<td align="center">'''Figure 8'''<br />Duplicate of Fig. 1 from [https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1984PASJ...36..497H/abstract Hachisu & Eriguchi (1984)]</td>
<div align="center">[[File:BifurcationPointsHE84.png|center|500px|Bifurcation Points Along Maclaurin Spheroid Sequence]]</div><br />
Bifurcation points on the Maclaurin sequence for the deformation type <math>P_n^m(\eta) \times \cos(m\phi)</math>, plotted in the <math>\omega^2-j^2</math> plane. The numbers in the parentheses denote the deformation type of <math>(n, m)</math>. Other computed sequences are also plotted [taken from Eriguchi and Hachisu (1982)]. One-ring sequence starts from the bifurcation point of <math>(4, 0)</math> and two-ring sequence bifurcates from the point of <math>(6, 0)</math>.
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">
This solid black curve also appears in:
<div align="center">
Fig. 3 (p. 1134) of [https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1983PThPh..69.1131E/abstract Eriguchi & Hachisu (1983)]<br />
Fig. 3 (p. 487) of [https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1986ApJS...61..479H/abstract Hachisu (1986)]<br />
Fig. 4 (p. 4507) of [https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.487.4504B/abstract Basillais & Huré (2019)]
The dark blue circular markers locate 15 of the 18 individual models identified in Table 1. The solid black curve derives from our evaluation of the function, this curve also may be found in:
Fig. 5 (p. 79) of [EFE];
Fig. 7.2 (p. 173) of [ST83]
The essential structural elements of each Maclaurin spheroid model are uniquely determined once we specify the system's axis ratio, , or the system's meridional-plane eccentricity, , where
which varies from e = 0 (spherical structure) to e = 1 (infinitesimally thin disk). According to our accompanying derivation, for a given choice of , the square of the system's equilibrium angular velocity is,
[EFE], §32, p. 77, Eq. (4)
[T78], §4.5, p. 86, Eq. (52)
[ST83], §7.3, p. 172, Eq. (7.3.18)
where,
📚 Thomson & Tait (1867), §522, p. 392, Eqs. (9) & (7)
[EFE], §17, p. 43, Eq. (36)
[T78], §4.5, p. 85, Eqs. (48) & (49)
[ST83], §7.3, p. 170, Eq. (7.3.8)
Figure 1 shows how the square of the angular velocity varies with eccentricity along the Maclaurin spheroid sequence; given the chosen normalization unit, , it is understood that the density of the configuration is held fixed as the eccentricity is varied.
Examining the Maclaurin spheroid sequence "… we see that the value of increases gradually from zero to a maximum as the eccentricity rises from zero to about 0.93, and then (more quickly) falls to zero as the eccentricity rises from 0.93 to unity." … "If the angular velocity exceed the value associated with this maximum, "… equilibrium is impossible in the form of an ellipsoid of revolution. If the angular velocity fall short of this limit there are always two ellipsoids of revolution which satisfy the conditions of equilibrium. In one of these the eccentricity is greater than 0.93, in the other less."
The extremum of the curve occurs where ; that is, it occurs where,
In our Figure 1, the small solid-green square marker identifies the location along the sequence where the system with the maximum angular velocity resides:
Figure 2 shows how the system's normalized angular momentum, , varies with eccentricity along the Maclaurin spheroid sequence; given the chosen normalization unit, , it is understood that the mass and the volume — hence, also the density — of the configuration are held fixed as the eccentricity is varied. Strictly speaking, along this sequence the angular momentum asymptotically approaches infinity as ; by limiting the ordinate to a maximum value of 1.2, the plot masks this asymptotic behavior. The small solid-green square marker identifies the location along this sequence where the system with the maximum angular velocity resides (see Figure 1); this system is not associated with a turning point along this angular-momentum versus eccentricity sequence.
Building on an accompanying discussion of the structure of Maclaurin spheroids, Table 2 — shown just above, on the right — lists the limiting values of several key functions. Note, in particular, that as the eccentricity varies smoothly from zero (spherical configuration) to unity (infinitesimally thin disk), the energy ratio, , varies smoothly from zero to one-half. In his examination of the Maclaurin spheroid sequence, Tassoul (1978) chose to use this energy ratio as the order parameter, rather than the eccentricity.
Following Tassoul, our Figure 3 shows how the square of the angular velocity varies with , and our Figure 4 shows how the system angular momentum varies with . In these plots, respectively, the square of the angular velocity has been normalized by — that is, by a quantity that is a factor of two larger than the normalization adopted in EFE — while the angular momentum has been normalized to the same quantity used in EFE. As above, the small solid-green square marker identifies the location along the sequence where the system with the maximum angular velocity resides.
Angular Velocity or T/|W| vs. Angular Momentum
Figures 5 and 6, respectively, show how the square of the angular velocity and how the energy ratio, τ, vary with the square of the angular momentum for models along the Maclaurin spheroid sequence. In generating these plots, following the lead of 📚 Eriguchi & Hachisu (1983a), we have normalized the square of the angular velocity by — a factor of four larger than the normalization used in EFE — and we have adopted a slightly different angular-momentum-squared normalization, namely,
Note that in 📚 Wong (1974) — see the NOTE appended to his Table 2 (p. 686) — the parameter provides the measure of the configuration's specific angular momentum; specifically,
In this coordinate system, the surface of the Maclaurin spheroid is marked by a specific value of the coordinate, — call it, — and points along the surface (in any meridional plane) are identified by varying from zero (equatorial plane) to unity (the pole). Given that the eccentricity of the spheroid is , we understand that,
Also, in order for the volume of the spheroid to remain constant — and equal to that of a sphere of the same total mass and density — along the sequence of spheroids we understand that,