ThreeDimensionalConfigurations/Stability/RiemannEllipsoids: Difference between revisions

From jetwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 8: Line 8:
|}
|}


Here we review the work of {{ LL96full }} titled, "New Global Instabilities of the Riemann Ellipsoids," and discuss various extensions that have been made to this work. Note that a good summary of the research efforts that preceded (and inspired) the work of {{ LL96 }} can be found in the introductory section of [https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJ...665.1074O/abstract S. Ou, J. E. Tohline, & P. M. Motl (2007, ApJ, Vol. 665, pp. 1074 - 1083)].
Here we review the work of {{ LL96full }} titled, "New Global Instabilities of the Riemann Ellipsoids," and discuss various extensions that have been made to this work. Note that a good summary of the research efforts that preceded (and inspired) the work of {{ LL96 }} can be found in the introductory section of {{ OTM2007full }}.  


We were prompted to tackle this review in response to an email received in December 2021 from [https://www.nist.gov/people/howard-cohl Howard S. Cohl].
We were prompted to tackle this review in response to an email received in December 2021 from [[Appendix/Ramblings/ForCohlHoward|Howard Cohl]].
&nbsp;<br />
&nbsp;<br />
&nbsp;<br />
&nbsp;<br />

Revision as of 20:47, 30 January 2022


Lebovitz & Lifschitz (1996)

Lebovitz & Lifschitz
(1996)

Here we review the work of 📚 N. R. Lebovitz, & A. Lifschitz (1996, ApJ, Vol. 458, pp. 699 - 713) titled, "New Global Instabilities of the Riemann Ellipsoids," and discuss various extensions that have been made to this work. Note that a good summary of the research efforts that preceded (and inspired) the work of 📚 Lebovitz & Lifschitz (1996) can be found in the introductory section of 📚 S. Ou, J. E. Tohline, & P. M. Motl (2007, ApJ, Vol. 665, pp. 1074 - 1083).

We were prompted to tackle this review in response to an email received in December 2021 from Howard Cohl.  
 

Background

In Figure 1, the abscissa is the ratio b/a of semiaxes in the equatorial plane, and the ordinate is the ratio c/a of the vertical semiaxis to the larger of the equatorial semi axes. This diagram shows what 📚 Lebovitz & Lifschitz (1996) — hereafter, LL96 — refer to as "the horn-shaped region of existence of S-type ellipsoids and the Jacobi family;" it underpins all four panels of the LL96 Figure 2.

Figure 1: The Horn-Shaped Region of S-type Ellipsoids

EFE Diagram02

  • Jacobi sequence — the smooth curve that runs through the set of small, dark-blue, diamond-shaped markers; the data identifying the location of these markers have been drawn from §39, Table IV of [EFE]. The small red circular markers lie along this same sequence; their locations are taken from our own determinations, as detailed in Table 2 of our accompanying discussion of Jacobi ellipsoids. All of the models along this sequence have fζ/Ωf=0 and are therefore solid-body rotators, that is, there is no internal motion when the configuration is viewed from a frame that is rotating with frequency, Ωf.
  • Dedekind sequence — a smooth curve that lies precisely on top of the Jacobi sequence. Each configuration along this sequence is adjoint to a model on the Jacobi sequence that shares its (b/a, c/a) axis-ratio pair. All ellipsoidal figures along this sequence have 1/f=Ωf/ζ=0 and are therefore stationary as viewed from the inertial frame; the angular momentum of each configuration is stored in its internal motion (vorticity).
  • The X = -1 self-adjoint sequence — At every point along this sequence, the value of the key frequency ratio, ζ/Ωf, in the adjoint configuration (f+) is identical to the value of the frequency ratio in the direct configuration (f); specifically, f+=f=(a2+b2)/(ab). The data identifying the location of the small, solid-black markers along this sequence have been drawn from §48, Table VI of [EFE].
  • The X = +1 self-adjoint sequence — At every point along this sequence, the value of the key frequency ratio, ζ/Ωf, in the adjoint configuration (f+) is identical to the value of the frequency ratio in the direct configuration (f); specifically, f+=f=+(a2+b2)/(ab). The data identifying the location of the small, solid-black markers along this sequence have been drawn from §48, Table VI of [EFE].

EFE Diagram identifying example models from Ou (2006)

Riemann S-type ellipsoids all lie between or on the two (self-adjoint) curves marked "X = -1" and "X = +1" in the EFE Diagram. The yellow circular markers in the diagram shown here, on the left, identify four Riemann S-type ellipsoids that were examined by 📚 S. Ou (2006, ApJ, Vol. 639, pp. 549 - 558) and that we have also chosen to use as examples.

Four example models of equilibrium Riemann S-Type ellipsoids (click each parameter-pair to go to a related chapter discussion):

 
 
 

Self-Adjoint Sequences

What are the expressions that define the upper (x=1) and lower (x=+1) boundaries of the horned shaped region of equilibrium S-Type Riemann Ellipsoids? Well, as we have discussed in an associated chapter, the value of the parameter, x, that is associated with each point (b/a,c/a) within the horned shaped region is given by the expression,

1+2Cx+x2

=

0,

📚 Lebovitz & Lifschitz (1996), §2, Eq. (5)

where,

C

=

[abB12c2A3a2b2A12],

📚 Lebovitz & Lifschitz (1996), §2, Eq. (6)

A12

A1A2(a2b2),

[ EFE, §21, Eq. (107) ]

B12

A2a2A12.

[ EFE, §21, Eq. (105) ]
See also the note immediately following §21, Eq. (127)

Upper Boundary

The upper boundary of the horn-shaped region is obtained by setting x=1. That is, it is associated with coordinate pairs (b/a,c/a) for which,

12C+1

=

0

C

=

+1

[abB12c2A3a2b2A12]

=

+1

abB12

=

c2A3a2b2A12

c2A3

=

ab[A2a2A12]+a2b2A12

 

=

abA2+ba2A12(ba)

 

=

abA2+ba2(ab)[A1A2a2b2]

[c2ab]A3

=

A2+a[A1A2a+b]

[c2(a+b)ab]A3

=

aA1+bA2.

Now, from the expressions for A1, A2, and A3, we can furthermore write,

c2(a+b)A3

=

a2bA1+ab2[2(A1+A3)]

 

=

a2bA1+2ab2ab2A1ab2A3

c2(a+b)A3+ab2A3

=

2ab2+a2bA1ab2A1

ab[c2(a+b)+ab2]A3

=

2a2b+a2(ab)A1

[c2(a+b)+ab2][(b/a)sinθ(c/a)E(θ,k)(1k2)sin3θ]

=

a2b+bc(ab){[F(θ,k)E(θ,k)k2sin3θ]},

where, F(θ,k) and E(θ,k) are incomplete elliptic integrals of the first and second kind, respectively, with arguments,

θ=cos1(ca)

      and      

k=[1(b/a)21(c/a)2]1/2.

[ EFE, Chapter 3, §17, Eq. (32) ]

STRATEGY for finding the locus of points that define the upper boundary of the horned-shape region …    Set a=1, and pick a value for 0<b<1; then, using an iterative technique, vary c until the following expression is satisfied:

[c2(a+b)+ab2][(b/a)sinθ(c/a)E(θ,k)(1k2)sin3θ]

=

a2b+bc(ab)[F(θ,k)E(θ,k)k2sin3θ].

Choose another value of 0<b<1, then iterate again to find the value of c that corresponds to this new, chosen value of b. Repeat!

Lower Boundary

Similarly, the lower boundary is obtained by setting x=+1, that is, it is associated with coordinate pairs (b/a,c/a) for which,

C

=

1

[abB12c2A3a2b2A12]

=

1

abB12

=

c2A3a2b2A12

c2A3

=

ab[A2a2A12]+a2b2A12

 

=

abA2+ba2A12(b+a)

 

=

abA2ba2(a+b)[A1A2a2b2]

[c2ab]A3

=

A2a[A1A2ab]

[c2(ab)ab]A3

=

A2(ba)aA1+aA2

 

=

bA2aA1.

Now, from the expressions for A1, A2, and A3, we can furthermore write,

c2(ab)A3

=

2ab2ab2A1ab2A3a2bA1

c2(ab)A3+ab2A3

=

2ab2ab(b+a)A1

ab[c2(ab)+ab2]A3

=

a2[2b(b+a)A1]

[c2(ab)+ab2][(b/a)sinθ(c/a)E(θ,k)(1k2)sin3θ]

=

a2bbc(b+a)[F(θ,k)E(θ,k)k2sin3θ].

STRATEGY for finding the locus of points that define the lower boundary of the horned-shape region …    Set a=1, and pick a value for 0<b<1; then, using an iterative technique, vary c until the following expression is satisfied:

[c2(ab)+ab2][(b/a)sinθ(c/a)E(θ,k)(1k2)sin3θ]

=

a2bbc(b+a)[F(θ,k)E(θ,k)k2sin3θ].

Choose another value of 0<b<1, then iterate again to find the value of c that corresponds to this new, chosen value of b. Repeat!

Stability Equations

Here we will closely follow the derivation found in 📚 N. R. Lebovitz (1989a, Geophysical & Astrophysical Fluid Dynamics, Vol. 46:4, pp. 221 - 243), hereafter L89a.

From our initial overarching presentation of the principal governing equation, we draw an expression for the,

Lagrangian Representation
of the Euler Equation
as viewed from a Rotating Reference Frame

[dvdt]rot=1ρPΦ2Ωf×vrotCoriolisΩf×(Ωf×x)Centrifugal.

Moving the term that accounts for the Coriolis acceleration to the left-hand side of this expression, and realizing that the centrifugal acceleration may be rewritten in the form,

Centrifugal Acceleration

aCentrifugalΩf×(Ωf×x)=12[|Ωf×x|2],

the Euler equation becomes,

[dvdt]rot+2Ωf×vrot

=

1ρPΦ+12[|Ωf×x|2].

Except for the adopted sign convention for the gravitational potential, Φ, this precisely matches Equation (2) of L89a, namely,

D𝐮dt+2ω×𝐮

=

ρ1𝐩+{Φ+12|ω×𝐱|2}.

L89a
L89a, §2, p. 223, Eq. (2)

See Also


Tiled Menu

Appendices: | VisTrailsEquations | VisTrailsVariables | References | Ramblings | VisTrailsImages | myphys.lsu | ADS |