Appendix/Mathematics/Hypergeometric

From jetwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Hypergeometric Differential Equation

Gradshteyn & Ryzhik

According to §9.151 (p. 1045) of Gradshteyn & Ryzhik (1965), "… a hypergeometric series is one of the solutions of the differential equation,

0

=

z(1−z)d2udz2+[γ−(α+β+1)z]dudz−αβu,

which is called the hypergeometric equation. And, according to §9.10 (p. 1039) of Gradshteyn & Ryzhik (1965), "A hypergeometric series is a series of the form,

F(α,β;γ;z)

=

1+[α⋅βγ⋅1]z+[α(α+1)β(β+1)γ(γ+1)⋅1⋅2]z2+[α(α+1)(α+2)β(β+1)(β+2)γ(γ+1)(γ+2)⋅1⋅2⋅3]z3+…

Among other attributes, Gradshteyn & Ryzhik (1965) note that this, "… series terminates if α or β is equal to a negative integer or to zero."

Van der Borght

General Value for b

Comment by J. E. Tohline: In Van der Borght (1970), the fourth argument of the hypergeometric function is ax2 whereas the more general power law form, axb, applies.
Comment by J. E. Tohline: In Van der Borght (1970), the fourth argument of the hypergeometric function is ax2 whereas the more general power law form, axb, applies.

In association with his equation (3), 📚 R. Van der Borght (1970, Proc. Astr. Soc. Australia, Vol. 1, Issue 7, pp. 325 - 326) states that a displacement function of the form,

ξ

=

xcF(α,β,γ,axb),

provides a solution to the following 2nd-order ODE:

0

=

x2(axb−1)⋅d2ξdx2+(apxb+λ)x⋅dξdx+(arxb+s)⋅ξ.

Is this ODE essentially the same as the above-defined hypergeometric equation?

A mapping between the two differential equations requires,

axb

↔

z,

      and,      

ξxc

↔

u,

⇒dxdz

=

ddz(za)1/b=a−1/b⋅dz1/bdz=1b⋅a−1/bz−1+1/b=1bz⋅(za)1/b=xbz=x1−bab,

in which case,

0

=

z(1−z)d2udz2+[γ−(α+β+1)z]dudz−αβu

 

=

axb(1−axb){dxdz⋅ddx[dxdz⋅ddx(ξx−c)]}+[γ−(α+β+1)axb]dxdz⋅ddx⋅(ξx−c)−αβ(ξx−c)

 

=

axb(1−axb){x1−bab⋅ddx[x1−bab⋅(x−cdξdx−cξx−1−c)]}+[γ−(α+β+1)axb]⋅x1−bab⋅(x−cdξdx−cξx−1−c)−αβ(ξx−c)

 

=

axb(1−axb){x1−ba2b2⋅ddx[x1−b−cdξdx−cξx−b−c]}+[γ−(α+β+1)axb]ab⋅(x1−b−cdξdx−cξx−b−c)−αβ(ξx−c)

 

=

axb(1−axb)⋅x1−ba2b2⋅[x1−b−cd2ξdx2+(1−b−c)x−b−cdξdx−cx−b−cdξdx−c(−b−c)ξx−1−b−c]

 

 

+[γ−(α+β+1)axb]ab⋅[x1−b−cdξdx−cξx−b−c]−(αβx−c)ξ

 

=

(1−axb)⋅xab2⋅[x1−b−cd2ξdx2]+(1−axb)⋅xab2⋅[(1−b−c)x−b−cdξdx−cx−b−cdξdx]+(1−axb)⋅xab2⋅[c(b+c)ξx−1−b−c]

 

 

+[γ−(α+β+1)axb]ab⋅[x1−b−cdξdx]−[γ−(α+β+1)axb]ab⋅[cξx−b−c]−(αβx−c)ξ

 

=

(1−axb)ab2⋅x2[x−b−cd2ξdx2]+{(1−axb)ab2⋅[(1−b−c)x1−b−c−cx1−b−c]+[γ−(α+β+1)axb]ab⋅[x1−b−c]}dξdx

 

 

+{−c[γ−(α+β+1)axb]ab⋅[x−b−c]−(αβx−b−c)xb+(1−axb)ab2⋅[c(b+c)x−b−c]}ξ.

Multiplying through by (−ab2xb+c) gives,

(−ab2xb+c)×0

=

x2(axb−1)d2ξdx2+{(axb−1)⋅[(1−b−c)−c]−b[γ−(α+β+1)axb]}x⋅dξdx

 

 

+{bc[γ−(α+β+1)axb]+(αβab2)xb−(1−axb)⋅[c(b+c)]}ξ

 

=

x2(axb−1)d2ξdx2+{−(1+bγ−b−2c)+axb(1−b−2c)+b(α+β+1)axb}x⋅dξdx

 

 

+{bcγ−c(b+c)−bc(α+β+1)axb+αβab2xb+c(b+c)axb}ξ

 

=

x2(axb−1)d2ξdx2+(apxb+λ)x⋅dξdx+(arxb+s)ξ,

which matches equation (3) of 📚 Van der Borght (1970) if the expressions for the four new scalar coefficients are,

Required Mapping Expressions

1st:

p

=

(1−b−2c)+b(α+β+1)=1−2c+b(α+β),

2nd:

λ

=

−(1+bγ−b−2c),

3rd:

s

=

bcγ−c(b+c)=c(bγ−b−c),

4th:

r

=

−bc(α+β+1)+αβb2+c(b+c).

If, for any given problem, we are given the values of these four scalar coefficients along with a choice of the exponent, b, that appears in the fourth argument of the hypergeometric series, we can determine values the other three arguments of the hypergeometric series — α,β,γ — and the exponent, c. In what follows we show how this is done.

Determining the Value of the Exponent, c

Equating (bγ) in the 2nd and 3rd of the required mapping expressions, gives,

−(1−b−2c+λ)

=

sc+b+c

⇒(1+λ)

=

c−sc

⇒0

=

c2−c(1+λ)−s.

The pair of roots, c±, of this quadratic equation are then obtained from the relation,

2c±

=

(1+λ)±[(1+λ)2+4s]1/2.

Note for further use below that,

2(c+−c−)

=

{(1+λ)+[(1+λ)2+4s]1/2}−{(1+λ)−[(1+λ)2+4s]1/2}.

 

=

2[(1+λ)2+4s]1/2.

Consistent with our derivation, 📚 Van der Borght (1970) states, "… if A1, A2 are the solutions of A2−(λ+1)A−s=0 … then c=A1 …"

Determining the Value of the Coefficient, γ

Combining our 3rd required mapping expression with the quadratic equation for c± in such a way as to eliminate s, we find,

cb(γ−1)−c2

=

c2−c(1+λ)

⇒b(γ−1)

=

2c±−(1+λ).

Adopting the superior sign, we find that,

b(γ−1)

=

2c+−(1+λ)=[(1+λ)2+4s]1/2

 

=

(c+−c−),

where, in order to make this last step we have drawn from the relation derived immediately above.

Consistent with this derivation, 📚 Van der Borght (1970) states, "… (1−γ)b=A2−A1 …"

Determining the Values of the Coefficients, α and β

Combining the 1st and 4th required mapping expressions in such a way as to cancel terms involving bc(α+β), we find,

(1−p)c−2c2+bc(α+β)

=

bc(α+β)+bc−αβb2−c(b+c)+r

⇒(1−p)c−c2

=

−αβb2+r

⇒(bα)(bβ)

=

−(1−p)c+c2+r.

Also, from the 1st required mapping expression alone we can write,

(bα)

=

(p−1)+2c−bβ.

Together, then, we have,

(bβ)[(p−1)+2c−bβ]

=

−(1−p)c+c2+r

⇒0

=

(bβ)2−(bβ)[(p−1)+2c]⏟(bα+bβ)+[c2+(p−1)c+r]⏞(bα)⋅(bβ).

The pair of roots, (bβ)±, of this quadratic equation are then obtained from the relation,

2(bβ)±

=

[(p−1)+2c]±{[(p−1)+2c]2−4[c2+(p−1)c+r]}1/2.

Finally, plugging this expression for (bβ±) into the 1st required mapping expression gives (bα±).


Alternate Determination of α and β by Completing Squares

Again, let's draw upon the 📚 Van der Borght (1970) statement that, "… if A1, A2 are the solutions of A2−(λ+1)A−s=0 … then c=A1 …"


📚 Van der Borght (1970) also states that if, "… B1,B2 are solutions of B2−(p−1)B+r=0, then … bα=A1+B1 and bβ=A1+B2."

Let's see if we draw these same conclusions.

First, Complete the square in the quadratic equation for B2:

B2−(p−1)B

=

−r

⇒B2−(p−1)B+[(p−1)2]2

=

[(p−1)2]2−r

⇒[B−(p−1)2]2

=

[(p−1)2]2−r

Second, complete the square in the quadratic equation for A2 — which also completes the square for c2:

A2−(λ+1)A

=

s

⇒A2−(λ+1)A+[(λ+1)2]2

=

s+[(λ+1)2]2

⇒[A−(λ+1)2]2

=

s+[(λ+1)2]2

Third, complete the square in the quadratic equation for (bβ)2:

(bβ)2−(bβ)[(p−1)+2c]

=

−[c2+(p−1)c+r]

⇒(bβ)2−(bβ)[(p−1)+2c]+[(p−1)+2c2]2

=

[(p−1)+2c2]2−[c2+(p−1)c+r]

⇒[(bβ)−(p−1)+2c2]2

=

[(p−1)+2c2]2−[c2+(p−1)c+(p−1)222]−r+(p−1)222

 

=

[(p−1)2+c]2−[c+(p−1)2]2−r+(p−1)222

 

=

−r+(p−1)222

 

=

[B−(p−1)2]2.

Taking the positive root of both sides of this expression, we find that,

(bβ)−(p−1)2−c+

=

B+−(p−1)2

⇒(bβ)

=

B++c+.

But, c±=A±. So we conclude, as did 📚 Van der Borght (1970), that,

(bβ)

=

B++A+.

Alternatively, taking the negative root of the RHS of this expression, we find that,

(bβ)−(p−1)2−c+

=

−B−+(p−1)2

⇒(bβ)

=

(p−1)2+c+−B−+(p−1)2

 

=

c+−B−+(p−1).

Also, given that,

1−2c+b(α+β)

=

p

⇒(bα)

=

p−1+2c−(bβ)

 

=

(p−1)+2c−[c+−B−+(p−1)]

 

=

2c−c++B−.

As long as we assume that c=c+ in this expression, we also obtain the 📚 Van der Borght (1970) expression for (bα), namely,

(bα)

=

B−+A+.

If b = 2

0

=

z(1−z)d2udz2+[γ−(α+β+1)z]dudz−αβu

 

=

ax2(1−ax2){dxdz⋅ddx[dxdz⋅ddx(ξx−c)]}+[γ−(α+β+1)ax2]dxdz⋅ddx⋅(ξx−c)−αβ(ξx−c)

 

=

ax2(1−ax2){12ax⋅ddx[12ax⋅(x−cdξdx−cξx−1−c)]}+[γ−(α+β+1)ax2]⋅12ax⋅(x−cdξdx−cξx−1−c)−αβ(ξx−c)

 

=

ax2(1−ax2){14a2x⋅ddx[(x−1−cdξdx−cξx−2−c)]}+[γ−(α+β+1)ax2]⋅12a⋅(x−1−cdξdx−cξx−2−c)−αβ(ξx−c)

 

=

x(1−ax2)4a{x−1−cd2ξdx2−(1+c)x−2−cdξdx−cx−2−cdξdx+(2c+c2)ξx−3−c}

 

 

+[γ−(α+β+1)ax22a]⋅(x−1−cdξdx)−{[γ−(α+β+1)ax22a]⋅cx−2−c+αβx−c}ξ

 

=

x(1−ax2)4a{x−1−cd2ξdx2}+{x(1−ax2)4a[−(1+c)x−2−c−cx−2−c]+[γ−(α+β+1)ax22a]⋅x−1−c}dξdx

 

 

+{[x(1−ax2)4a](2c+c2)x−3−c−[γ−(α+β+1)ax22a]⋅cx−2−c−αβx−c}ξ.

Multiplying through by a term proportional to x2+c gives us,

[−4ax2+c]×[0]

=

x2(ax2−1){d2ξdx2}+{x(1−ax2)[(1+c)+c]−2[γ−(α+β+1)ax2]⋅x}dξdx

 

 

+{(ax2−1)(2c+c2)−2c[γ−(α+β+1)ax2]+4aαβx2}ξ

 

=

x2(ax2−1){d2ξdx2}+{(1+2c−2γ)−ax2(1+2c)+2(α+β+1)ax2]}x⋅dξdx

 

 

+{(ax2−1)(2c+c2)−2c[γ−(α+β+1)ax2]+4aαβx2}ξ

LAWE

Familiar Foundation

Drawing from an accompanying discussion, we have the,

LAWE:   Linear Adiabatic Wave (or Radial Pulsation) Equation

d2xdr02+[4r0−(g0ρ0P0)]dxdr0+(ρ0γgP0)[ω2+(4−3γg)g0r0]x=0

where,

g0

=

−1ρ0dP0dr0.

Multiplying through by R2, and making the variable substitutions,

x

→

f,

r0R

→

x,

(4−3γg)

→

−αγg,

the LAWE may be rewritten as,

0

=

d2fdx2+[4x−(g0ρ0RP0)]dfdx+(ρ0R2γgP0)[ω2−αγgg0r0]f

 

=

d2fdx2+1x[4−(g0ρ0r0P0)]dfdx+[(ω2ρ0R2γgP0)−αγgg0r0(ρ0R2γgP0)]f

 

=

d2fdx2+1x[4−(g0ρ0r0P0)]dfdx+[(ω2ρ0R2γgP0)−αx2(g0r0ρ0P0)]f.

If we furthermore adopt the variable definition,

μ

≡

(g0ρ0r0P0)=−dln⁡P0dln⁡r0,

we obtain what we will refer to as the,

Kopal (1948) LAWE

0

=

d2fdx2+(4−μ)x⋅dfdx+[(ω2ρ0R2γgP0)−αμx2]f.

📚 Kopal (1948), p. 378, Eq. (6)
📚 Van der Borght (1970), p. 325, Eq. (1)

Specifically for Polytropes

Let's look at the expression for the function, μ, that arises in the context of polytropic spheres.

General Expression for the Function μ

First, we note that,

r0

=

aξ,

ρ0

=

ρcθn,

P0

=

K[ρcθn](n+1)/n,

Mr

=

4πa3ρc(−ξ2dθdξ),

g0≡GMrr02

=

4πGaρc(−dθdξ),

where,

a

≡

[(n+1)K4πG]1/2ρc(1−n)/2n.

⇒K

=

[4πG(n+1)]a2ρc(n−1)/n.

Hence,

μ=(g0ρ0r0P0)

=

4πGaρc(−dθdξ)ρcθnaξ[ρcθn]−(n+1)/n[(n+1)4πG]a−2ρc−(n−1)/n

 

=

(n+1)(−dθdξ)θnξθ−(n+1)ρc2−(n+1)/n−(n−1)/n

 

=

(n+1)(−ξθ⋅dθdξ)=(n+1)(−dln⁡θdln⁡ξ).

Alternatively,

μ=−dln⁡P0dln⁡r0

=

−r0P0⋅dP0dr0

 

=

−ξθ−(n+1)⋅ddξ[θ(n+1)]

 

=

−(n+1)(ξθ⋅dθdξ)=(n+1)(−dln⁡θdln⁡ξ).

Yes!

Trial Displacement Function

Now, building on an accompanying discussion, let's guess,

ftrial

=

3(n−1)2n[1+(n−3n−1)(1ξθn)dθdξ]

⇒[2n3(n−1)]ftrial

=

1+(n−3n−1)ξ−1θ−n[θξ⋅dln⁡θdln⁡ξ]

 

=

1+(3−nn−1)ξ−2θ(1−n)⋅(−dln⁡θdln⁡ξ)

 

=

1+[3−n(n+1)(n−1)]ξ−2θ(1−n)⋅μ

Flipping it around, we have alternatively,

μ

=

[(n+1)(n−1)3−n]{[2n3(n−1)]ftrial−1}ξ2θ(n−1)


Plug into Kopal (1948) LAWE

Replace ftrial by μ

Plugging this trial function into the Kopal (1948) LAWE and recognizing that x=ξ/ξ1, we find,

ξ1−2⋅LAWE

=

d2ftrialdξ2+(4−μ)ξ⋅dftrialdξ+[(ω2ρ0R2γgP0ξ12)−αμξ2]ftrial

⇒[2n3(n−1)]ξ1−2⋅LAWE

=

d2dξ2{1+[3−n(n+1)(n−1)]ξ−2θ(1−n)⋅μ}+(4−μ)ξ⋅ddξ{1+[3−n(n+1)(n−1)]ξ−2θ(1−n)⋅μ}

 

 

+[(ω2ρ0R2γgP0ξ12)−αμξ2]{1+[3−n(n+1)(n−1)]ξ−2θ(1−n)⋅μ}

⇒[2n(n+1)3]ξ1−2⋅LAWE

=

d2dξ2{(3−n)ξ−2θ(1−n)⋅μ}+(4−μ)ξ⋅ddξ{(3−n)ξ−2θ(1−n)⋅μ}

 

 

+[(ω2ρ0R2γgP0ξ12)−αμξ2]{(n+1)(n−1)+(3−n)ξ−2θ(1−n)⋅μ}

⇒[2n(n+1)3(3−n)]ξ1−2⋅LAWE

=

d2dξ2{ξ−2θ(1−n)⋅μ}+(4−μ)ξ⋅ddξ{ξ−2θ(1−n)⋅μ}+[(ω2ρ0R2γgP0ξ12)−αμξ2]{(n+1)(n−1)(3−n)+ξ−2θ(1−n)⋅μ}.

Noting that, R/ξ1=a and

ρ0P0

=

ρcθnK−1ρc−(n+1)/nθ−(n+1)=K−1ρc−1/nθ−1,

the frequency-squared term may be rewritten as,

ω2γg(ρ0a2P0)

=

(ω2γg)K−1ρc−1/nθ−1[(n+1)K4πG]ρc(1−n)/n=(ω2γg)[(n+1)4πρcG]θ−1.

Replace μ by ftrial

Making instead the alternate substitution, namely,

μ

=

[(n+1)(n−1)3−n]{[2n3(n−1)]ftrial−1}ξ2θ(n−1)

 

=

{2n(n+1)3(3−n)⋅ftrial−(n+1)(n−1)3−n}ξ2θ(n−1)

 

=

13(3−n)[2n(n+1)⏟Aftrial−3(n+1)(n−1)⏟B]ξ2θ(n−1)

we have,

ξ1−2⋅LAWE

=

d2ftrialdξ2+{4ξ}dftrialdξ−{μξ}dftrialdξ+(ω2γg)[(n+1)4πρcG]ftrialθ−(αξ2)μftrial

⇒[3(3−n)ξ12]LAWE

=

3(3−n)d2ftrialdξ2+{12(3−n)ξ}dftrialdξ−[Aftrial−B]ξθ(n−1)dftrialdξ

 

 

+3(3−n)(ω2γg)[(n+1)4πρcG]ftrialθ−α[Aftrial−B]θ(n−1)ftrial.

Noting that,

ddξ[ξθ(n−1)ftrial]

=

{θ(n−1)ftrial+ξftrial(n−1)θ(n−2)dθdξ+ξθ(n−1)dftrialdξ}

⇒ξθ(n−1)dftrialdξ

=

ddξ[ξθ(n−1)ftrial]−[θ(n−1)ftrial+ξftrial(n−1)θ(n−2)dθdξ],

we furthermore can write,

⇒[3(3−n)ξ12]LAWE

=

3(3−n)d2ftrialdξ2+{12(3−n)ξ}dftrialdξ+3(3−n)(ω2γg)[(n+1)4πρcG]ftrialθ

 

 

−α[Aftrial−B]θ(n−1)ftrial−[Aftrial−B]{ddξ[ξθ(n−1)ftrial]−[θ(n−1)ftrial+ξftrial(n−1)θ(n−2)dθdξ]}

 

=

3(3−n)d2ftrialdξ2+{12(3−n)ξ}dftrialdξ+3(3−n)(ω2γg)[(n+1)4πρcG]ftrialθ

 

 

−[Aftrial−B]{ddξ[ξθ(n−1)ftrial]−[θ(n−1)ftrial+ξftrial(n−1)θ(n−2)dθdξ]+αθ(n−1)ftrial}

Seek Hypergeometric Form

Start with the standard LAWE, namely,

0

=

d2fdξ2+(4−μ)ξ⋅dfdξ+[(ω2ρ0R2γgP0)−αμξ2]f

 

=

d2fdξ2+1ξ[4+(n+1)ξθ'θ]⋅dfdξ+(n+1)[(σc26γg)1θ+αθ'ξθ]f.

Part I

Try switching the independent variable from ξ to z such that,

z

=

ξ−1θ−n(θ')⇒(θ')=ξθnz

⇒dzdξ

=

−ξ−2θ−n(θ')−nξ−1θ−n−1(θ')2+ξ−1θ−n(θ'′)

 

=

−[ξ−2θ−n(θ')+nξ−1θ−n−1(θ')2+ξ−1θ−n(θn+2θ′ξ)]

 

=

−[ξ−2θ−n(ξθnz)+nξ−1θ−n−1(ξθnz)2+ξ−1θ−n(θn)+ξ−1θ−n(2θ′ξ)]

 

=

−[ξ−1z+nξθn−1z2+ξ−1+2ξ−1z]

 

=

−[ξ−1(1+3z)+nξθn−1z2];

and,

d2zdξ2

=

−{−ξ−2(1+3z)+3ξ−1⋅dzdξ+nθn−1z2+n(n−1)ξθn−2(θ')z2+2nξθn−1z⋅dzdξ}

 

=

−{−ξ−2(1+3z)−3ξ−1⋅[ξ−1(1+3z)+nξθn−1z2]+nθn−1z2+n(n−1)ξθn−2(ξθnz)z2−2nξθn−1z⋅[ξ−1(1+3z)+nξθn−1z2]}

 

=

{ξ−2(1+3z)+3ξ−1⋅[ξ−1(1+3z)+nξθn−1z2]−nθn−1z2−n(n−1)ξθn−2(ξθnz)z2+2nξθn−1z⋅[ξ−1(1+3z)+nξθn−1z2]}

 

=

{ξ−2(1+3z)+[3ξ−2(1+3z)+3nθn−1z2]−nθn−1z2−n(n−1)ξ2θ2(n−1)z3+[2nθn−1z(1+3z)+2n2ξ2θ2(n−1)z3]}

 

=

4ξ−2(1+3z)+2nθn−1[z(1+3z)+z2]+[2n2−n(n−1)]ξ2θ2(n−1)z3

 

=

4ξ−2(1+3z)+2nθn−1[1+4z]z+n(n+1)ξ2θ2(n−1)z3.

Part II

Part I Summary …

(θ')

=

ξθnz,

dzdξ

=

−[ξ−1(1+3z)+nξθn−1z2],

d2zdξ2

=

4ξ−2(1+3z)+2nθn−1[1+4z]z+n(n+1)ξ2θ2(n−1)z3.



Also,

dfdξ

→

dzdξ⋅dfdz;

d2fdξ2=ddξ[dzdξ⋅dfdz]

→

d2zdξ2⋅dfdz+[dzdξ]2⋅d2fdz2

As a result,

LAWE

=

d2fdξ2+1ξ[4+(n+1)ξθ'θ]⋅dfdξ+(n+1)[(σc26γg)1θ+αθ'ξθ]f

 

=

d2fdξ2

 

 

+1ξ[4+(n+1)ξ2θn−1z]⋅dfdξ

 

 

+(n+1)[(σc26γg)1θ+αθn−1z]f

 

=

[dzdξ]2⋅d2fdz2+d2zdξ2⋅dfdz

 

 

+[4ξ−1+(n+1)ξθn−1z]dzdξ⋅dfdz

 

 

+(n+1)[(σc26γg)θ−1+αθn−1z]f

 

=

{dzdξ}2⋅d2fdz2

 

 

+{d2zdξ2+[4ξ−1+(n+1)ξθn−1z]dzdξ}dfdz

 

 

+(n+1)[(σc26γg)θ−1+αθn−1z]f

 

=

{ξ−1(1+3z)+nξθn−1z2}2⋅d2fdz2+(n+1)[(σc26γg)θ−1+αθn−1z]f

 

 

+{[4ξ−2(1+3z)+2nθn−1[1+4z]z+n(n+1)ξ2θ2(n−1)z3]−[4ξ−1+(n+1)ξθn−1z][ξ−1(1+3z)+nξθn−1z2]}dfdz

 

=

[ξ−1(1+3z)+nξθn−1z2][ξ−1(1+3z)+nξθn−1z2]⋅d2fdz2+(n+1)[(σc26γg)θ−1+αθn−1z]f

 

 

+[4ξ−2(1+3z)+2nθn−1[1+4z]z+n(n+1)ξ2θ2(n−1)z3]dfdz

 

 

−[4ξ−1][ξ−1(1+3z)+nξθn−1z2]dfdz−[(n+1)ξθn−1z][ξ−1(1+3z)+nξθn−1z2]dfdz

 

=

[ξ−2(1+3z)2+2n(1+3z)z2θn−1+n2ξ2θ2(n−1)z4]⋅d2fdz2+(n+1)[(σc26γg)θ−1+αθn−1z]f

 

 

+[4ξ−2(1+3z)+2nθn−1[1+4z]z+n(n+1)ξ2θ2(n−1)z3]dfdz

 

 

−[4ξ−2(1+3z)+4nθn−1z2]dfdz−[(n+1)θn−1(1+3z)z+n(n+1)ξ2θ2(n−1)z3]dfdz

 

=

[ξ−2(1+3z)2+2n(1+3z)z2θn−1+n2ξ2θ2(n−1)z4]⋅d2fdz2+(n+1)[(σc26γg)θ−1+αθn−1z]f

 

 

+{[2nθn−1(1+4z)]−[4nθn−1z]−[(n+1)θn−1(1+3z)]}z⋅dfdz

 

=

[ξ−2(1+3z)2+2n(1+3z)z2θn−1+n2ξ2θ2(n−1)z4]⋅d2fdz2+(n+1)[(σc26γg)θ−1+αθn−1z]f

 

 

+{[2n+8nz]−[4nz]−[(n+1)+3(n+1)z]}θn−1z⋅dfdz

 

=

[ξ−2(1+3z)2+2n(1+3z)z2θn−1+n2ξ2θ2(n−1)z4]⋅d2fdz2+(n+1)[(σc26γg)θ−1+αθn−1z]f

 

 

+{(n−1)+(n−3)z}θn−1z⋅dfdz.

Part III

Now, suppose that f=(a0+b0z). We have,

LAWE

=

[ξ−2(1+3z)2+2n(1+3z)z2θn−1+n2ξ2θ2(n−1)z4]⋅d2fdz20+(n+1)[(σc26γg)θ−1+αθn−1z](a0+b0z)+{(n−1)+(n−3)z}θn−1z⋅b0

 

=

(n+1)[(σc26γg)θ−1](a0+b0z)+{(n+1)α(a0+b0z)+b0(n−1)+b0(n−3)z}θn−1z

 

=

(n+1)[(σc26γg)θ−1](a0+b0z)+{(n+1)α(a0)+b0(n−1)+[(n−3)+(n+1)α]b0z}θn−1z.

Now, in order for the last term to be zero, we need,

0

=

[(n−3)+(n+1)α]

⇒α

=

3−nn+1.

This is precisely the relation that results from the definition of α≡(3−4/γg) if the model is evolved assuming γg=(n+1)/n. We simultaneously seek the relation,

0

=

(n+1)α(a0)+b0(n−1)

⇒b0

=

[n+11−n]α(a0)

 

=

a0[3−n1−n]

It appears as though the leading coefficient, a0, is arbitrary, so we will set it equal to unity. This means that the displacement function is,

f

=

1+[3−n1−n]z.

This expression for the displacement function, f, is identical to the expression found inside the square brackets of our separately derived exact solution of the polytropic LAWE. Furthermore, given the notation, (σc2/γg)=(𝔉−2α), the first term on the RHS of the LAWE will go to zero when, 𝔉=2(3−n)/(n+1).

Part IV

If we divide through by (θn−1z), the LAWE that was derived above in Part II assumes the following form,

[θ1−nz−1]× LAWE

=

θ1−nz−1[ξ−2(1+3z)2+2n(1+3z)z2θn−1+n2ξ2θ2(n−1)z4]⋅d2fdz2+{(n−1)+(n−3)z}⋅dfdz+(n+1)[(σc26γg)θ−nz−1+α]⋅f

 

=

[ξ−2θ1−nz−1(1+3z)2+2n(1+3z)z+n2ξ2θ(n−1)z3]⋅d2fdz2+{(n−1)+(n−3)z}⋅dfdz+(n+1)[(σc26γg)θ−nz−1+α]⋅f,

which resembles the above-discussed hypergeometric differential equation, namely,

0

=

z(1−z)d2udz2+[γ−(α+β+1)z]dudz−αβu.

For the record we note that the coefficient (in square brackets) of the first term on the RHS of our LAWE expression is the square of the first derivative of z with respect to ξ; that is,

θ1−nz−1(dzdξ)2

=

θ1−nz−1[ξ−1(1+3z)+nξθn−1z2]2

 

=

θ1−nz−1[ξ−2(1+3z)2+2n(1+3z)θn−1z2+n2ξ2θ2(n−1)z4].

Part V

Now suppose that, f=(a0+b0z+c0z2), where again,

z

=

ξ−1θ−n(θ').

Recalling that,

Part I Summary …

(θ')

=

ξθnz,

dzdξ

=

−[ξ−1(1+3z)+nξθn−1z2],

d2zdξ2

=

4ξ−2(1+3z)+2nθn−1[1+4z]z+n(n+1)ξ2θ2(n−1)z3.

it may prove useful to recognize that,

θ'=dθdξ

→

dzdξ⋅dθdz

⇒dθdz

=

(dzdξ)−1ξθnz

⇒dln⁡θdln⁡z

=

(dzdξ)−1ξθn−1z2

⇒dzdξ

=

(dln⁡θdln⁡z)−1ξθn−1z2


In this case we have,

LAWE

=

[−(dln⁡θdln⁡z)−1ξθn−1z2]2⋅(2c0)+(n+1)[(σc26γg)θ−1+αθn−1z](a0+b0z+c0z2)

 

 

+{(n−1)+(n−3)z}θn−1z⋅(b0+2c0z)

Useful ?????

Try again …

[θ1−nz−1]× LAWE

=

θ1−nz−1[dzdξ]2⋅d2(a0+b0z+c0z2)dz2+{(n−1)+(n−3)z}⋅d(a0+b0z+c0z2)dz+(n+1)[(σc26γg)θ−nz−1+α]⋅(a0+b0z+c0z2)

 

=

[ξ−2(1+3z)2+2n(1+3z)z2θn−1+n2ξ2θ2(n−1)z4]⋅(2c0)+{(n−1)+(n−3)z}⋅(b0+2c0z)+(n+1)[(σc26γg)θ−nz−1+α]⋅(a0+b0z+c0z2)

 

=

[(2c0)ξ−2(1+6z+9z2)+4c0n(z2+3z3)θn−1+2c0n2ξ2θ2(n−1)z4]+(n−1)(b0+2c0z)

 

 

+(n−3)(b0z+2c0z2)+(n+1)[(σc26γg)θ−nz−1]⋅(a0+b0z+c0z2)+(n+1)α(a0+b0z+c0z2).

Looks pretty hopeless!

Example Density- and Pressure-Profiles

Properties of Analytically Defined, Spherically Symmetric, Equilibrium Structures

Note:  x≡r0R

Model ρ0(x)ρc P0(x)Pc RPc⋅P0'(x)

μ(x)=−[P0(x)Pc]−1⋅[RPc⋅P0'(x)]x

Pcρc⋅ρ0(x)P0(x)
Uniform-density 1 1−x2 −2x 2x2(1−x2) 1(1−x2)
Linear 1−x (1−x)2(1+2x−95x2) −125x(1−x)(4−3x) 125x2(4−3x)(1−x)(1+2x−95x2) 1(1−x)(1+2x−95x2)
Parabolic 1−x2 (1−x2)2(1−12x2) −x(1−x2)(5−3x2) x2(5−3x2)(1−x2)(1−12x2) 1(1−x2)(1−12x2)
n=1 Polytrope sin⁡xx (sin⁡xx)2 2x[cos⁡x−sin⁡xx]sin⁡xx 2(1−xcot⁡x) xsin⁡x

Parabolic Density Distribution

Relevant, Parabolic LAWE

In the case of a parabolic density distribution, we have found that the equilibrium configuration is defined by the relations:

x

=

r0R,

ρ0ρc

=

(1−x2),

P0Pc

=

(1−x2)2(1−12x2),       where,       Pc=(4π15)Gρc2R2,

g0

=

(4π3)GρcRx(1−35x2),

in which case,

μ=g0ρ0r0P0

=

(4π3)GρcRx(1−35x2)ρc(1−x2)Rx[(4π15)Gρc2R2(1−x2)2(1−12x2)]−1

 

=

x2(5−3x2)[(1−x2)(1−12x2)]−1,

(ω2ρ0R2γgP0)

=

(ω2R2γg)ρc(1−x2)[(4π15)Gρc2R2(1−x2)2(1−12x2)]−1

 

=

(15ω24πGρcγg)[(1−x2)(1−12x2)]−1.

Hence, in the case of a parabolic density distribution, the Kopal (1948) LAWE becomes,

0

=

d2fdx2+(4−μ)x⋅dfdx+{(ω2ρ0R2γgP0)−αμx2}f

 

=

d2fdx2+1x{4−x2(5−3x2)[(1−x2)(1−12x2)]−1}⋅dfdx+{(15ω24πGρcγg)−α(5−3x2)}[(1−x2)(1−12x2)]−1f.

Multiplying through by [(1−x2)(1−12x2)] gives,

0

=

(1−x2)(1−12x2)⋅d2fdx2+1x[(1−x2)(4−2x2)−x2(5−3x2)]⋅dfdx+[(15ω24πGρcγg)−α(5−3x2)]⋅f

 

=

(1−x2)(1−12x2)⋅d2fdx2+1x[4−11x2+5x4]⋅dfdx+[(52)𝔉+3αx2]⋅f

where,

𝔉

≡

2[(3ω24πγgGρc)−α].

Change of Variable

In an effort to shift this LAWE into a 2nd-order ODE that has the form of an hypergeometric equation, let's try …

First Try

z=x2−1

⇒

x=(1+z)1/2;       also,       1−12x2=12(1−z);

⇒dzdx

=

2x=2(1+z)1/2;

⇒dfdx=dzdx⋅dfdz

=

2(1+z)1/2⋅dfdz;

⇒d2fdx2=dzdx⋅ddz[2(1+z)1/2⋅dfdz]

=

2(1+z)1/2[(1+z)−1/2⋅dfdz+2(1+z)1/2⋅d2fdz2]

 

=

[2⋅dfdz+4(1+z)⋅d2fdz2].

Hence, the parabolic LAWE takes the form,

0

=

(1−x2)(1−12x2)⋅d2fdx2+1x[4−11x2+5x4]⋅dfdx+[(52)𝔉+3αx2]⋅f

 

=

(−z)(1−z)⋅[dfdz+2(1+z)⋅d2fdz2]+(1+z)−1/2[4−11(1+z)+5(1+z)2]2(1+z)1/2⋅dfdz+[(52)𝔉+3α(1+z)]⋅f

 

=

−z(1−z)⋅[2(1+z)⋅d2fdz2]−z(1−z)⋅dfdz+[8−22(1+z)+10(1+z)2]⋅dfdz+[(52⋅𝔉+3α)+3αz]⋅f

 

=

−2z(1−z2)⋅d2fdz2+[8−22−22z+10+20z+10z2+z2−z]⋅dfdz+[(52⋅𝔉+3α)+3αz]⋅f

 

=

−2z(1−z2)⋅d2fdz2+[−4−3z+11z2]⋅dfdz+[(52⋅𝔉+3α)+3αz]⋅f

Second Try

z=FxB−G

⇒

x=(G+zF)1/B;       also,       1−12x2=1−12(G+zF)2/B;

⇒dzdx

=

BFxB−1=BF(G+zF)(B−1)/B;

⇒dfdx=dzdx⋅dfdz

=

BF(G+zF)(B−1)/Bdfdz;

⇒d2fdx2=dzdx⋅ddz[BF(G+zF)(B−1)/Bdfdz]

=

BF(G+zF)(B−1)/B{BF⋅F−1+1/B[B−1B](G+z)−1/B⋅dfdz+BF(G+zF)(B−1)/Bd2fdz2}

 

=

BF1/B(G+z)1−1/B{F1/B(B−1)(G+z)−1/B⋅dfdz+BF1/B(G+z)1−1/Bd2fdz2}

 

=

BF2/B(G+z)1−2/B[(B−1)⋅dfdz+B(G+z)⋅d2fdz2].

This should reduce to the "First Try" example by setting:  (B,F,G)=(2,1,1). Let's see …

dzdx

=

BF(G+zF)(B−1)/B=2(1+z)1/2;

dfdx

=

BF(G+zF)(B−1)/Bdfdz=2(1+z)1/2⋅dfdz;

d2fdx2

=

BF2/B(G+z)1−2/B[(B−1)⋅dfdz+B(G+z)⋅d2fdz2]=2(1+z)0[dfdz+2(1+z)d2fdz2].

Functional Expressions from "First Try"

z=x2−1

⇒

x=(1+z)1/2;       also,       1−12x2=12(1−z);

dzdx

=

2(1+z)1/2;

dfdx

=

2(1+z)1/2⋅dfdz;

d2fdx2

=

[2⋅dfdz+4(1+z)⋅d2fdz2].

Hence, the parabolic LAWE takes the form,

0

=

(1−x2)(1−12x2)⋅d2fdx2+1x[4−11x2+5x4]⋅dfdx+[(52)𝔉+3αx2]⋅f

 

=

[1−(G+zF)2/B][1−12(G+zF)2/B]BF2/B(G+z)1−2/B[(B−1)⋅dfdz+B(G+z)⋅d2fdz2]

 

 

+(G+zF)−1/B[4−11x2+5x4]⋅BF(G+zF)1−1/Bdfdz

 

 

+[(52)𝔉+3α(G+zF)2/B]⋅f

 

=

[F2/B−(G+z)2/B][F2/B−12(G+z)2/B]BF−2/B(G+z)1−2/B[B(G+z)⋅d2fdz2]

 

 

+[F2/B−(G+z)2/B][F2/B−12(G+z)2/B]BF−2/B(G+z)1−2/B[(B−1)⋅dfdz]

 

 

+[4F4/B−11F2/B(G+z)2/B+5(G+z)4/B]⋅BF−2/B(G+z)1−2/B⋅dfdz

 

 

+[(52)𝔉+3αF−2/B(G+z)2/B]⋅f

Dividing through by, BF−2/B(G+z)1−2/B, we have,

0

=

{[F2/B−(G+z)2/B][F2/B−12(G+z)2/B]B(G+z)}⋅d2fdz2

 

 

+{[F2/B−(G+z)2/B][F2/B−12(G+z)2/B](B−1)+[4F4/B−11F2/B(G+z)2/B+5(G+z)4/B]}⋅dfdz

 

 

+B−1(G+z)−1+2/B[F2/B(52)𝔉+3α(G+z)2/B]⋅f

 

=

12[2F4/B−3F2/B(G+z)2/B+(G+z)4/B]B(G+z)⋅d2fdz2+B−1(G+z)−1+2/B[F2/B(52)𝔉+3α(G+z)2/B]⋅f

 

 

+12{[2F4/B−3F2/B(G+z)2/B+(G+z)4/B](B−1)+[8F4/B−22F2/B(G+z)2/B+10(G+z)4/B]}⋅dfdz

 

=

12[2F4/B−3F2/B(G+z)2/B+(G+z)4/B]B(G+z)⋅d2fdz2+B−1(G+z)−1+2/B[F2/B(52)𝔉+3α(G+z)2/B]⋅f

 

 

+12[(2B+6)F4/B−(3B+19)F2/B(G+z)2/B+(B+9)(G+z)4/B]⋅dfdz

Now, this should reduce to the "First Try" example by setting:  (B,F,G)=(2,1,1). Let's see …

0

=

12[2−3(1+z)+(1+z)2]2(1+z)⋅d2fdz2+12[10−25(1+z)+11(1+z)2]⋅dfdz+12[(52)𝔉+3α(1+z)]⋅f

 

=

[2−3−3z+(1+2z+z2)](1+z)⋅d2fdz2+12[10−25−25z+11(1+2z+z2)]⋅dfdz+12[(52)𝔉+3α(1+z)]⋅f

 

=

z(z−1)(1+z)⋅d2fdz2+12[−4−3z+11z2]⋅dfdz+12[(52)𝔉+3α(1+z)]⋅f.

Compare with LAWE from "First Try"

0

=

−2z(1−z2)⋅d2fdz2+[−4−3z+11z2]⋅dfdz+[(52⋅𝔉+3α)+3αz]⋅f

Next, let's try setting B=2 while leaving F and G arbitrary. The LAWE becomes,

0

=

12[2F2−3F(G+z)+(G+z)2]2(G+z)⋅d2fdz2+2−1(G+z)0[F(52)𝔉+3α(G+z)]⋅f

 

 

+12[10F2−25F(G+z)+11(G+z)2]⋅dfdz

 

=

[2F2−3F(G+z)+(G+z)2](G+z)⋅d2fdz2+12[10F2−25F(G+z)+11(G+z)2]⋅dfdz+12[F(52)𝔉+3α(G+z)]⋅f.



Now, let's set G=−1 to obtain,

0

=

[2F2−3F(z−1)+(z−1)2](z−1)⋅d2fdz2+12[10F2−25F(z−1)+11(z−1)2]⋅dfdz+12[F(52)𝔉+3α(z−1)]⋅f

 

=

[2F2−3Fz+3F+z2−2z+1](z−1)⋅d2fdz2+12[10F2+25F−25Fz+11z2−22z+11]⋅dfdz+12[F(52)𝔉−3α+3αz]⋅f

 

=

[(2F2+3F+1)−(3F+2)z+z2](z−1)⋅d2fdz2+12[(10F2+25F+11)−(25F+22)z+11z2]⋅dfdz+12[F(52)𝔉−3α+3αz]⋅f.

Notice that if F=−23, we have,

0

=

[z2−19](z−1)⋅d2fdz2+12[409+503+11−(503+22)z+11z2]⋅dfdz+12[F(52)𝔉−3α+3αz]⋅f

 

=

19[9z2−1](z−1)⋅d2fdz2+118[201−348z+99z2]⋅dfdz+12[F(52)𝔉−3α+3αz]⋅f



Alternatively, let's set,

0

=

z2+G[2F2−3F(G+z)+(G+z)2]

 

=

2GF2−3GF(G+z)+G(G+z)2+z2

 

=

2G[F2−3FG(G+z)+3222G2(G+z)2]−322G(G+z)2+G(G+z)2+z2

 

=

2G[F−32G(G+z)]2−322G(G+z)2+G(G+z)2+z2

in which case,

0

=

z2(zG−1)⋅d2fdz2+12[10F2−25F(G+z)+11(G+z)2]⋅dfdz+12[F(52)𝔉+3α(G+z)]⋅f.

The coefficient of the first-derivative term also may be rewritten ad,

Uniform Density

In the case of a uniform-density, incompressible configuration, the Kopal (1948) LAWE becomes,

0

=

d2fdx2+(4−μ)x⋅dfdx+[(ω2ρ0R2γgP0)−αμx2]f

 

=

d2fdx2+1x[4−2x2(1−x2)]dfdx+[(ω2ρcR2γgPc)1(1−x2)−(2α1−x2)]f

 

=

(1−x2)⋅d2fdx2+1x[4−6x2]dfdx+[(ω2ρcR2γgPc)−2α]f.

Given that, in the equilibrium state,

ρcR2Pc

=

64πGρc

we obtain the LAWE derived by 📚 T. E. Sterne (1937, MNRAS, Vol. 97, pp. 582 - 593) — see his equation (1.91) on p. 585 — namely,

0

=

(1−x2)⋅d2fdx2+1x[4−6x2]dfdx+[6(ω24πγgGρc)−2α]f

 

=

(1−x2)⋅d2fdx2+1x[4−6x2]dfdx+𝔉f,

where,

𝔉

≡

[6(ω24πγgGρc)−2α].

Summary for PowerPoint Slide

LAWE:    0

=

(1−x2)⋅d2fdx2+1x[4−6x2]dfdx+𝔉f,

where,

𝔉

≡

[(ω2ρcR2γgPc)−2α].

This also matches, respectively, equations (8) and (9) of 📚 Z. Kopal (1948, Proc. NAS, Vol. 34, Issue 8, pp.377-384), aside from what, we presume, is a type-setting error that appears in the numerator of the second term on the RHS of his equation (8):  (4−x2) appears, whereas it should be (4−6x2).

In order to see if this differential equation is of the same form as the hypergeometric expression, we'll make the substitution,

z

≡

x2

⇒dz

=

2xdx

⇒dfdx

=

dzdx⋅dfdz=2x⋅dfdz=2z1/2⋅dfdz

⇒d2fdx2

=

2z1/2⋅ddz[2z1/2⋅dfdz]=2z1/2[z−1/2⋅dfdz+2z1/2⋅d2fdz2]=[2⋅dfdz+4z⋅d2fdz2],

in which case the 📚 Sterne (1937) LAWE may be rewritten as,

0

=

(1−z)[2⋅dfdz+4z⋅d2fdz2]+1z1/2[4−6z]2z1/2dfdz+𝔉f

 

=

(1−z)[4z⋅d2fdz2]+(1−z)[2⋅dfdz]+2[4−6z]dfdz+𝔉f

 

=

4z(1−z)⋅d2fdz2+2[5−7z]dfdz+𝔉f.

This is, indeed, of the hypergeometric form if we set (α,β;γ;z)

γ

=

52,

(α+β+1)

=

72,

αβ

=

−𝔉4.

Combining this last pair of expressions gives,

0

=

−𝔉4−α[52−α]

 

=

α2−(52)α−𝔉4

⇒α

=

12{52±[(52)2−𝔉]1/2}

 

=

54{1±[1−(425)𝔉]1/2};

and,

β

=

52−54{1±[1−(425)𝔉]1/2}.

Example α = -1

If we set α=−1, then the eigenvector is,

u1=F(−1,72;52;x2)

=

1−[βγ]x2=1−(75)x2;

and the corresponding eigenfrequency is obtained from the expression,

−1

=

54{1±[1−(425)𝔉]1/2}

⇒−95

=

±[1−(425)𝔉]1/2

⇒3452

=

1−(425)𝔉

⇒𝔉

=

(524)[1−3452]=14[52−34]=14.

As we have reviewed in a separate discussion, this is identical to the eigenvector identified by 📚 Sterne (1937) as mode "j=1".

More Generally

More generally, in agreement with 📚 Sterne (1937), for any (positive integer) mode number, 0≤j≤∞, we find,

αj

=

−j;       βj=52+j;       γ=52;       𝔉=2j(2j+5).

And, in terms of the hypergeometric function series, the corresponding eigenfunction is,

uj=

=

F(αj,βj;52;x2).

See Also


Tiled Menu

Appendices: | VisTrailsEquations | VisTrailsVariables | References | Ramblings | VisTrailsImages | myphys.lsu | ADS |