H BookTiledMenu: Difference between revisions

From jetwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 163: Line 163:
! style="height: 30px; width: 800px; background-color:lightgrey;"|<font color="white" size="+1">1D STABILITY</font>
! style="height: 30px; width: 800px; background-color:lightgrey;"|<font color="white" size="+1">1D STABILITY</font>
|}
|}
<p>&nbsp;</p>
 
<span id="BKB74pt1">Text written in ''green'' has been taken directly from the introductory paragraphs of</span> [http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1974A%26A....31..391B G. S. Bisnovatyi-Kogan &amp; S. I. Blinnikov (1974)].  <font color="darkgreen">Three different approaches are used in the study of hydrodynamical stability of stars and other gravitating objects &hellip; &nbsp; The first approach is based on the use of the equations of small oscillations.  In that case the problem is reduced to a search for the solution of the boundary-value problem of the Stourme-Liuville type for the linearised system of equations of small oscillations.  The solutions consist of a set of eigenfrequencies and eigenfunctions.  This approach is subject to great numerical difficulties and has been carried through successfully only for the simplest case</font>[s].  For spherically symmetric, Newtonian systems, see, for example, [[SSC/Stability/n3PolytropeLAWE#Schwarzschild_.281941.29| Schwarzschild (1941)]] or [[SSC/PerspectiveReconciliation#Approach_by_Ledoux_and_Walraven|Ledoux &amp; Walraven (1958)]].  Second, one can derive <font color="darkgreen">a variational principle from the equations of small oscillations.  This principle replaces the straightforward solution of these equations:</font>  In the context of rotating Newtonian systems, see, for example, [http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1964ApJ...140.1045C Clement (1964)], [http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1968ApJ...152..267C Chandrasekhar &amp; Lebovitz (1968)], [http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1967MNRAS.136..293L Lynden-Bell and Ostriker (1967)], or [http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1972ApJS...24..319S Schutz (1972)].  <font color="darkgreen">With the aid of the variational principle, the problem is reduced to the search of the best trial functions; this leads to approximate eigenvalues of oscillations.  In spite of the simplifications introduced by the use of the variational principle and by not solving the equations of motion exactly, the problem still remains complicated &hellip;</font>  The third approach is what we have referred to as a free-energy analysis.  <font color="darkgreen">When this method is used, it is not necessary to use the equations of small oscillations but, instead, the functional expression for the total energy of the momentarily stationary (but not necessarily in equilibrium) star is sufficient.  The condition that the first variation of the energy vanishes, determines the state of equilibrium of the star and the positiveness of a second variation indicates stability.</font>  For non rotating systems having <math>~\gamma_g</math> near 4/3, see, for example, [http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1966ApJ...144..180F Fowler (1964)] or Zeldovich &amp; Novikov (Soviet journal, 1965).
 
<span id="BKB74pt2"><font color="darkgreen">If one wants to know from a stability analysis the answer to only one question &#8212; whether the model is stable or not &#8212; then the most straightforward procedure is to use the third, static method (Zeldovich 1963; Dmitrie &amp; Kholin 1963).  For the application of this method, one needs to construct only equilibrium, stationary models, with no further calculation.  Generally the static analysis gives no information about the shape of the modes of oscillation, but, in the vicinity of critical points, where instability sets in, this method makes it possible to find the eigenfunction of the mode which becomes unstable at the critical point.</font></span>
&nbsp;<br />
&nbsp;<br />
 
{| class="Chap4B" style="float:right; margin-left: 150px; border-style: solid; border-width: 3px; border-color:black;"
{| class="Chap4B" style="float:right; margin-left: 150px; border-style: solid; border-width: 3px; border-color:black;"
|-
|-

Revision as of 12:44, 1 August 2021


Tiled Menu

Whitworth's (1981) Isothermal Free-Energy Surface

ATTENTION:   You may need to alter your browser's magnification (zoom out and/or widen its window, for example) in order to view the most orderly layout of the "menu tiles" on this page.

Context

Global Energy
Considerations
Principal
Governing
Equations

(PGEs)
Continuity Euler 1st Law of
Thermodynamics
Poisson

 

Equation
of State

(EOS)
Ideal Gas Total Pressure
 

Bond, Arnett, & Carr
(1984)


Spherically Symmetric Configurations

(Initially) Spherically Symmetric Configurations

 

Whitworth's (1981) Isothermal Free-Energy Surface Structural
Form
Factors
Free-Energy
of
Spherical
Systems
One-Dimensional
PGEs

Equilibrium Structures

1D STRUCTURE

 

Spherical Structures Synopsis Scalar
Virial
Theorem
Hydrostatic
Balance
Equation

dPdr=GMrρr2

Solution
Strategies


Uniform-Density
Sphere

 

Isothermal
Sphere

1ξ2ddξ(ξ2dψdξ)=eψ

via
Direct
Numerical
Integration


Isolated
Polytropes
Lane
(1870)

1ξ2ddξ(ξ2dΘHdξ)=ΘHn

Known
Analytic
Solutions
via
Direct
Numerical
Integration
via
Self-Consistent
Field (SCF)
Technique

 

Zero-Temperature
White Dwarf
Chandrasekhar
Limiting
Mass
(1935)


Virial Equilibrium
of
Pressure-Truncated
Polytropes
Pressure-Truncated
Configurations
Bonnor-Ebert
(Isothermal)
Spheres
(1955 - 56)
Embedded
Polytropes
Equilibrium
Sequence
Turning-Points

Equilibrium sequences of Pressure-Truncated Polytropes Turning-Points
(Broader Context)


Free Energy
of
Bipolytropes


(nc, ne) = (5, 1)
Composite
Polytropes

(Bipolytropes)
Milne
(1930)
Schönberg-
Chandrasekhar
Mass
(1942)
Murphy (1983)


Analytic

(nc, ne) = (1, 5)
Eggleton, Faulkner
& Cannon (1998)

Analytic

(nc, ne) = (5, 1)


Stability Analysis

1D STABILITY

Text written in green has been taken directly from the introductory paragraphs of G. S. Bisnovatyi-Kogan & S. I. Blinnikov (1974). Three different approaches are used in the study of hydrodynamical stability of stars and other gravitating objects …   The first approach is based on the use of the equations of small oscillations. In that case the problem is reduced to a search for the solution of the boundary-value problem of the Stourme-Liuville type for the linearised system of equations of small oscillations. The solutions consist of a set of eigenfrequencies and eigenfunctions. This approach is subject to great numerical difficulties and has been carried through successfully only for the simplest case[s]. For spherically symmetric, Newtonian systems, see, for example, Schwarzschild (1941) or Ledoux & Walraven (1958). Second, one can derive a variational principle from the equations of small oscillations. This principle replaces the straightforward solution of these equations: In the context of rotating Newtonian systems, see, for example, Clement (1964), Chandrasekhar & Lebovitz (1968), Lynden-Bell and Ostriker (1967), or Schutz (1972). With the aid of the variational principle, the problem is reduced to the search of the best trial functions; this leads to approximate eigenvalues of oscillations. In spite of the simplifications introduced by the use of the variational principle and by not solving the equations of motion exactly, the problem still remains complicated … The third approach is what we have referred to as a free-energy analysis. When this method is used, it is not necessary to use the equations of small oscillations but, instead, the functional expression for the total energy of the momentarily stationary (but not necessarily in equilibrium) star is sufficient. The condition that the first variation of the energy vanishes, determines the state of equilibrium of the star and the positiveness of a second variation indicates stability. For non rotating systems having γg near 4/3, see, for example, Fowler (1964) or Zeldovich & Novikov (Soviet journal, 1965).

If one wants to know from a stability analysis the answer to only one question — whether the model is stable or not — then the most straightforward procedure is to use the third, static method (Zeldovich 1963; Dmitrie & Kholin 1963). For the application of this method, one needs to construct only equilibrium, stationary models, with no further calculation. Generally the static analysis gives no information about the shape of the modes of oscillation, but, in the vicinity of critical points, where instability sets in, this method makes it possible to find the eigenfunction of the mode which becomes unstable at the critical point.  
 

Synopsis: Stability of Spherical Structures Variational
Principle
Radial
Pulsation
Equation
Example
Derivations
&
Statement of
Eigenvalue
Problem
(poor attempt at)
Reconciliation
Relationship
to
Sound Waves

 

Jeans (1928) or Bonnor (1957)
Ledoux & Walraven (1958)
Rosseland (1969)

 

Uniform-Density
Configurations
Sterne's
Analytic Sol'n
of Eigenvalue
Problem
(1937)
Sterne's (1937) Solution to the Eigenvalue Problem for Uniform-Density Spheres

 

Pressure-Truncated
Isothermal
Spheres

0=d2xdξ2+[4ξ(dψdξ)]1ξdxdξ+[(σc26γg)ξ2αξ(dψdξ)]xξ2

where:    σc23ω22πGρc     and,     α(34γg)

via
Direct
Numerical
Integration
Fundamental-Mode Eigenvectors

 

Yabushita's
Analytic Sol'n for
Marginally Unstable
Configurations
(1974)

σc2=0,γg=1

 and  

x=1(1ξeψ)dψdξ

 

Polytropes

0=d2xdξ2+[4(n+1)Q]1ξdxdξ+(n+1)[(σc26γg)ξ2θαQ]xξ2

where:    Q(ξ)dlnθdlnξ,    σc23ω22πGρc,     and,     α(34γg)

Isolated
n = 3
Polytrope
Schwarzschild's Modal Analysis Pressure-Truncated
n = 5
Configurations


Exact
Demonstration
of
B-KB74
Conjecture
Exact
Demonstration
of
Variational
Principle
Pressure-Truncated
n = 5
Polytropes
Our (2017)
Analytic Sol'n for
Marginally Unstable
Configurations

σc2=0,γg=(n+1)/n

 and  

x=3(n1)2n[1+(n3n1)(1ξθn)dθdξ]

 

BiPolytropes Murphy & Fiedler
(1985b)


(nc, ne) = (1,5)
Our
Broader
Analysis

See Also

Tiled Menu

Appendices: | VisTrailsEquations | VisTrailsVariables | References | Ramblings | VisTrailsImages | myphys.lsu | ADS |