ThreeDimensionalConfigurations/Stability/RiemannEllipsoids: Difference between revisions

From jetwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 572: Line 572:


==Stability Equations==
==Stability Equations==
Here we will closely follow the derivation found in {{ Lebovitz89afull }}, hereafter L89a.
Here we will closely follow the derivation found in {{ Lebovitz89afull }}, hereafter {{ Lebovitz89ahereafter }}.


===Euler Equation===
From our initial overarching presentation of the principal governing equation, we draw an expression for the,
From our initial overarching presentation of the principal governing equation, we draw an expression for the,


Line 611: Line 612:
</tr>
</tr>
</table>
</table>
Except for the adopted sign convention for the gravitational potential, <math>\Phi</math>, this precisely matches Equation (2) of {{ Lebovitz89ahereafter }}, namely,
Except for the adopted sign convention for the gravitational potential, <math>\Phi \leftrightarrow -\Phi_\mathrm{L89}</math>, this precisely matches Equation (2) of {{ Lebovitz89ahereafter }}, namely,
<div align="center" id="EulerRotating">
<div align="center" id="EulerRotating">
<table border="1" align="center" cellpadding="8" width="80%">
<table border="1" align="center" cellpadding="8" width="80%">
<tr><td align="center" bgcolor="lightgreen">{{ Lebovitz89afigure }}</td></tr>
<tr><td align="center" bgcolor="lightgreen">{{ Lebovitz89afigure }}</td></tr>
<tr><td align="left">
<tr><td align="left">
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="3" align="center">
<tr>
<tr>
   <td align="right">
   <td align="right">
Line 626: Line 627:
   <td align="left">
   <td align="left">
<math>  
<math>  
-~ \rho^{-1} \nabla \mathbf{p} + \mathbf\nabla \{ \Phi + \tfrac{1}{2} |\mathbf{\omega\times x}|^2 \}
-~ \rho^{-1} \nabla \mathbf{p} + \mathbf\nabla \{ \Phi_\mathrm{L89} + \tfrac{1}{2} |\mathbf{\omega\times x}|^2 \}
\, .
\, .
</math>
</math>
Line 640: Line 641:
</table>
</table>
</div>
</div>
In what follows, we will adopt the {{ Lebovitz89ahereafter }} variable notation.
===Lagrangian Displacement and Linearization===
Suppose that, at time <math>t = 0</math>, the function set <math>[\mathbf{u}_0(\mathbf{x}), \rho_0(\mathbf{x}), p_0(\mathbf{x})]</math> properly describes the properties of a &#8212; as yet unspecified &#8212; geometrically extended, fluid configuration. <!-- Now suppose that the entire fluid configuration is "perturbed." -->  According to the Euler equation and, in particular, as dictated by the flow-field <math>\mathbf{u}_0(\mathbf{x})</math>, after an interval of time, <math>t</math>, each "Lagrangian" fluid element will move from its initial location, <math>\mathbf{x}</math>, to a new position, <math>\mathbf{x} + \mathbf\xi</math>.  In general each Lagrangian fluid element will discover that, at its new coordinate location, the "environment" is different.  Specifically,
<table border="0" align="center" cellpadding="8">
<tr>
  <td align="right"><math>p_0(\mathbf{x})</math></td>
  <td align="center"><math>~~\rightarrow~~</math></td>
  <td align="left"><math>p(\mathbf{x} + \mathbf\xi,t) \, ,</math></td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right"><math>\rho_0(\mathbf{x})</math></td>
  <td align="center"><math>~~\rightarrow~~</math></td>
  <td align="left"><math>\rho(\mathbf{x} + \mathbf\xi,t) \, ,</math></td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right"><math>\mathbf{u}_0(\mathbf{x})</math></td>
  <td align="center"><math>~~\rightarrow~~</math></td>
  <td align="left"><math>\mathbf{u}(\mathbf{x} + \mathbf\xi,t) \, .</math></td>
</tr>
</table>
With this in mind, {{ Lebovitz89ahereafter }} introduces a ''Lagrangian-change operator'', <math>\Delta</math>, in order to mathematically indicate that this evolutionary step is being executed for any physical variable, <math>F</math>; specifically,
<table border="0" align="center" cellpadding="3">
<tr>
  <td align="right"><math>\Delta F</math></td>
  <td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
  <td align="left"><math>F(\mathbf{x} + \mathbf\xi,t) - F_0(\mathbf{x}) \, .</math></td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="center" colspan="3">
{{ Lebovitz89ahereafter }}, §2, p. 223, Eq. (3)
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
After assuring us that <math>\Delta</math> commutes with the Lagrangian time-derivative, <math>D/Dt</math>, and that
<table border="0" align="center" cellpadding="3">
<tr>
  <td align="right"><math>\Delta \mathbf{u}</math></td>
  <td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
  <td align="left"><math>\frac{D\xi}{Dt} \, ,</math></td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="center" colspan="3">
{{ Lebovitz89ahereafter }}, §2, p. 223, Eq. (4)
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
{{ Lebovitz89ahereafter }} applies the operator, <math>\Delta</math>, to each side of the Euler equation.


=See Also=
=See Also=

Revision as of 01:27, 31 January 2022


Lebovitz & Lifschitz (1996)

Lebovitz & Lifschitz
(1996)

Here we review the work of 📚 N. R. Lebovitz, & A. Lifschitz (1996, ApJ, Vol. 458, pp. 699 - 713) titled, "New Global Instabilities of the Riemann Ellipsoids," and discuss various extensions that have been made to this work. Note that a good summary of the research efforts that preceded (and inspired) the work of 📚 Lebovitz & Lifschitz (1996) can be found in the introductory section of 📚 S. Ou, J. E. Tohline, & P. M. Motl (2007, ApJ, Vol. 665, pp. 1074 - 1083).

We were prompted to tackle this review in response to an email received in December 2021 from Howard Cohl.  
 

Background

In Figure 1, the abscissa is the ratio b/a of semiaxes in the equatorial plane, and the ordinate is the ratio c/a of the vertical semiaxis to the larger of the equatorial semi axes. This diagram shows what 📚 Lebovitz & Lifschitz (1996) — hereafter, LL96 — refer to as "the horn-shaped region of existence of S-type ellipsoids and the Jacobi family;" it underpins all four panels of the LL96 Figure 2.

Figure 1: The Horn-Shaped Region of S-type Ellipsoids

EFE Diagram02

  • Jacobi sequence — the smooth curve that runs through the set of small, dark-blue, diamond-shaped markers; the data identifying the location of these markers have been drawn from §39, Table IV of [EFE]. The small red circular markers lie along this same sequence; their locations are taken from our own determinations, as detailed in Table 2 of our accompanying discussion of Jacobi ellipsoids. All of the models along this sequence have fζ/Ωf=0 and are therefore solid-body rotators, that is, there is no internal motion when the configuration is viewed from a frame that is rotating with frequency, Ωf.
  • Dedekind sequence — a smooth curve that lies precisely on top of the Jacobi sequence. Each configuration along this sequence is adjoint to a model on the Jacobi sequence that shares its (b/a, c/a) axis-ratio pair. All ellipsoidal figures along this sequence have 1/f=Ωf/ζ=0 and are therefore stationary as viewed from the inertial frame; the angular momentum of each configuration is stored in its internal motion (vorticity).
  • The X = -1 self-adjoint sequence — At every point along this sequence, the value of the key frequency ratio, ζ/Ωf, in the adjoint configuration (f+) is identical to the value of the frequency ratio in the direct configuration (f); specifically, f+=f=(a2+b2)/(ab). The data identifying the location of the small, solid-black markers along this sequence have been drawn from §48, Table VI of [EFE].
  • The X = +1 self-adjoint sequence — At every point along this sequence, the value of the key frequency ratio, ζ/Ωf, in the adjoint configuration (f+) is identical to the value of the frequency ratio in the direct configuration (f); specifically, f+=f=+(a2+b2)/(ab). The data identifying the location of the small, solid-black markers along this sequence have been drawn from §48, Table VI of [EFE].

EFE Diagram identifying example models from Ou (2006)

Riemann S-type ellipsoids all lie between or on the two (self-adjoint) curves marked "X = -1" and "X = +1" in the EFE Diagram. The yellow circular markers in the diagram shown here, on the left, identify four Riemann S-type ellipsoids that were examined by 📚 S. Ou (2006, ApJ, Vol. 639, pp. 549 - 558) and that we have also chosen to use as examples.

Four example models of equilibrium Riemann S-Type ellipsoids (click each parameter-pair to go to a related chapter discussion):

 
 
 

Self-Adjoint Sequences

What are the expressions that define the upper (x=1) and lower (x=+1) boundaries of the horned shaped region of equilibrium S-Type Riemann Ellipsoids? Well, as we have discussed in an associated chapter, the value of the parameter, x, that is associated with each point (b/a,c/a) within the horned shaped region is given by the expression,

1+2Cx+x2

=

0,

📚 Lebovitz & Lifschitz (1996), §2, Eq. (5)

where,

C

=

[abB12c2A3a2b2A12],

📚 Lebovitz & Lifschitz (1996), §2, Eq. (6)

A12

A1A2(a2b2),

[ EFE, §21, Eq. (107) ]

B12

A2a2A12.

[ EFE, §21, Eq. (105) ]
See also the note immediately following §21, Eq. (127)

Upper Boundary

The upper boundary of the horn-shaped region is obtained by setting x=1. That is, it is associated with coordinate pairs (b/a,c/a) for which,

12C+1

=

0

C

=

+1

[abB12c2A3a2b2A12]

=

+1

abB12

=

c2A3a2b2A12

c2A3

=

ab[A2a2A12]+a2b2A12

 

=

abA2+ba2A12(ba)

 

=

abA2+ba2(ab)[A1A2a2b2]

[c2ab]A3

=

A2+a[A1A2a+b]

[c2(a+b)ab]A3

=

aA1+bA2.

Now, from the expressions for A1, A2, and A3, we can furthermore write,

c2(a+b)A3

=

a2bA1+ab2[2(A1+A3)]

 

=

a2bA1+2ab2ab2A1ab2A3

c2(a+b)A3+ab2A3

=

2ab2+a2bA1ab2A1

ab[c2(a+b)+ab2]A3

=

2a2b+a2(ab)A1

[c2(a+b)+ab2][(b/a)sinθ(c/a)E(θ,k)(1k2)sin3θ]

=

a2b+bc(ab){[F(θ,k)E(θ,k)k2sin3θ]},

where, F(θ,k) and E(θ,k) are incomplete elliptic integrals of the first and second kind, respectively, with arguments,

θ=cos1(ca)

      and      

k=[1(b/a)21(c/a)2]1/2.

[ EFE, Chapter 3, §17, Eq. (32) ]

STRATEGY for finding the locus of points that define the upper boundary of the horned-shape region …    Set a=1, and pick a value for 0<b<1; then, using an iterative technique, vary c until the following expression is satisfied:

[c2(a+b)+ab2][(b/a)sinθ(c/a)E(θ,k)(1k2)sin3θ]

=

a2b+bc(ab)[F(θ,k)E(θ,k)k2sin3θ].

Choose another value of 0<b<1, then iterate again to find the value of c that corresponds to this new, chosen value of b. Repeat!

Lower Boundary

Similarly, the lower boundary is obtained by setting x=+1, that is, it is associated with coordinate pairs (b/a,c/a) for which,

C

=

1

[abB12c2A3a2b2A12]

=

1

abB12

=

c2A3a2b2A12

c2A3

=

ab[A2a2A12]+a2b2A12

 

=

abA2+ba2A12(b+a)

 

=

abA2ba2(a+b)[A1A2a2b2]

[c2ab]A3

=

A2a[A1A2ab]

[c2(ab)ab]A3

=

A2(ba)aA1+aA2

 

=

bA2aA1.

Now, from the expressions for A1, A2, and A3, we can furthermore write,

c2(ab)A3

=

2ab2ab2A1ab2A3a2bA1

c2(ab)A3+ab2A3

=

2ab2ab(b+a)A1

ab[c2(ab)+ab2]A3

=

a2[2b(b+a)A1]

[c2(ab)+ab2][(b/a)sinθ(c/a)E(θ,k)(1k2)sin3θ]

=

a2bbc(b+a)[F(θ,k)E(θ,k)k2sin3θ].

STRATEGY for finding the locus of points that define the lower boundary of the horned-shape region …    Set a=1, and pick a value for 0<b<1; then, using an iterative technique, vary c until the following expression is satisfied:

[c2(ab)+ab2][(b/a)sinθ(c/a)E(θ,k)(1k2)sin3θ]

=

a2bbc(b+a)[F(θ,k)E(θ,k)k2sin3θ].

Choose another value of 0<b<1, then iterate again to find the value of c that corresponds to this new, chosen value of b. Repeat!

Stability Equations

Here we will closely follow the derivation found in 📚 N. R. Lebovitz (1989a, Geophysical & Astrophysical Fluid Dynamics, Vol. 46:4, pp. 221 - 243), hereafter L89a.

Euler Equation

From our initial overarching presentation of the principal governing equation, we draw an expression for the,

Lagrangian Representation
of the Euler Equation
as viewed from a Rotating Reference Frame

[dvdt]rot=1ρPΦ2Ωf×vrotCoriolisΩf×(Ωf×x)Centrifugal.

Moving the term that accounts for the Coriolis acceleration to the left-hand side of this expression, and realizing that the centrifugal acceleration may be rewritten in the form,

Centrifugal Acceleration

aCentrifugalΩf×(Ωf×x)=12[|Ωf×x|2],

the Euler equation becomes,

[dvdt]rot+2Ωf×vrot

=

1ρPΦ+12[|Ωf×x|2].

Except for the adopted sign convention for the gravitational potential, ΦΦL89, this precisely matches Equation (2) of L89a, namely,

N. R. Lebovitz (1989a)
The Stability Equations for Rotating, Inviscid Fluids:   Galerkin Methods and Orthogonal Bases
Geophysical & Astrophysical Fluid Dynamics, Vol. 46:4, pp. 221 - 243

D𝐮dt+2ω×𝐮

=

ρ1𝐩+{ΦL89+12|ω×𝐱|2}.

L89a, §2, p. 223, Eq. (2)

In what follows, we will adopt the L89a variable notation.

Lagrangian Displacement and Linearization

Suppose that, at time t=0, the function set [𝐮0(𝐱),ρ0(𝐱),p0(𝐱)] properly describes the properties of a — as yet unspecified — geometrically extended, fluid configuration. According to the Euler equation and, in particular, as dictated by the flow-field 𝐮0(𝐱), after an interval of time, t, each "Lagrangian" fluid element will move from its initial location, 𝐱, to a new position, 𝐱+ξ. In general each Lagrangian fluid element will discover that, at its new coordinate location, the "environment" is different. Specifically,

p0(𝐱) p(𝐱+ξ,t),
ρ0(𝐱) ρ(𝐱+ξ,t),
𝐮0(𝐱) 𝐮(𝐱+ξ,t).

With this in mind, L89a introduces a Lagrangian-change operator, Δ, in order to mathematically indicate that this evolutionary step is being executed for any physical variable, F; specifically,

ΔF = F(𝐱+ξ,t)F0(𝐱).

L89a, §2, p. 223, Eq. (3)

After assuring us that Δ commutes with the Lagrangian time-derivative, D/Dt, and that

Δ𝐮 = DξDt,

L89a, §2, p. 223, Eq. (4)

L89a applies the operator, Δ, to each side of the Euler equation.

See Also


Tiled Menu

Appendices: | VisTrailsEquations | VisTrailsVariables | References | Ramblings | VisTrailsImages | myphys.lsu | ADS |