H BookTiledMenu: Difference between revisions
| Line 164: | Line 164: | ||
|} | |} | ||
<span id="BKB74pt1">Text written in ''green'' has been taken directly from the introductory paragraphs of</span> [http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1974A%26A....31..391B G. S. Bisnovatyi-Kogan & S. I. Blinnikov (1974)]. <font color="darkgreen">Three different approaches are used in the study of hydrodynamical stability of stars and other gravitating objects … The first approach is based on the use of the equations of small oscillations. In that case the problem is reduced to a search for the solution of the boundary-value problem of the Stourme-Liuville type for the linearised system of equations of small oscillations. The solutions consist of a set of eigenfrequencies and eigenfunctions. This approach is subject to great numerical difficulties and has been carried through successfully only for the simplest case</font>[s]. For spherically symmetric, Newtonian systems, see, for example, [[SSC/Stability/n3PolytropeLAWE#Schwarzschild_.281941.29| Schwarzschild (1941)]] or [[SSC/PerspectiveReconciliation#Approach_by_Ledoux_and_Walraven|Ledoux & Walraven (1958)]]. Second, one can derive <font color="darkgreen">a variational principle from the equations of small oscillations. This principle replaces the straightforward solution of these equations:</font> In the context of rotating Newtonian systems, see, for example, [http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1964ApJ...140.1045C Clement (1964)], [http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1968ApJ...152..267C Chandrasekhar & Lebovitz (1968)], [http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1967MNRAS.136..293L Lynden-Bell and Ostriker (1967)], or [http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1972ApJS...24..319S Schutz (1972)]. <font color="darkgreen">With the aid of the variational principle, the problem is reduced to the search of the best trial functions; this leads to approximate eigenvalues of oscillations. In spite of the simplifications introduced by the use of the variational principle and by not solving the equations of motion exactly, the problem still remains complicated …</font> The third approach is what we have referred to as a free-energy analysis. <font color="darkgreen">When this method is used, it is not necessary to use the equations of small oscillations but, instead, the functional expression for the total energy of the momentarily stationary (but not necessarily in equilibrium) star is sufficient. The condition that the first variation of the energy vanishes, determines the state of equilibrium of the star and the positiveness of a second variation indicates stability.</font> For non rotating systems having <math>~\gamma_g</math> near 4/3, see, for example, [http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1966ApJ...144..180F Fowler (1964)] or Zeldovich & Novikov (Soviet journal, 1965). | <span id="BKB74pt1">Text written in ''green'' has been taken directly from the introductory paragraphs of</span> [http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1974A%26A....31..391B G. S. Bisnovatyi-Kogan & S. I. Blinnikov (1974)]; referred to, below, as B-KB74. <font color="darkgreen">Three different approaches are used in the study of hydrodynamical stability of stars and other gravitating objects … The first approach is based on the use of the equations of small oscillations. In that case the problem is reduced to a search for the solution of the boundary-value problem of the Stourme-Liuville type for the linearised system of equations of small oscillations. The solutions consist of a set of eigenfrequencies and eigenfunctions. This approach is subject to great numerical difficulties and has been carried through successfully only for the simplest case</font>[s]. For spherically symmetric, Newtonian systems, see, for example, [[SSC/Stability/n3PolytropeLAWE#Schwarzschild_.281941.29| Schwarzschild (1941)]] or [[SSC/PerspectiveReconciliation#Approach_by_Ledoux_and_Walraven|Ledoux & Walraven (1958)]]. Second, one can derive <font color="darkgreen">a variational principle from the equations of small oscillations. This principle replaces the straightforward solution of these equations:</font> In the context of rotating Newtonian systems, see, for example, [http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1964ApJ...140.1045C Clement (1964)], [http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1968ApJ...152..267C Chandrasekhar & Lebovitz (1968)], [http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1967MNRAS.136..293L Lynden-Bell and Ostriker (1967)], or [http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1972ApJS...24..319S Schutz (1972)]. <font color="darkgreen">With the aid of the variational principle, the problem is reduced to the search of the best trial functions; this leads to approximate eigenvalues of oscillations. In spite of the simplifications introduced by the use of the variational principle and by not solving the equations of motion exactly, the problem still remains complicated …</font> The third approach is what we have referred to as a free-energy analysis. <font color="darkgreen">When this method is used, it is not necessary to use the equations of small oscillations but, instead, the functional expression for the total energy of the momentarily stationary (but not necessarily in equilibrium) star is sufficient. The condition that the first variation of the energy vanishes, determines the state of equilibrium of the star and the positiveness of a second variation indicates stability.</font> For non rotating systems having <math>~\gamma_g</math> near 4/3, see, for example, [http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1966ApJ...144..180F Fowler (1964)] or Zeldovich & Novikov (Soviet journal, 1965). | ||
<span id="BKB74pt2"><font color="darkgreen">If one wants to know from a stability analysis the answer to only one question — whether the model is stable or not — then the most straightforward procedure is to use the third, static method (Zeldovich 1963; Dmitrie & Kholin 1963). For the application of this method, one needs to construct only equilibrium, stationary models, with no further calculation. Generally the static analysis gives no information about the shape of the modes of oscillation, but, in the vicinity of critical points, where instability sets in, this method makes it possible to find the eigenfunction of the mode which becomes unstable at the critical point.</font></span> | <span id="BKB74pt2"><font color="darkgreen">If one wants to know from a stability analysis the answer to only one question — whether the model is stable or not — then the most straightforward procedure is to use the third, static method (Zeldovich 1963; Dmitrie & Kholin 1963). For the application of this method, one needs to construct only equilibrium, stationary models, with no further calculation. Generally the static analysis gives no information about the shape of the modes of oscillation, but, in the vicinity of critical points, where instability sets in, this method makes it possible to find the eigenfunction of the mode which becomes unstable at the critical point.</font></span> This method is referred to, below, as the "B-KB74 conjecture." | ||
<br /> | <br /> | ||
<br /> | <br /> | ||
Revision as of 12:55, 1 August 2021
Tiled Menu
ATTENTION: You may need to alter your browser's magnification (zoom out and/or widen its window, for example) in order to view the most orderly layout of the "menu tiles" on this page.
Context
| Global Energy Considerations |
|---|
| Principal Governing Equations (PGEs) |
Continuity | Euler | 1st Law of Thermodynamics |
Poisson |
|---|
| Equation of State (EOS) |
Ideal Gas | Total Pressure Bond, Arnett, & Carr (1984) |
|---|
Spherically Symmetric Configurations
| (Initially) Spherically Symmetric Configurations |
|---|
| Structural Form Factors |
Free-Energy of Spherical Systems |
|---|
| One-Dimensional PGEs |
|---|
Equilibrium Structures
| 1D STRUCTURE |
|---|
| Scalar Virial Theorem |
|---|
| Hydrostatic Balance Equation |
Solution Strategies |
|---|
| Uniform-Density Sphere |
|---|
| Isothermal Sphere |
via Direct Numerical Integration |
|---|
| Isolated Polytropes |
Lane (1870) |
Known Analytic Solutions |
via Direct Numerical Integration |
via Self-Consistent Field (SCF) Technique |
|---|
| Zero-Temperature White Dwarf |
Chandrasekhar Limiting Mass (1935) |
|---|
| Virial Equilibrium of Pressure-Truncated Polytropes |
|---|
| Pressure-Truncated Configurations |
Bonnor-Ebert (Isothermal) Spheres (1955 - 56) |
Embedded Polytropes |
Equilibrium Sequence Turning-Points ♥ |
Turning-Points (Broader Context) |
|---|
| Free Energy of Bipolytropes (nc, ne) = (5, 1) |
|---|
| Composite Polytropes (Bipolytropes) |
Milne (1930) |
Schönberg- Chandrasekhar Mass (1942) |
Murphy (1983) Analytic (nc, ne) = (1, 5) |
Eggleton, Faulkner & Cannon (1998) Analytic (nc, ne) = (5, 1) |
|---|
Stability Analysis
| 1D STABILITY |
|---|
Text written in green has been taken directly from the introductory paragraphs of G. S. Bisnovatyi-Kogan & S. I. Blinnikov (1974); referred to, below, as B-KB74. Three different approaches are used in the study of hydrodynamical stability of stars and other gravitating objects … The first approach is based on the use of the equations of small oscillations. In that case the problem is reduced to a search for the solution of the boundary-value problem of the Stourme-Liuville type for the linearised system of equations of small oscillations. The solutions consist of a set of eigenfrequencies and eigenfunctions. This approach is subject to great numerical difficulties and has been carried through successfully only for the simplest case[s]. For spherically symmetric, Newtonian systems, see, for example, Schwarzschild (1941) or Ledoux & Walraven (1958). Second, one can derive a variational principle from the equations of small oscillations. This principle replaces the straightforward solution of these equations: In the context of rotating Newtonian systems, see, for example, Clement (1964), Chandrasekhar & Lebovitz (1968), Lynden-Bell and Ostriker (1967), or Schutz (1972). With the aid of the variational principle, the problem is reduced to the search of the best trial functions; this leads to approximate eigenvalues of oscillations. In spite of the simplifications introduced by the use of the variational principle and by not solving the equations of motion exactly, the problem still remains complicated … The third approach is what we have referred to as a free-energy analysis. When this method is used, it is not necessary to use the equations of small oscillations but, instead, the functional expression for the total energy of the momentarily stationary (but not necessarily in equilibrium) star is sufficient. The condition that the first variation of the energy vanishes, determines the state of equilibrium of the star and the positiveness of a second variation indicates stability. For non rotating systems having near 4/3, see, for example, Fowler (1964) or Zeldovich & Novikov (Soviet journal, 1965).
If one wants to know from a stability analysis the answer to only one question — whether the model is stable or not — then the most straightforward procedure is to use the third, static method (Zeldovich 1963; Dmitrie & Kholin 1963). For the application of this method, one needs to construct only equilibrium, stationary models, with no further calculation. Generally the static analysis gives no information about the shape of the modes of oscillation, but, in the vicinity of critical points, where instability sets in, this method makes it possible to find the eigenfunction of the mode which becomes unstable at the critical point. This method is referred to, below, as the "B-KB74 conjecture."
| Variational Principle |
|---|
| Radial Pulsation Equation |
Example Derivations & Statement of Eigenvalue Problem |
(poor attempt at) Reconciliation |
Relationship to Sound Waves |
|---|
| Uniform-Density Configurations |
Sterne's Analytic Sol'n of Eigenvalue Problem (1937) |
|---|
| Pressure-Truncated Isothermal Spheres |
via Direct Numerical Integration |
|---|
| Yabushita's Analytic Sol'n for Marginally Unstable Configurations (1974) |
|
|---|
| Polytropes | Isolated n = 3 Polytrope |
Pressure-Truncated n = 5 Configurations |
|---|
| Exact Demonstration of B-KB74 Conjecture |
Exact Demonstration of Variational Principle |
Pressure-Truncated n = 5 Polytropes |
|---|
| Our (2017) Analytic Sol'n for Marginally Unstable Configurations ♥ |
|
|---|
| BiPolytropes | Murphy & Fiedler (1985b) (nc, ne) = (1,5) |
Our Broader Analysis |
|---|
See Also
|
Appendices: | VisTrailsEquations | VisTrailsVariables | References | Ramblings | VisTrailsImages | myphys.lsu | ADS | |


