hope — as yet unfulfilled — is that we can discover an analytically prescribed eigenvector solution to the governing LAWE.

Search for Analytic Solutions to the LAWE

Setup

From our derived structure of an n = 1 polytrope, in terms of the configuration's radius R and mass M, the central pressure and density are, respectively,

Pc=πG8(M2R4) ,

and

ρc=πM4R3 .

Hence the characteristic time and acceleration are, respectively,

τSSC=[R2ρcPc]1/2=[2R3GM]1/2=[π2Gρc]1/2,

and,

gSSC=PcRρc=(GM2R2).

The required functions are,

  • Density:

ρ0(χ0)ρc=sin(πχ0)πχ0 ;

  • Pressure:

P0(χ0)Pc=[sin(πχ0)πχ0]2 ;

  • Gravitational acceleration:

g0(r0)gSSC=2χ02[Mr(χ0)M]=2πχ02[sin(πχ0)πχ0cos(πχ0)].

So our desired Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors will be solutions to the following ODE:

d2xdχ02+2χ0[1+πχ0cot(πχ0)]dxdχ0+1γg{πχ0sin(πχ0)[πω22Gρc]+2χ02(43γg)[1πχ0cot(πχ0)]}x=0,


or, replacing χ0 with ξπχ0 and dividing the entire expression by π2, we have,

d2xdξ2+2ξ[1+ξcotξ]dxdξ+1γg{ξsinξ[ω22πGρc]+2ξ2(43γg)[1ξcotξ]}x=0.


This is identical to the formulation of the wave equation that is relevant to the (n = 1) core of the composite polytrope studied by J. O. Murphy & R. Fiedler (1985b); for comparison, their expression is displayed, here, in the following boxed-in image.

n = 1 Polytropic Formulation of Wave Equation as Presented by Murphy & Fiedler (1985b)

Murphy & Fiedler (1985b)
Murphy & Fiedler (1985b)

Material that appears after this point in our presentation is under development and therefore
may contain incorrect mathematical equations and/or physical misinterpretations.
|   Go Home   |


 

From an accompanying discussion, we find the,

Polytropic LAWE (linear adiabatic wave equation)

0=d2xdξ2+[4(n+1)Q]1ξdxdξ+(n+1)[(σc26γg)ξ2θαQ]xξ2

where:    Q(ξ)dlnθdlnξ,    σc23ω22πGρc,     and,     α(34γg)

For an isolated n = 1 (γg=2,α=1) polytrope, we know that,

θ

=

sinξξ

    Q(ξ)dlnθdlnξ

=

[1ξcotξ].

Hence, the relevant LAWE is,

0

=

d2xdξ2+[42(1ξcotξ)]1ξdxdξ+2[(σc212)ξ3sinξ(1ξcotξ)]xξ2

LAWE for n = 1 Polytrope

0

=

d2xdξ2+2ξ[1+ξcotξ]dxdξ+12[(σc23)ξsinξ4ξ2(1ξcotξ)]x

This matches precisely the expression derived immediately above.

Surface boundary condition:

dlnxdlnξ|surf

=

(3nn+1)+nσc26(n+1)[ξθ]surf

dlnxdlnξ|surf

=

1+σc212[ξ3(ξcosξsinξ)]ξ=π=1π2σc212

Attempt at Deriving an Analytic Eigenvector Solution

Multiplying the last expression through by ξ2sinξ gives,

(ξ2sinξ)d2xdξ2+2[ξsinξ+ξ2cosξ]dxdξ+[σ2ξ32α(sinξξcosξ)]x=0,


where,

σ2

ω22πGρcγg,

α

34γg.

The first two terms can be folded together to give,

1ξ2sin2ξddξ[ξ2sin2ξdxdξ]

=

1ξ2sinξ[2α(sinξξcosξ)σ2ξ3]x

 

=

[2αξ2(ξcosξsinξ1)+σ2(ξsinξ)]x

 

=

[2αξ2ξ2sinξddξ(sinξξ)+σ2(ξsinξ)]x

 

=

[2αξddξ(sinξξ)+σ2](ξsinξ)x,

where, in order to make this next-to-last step, we have recognized that,

ddξ(sinξξ)

=

sinξξ2[ξcosξsinξ1].

It would seem that the eigenfunction, x(ξ), should be expressible in terms of trigonometric functions and powers of ξ; indeed, it appears as though the expression governing this eigenfunction would simplify considerably if xsinξ/ξ. With this in mind, we have made some attempts to guess the exact form of the eigenfunction. Here is one such attempt.

First Guess (n1)

Let's try,

x=sinξξ,

which means,

x'dxdξ

=

sinξξ2[ξcosξsinξ1].

Does this satisfy the governing expression? Let's see. The right-and-side (RHS) gives:

RHS

=

[2αξddξ(sinξξ)+σ2](ξsinξ)x=[2αx'ξ+σ2].

At the same time, the left-hand-side (LHS) may, quite generically, be written as:

LHS

=

x'ξ{ξ(ξ2sin2ξ)x'd[(ξ2sin2ξ)x']dξ}

 

=

x'ξ[dln[(ξ2sin2ξ)x']dlnξ].

Putting the two sides together therefore gives,

x'ξ[dln[(ξ2sin2ξ)x']dlnξ+2α]

=

σ2

[dln[(ξ2sin2ξ)x']1/(2α)dlnξ+1]

=

σ22α(ξx')

dln[(ξ2sin2ξ)x']1/(2α)dlnξ

=

1+σ22α(ξx').

[Comment from J. E. Tohline on 6 April 2015: I'm not sure what else to make of this.]

Second Guess (n1)

Adopting the generic rewriting of the LHS, and leaving the RHS fully generic as well, we have,

x'ξ[dln[(ξ2sin2ξ)x']dlnξ]

=

[2αξddξ(sinξξ)+σ2](ξsinξ)x

x'x[dln[(ξ2sin2ξ)x']dlnξ]

=

2α(ξsinξ)ddξ(sinξξ)σ2(ξ2sinξ)

dln(x)dlnξ[dln[(ξ2sin2ξ)x']dlnξ]

=

2α[dln(sinξ/ξ)dlnξ]σ2(ξ3sinξ).

σ2

=

(sinξξ3){dln(x)dlnξ[dln[(ξ2sin2ξ)x']dlnξ]+2α[dln(sinξ/ξ)dlnξ]}.

[Comment from J. E. Tohline on 6 April 2015: I'm not sure what else to make of this.]


Third Guess (n1)

Let's rewrite the polytropic (n = 1) wave equation as follows:

sinξ[ξ2x'+2ξx'2αx]+cosξ[2ξ2x'+2αξx]+σ2ξ3x=0.

It is difficult to determine what term in the adiabatic wave equation will cancel the term involving σ2 because its leading coefficient is ξ3 and no other term contains a power of ξ that is higher than two. After thinking through various trial eigenvector expressions, x(ξ), I have determined that a function of the following form has a chance of working because the second derivative of the function generates a leading factor of ξ3 while the function itself does not introduce any additional factors of ξ into the term that contains σ2:

x

=

[asin2(ξ5/2)+bsin(ξ5/2)cos(ξ5/2)+ccos2(ξ5/2)][Asinξ+Bcosξ]

x'

=

[asin2(ξ5/2)+bsin(ξ5/2)cos(ξ5/2)+ccos2(ξ5/2)]d[Asinξ+Bcosξ]dξ

 

 

+d[asin2(ξ5/2)+bsin(ξ5/2)cos(ξ5/2)+ccos2(ξ5/2)]dξ[Asinξ+Bcosξ]

 

=

[asin2(ξ5/2)+bsin(ξ5/2)cos(ξ5/2)+ccos2(ξ5/2)]d[Asinξ+Bcosξ]dξ

 

 

+[Asinξ+Bcosξ]{5aξ3/2sin(ξ5/2)cos(ξ5/2)+b[52ξ3/2cos2(ξ5/2)52ξ3/2sin2(ξ5/2)]5cξ3/2sin(ξ5/2)cos(ξ5/2)}

 

=

[asin2(ξ5/2)+bsin(ξ5/2)cos(ξ5/2)+ccos2(ξ5/2)]d[Asinξ+Bcosξ]dξ

 

 

+[Asinξ+Bcosξ]{5(ac)ξ3/2sin(ξ5/2)cos(ξ5/2)+5b2ξ3/2[12sin2(ξ5/2)]}

x'

=

[asin2(ξ5/2)+bsin(ξ5/2)cos(ξ5/2)+ccos2(ξ5/2)]d2[Asinξ+Bcosξ]d2ξ

 

 

+{5(ac)ξ3/2sin(ξ5/2)cos(ξ5/2)+5b2ξ3/2[12sin2(ξ5/2)]}d[Asinξ+Bcosξ]dξ

 

 

+[Asinξ+Bcosξ]{152(ac)ξ1/2sin(ξ5/2)cos(ξ5/2)+252(ac)ξ3cos2(ξ5/2)252(ac)ξ3sin2(ξ5/2)

 

 

+15b4ξ1/2[12sin2(ξ5/2)]25bξ3sin(ξ5/2)cos(ξ5/2)}

 

=

[asin2(ξ5/2)+bsin(ξ5/2)cos(ξ5/2)+ccos2(ξ5/2)]d2[Asinξ+Bcosξ]d2ξ

 

 

+{5(ac)ξ3/2sin(ξ5/2)cos(ξ5/2)+5b2ξ3/2[12sin2(ξ5/2)]}d[Asinξ+Bcosξ]dξ

 

 

+[Asinξ+Bcosξ]{154ξ1/2[2(ac)sin(ξ5/2)cos(ξ5/2)+b(12sin2(ξ5/2))]

 

 

+252ξ3[2bsin(ξ5/2)cos(ξ5/2)+(ac)(12sin2(ξ5/2))]}

[Comment from J. E. Tohline on 9 April 2015: I'm not sure what else to make of this.]

[Additional comment from J. E. Tohline on 15 April 2015: It is perhaps worth mentioning that there is a similarity between the argument of the trigonometric function being used in this "third guess" and the Lane-Emden function derived by Srivastava for n=5 polytropes; and also a similarity between Srivastava's function and the functional form of the LHS that we constructed, above, in connection with our "second guess."]

Fourth Guess (n1)

Again, working with the polytropic (n = 1) wave equation written in the following form,

sinξ[ξ2x'+2ξx'2αx]+cosξ[2ξ2x'+2αξx]+σ2ξ3x=0.

Now, let's try:

x=a0+b1ξsinξ+c2ξ2cosξ,

which means,

x'

=

b1sinξ+b1ξcosξ+2c2ξcosξc2ξ2sinξ

 

=

(b1c2ξ2)sinξ+(b1+2c2)ξcosξ,

x'

=

(2c2ξ)sinξ+(b1c2ξ2)cosξ+(b1+2c2)cosξ(b1+2c2)ξsinξ

 

=

(2c2+b1+2c2)ξsinξ+(2b1+2c2c2ξ2)cosξ.

The LHS of the wave equation then becomes,

LHS

=

sinξ{ξ2[(2c2+b1+2c2)ξsinξ+(2b1+2c2c2ξ2)cosξ]+2ξ[(b1c2ξ2)sinξ+(b1+2c2)ξcosξ]2α[a0+(b1ξ)sinξ+(c2ξ2)cosξ]}

 

 

+cosξ{2ξ2[(b1c2ξ2)sinξ+(b1+2c2)ξcosξ]+2αξ[a0+(b1ξ)sinξ+(c2ξ2)cosξ]}+σ2ξ3[a0+b1ξsinξ+c2ξ2cosξ]

 

=

sinξ{[(2c2+b1+2c2)ξ3sinξ+(2b1+2c2c2ξ2)ξ2cosξ]+[2(b1c2ξ2)ξsinξ+2(b1+2c2)ξ2cosξ]2α[a0+(b1ξ)sinξ+(c2ξ2)cosξ]}

 

 

+cosξ{[2(b1c2ξ2)ξ2sinξ+2(b1+2c2)ξ3cosξ]+[2a0αξ+2b1αξ2sinξ+2c2αξ3cosξ]}+σ2[a0ξ3+b1ξ4sinξ+c2ξ5cosξ]

 

=

sinξ{2αa0+[(2c2+b1+2c2)ξ3+2(b1c2ξ2)ξ2α(b1ξ)]sinξ+[(2b1+2c2c2ξ2)ξ2+2(b1+2c2)ξ22α(c2ξ2)]cosξ}

 

 

+cosξ{+2a0αξ+[2(b1c2ξ2)ξ2+2b1αξ2]sinξ+[2(b1+2c2)ξ3+2c2αξ3]cosξ}+σ2[a0ξ3+b1ξ4sinξ+c2ξ5cosξ]

 

=

σ2a0ξ3+[(2c2+b1+2c2)ξ3+2(b1c2ξ2)ξ2α(b1ξ)]sin2ξ+[2(b1+2c2)ξ3+2c2αξ3](1sin2ξ)

 

 

+[(2b1+2c2c2ξ2)ξ2+2(b1+2c2)ξ22α(c2ξ2)]sinξcosξ+[2(b1c2ξ2)ξ2+2b1αξ2]sinξcosξ

 

 

+σ2[b1ξ4sinξ+c2ξ5cosξ]+2a0αξcosξ2αa0sinξ

 

=

[σ2a0+2(b1+2c2)+2c2α]ξ3+{+2(b1)ξ2α(b1ξ)+[2c22(b1+2c2)2c2α(2c2+b1+2c2)]ξ3}sin2ξ

 

 

+{[(2b1+2c2)+2(b1+2c2)2α(c2)+2(b1)+2b1α]ξ23c2ξ4}sinξcosξ

 

 

+sinξ[σ2b1ξ42αa0]+ξcosξ[σ2c2ξ4+2a0α]

 

=

[σ2a0+2(b1+2c2)+2c2α]ξ3+{2b1(1α)[2c2(5+α)+3b1]ξ2}ξsin2ξ

 

 

+{2(3α)(b1+c2)3c2ξ2}ξ2sinξcosξ+sinξ[σ2b1ξ42αa0]+ξcosξ[σ2c2ξ4+2a0α].

Fifth Guess (n1)

Along a similar line of reasoning, let's try a function of the form,

x

=

xssinξ+xccosξ+x1sin2ξ+x2cos2ξ+x3sinξcosξ,

where xs,xc,x1,x2, and x3 are five separate, as yet, unspecified (polynomial?) functions of ξ. This also means that,

x'

=

(xs'xc)sinξ+(xc'+xs)cosξ+(x1'x3)sin2ξ+(x2'+x3)cos2ξ+(x3'+2x12x2)sinξcosξ;

and,

x'

=

(xs'2xc'xs)sinξ+(xc'+2xs'xc)cosξ+(x1'2x3'2x1+2x2)sin2ξ+(x2'+2x3'+2x12x2)cos2ξ+(x3'+4x1'4x2'4x3)sinξcosξ.

Hence the LHS of the polytropic (n = 1) wave equation becomes,

LHS

=

sinξ{ξ2[(xs'2xc'xs)sinξ+(xc'+2xs'xc)cosξ+(x1'2x3'2x1+2x2)sin2ξ+(x2'+2x3'+2x12x2)cos2ξ+(x3'+4x1'4x2'4x3)sinξcosξ]

 

 

+2ξ[(xs'xc)sinξ+(xc'+xs)cosξ+(x1'x3)sin2ξ+(x2'+x3)cos2ξ+(x3'+2x12x2)sinξcosξ]

 

 

2α[xssinξ+xccosξ+x1sin2ξ+x2cos2ξ+x3sinξcosξ]}

 

 

+cosξ{2ξ2[(xs'xc)sinξ+(xc'+xs)cosξ+(x1'x3)sin2ξ+(x2'+x3)cos2ξ+(x3'+2x12x2)sinξcosξ]

 

 

+2αξ[xssinξ+xccosξ+x1sin2ξ+x2cos2ξ+x3sinξcosξ]}

 

 

+σ2ξ3{xssinξ+xccosξ+x1sin2ξ+x2cos2ξ+x3sinξcosξ}

 

=

[(xs'2xc'xs)ξ2+2ξ(xs'xc)2αxs+σ2ξ3x1]sin2ξ+[(xc'+2xs'xc)ξ2+2ξ(xc'+xs)2αxc+2ξ2(xs'xc)+2αξxs+σ2ξ3x3]sinξcosξ

 

 

+[(x1'2x3'2x1+2x2)ξ2+2ξ(x1'x3)2αx1]sin3ξ+[(x2'+2x3'+2x12x2)ξ2+2ξ(x2'+x3)2αx2+2ξ2(x3'+2x12x2)+2αξx3]sinξcos2ξ

 

 

+[(x3'+4x1'4x2'4x3)ξ2+2ξ(x3'+2x12x2)2αx3+2ξ2(x1'x3)+2αξx1]sin2ξcosξ

 

 

+[2ξ2(xc'+xs)+2αξxc+σ2ξ3x2]cos2ξ+[2ξ2(x2'+x3)+2αξx2]cos3ξ+σ2ξ3xssinξ+σ2ξ3xccosξ

 

=

[(xs'2xc'xs)ξ2+2ξ(xs'xc)2αxs+σ2ξ3x1]sin2ξ+[(xc'+2xs'xc)ξ2+2ξ(xc'+xs)2αxc+2ξ2(xs'xc)+2αξxs+σ2ξ3x3]sinξcosξ

 

 

+[(x1'2x3'2x1+2x2)ξ2+2ξ(x1'x3)2αx1+σ2ξ3xs]sinξ

 

 

+[(x2'+2x3'+2x12x2)ξ2+2ξ(x2'+x3)2αx2+2ξ2(x3'+2x12x2)+2αξx3(x1'2x3'2x1+2x2)ξ22ξ(x1'x3)+2αx1]sinξcos2ξ

 

 

+[(x3'+4x1'4x2'4x3)ξ2+2ξ(x3'+2x12x2)2αx3+2ξ2(x1'x3)+2αξx12ξ2(x2'+x3)2αξx2]sin2ξcosξ

 

 

+[2ξ2(xc'+xs)+2αξxc+σ2ξ3x2]cos2ξ+[2ξ2(x2'+x3)+2αξx2+σ2ξ3xc]cosξ

So, the five chosen (polynomial?) functions of ξ must simultabeously satisfy the following, seven 2nd-order ODEs:

sinξ

      :      

(x1'2x3'2x1+2x2)ξ2+2ξ(x1'x3)2αx1+σ2ξ3xs=0

sin2ξ

      :      

(xs'2xc'xs)ξ2+2ξ(xs'xc)2αxs+σ2ξ3x1=0

sin2ξcosξ

      :      

(x3'+4x1'4x2'4x3)ξ2+2ξ(x3'+2x12x2)2αx3+2ξ2(x1'x3)+2αξx12ξ2(x2'+x3)2αξx2=0

sinξcosξ

      :      

(xc'+2xs'xc)ξ2+2ξ(xc'+xs)2αxc+2ξ2(xs'xc)+2αξxs+σ2ξ3x3=0

sinξcos2ξ

      :      

(x2'+2x3'+2x12x2)ξ2+2ξ(x2'+x3)2αx2+2ξ2(x3'+2x12x2)+2αξx3(x1'2x3'2x1+2x2)ξ22ξ(x1'x3)+2αx1=0

cos2ξ

      :      

2ξ2(xc'+xs)+2αξxc+σ2ξ3x2=0

cosξ

      :      

2ξ2(x2'+x3)+2αξx2+σ2ξ3xc=0

Example 1

Let's work on the coefficient of the cosξ term:

xc

=

ξβ(Ac)

x2

=

ξβ(C2ξ2)

x3

=

ξβ(B3ξ)

      Coefficient of "cosξ" term

=

ξβ[2ξ2(2C2ξ+(B3ξ))+2αξ(C2ξ2)+σ2ξ3(Ac)]

 

=

ξβ+3[2(2C2+B3)+2αC2+σ2(Ac)]

σ2

=

2Ac[B3+(2+α)C2]

Sixth Guess (n1)

Rationale

From our review of the properties of n=1 polytropic spheres, we know that the equilibrium density distribution is given by the sinc function, namely,

ρρc

=

sinξξ,

where,

ξπ(r0R0).

The total mass is,

Mtot=4πρcR03,

and the fractional mass enclosed within a given radius, r, is,

Mr(ξ)Mtot

=

1π[sinξξcosξ].

Let's guess that, during the fundamental mode of radial oscillation, the sinc-function profile is preserved as the system's total radius varies. In particular, we will assume that the system's time-varying radius is,

R=R0(1+δRR0)=R0(1+ϵR),

and seek to determine how the displacement vector, ϵδr/r0, varies with r0 in order to preserve the overall sinc-function profile. As is usual, we will only examine small perturbations away from equilibrium, that is, we will assume that everywhere throughout the configuration, |ϵ|1.


Let's begin by defining a new dimensionless coordinate,

ηπ(rR)=π[r0(1+ϵ)R0(1+ϵR)]ξ(1+ϵ),

and recognize that, in the new perturbed state, the fractional mass enclosed within a given radius, r, is,

Mr(η)Mtot

=

1π[sinηηcosη].

In order to associate each mass shell in the perturbed configuration with its corresponding mass shell in the unperturbed, equilibrium state, we need to set the two Mr functions equal to one another, that is, demand that,

sinξξcosξ

=

sinηηcosη

 

sin[ξ(1+ϵ)]ξ(1+ϵ)cos[ξ(1+ϵ)]

 

=

[sinξcos(ξϵ)+cosξsin(ξϵ)]ξ(1+ϵ)[cosξcos(ξϵ)sinξsin(ξϵ)]

 

sinξ[112(ξϵ)2]+(ξϵ)cosξξ(1+ϵ)cosξ[112(ξϵ)2]+ξ2ϵ(1+ϵ)sinξ

 

sinξξcosξ12(ξϵ)2sinξ+(ξϵ)cosξ(ξϵ)cosξ+12ξ3ϵ2cosξ+ξ2ϵsinξ+(ξϵ)2sinξ

ξ2ϵsinξ

(ξϵ)22[ξcosξ+sinξ]

1ϵ

12[ξcosξsinξ+1]

ϵ

2[1+ξcosξsinξ]1=2sinξ[sinξ+ξcosξ]1.

Resulting Polytropic Wave Equation

So, let's try,

x

=

2sinξ[sinξ+ξcosξ]1

 

=

[sinξ+ξcosξ]32sinξ[sin2ξ+2ξsinξcosξ+ξ2cos2ξ],

in which case,

x'

=

2cosξ[sinξ+ξcosξ]12sinξ[sinξ+ξcosξ]2[2cosξξsinξ]

 

=

[sinξ+ξcosξ]2{2cosξ[sinξ+ξcosξ]2sinξ[2cosξξsinξ]}

 

=

[sinξ+ξcosξ]2[2cosξsinξ+2ξcos2ξ4sinξcosξ+2ξsin2ξ]

 

=

2[sinξ+ξcosξ]2[ξsinξcosξ]

 

=

[sinξ+ξcosξ]32[ξsinξ+ξ2cosξsin2ξcosξξsinξcos2ξ],

and,

x'

=

2[sinξ+ξcosξ]2[1cos2ξ+sin2ξ]4[sinξ+ξcosξ]3[ξsinξcosξ][2cosξξsinξ]

 

=

4[sinξ+ξcosξ]3{sin2ξ[sinξ+ξcosξ][ξsinξcosξ][2cosξξsinξ]}

 

=

4[sinξ+ξcosξ]3[sin3ξ+ξsinξcosξ+ξ2sinξ2ξcosξξsin2ξcosξ+2sinξcos2ξ]

Graphical Reassessment

Before plowing ahead and plugging these expressions into the polytropic wave equation, I plotted the trial eigenfunction,

ϵ(ξ/π)

(see the blue curve in the accompanying "Trial Eigenfunction" figure), and noticed that it passes through

±

midway through the configuration. This is a very unphysical behavior. On the other hand, the inverse of this function (see the red curve) exhibits a relatively desirable behavior because it increases monotonically from negative one at the center. As plotted, however, the function has one node. In searching for the eigenfunction of the fundamental mode of oscillation, it might be better to add "1" to the inverse of the function and thereby get rid of all nodes. (Keep in mind, however, that the red curve might be displaying the eigenfunction associated with the first overtone.)

Let's therefore try,

x=1+1ϵ=112[ξcosξsinξ+1]=12[1ξcosξsinξ].

In this case we have,

x'

=

12[ξcosξsinξ+ξcos2ξsin2ξ]

 

=

12sin2ξ[ξsin2ξsinξcosξ+ξcos2ξ],

 

=

12sin2ξ[ξsinξcosξ],

and,

x'

=

cosξsin3ξ[ξsinξcosξ]+12sin2ξ[1cos2ξ+sin2ξ]

 

=

1cosξsin3ξ[ξsinξcosξ].

Now let's plug these expressions into the polytropic (n = 1) wave equation, namely,

σ2ξ3x

=

sinξ[ξ2x'+2ξx'2αx]+cosξ[2ξ2x'+2αξx].

The first term inside the square brackets on the right-hand-side gives,

ξ2x'+2ξx'2αx

=

ξ2cosξsin3ξ(ξ3ξ2sinξcosξ)+1sin2ξ(ξ2ξsinξcosξ)α(1ξcosξsinξ)

 

=

1sin3ξ[ξ2sin3ξcosξ(ξ3ξ2sinξcosξ)+sinξ(ξ2ξsinξcosξ)α(sin3ξξcosξsin2ξ)]

 

=

1sin3ξ[ξ2sinξ(1cos2ξ)+ξ2sinξcos2ξξ3cosξ+ξ2sinξξsin2ξcosξαsin3ξ+αξcosξsin2ξ]

 

=

α+1sin3ξ[2ξ2sinξξ3cosξξsin2ξcosξ+αξcosξsin2ξ];

and the second term inside the square brackets on the right-hand-side gives,

2ξ2x'+2αξx

=

1sin2ξ(ξ3ξ2sinξcosξ)+αsinξ(ξsinξξ2cosξ).

Put together, then, we have,

RHS

=

1sin2ξ[2ξ2sinξξ3cosξξsin2ξcosξ+αξcosξsin2ξ]+cosξsin2ξ(ξ3ξ2sinξcosξ)αsinξ+αcosξsinξ(ξsinξξ2cosξ)

 

=

1sin2ξ[2ξ2sinξξ3cosξξsin2ξcosξ+αξcosξsin2ξ+ξ3cosξξ2sinξcos2ξ]+αsinξ[sin2ξ+ξsinξcosξξ2cos2ξ]

 

=

ξsinξ[2ξsinξcosξξcos2ξ]αsinξ[sin2ξ+ξ2cos2ξ]

 

=

ξ2sinξ[1+sin2ξ(sinξξ)cosξα(sin2ξξ2+cos2ξ)],

and,

LHS

=

ξσ22(ξ2sinξ)[sinξξcosξ].

If our trial eigenfunction is a proper solution to the polytropic wave equation, then the difference of these two expressions should be zero. Let's see:

sinξξ2(RHSLHS)

=

1+sin2ξ(sinξξ)cosξα(sin2ξξ2+cos2ξ)+ξσ22[sinξξcosξ].

This expression clearly is not zero, so our trial eigenfunction is not a good one. However, the terms in the wave equation did combine somewhat to give a fairly compact — albeit nonzero — expression. So we may be on the right track!

New Idea Involving Logarithmic Derivatives

Simplistic Layout

Let's begin, again, with the relevant LAWE, as provided above. After dividing through by x, we have,

(sinξ)ξ2xd2xdξ2+2[sinξ+ξcosξ]ξxdxdξ+[σ2ξ32α(sinξξcosξ)]=0,


where,

σ2

ω22πGρcγg,

α

34γg.

Now, in addition to recognizing that,

ξxdxdξ

=

dlnxdlnξ,

in a separate context, we showed that, quite generally,

ξ2xd2xdξ2

=

ddlnξ[dlnxdlnξ][1dlnxdlnξ]dlnxdlnξ.

Hence, if we assume that the eigenfunction is a power-law of ξ, that is, assume that,

x=a0ξc0,

then the logarithmic derivative of x is a constant, namely,

dlnxdlnξ=c0,

and the two key derivative terms will be,

ξxdxdξ=c0,

      and      

ξ2xd2xdξ2=c0(c01).

In this case, the LAWE is no longer a differential equation but, instead, takes the form,

σ2ξ3

=

c0(c01)sinξ+2c0[sinξ+ξcosξ]2α(sinξξcosξ)

 

=

sinξ[c0(c01)+2c02α]+ξcosξ[2(c0+α)]

 

=

sinξ[c02+c02α]+ξcosξ[2(c0+α)].

Now, the cosine term will go to zero if c0=α; and the sine term will go to zero if,

α

=

3

γg

=

.

If these two — rather strange — conditions are met, then we have a marginally unstable configuration because, σ2=0. This, in and of itself, is not very physically interesting. However, it may give us a clue regarding how to more generally search for a physically reasonable radial eigenfunction.

More general Assumption

Try,

x

=

ξc0[a0+b0sinξ+d0ξcosξ]

dxdξ

=

ξc0ddξ[a0+b0sinξ+d0ξcosξ]+c0ξc01[a0+b0sinξ+d0ξcosξ]

 

=

ξc0[b0cosξd0ξsinξ+d0cosξ]+c0ξc01[a0+b0sinξ+d0ξcosξ]

dlnxdlnξ

=

ξ[b0cosξd0ξsinξ+d0cosξ][a0+b0sinξ+d0ξcosξ]1+c0

 

=

[(b0+d0)ξcosξd0ξ2sinξ][a0+b0sinξ+d0ξcosξ]1+c0


Another Viewpoint

Development

Multiplying through the above LAWE by (xξ3) gives,

0

=

sinξξd2xdξ2+2[sinξ+ξcosξξ2]dxdξ+[σ22α(sinξξcosξξ3)]x

Notice that,

ddξ[sinξξ]

=

sinξξ2+cosξξ

 

=

[ξcosξsinξξ2].

And, hence,

d2dξ2[sinξξ]

=

ddξ[cosξξsinξξ2]

 

=

cosξξ2sinξξ+2sinξξ3cosξξ2

 

=

sinξξ+2[sinξξcosξξ3].

So, we can write,

d2dξ2{(sinξξ)x}

=

ddξ{(sinξξ)dxdξ+xddξ[(sinξξ)]}

 

=

sinξξd2xdξ2+2dxdξ[ddξ(sinξξ)]+xd2dξ2(sinξξ)

 

=

sinξξd2xdξ2+2dxdξ[ξcosξsinξξ2]+x{sinξξ+2[sinξξcosξξ3]}.

This means that we can rewrite the LAWE as,

0

=

d2dξ2{(sinξξ)x}2dxdξ[ξcosξsinξξ2]x{sinξξ+2[sinξξcosξξ3]}+2[sinξ+ξcosξξ2]dxdξ+[σ22α(sinξξcosξξ3)]x

 

=

d2dξ2{(sinξξ)x}+4[sinξξ2]dxdξ+{sinξξ+σ22(1+α)(sinξξcosξξ3)}x.

We recognize, also, that,

1ξddξ[(sinξξ)x]

=

[ξcosξsinξξ3]x+(sinξξ2)dxdξ.

4(sinξξ2)dxdξ

=

4ξddξ[(sinξξ)x]+4[sinξξcosξξ3]x.

So the LAWE becomes,

0

=

d2dξ2{(sinξξ)x}+4ξddξ[(sinξξ)x]+4[sinξξcosξξ3]x+{sinξξ+σ22(1+α)(sinξξcosξξ3)}x

 

=

d2dξ2{(sinξξ)x}+4ξddξ[(sinξξ)x]+{sinξξ+σ2+[42(1+α)](sinξξcosξξ3)}x

 

=

d2Υdξ2+4ξdΥdξ+Υ+[σ2+2(1α)(sinξξcosξξ3)]x,

where we have introduced the new, modified eigenfunction,

Υ(sinξξ)x.

Alternatively, the LAWE may be written as,

0

=

d2Υdξ2+4ξdΥdξ+[σ2+2(1α)(sinξξcosξξ3)+sinξξ]x;

or,

0

=

ξ2Υd2Υdξ2+4ξΥdΥdξ+[σ2+2(1α)(sinξξcosξξ3)+sinξξ]ξ3sinξ

 

=

ξ2Υd2Υdξ2+4ξΥdΥdξ+[σ2(ξ3sinξ)+2(1α)(1ξcotξ)+ξ2]


Now, if we adopt the homentropic convention that arises from setting, γ=(n+1)/n, then for our n=1 polytropic configuration, we should set, γ=2 and, hence, α=1. This will mean that the lat term in this LAWE naturally goes to zero. Hence, we have,

σ2x

=

d2Υdξ2+4ξdΥdξ+Υ;

or,

0

=

d2Υdξ2+4ξdΥdξ+[1+σ2(ξsinξ)]Υ;

or,

0

=

ξ2Υd2Υdξ2+4ξΥdΥdξ+[ξ2+σ2(ξ3sinξ)].

Does this help?

Check for Mistakes

Given the definition of Υ, its first derivative is,

dΥdξ

=

(sinξξ)dxdξ+x[cosξξsinξξ2],

and its second derivative is,

d2Υdξ2

=

ddξ{(sinξξ)dxdξ+x[cosξξsinξξ2]}

 

=

(sinξξ)d2xdξ2+2[cosξξsinξξ2]dxdξ+xddξ[cosξξsinξξ2]

 

=

(sinξξ)d2xdξ2+2[cosξξsinξξ2]dxdξ+x[sinξξ2cosξξ2+2sinξξ3]

Hence, the "upsilon" LAWE becomes,

σ2x

=

d2Υdξ2+4ξdΥdξ+Υ+[2(1α)(sinξξcosξξ3)]x

 

=

(sinξξ)d2xdξ2+2[cosξξsinξξ2]dxdξ+x[sinξξ2cosξξ2+2sinξξ3]+4ξ{(sinξξ)dxdξ+x[cosξξsinξξ2]}+[sinξξ+2(1α)(sinξξcosξξ3)]x

 

=

(sinξξ)d2xdξ2+{(4sinξξ2)+2[cosξξsinξξ2]}dxdξ+[sinξξ2cosξξ2+2sinξξ3+4cosξξ24sinξξ3+sinξξ+2(1α)(sinξξcosξξ3)]x

 

=

(sinξξ)d2xdξ2+[2cosξξ+2sinξξ2]dxdξ+[2(sinξξcosξξ3)+(22α)(sinξξcosξξ3)]x

 

=

(sinξξ)d2xdξ2+2[sinξξ2+cosξξ]dxdξ+[2α(sinξξcosξξ3)]x.

This should be compared with the first expression, above, namely,

0

=

sinξξd2xdξ2+2[sinξ+ξcosξξ2]dxdξ+[σ22α(sinξξcosξξ3)]x,

and it matches! Q.E.D.

Motivated by Yabushita's Discovery

Initial Exploration

This subsection is being developed following our realization — see the accompanying overview — that the eigenfunction is known analytically for marginally unstable, pressure-truncated configurations having 3n. Specifically, from the work of Yabushita (1975) we have the following,

Exact Solution to the Isothermal LAWE

σc2=0

 and  

x=1(1ξeψ)dψdξ.

And from our own recent work, we have discovered the following,

Precise Solution to the Polytropic LAWE

σc2=0

      and      

xP3(n1)2n[1+(n3n1)(1ξθn)dθdξ]

if the adiabatic exponent is assigned the value, γg=(n+1)/n, in which case the parameter, α=(3n)/(n+1). Using this polytropic displacement function as a guide, let's try for the case of n=1, an expression of the form,

x

=

AB[(1ξθ)dθdξ]

 

=

AB[(1sinξ)ddξ(sinξξ)]

 

=

AB(1sinξ)[cosξξsinξξ2]

 

=

A+Bξ2(1ξcosξsinξ),

in which case,

dxdξ

=

B{(cosξsin2ξ)[cosξξsinξξ2]+(1sinξ)[sinξξcosξξ2cosξξ2+2sinξξ3]}

 

=

Bξ3{(cosξsin2ξ)[ξ2cosξ+ξsinξ]+[2ξ22ξcosξsinξ]}

 

=

Bξ3{2ξ2ξcosξsinξξ2cos2ξsin2ξ},


What if, instead, we try the more generalized form,

x

=

A+B(λξ)2[1λξcos(λξ)sin(λξ)].

Then we have,

1λBdxdξ

=

1(λξ)3{2(λξ)2λξcos(λξ)sin(λξ)(λξ)2cos2(λξ)sin2(λξ)},

Probably this also means,

1λ2Bdxdξ

=

1(λξ)4{62(λξ)22λξcos(λξ)sin(λξ)2(λξ)2cos2(λξ)sin2(λξ)2(λξ)3cos(λξ)sin(λξ)2(λξ)3cos3(λξ)sin3(λξ)}.



Let's check against the more general derivation, which gives after recognizing that, B(3n)/(n1),

dxdξ

=

(3nn1){1ξ+n(θ')2ξθn+1+3θ'ξ2θn}

 

=

Bξ3{ξ2+ξ2(ξsinξ)2[cosξξsinξξ2]2+3ξ2sinξ[cosξξsinξξ2]}

 

=

Bξ3{ξ2+3[ξcosξsinξ1]+[ξcosξsinξ1]2}

 

=

Bξ3{ξ2+3[ξcosξsinξ1]+[(ξcosξsinξ)22(ξcosξsinξ)+1]}

 

=

Bξ3{ξ2+[ξcosξsinξ2]+(ξcosξsinξ)2}.

This matches the preceding, direct derivation.

Also,

d2xdξ2

=

3Bξ4{(cosξsin2ξ)[ξ2cosξ+ξsinξ]+[2ξ22ξcosξsinξ]}

 

 

Bξ3{[1sinξ2cos2ξsin3ξ][ξ2cosξ+ξsinξ]+(cosξsin2ξ)[2ξcosξ+sinξ+ξ2sinξ+ξcosξ]

 

 

+[2ξ2cosξsinξ+2ξsinξsinξ+2ξcos2ξsin2ξ]}

 

=

Bξ4{(3cosξsin2ξ)[ξ2cosξ+ξsinξ]+[63ξ26ξcosξsinξ]+[1sinξ+2cos2ξsin3ξ][ξ3cosξ+ξ2sinξ]

 

 

+(cosξsin2ξ)[2ξ2cosξξsinξξ3sinξξ2cosξ]+[2ξ2+2ξcosξsinξ2ξ2sinξsinξ2ξ2cos2ξsin2ξ]}

 

=

Bξ4{[3ξ2cos2ξsin2ξ+3ξcosξsinξ]+[63ξ26ξcosξsinξ]+[ξ3cosξsinξ+ξ2]+[2ξ3cos3ξsin3ξ+2ξ2cos2ξsin2ξ]

 

 

+[2ξ2cos2ξsin2ξξcosξsinξξ3cosξsinξξ2cos2ξsin2ξ]+[2ξ2+2ξcosξsinξ2ξ2sinξsinξ2ξ2cos2ξsin2ξ]}

 

=

Bξ4{62ξ22ξcosξsinξ2ξ2cos2ξsin2ξ2ξ3cosξsinξ2ξ3cos3ξsin3ξ}.

Let's also check this against the more general derivation, which gives after again recognizing that, B(3n)/(n1),

d2xdξ2

=

(n3n1){4ξ2+2n(θ')ξθ+12θ'ξ3θn+8n(θ')2ξ2θn+1+(n+1)n(θ')3ξθn+2}

 

=

B{4ξ2+2ξθ[sinξξ2(ξcosξsinξ1)]+12ξ3θ[sinξξ2(ξcosξsinξ1)]+8ξ2θ2[sinξξ2(ξcosξsinξ1)]2+2ξθ3[sinξξ2(ξcosξsinξ1)]3}

 

=

Bξ4{4ξ2+2ξ2(ξcosξsinξ1)+12(ξcosξsinξ1)+8(ξcosξsinξ1)2+2(ξcosξsinξ1)3}

 

=

2Bξ4{2ξ2+ξ3cosξsinξξ2+6ξcosξsinξ6+4ξ2cos2ξsin2ξ8ξcosξsinξ+4+(ξ2cos2ξsin2ξ2ξcosξsinξ+1)(ξcosξsinξ1)}

 

=

2Bξ4{2+ξ22ξcosξsinξ+ξ3cosξsinξ+4ξ2cos2ξsin2ξ(ξ2cos2ξsin2ξ2ξcosξsinξ+1)+ξ3cos3ξsin3ξ2ξ2cos2ξsin2ξ+ξcosξsinξ}

 

=

2Bξ4{3+ξ2+ξcosξsinξ+ξ3cosξsinξ+ξ2cos2ξsin2ξ+ξ3cos3ξsin3ξ}

 

=

Bξ4{62ξ22ξcosξsinξ2ξ2cos2ξsin2ξ2ξ3cosξsinξ2ξ3cos3ξsin3ξ}.

A cross-check with the first attempt to derive this second derivative expression initially unveiled a couple of coefficient errors. These have now been corrected and both expressions agree.

Succinct Demonstration

Given that, for n=1, we should set γg=(n+1)/n=2α=(34/γg)=+1, and,

Qdlnθdlnξ

=

ξ2sinξddξ[sinξξ]=1ξcotξ.

If we then employ the displacement function,

x

=

A+Bξ2[1ξcotξ],

the LAWE becomes,

LAWE

=

d2xdξ2+[4(n+1)Q]1ξdxdξ+(n+1)[(σc26γg)ξ2θαQ]xξ2

 

=

d2xdξ2+[42Q]1ξdxdξ+[(σc26)ξ3sinξ2Q]xξ2

 

=

d2xdξ2+[2+2ξcosξsinξ]1ξdxdξ+[2+2ξcosξsinξ]xξ2+[(σc26)ξsinξ]x

 

=

2Bξ4{3ξ2ξcosξsinξ(ξcosξsinξ)2ξ3cosξsinξ(ξcosξsinξ)3}

 

 

+2Bξ4[1+ξcosξsinξ]{ξ22+ξcosξsinξ+(ξcosξsinξ)2}

 

 

+[2+2ξcosξsinξ][Aξ2+Bξ4(1ξcosξsinξ)]+[(σc26)ξsinξ]x

 

=

2Bξ4{3ξ2ξcosξsinξ(ξcosξsinξ)2ξ3cosξsinξ(ξcosξsinξ)3

 

 

+ξ2(ξcosξsinξ)2(ξcosξsinξ)+(ξcosξsinξ)2+(ξcosξsinξ)3+ξ22+ξcosξsinξ+(ξcosξsinξ)2}

 

 

2Bξ4[12ξcosξsinξ+(ξcosξsinξ)2]+2Aξ2[ξcosξsinξ1]+[(σc26)ξsinξ]x

 

=

2Aξ2[ξcosξsinξ1]+[(σc26)ξsinξ]x

Pretty amazing degree of cancelation! So the above-hypothesized displacement function does satisfy the n=1, polytropic LAWE — for any value of the coefficient, B — if we set A=0 and σc2=0. If we set B=3, the function will be normalized such that it goes to unity at the center. In summary, then, we have,

xP|n=1

=

3ξ2[1ξcotξ].


What About Bipolytropes?

Here we will try to find an analytic expression for the radial displacement function, x, for a bipolytropic envelope whose polytropic index is, ne=1. As in the above succinct derivation, the relevant LAWE is,

LAWE

=

d2xdξ2+[4(n+1)Q]1ξdxdξ+(n+1)[(σc26γg)ξ2θαQ]xξ2

 

=

d2xdξ2+[42Q]1ξdxdξ+[(σc26)ξ3sinξ2Q]xξ2

 

=

d2xdξ2+[2+2ξcosξsinξ]1ξdxdξ+[2+2ξcosξsinξ]xξ2+[(σc26)ξsinξ]x

First Attempt

Let's try,

x

=

A+B(ξF)2[1(ξD)cot(ξC)].

First, note that,

ddξ[cot(ξC)]

=

ddξ[cos(ξC)sin(ξC)]

 

=

[1+cot2(ξC)].

Hence,

dxdξ

=

2B(ξF)3[1(ξD)cot(ξC)]B(ξF)2{cot(ξC)(ξD)[1+cot2(ξC)]}

 

=

B(ξF)3{[22(ξD)cot(ξC)](ξF)[cot(ξC)(ξD)[1+cot2(ξC)]]}

 

=

B(ξF)3{2cot(ξC)[2(ξD)+(ξF)]+(ξF)(ξD)[1+cot2(ξC)]}

 

=

B(ξF)3{2[3ξ(2D+F)]cot(ξC)+[ξ2(D+F)ξ+FD]+[ξ2(D+F)ξ+FD]cot2(ξC)}

 

=

B(ξF)3{[ξ2(D+F)ξ+FD+2][3ξ(2D+F)]cot(ξC)+[ξ2(D+F)ξ+FD]cot2(ξC)}.

And,

d2xdξ2

=

3B(ξF)4{[ξ2(D+F)ξ+FD+2][3ξ(2D+F)]cot(ξC)+[ξ2(D+F)ξ+FD]cot2(ξC)}

 

 

B(ξF)3{[2ξ(D+F)]3cot(ξC)[3ξ(2D+F)]dcot(ξC)dξ+[2ξ(D+F)]cot2(ξC)+[ξ2(D+F)ξ+FD]dcot2(ξC)dξ}

[(ξF)4B]d2xdξ2

=

3[ξ2(D+F)ξ+FD+2]3[3ξ(2D+F)]cot(ξC)+3[ξ2(D+F)ξ+FD]cot2(ξC)

 

 

(ξF)[2ξ(D+F)]+3(ξF)cot(ξC)(ξF)[2ξ(D+F)]cot2(ξC)

 

 

+(ξF)[3ξ(2D+F)]dcot(ξC)dξ(ξF)[ξ2(D+F)ξ+FD]dcot2(ξC)dξ

 

=

3[ξ2(D+F)ξ+FD+2](ξF)[2ξ(D+F)]+{3(ξF)3[3ξ(2D+F)]}cot(ξC)

 

 

+{3[ξ2(D+F)ξ+FD](ξF)[2ξ(D+F)]}cot2(ξC)

 

 

(ξF)[3ξ(2D+F)][1+cot2(ξC)]+(ξF)[ξ2(D+F)ξ+FD]2cot(ξC)[1+cot2(ξC)]

 

=

3[ξ2(D+F)ξ+FD+2](ξF)[2ξ(D+F)](ξF)[3ξ(2D+F)]+{3(ξF)3[3ξ(2D+F)]+2(ξF)[ξ2(D+F)ξ+FD]}cot(ξC)

 

 

+{3[ξ2(D+F)ξ+FD](ξF)[2ξ(D+F)](ξF)[3ξ(2D+F)]}cot2(ξC)+2(ξF)[ξ2(D+F)ξ+FD]cot3(ξC).

Let's set C=D=F and see if these expressions match the ones above.

dxdξ|C=D=F

=

Bξ3{2+ξ23ξcotξ+ξ2cot2ξ}.

ξ4Bd2xdξ2|C=D=F

=

3[ξ2+2](ξ)[2ξ]ξ[3ξ]+{3(ξ)3[3ξ]+2ξ[ξ2]}cot(ξ)

 

 

+{3[ξ2]ξ[2ξ]ξ[3ξ]}cot2ξ+2ξ[ξ2]cot3ξ

 

=

3ξ2+62ξ23ξ2+[3ξ9ξ+2ξ3]cot(ξ)+[3ξ22ξ23ξ2]cot2ξ+2ξ3cot3ξ

 

=

62ξ2+[6ξ+2ξ3]cot(ξ)2ξ2cot2ξ+2ξ3cot3ξ

Second Attempt

Up to this point we have been rather cavalier about the use of ξ (and ξi) to represent the envelope's dimensionless radius (and interface location). Let's switch to η,

r*

=

(μeμc)1θi2(2π)1/2η

0

=

d2xdη2+{4(ρ*P*)Mr*(r*)}1ηdxdη+12πθi4(μeμc)2(ρ*P*){2πσc23γgαgMr*(r*)3}x.

and, throughout the envelope we have,

ρ*P*

=

(μeμc)θi1ϕ(η)1;

Mr*r*

=

(μeμc)2θi1(2π)1/2(η2dϕdη)[(μeμc)1θi2(2π)1/2η]1=2(μeμc)1θiη(dϕdη).

Hence, the LAWE relevant to the envelope is,

0

=

d2xdη2+{4[ρ*P*][Mr*(r*)]}1ηdxdη+12πθi4(μeμc)2[ρ*P*]{2πσc23γgαe(r*)2[Mr*r*]}x

 

=

d2xdη2+{4[(μeμc)θi1ϕ(η)1][2(μeμc)1θiη(dϕdη)]}1ηdxdη+12πθi4(μeμc)2[(μeμc)θi1ϕ(η)1]{2πσc23γgαe[(μeμc)1θi2(2π)1/2η]2[2(μeμc)1θiη(dϕdη)]}x

 

=

d2xdη2+{4[2ηϕ(dϕdη)]}1ηdxdη+12πθi5ϕ(μeμc)1{2πσc23γgαe[(μeμc)θi5(4π)η1](dϕdη)}x

 

=

d2xdη2+{4[2ηϕ(dϕdη)]}1ηdxdη+12πθi5ϕ(μeμc)1{2πσc23γg}xαe[2ηϕ(dϕdη)]xη2.

If we assume that, αe=(34/2)=1 and σc2=0, then the relevant envelope LAWE is,

0

=

d2xdη2+{42Q}1ηdxdη[2Q]xη2,

where,

Qdlnϕdlnη.

Now consider the,

Precise Solution to the Polytropic LAWE

xP

=

b(n1)2n[1+(n3n1)(1ηϕn)dϕdη]

 

=

b[(1ηϕ)dϕdη]

 

=

bη2[dlnϕdlnη]

 

=

bQη2.

From our accompanying discussion, we recall that the most general solution to the n=1 Lane-Emden equation can be written in the form,

ϕ=A[sin(ηB)η],

where A and B are constants whose values can be obtained from our accompanying parameter table. The first derivative of this function is,

dϕdη=Aη2[ηcos(ηB)sin(ηB)].

Hence,

Q=dlnϕdlnη

=

ηϕAη2[ηcos(ηB)sin(ηB)]

 

=

[1ηcot(ηB)]

xP

=

bη2[1ηcot(ηB)].

What is this in terms of the dimensionless radius, r*/R*? Well,

r*R*

=

(μeμc)1θi2(2π)1/2η[2πθi2ηs(μeμc)]

 

=

ηηs=η(π+B)

η

=

r*R*(π+B).

Also,

ηB

=

r*R*(π+B)B=π(r*R*)B[1(r*R*)]

 

=

π+π[(r*R*)1]B[1(r*R*)]

 

=

π(π+B)[1(r*R*)].


[12 January 2019]: Here's what appears to work pretty well, empirically:

xP

=

1η2{1ηcot[η(π0.8)]}.

η

=

r*R*(π0.6π).


Let's work through the analytic derivatives again. Keeping in mind that,

ddη[cot(ηB)]

=

[1+cot2(ηB)],

and starting with the guess,

xP

=

bη2[1ηcot(ηB)],

we have,

dxPdη

=

2bη3[1ηcot(ηB)]bη2{cot(ηB)η[1+cot2(ηB)]}

(η3b)dxPdη

=

[22ηcot(ηB)]{ηcot(ηB)η2[1+cot2(ηB)]}

 

=

η22+ηcot(ηB)+η2cot2(ηB).

The second derivative then gives,

d2xPdη2

=

ddη{bη3[η22+ηcot(ηB)+η2cot2(ηB)]}

 

=

3bη4[η22+ηcot(ηB)+η2cot2(ηB)]

 

 

+bη3{2η+cot(ηB)+2ηcot2(ηB)+ηddη[cot(ηB)]+2η2cot(ηB)ddη[cot(ηB)]}

d2xPdη2

=

bη4[63η23ηcot(ηB)3η2cot2(ηB)]

 

 

+bη4{2η2+ηcot(ηB)+2η2cot2(ηB)η2[1+cot2(ηB)]2η3cot(ηB)[1+cot2(ηB)]}

η4bd2xPdη2

=

63η23ηcot(ηB)3η2cot2(ηB)

 

 

+2η2+ηcot(ηB)+2η2cot2(ηB)η2η2cot2(ηB)2η3cot(ηB)2η3cot3(ηB)

 

=

2[3η2(η+η3)cot(ηB)η2cot2(ηB)η3cot3(ηB)].

Recalling that,

Q=[1ηcot(ηB)],

plugging these expressions into the relevant envelope LAWE gives,

LAWE

=

d2xdη2+{42Q}1ηdxdη2Qxη2

 

=

d2xdη2+{42[1ηcot(ηB)]}1ηdxdη[1ηcot(ηB)]2xη2

 

=

bη4{η4bd2xdη2+[1+ηcot(ηB)]2η3bdxdη[1ηcot(ηB)]2η2xb}

 

=

2bη4{3η2(η+η3)cot(ηB)η2cot2(ηB)η3cot3(ηB)

 

 

+[1+ηcot(ηB)][η22+ηcot(ηB)+η2cot2(ηB)][1ηcot(ηB)][1ηcot(ηB)]}

 

=

2bη4{3η2(η+η3)cot(ηB)η2cot2(ηB)η3cot3(ηB)+[η22+ηcot(ηB)+η2cot2(ηB)][1ηcot(ηB)]

 

 

+ηcot(ηB)[η22+ηcot(ηB)+η2cot2(ηB)]+ηcot(ηB)[1ηcot(ηB)]}

 

=

2bη4{(η+η3)cot(ηB)η3cot3(ηB)+2ηcot(ηB)

 

 

+η3cot(ηB)2ηcot(ηB)+η2cot2(ηB)+η3cot3(ηB)+ηcot(ηB)η2cot2(ηB)}

 

=

2bη4{[ηcot(ηB)ηcot(ηB)+2ηcot(ηB)]+[η3cot(ηB)η3cot(ηB)]

 

 

+[η2cot2(ηB)η2cot2(ηB)]+[η3cot3(ηB)η3cot3(ηB)]}

 

=

0.

Okay. Now let's determine at what value of η the logarithmic derivative of xP goes to negative one.

dlnxPdlnη=ηxPdxPdη

=

η3b[1ηcot(ηB)]1dxPdη

 

=

[1ηcot(ηB)]1[η22+ηcot(ηB)+η2cot2(ηB)].

Setting this to negative one, we have,

[1ηcot(ηB)]

=

[η22+ηcot(ηB)+η2cot2(ηB)]

1

=

η2[1+cot2(ηB)]

 

=

η2[1sin2(ηB)]

1

=

η2sin2(ηB).

And this occurs when,

(Aϕ)2=1.


Third Attempt

Prior to the Brute-Force Trial Fit

Let's work through the analytic derivatives again. Keeping in mind that,

ddη[cot(ηC)]

=

[1+cot2(ηC)],

and starting with the guess,

xP

=

bη2[1ηcot(ηC)],

we have,

(η3b)dxPdη

=

η22+ηcot(ηC)+η2cot2(ηC),

and,

η4bd2xPdη2

=

2[3η2(η+η3)cot(ηC)η2cot2(ηC)η3cot3(ηC)].


Note that the relevant logarithmic derivative is,

dlnxPdlnη

=

(bη2)[η22+ηcot(ηC)+η2cot2(ηC)]xP1

 

=

[η22+ηcot(ηC)+η2cot2(ηC)][1ηcot(ηC)]1

If we know the logarithmic slope and the value of η at the interface, then we can solve for

yiηicot(ηiC),

via the quadratic relation,

(1yi)[dlnxPdlnη]i

=

ηi22+yi+yi2

0

=

ηi22+yi+yi2(1yi)[dlnxPdlnη]i

 

=

yi2+yi{1+[dlnxPdlnη]i}+{ηi22[dlnxPdlnη]i}.

(In practice it appears as though the "plus" solution to this quadratic equation is desired if the quantity inside the last set of curly braces is positive; and the "minus" solution is desired if this quantity is negative.) Once the value of yi is known, we can solve for the key coefficient, C, via the relation,

tan(ηiC)

=

ηiyi

C

=

ηitan1(ηiyi).


Recalling that,

Q=[1ηcot(ηB)],

plugging these expressions into the relevant envelope LAWE gives,

LAWE

=

d2xdη2+{42Q}1ηdxdη2Qxη2

 

=

d2xdη2+{42[1ηcot(ηB)]}1ηdxdη[1ηcot(ηB)]2xη2

 

=

bη4{η4bd2xdη2+[1+ηcot(ηB)]2η3bdxdη[1ηcot(ηB)]2η2xb}

 

=

2bη4{3η2(η+η3)cot(ηC)η2cot2(ηC)η3cot3(ηC)

 

 

+[1+ηcot(ηB)][η22+ηcot(ηC)+η2cot2(ηC)][1ηcot(ηB)][1ηcot(ηC)]}

 

=

2bη4{3η2(η+η3)cot(ηC)η2cot2(ηC)η3cot3(ηC)+[η22+ηcot(ηC)+η2cot2(ηC)][1ηcot(ηC)]

 

 

+ηcot(ηB)[η22+ηcot(ηC)+η2cot2(ηC)]+ηcot(ηB)[1ηcot(ηC)]}

 

=

2bη4{(ηη3)cot(ηC)η3cot3(ηC)+ηcot(ηB)[η21+η2cot2(ηC)]}

 

=

2bη4{(ηη3)[cot(ηC)cot(ηB)]+η3cot2(ηC)[cot(ηB)cot(ηC)]}

 

=

2bη4[cot(ηC)cot(ηB)][ηη3η3cot2(ηC)]

 

=

2bη3[cot(ηC)cot(ηB)]{1η2[1+cot2(ηC)]}.

This will go to zero if C=(B2mπ), where m is a positive integer. When m=1, for example,

cot(ηC)

=

cot[η(B2π)]=cot(ηB).


Okay. Now let's determine at what value of η the logarithmic derivative of xP goes to negative one.

Brute-Force Trial Fit

Photo of white board with steps showing development of trial eigenfunction. This should be paired with an Excel spreadsheet.

Using a couple of separate Excel spreadsheets — FaulknerBipolytrope2.xlsx/mu100Mode0 and AnalyticTrialBipolytropeA.xlsx/Sheet2, both stored in a DropBox account under the folder Wiki_edits/Bipolytrope/LinearPerturbation — we used an inelegant and inefficient trial & error technique in search of an eigenfunction that had the same analytic form as the one represented above for xP, but that, when plotted, appeared to qualitatively match the numerically determined envelope eigenfunction. Then, on a whiteboard — see the photo, here on the right — we formulated a concise expression for a trial function that seemed to work pretty well. Our primary finding was that α, appearing as the argument to the tanα function, needed to be shifted by something like 3π/4.

 

THIS SPACE

INTENTIONALLY

LEFT BLANK

Following Up on the Brute-Force Trial Fit

In an accompanying discussion — see especially Attempt #2 — we have determined by visual inspection that a decent fit to the envelope's eigenfunction is given by the expression,

xtrial

=

b0Λ2{1Λ[tan(ηiΛ3π/4)+fα1fαtan(ηiΛ3π/4)]}a0

 

=

b0Λ2{1Λcot(ΛE)}a0,

Limiting Parameter Values
  min max α=αs
ηF ηi ηs 8π(ηsηi)2+2ηsηi
α π2 5π8 ηiηs3π4
Λ ηiπ4 ηiπ8 ηs

where, over the range, ηiηηs,

E

ηi5π4+tan1fα,

Λ(η)

ηi+gF[ηi2ηs+η]=Λ0+gFη,

1fα=tan(αs)

tan[(ηsηi+3π4)],

gF

π8(ηsηi).



Here, we reference a separate discussion of the bipolytrope's underlying equilibrium structure

B=ηiπ2+tan1f E=ηi5π4+tan1fα

cot(ηiB)

=

tan[π2(ηiB)]

 

=

tan[π2(π2tan1f)]

 

=

f

f

=

tan(B+π2ηi)

cot(ηiE)

=

tan[π2(ηiE)]

 

=

tan[π2(5π4tan1fα)]

 

=

tan(tan1fα3π4)

 

=

tan(3π4tan1fα)

 

=

cot(tan1fα)

 

=

1fα

Hence …     cot(ηB)

=

tan[π2(ηB)]

 

=

tan[π2η+ηiπ2+tan1f]

 

=

tan[ηiη+tan1f]

 

=

tan(ηiη)+f1ftan(ηiη)

Hence …     cot(ΛE)

=

tan[π2(ΛE)]

 

=

tan[ηiΛ3π4+tan1fα]

 

=

tan(ηiΛ3π4)+fα1fαtan(ηiΛ3π4)

Also …    B=ηsπ

f=cot(ηiB)

=

cot(ηiηs+π)

1f

=

tan(ηiηs+π)



Let's examine the first and second derivatives of this trial eigenfunction, recognizing that,

dxtrialdη=dΛdηdxtrialdΛ=gFdxtrialdΛ

      and      

d2xtrialdη2=dΛdηddΛ[gFdxtrialdΛ]=gF2d2xtrialdΛ2.

and drawing from the derivative expressions already derived, above. For the first derivative, we have,

dxtrialdη

=

gF(b0Λ3)[Λ22+Λcot(ΛE)+Λ2cot2(ΛE)].

And the second derivative gives,

d2xtrialdη2

=

gF2(2b0Λ4)[3Λ2(Λ+Λ3)cot(ΛE)Λ2cot2(ΛE)Λ3cot3(ΛE)].

Hence,

LAWE

=

d2xtrialdη2+{42Q}1ηdxtrialdη2Qxtrialη2

 

=

d2xtrialdη2+{42[1ηcot(ηB)]}1ηdxtrialdη[1ηcot(ηB)]2xtrialη2

 

=

b0η4{η4b0d2xtrialdη2+[1+ηcot(ηB)]2η3b0dxtrialdη[1ηcot(ηB)]2η2xtrialb0}

 

=

b0η4{η4b0gF2(2b0Λ4)[3Λ2(Λ+Λ3)cot(ΛE)Λ2cot2(ΛE)Λ3cot3(ΛE)]

 

 

+[1+ηcot(ηB)]2η3b0gF(b0Λ3)[Λ22+Λcot(ΛE)+Λ2cot2(ΛE)]

 

 

[1ηcot(ηB)]2η2b0[b0Λ2{1Λcot(ΛE)}a0]}

 

=

b0η4{gF2(2η4Λ4)[3Λ2(Λ+Λ3)cot(ΛE)Λ2cot2(ΛE)Λ3cot3(ΛE)]

 

 

+[1+ηcot(ηB)]gF(2η3Λ3)[Λ22+Λcot(ΛE)+Λ2cot2(ΛE)]

 

 

[1ηcot(ηB)][2η2Λ2[1Λcot(ΛE)]2η2a0b0]}

 

=

2b0Λ4η2{gF2η2[3Λ2(Λ+Λ3)cot(ΛE)Λ2cot2(ΛE)Λ3cot3(ΛE)]

 

 

+[1+ηcot(ηB)]gFΛη[Λ22+Λcot(ΛE)+Λ2cot2(ΛE)]

 

 

[1ηcot(ηB)][Λ2[1Λcot(ΛE)]a0Λ4b0]}

(Λ42b0)  LAWE

=

gF2[3Λ2(Λ+Λ3)cot(ΛE)Λ2cot2(ΛE)Λ3cot3(ΛE)]

 

 

+gFΛη[Λ22+Λcot(ΛE)+Λ2cot2(ΛE)](Λη)2[1Λcot(ΛE)a0Λ2b0]

 

 

+[ηcot(ηB)]{gFΛη[Λ22+Λcot(ΛE)+Λ2cot2(ΛE)]+(Λη)2[1Λcot(ΛE)a0Λ2b0]}


Fourth Attempt

XXXX

If we assume that, αe=(34/2)=1 and σc2=0, then the relevant envelope LAWE is,

0

=

d2xdη2+{42Q}1ηdxdη[2Q]xη2,

where,

Qdlnϕdlnη

=

[1ηcot(ηB0)].


Let's work through the analytic derivatives again. Keeping in mind that,

ddη[cot(ηB)]

=

[1+cot2(ηB)];

and that the,

Precise Solution to the Polytropic LAWE

xP

=

b(n1)2n[1+(n3n1)(1ηϕn)dϕdη]

 

=

b[(1ηϕ)dϕdη]

 

=

bη2[dlnϕdlnη]

 

=

bQη2

xP

=

bη2[1ηcot(ηB0)].

As we have already tried once, above, let's try a more general form of this expression, namely,

xQ

=

A+C(ηF)2[1(ηD)cot(ηB)].

Hence,

dxQdη

=

[1(ηD)cot(ηB)]ddη[C(ηF)2]C(ηF)2ddη[(ηD)cot(ηB)]

 

=

[1(ηD)cot(ηB)][2C(ηF)3]C(ηF)2[cot(ηB)]+C(ηD)(ηF)2[1+cot2(ηB)]

 

=

C(ηF)3{2+2(ηD)cot(ηB)(ηF)[cot(ηB)]+(ηD)(ηF)[1+cot2(ηB)]}

 

=

C(ηF)3{[(ηD)(ηF)2]+(η2D+F)cot(ηB)+(ηD)(ηF)cot2(ηB)}.

And,

d2xQdη2

=

{[(ηD)(ηF)2]+(η2D+F)cot(ηB)+(ηD)(ηF)cot2(ηB)}ddη[C(ηF)3]

 

 

+C(ηF)3ddη{[(ηD)(ηF)2]+(η2D+F)cot(ηB)+(ηD)(ηF)cot2(ηB)}

 

=

{[(ηD)(ηF)2]+(η2D+F)cot(ηB)+(ηD)(ηF)cot2(ηB)}[3C(ηF)4]

 

 

+C(ηF)3{[2η(D+F)]+cot(ηB)(η2D+F)[1+cot2(ηB)]+[2η(D+F)]cot2(ηB)2[η2η(D+F)+DF]cot(ηB)[1+cot2(ηB)]}

 

=

C(ηF)4{3[(ηD)(ηF)2]3(η2D+F)cot(ηB)3(ηD)(ηF)cot2(ηB)}

 

 

+C(ηF)3{[2η(D+F)](η2D+F)+cot(ηB)(η2D+F)cot2(ηB)+[2η(D+F)]cot2(ηB)2[η2η(D+F)+DF]cot(ηB)2[η2η(D+F)+DF]cot3(ηB)}

YYYY

And,

d2xQdη2

=

{[(ηD)(ηF)2]+(η2D+F)cot(ηB)+(ηD)(ηF)cot2(ηB)}ddη[C(ηF)3]

 

 

+C(ηF)3ddη{[(ηD)(ηF)2]+(η2D+F)cot(ηB)+(ηD)(ηF)cot2(ηB)}

 

=

{[(ηD)(ηF)2]+(η2D+F)cot(ηB)+(ηD)(ηF)cot2(ηB)}[3C(ηF)4]

 

 

+C(ηF)3{ddη[(η2D+F)cot(ηB)]+ddη[(ηD)(ηF)cot2(ηB)]}

 

=

C(ηF)4{3[(ηD)(ηF)2]3(η2D+F)cot(ηB)3(ηD)(ηF)cot2(ηB)

 

 

+(ηF)ddη[(η2D+F)cot(ηB)]+(ηF)ddη[(ηD)(ηF)cot2(ηB)]}

 

=

C(ηF)4{3[(ηD)(ηF)2]3(η2D+F)cot(ηB)3(ηD)(ηF)cot2(ηB)

 

 

+(ηF)cot(ηB)ddη[(η2D+F)]+(ηF)(η2D+F)ddη[cot(ηB)]

 

 

+(ηF)cot2(ηB)ddη[η2η(D+F)+DF]+(ηF)(ηD)(ηF)ddη[cot2(ηB)]}

 

=

C(ηF)4{3[(ηD)(ηF)2]3(η2D+F)cot(ηB)3(ηD)(ηF)cot2(ηB)

 

 

+(ηF)cot(ηB)(ηF)(η2D+F)[1+cot2(ηB)]

 

 

+(ηF)cot2(ηB)[2η(D+F)]2(ηF)(ηD)(ηF)cot(ηB)[1+cot2(ηB)]}

 

=

C(ηF)4{3[(ηD)(ηF)2](ηF)(η2D+F)

 

 

+[(ηF)3(η2D+F)2(ηF)(ηD)(ηF)]cot(ηB)

 

 

+[(ηF)[2η(D+F)]3(ηD)(ηF)2(ηF)(ηD)(ηF)cot(ηB)(ηF)(η2D+F)]cot2(ηB)}

So the envelope LAWE becomes,

(ηF)4CLAWE

=

(ηF)4Cd2xQdη2+(ηF)4C[1+ηcot(ηB0)]2ηdxQdη(ηF)4C[1ηcot(ηB0)]2xQη2

 

=

{3[(ηD)(ηF)2](ηF)(η2D+F)+[(ηF)3(η2D+F)2(ηF)(ηD)(ηF)]cot(ηB)

 

 

+[(ηF)[2η(D+F)]3(ηD)(ηF)2(ηF)(ηD)(ηF)cot(ηB)(ηF)(η2D+F)]cot2(ηB)}

 

 

+(ηF)[1+ηcot(ηB0)]2η{[(ηD)(ηF)2]+(η2D+F)cot(ηB)+(ηD)(ηF)cot2(ηB)}

 

 

(ηF)4C[1ηcot(ηB0)]2η2{A+C(ηF)2[1(ηD)cot(ηB)]}

 

=

3[(ηD)(ηF)2](ηF)(η2D+F)+[(ηF)3(η2D+F)2(ηF)(ηD)(ηF)]cot(ηB)

 

 

+(ηF)[1+ηcot(ηB0)]2η{[(ηD)(ηF)2]+(η2D+F)cot(ηB)}

 

 

+[(ηF)[2η(D+F)]3(ηD)(ηF)2(ηF)(ηD)(ηF)cot(ηB)(ηF)(η2D+F)]cot2(ηB)

 

 

+(ηF)[1+ηcot(ηB0)]2η[(ηD)(ηF)cot2(ηB)](ηF)2[1ηcot(ηB0)]2η2[1(ηD)cot(ηB)]

 

 

(ηF)4C[1ηcot(ηB0)]2Aη2.

What does this reduce to if A=D=F=0.

η4CLAWE

=

3[(η)(η)2](η)(η)+[(η)3(η)2(η)(η)(η)]cot(ηB)

 

 

+(η)[1+ηcot(ηB0)]2η{[(η)(η)2]+(η)cot(ηB)}

 

 

+[(η)[2η]3(η)(η)2(η)(η)(η)cot(ηB)(η)(η)]cot2(ηB)

 

 

+(η)[1+ηcot(ηB0)]2η[(η)(η)cot2(ηB)](η)2[1ηcot(ηB0)]2η2[1(η)cot(ηB)]

 

 

(η)4C[1ηcot(ηB0)]2Aη2.

 

=

64η22(η+η3)cot(ηB)+2[1+ηcot(ηB0)][η22+ηcot(ηB)]2[η2+η3cot(ηB)]cot2(ηB)

 

 

+2[1+ηcot(ηB0)][η2cot2(ηB)]2[1ηcot(ηB0)][1ηcot(ηB)]2Aη2C[1ηcot(ηB0)]

 

=

64η22(η+η3)cot(ηB)+2η24+2ηcot(ηB)+2η3cot(ηB0)4ηcot(ηB0)+2η2cot(ηB0)cot(ηB)2η2cot2(ηB)2η3cot3(ηB)

 

 

+2η2cot2(ηB)+2η3cot(ηB0)cot2(ηB)2+4ηcot(ηB0)2η2cot2(ηB0)2Aη2C[1ηcot(ηB0)]

 

=

2η22η3[cot(ηB)+cot3(ηB)]+cot(ηB0)[2η3+2η2cot(ηB)+2η3cot2(ηB)]2η2cot2(ηB0)2Aη2C[1ηcot(ηB0)]

 

=

2η2+2η3[cot(ηB0)cot(ηB)][1+cot2(ηB)]+2η2cot(ηB0)[cot(ηB)cot(ηB0)]2Aη2C[1ηcot(ηB0)].

See Also

  • In an accompanying Chapter within our "Ramblings" Appendix, we have played with the adiabatic wave equation for polytropes, examining its form when the primary perturbation variable is an enthalpy-like quantity, rather than the radial displacement of a spherical mass shell. This was done in an effort to mimic the approach that has been taken in studies of the stability of Papaloizou-Pringle tori.
  • n=32 … D. Lucas (1953, Bul. Soc. Roy. Sci. Liege, 25, 585) … Citation obtained from the Prasad & Gurm (1961) article.


Tiled Menu

Appendices: | VisTrailsEquations | VisTrailsVariables | References | Ramblings | VisTrailsImages | myphys.lsu | ADS |